|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking.
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Chaol |
|
Post Content
|
...Oh, you tease. It seems that without some mystery to ponder we may be like a ship too close to a dark foggy shore lacking a lighthouse. If I squint hard enough maybe Ill see it before the crash.  Quoting: Jesse Sovoda It's your ancient secret ("deep, dark", as it would be said). It's one of those things that we don't want to think about. As it implies that we would not exist. Indeed, it is the thing we don't want to consider. Only in an abstract way, perhaps. It's something I've covered at length so the basics are no secret for me. Only the practical applications. If you cannot perceive of something directly then what are you actually perceiving? You'd be perceiving an inferential experience? I think that that inference is made by our intent and is subject to the logic in the system by which we perceive. We are basically choosing what we experience at all times. It's just that on the most basic level we (as we currently can perceive our sense of self) do not exist. Am I off? You're not that far off but I may confuse some by the responses on this page so I will keep it to a minimum. (As I will need to seem to contradict my responses a bit for clarity when we get to more advanced Ecsys). You are the inference. You can say that you choose your experience by 'choosing' what you relate to. (Although there is no choice. It's more of a matter of the relations that you are focusing on. There is really no relation because the subject of relations don't actually change because they don't actually exist. And so we've reached the limits of the English language.)
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
