Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking.

where art thy Chaol?

How can one know if they are ready for the acsension?

thank you

[snips]

Would that sound a fair reasoning or have i left any holes behind?
If it is fair, then it begs the question: The only way to reach the singular perspective of no wishes is the one through which you know how to (and) have every wish come true?

Please forgive my confusion :)

also, Chaol, is there any significance behind 11:11, also can you tell me some interesting things about Thoth and the emerald tablets?

thanks

No problem with confusion. We learn by asking and we learn by teaching. I'm glad you're trying to get something straight in your mind. I do it all the time. And wait until we get into learning the language...I'll probably drive you guys nuts, LOL!

Okay, here's what I understand.

The reason we are learning how to use the Genius is so we can see HOW we create our perspectives. Once we see HOW we create.....then we are in a different level of awareness.

Once we are at that level of awareness, we know we are creating illusions, and that's a whole different thing than creating because we want something.

It makes it easier to see HOW you are creating and also that you are creating one single perspective, if you don't have whole lot of "good" and "bad" perceptions.

So there are really 2 things we are working on to get to Chaol's level. We are learning good and bad are not so good and bad. And, we are learning how we create our ONE SINGLE PERSPECTIVE. There is only one perspective.....mine! (or yours).

And really, once you see that good/bad is getting in the way of seeing your one perspective, it sort of takes the juice out of good/bad.

Well, it does if you really want to experience another level of awareness, imo.

If "Time" really is an Illusion, how does one go from one place, or another, in a second, without any help from machines and anything technological?

Yeah. I don't know enough about time to be able to tell anybody much about it, but technology on the "outside" is actually a mental process that we see as a tangible piece of equipment. It is a symbol emerging from thought. So, using technology on the "outside" is the very same as using it on the "inside".

Somewhere in these threads, Chaol mentions that technology that we use is all alive and as "human" as we are.

Chaol, I love marijuana.

What is your perception on marihuana?

Thank you

If there is only one perspective, fragmented into countless (but finite) perspectives and if each fragment/perspective contains the whole, then where the "new" could/would come from?

Chaol has stated that nothing is created (and therefore nothing dies*), which means that "new" does not exist. "New", doesn't change perspectives


However, please allow me to supplement your thought

As I think of it, or understand it, is that in order to have "a" perspective it requires to have "a" question and "an" answer. If one has no questions (because he knows everything maybe), then there is no perspective (or, you can say "directionless", or has everything in his perspective). The same applies, I assume, if you have unanswerable questions or answers that you dont know the question. Or else we can say, it is not in your perspective, it doesn't exist, because you cannot relate a question to an answer. "This", does not exist because either you dont know what "this" is, or because you haven't asked what "this" is. If you have, then "this" exists, in your perspective.

As we all know, the "meaning in ("my") life" is situated where "my" questions point it to be. By changing questions -that "I" ask in "my" life- "I" change the "meaning in my life" (or what I define meaning in my life) and thus perspective.

In that context, I understand the "expanded perspective" as the process by which you somehow keep on asking questions after answers, until you decide to arrive to conclusions, where is the place one rests because he got bored of thinking, as they say and wants to live :)

With the same token, methinks, if i change questions, I change my reality. So, the questions I ask determine the "size" of my reality or how expanded my big picture/reality is.

The way you form these questions is through letters/words in a logical manner (grammar/syntax), creating something like a string of symbols, which makes it important consequently, to know what words/symbols to use for the purpose.
Let's not forget the truism that even the deepest secret in the universe will be told in a language that we understand and with words that we already know and exist.

The above of course refer to what I understand (bring into my perspective :)), or misunderstand, when i read Chaol writing about "the perspective...". I hope it helped, if i have not misunderstood Chaol and not been boring.


*If immortal is something that never dies, then the only immortal is the one that has never been born. So, if nothing has been born (created), then everything is immortal. This is how Chaol has suggested us to think of him, afew pages back if I remember.

How long would we have if the note was a calculation based on the speed of the expansion of the universe a a 5 of light speed and the note is from somebody in another universe coming at us at a speed that is,
a) slight slower than light speed so we get a 3 hour window to prevent a collision.

b) slightly faster than the speed of light so we get the news 3 hours after the collision has already taken place.

How would the notes differ?

In my dream last night I knew exactly how to assign value to things to make it useful to my experience. When I woke up I could not remember how I did it.

But how would you acquire "knowledge" into your new library/language? again I struggle to explain what I'm trying to get across here with words.

When we create our new language or in EC if you made a neuronicon for "a book of this worlds true history" how would you access it?

Or even a neuronicon for "a full length feature visualization with full control to perceive this worlds true history"

A book wouldn't be as fun for comparison.

Inside the Sphinx's library I have seen others reports of books and "movie" things.

The act of perception is creation itself.

To understand how you create perception look back at the airplane picture on the ecsys website. Now let's substitute today's events to make things more clear. When you have all of the props (the school, ambulances, police, SWAT team, a story about a shooter) and actors (grieving parents, grieving teachers, news media, other students) you don't actually need any harmed children. That part of the story is like the airplane. You will never see any real evidence that any children were actually harmed, because they were not harmed, it's not necessary because the other relationships tell you it must be real.

You're real, I'm real, Chaol is real...I bet every poster on this thread would say they are real.

Hi.

Death, to the few who really subscribe to X in my world, is more of a myth. It seems real when you see or know of others 'tune out' but we also know that the experience of it is different from what it appears to be.

We're sad to see people go, of course. And in a way it's the end of that person's life (or relevance in the world) so they are missed.

Anyone remember Chaol saying we'd probably not be using the internet by last december?

I found it and also rememberd another question I have. If Choal creates his perspective, why does he need a nexus point to travel back and forth between worlds? There is something I'm no understanding (or Chaol isn't) about our perception creating powers.

Thread: Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking. (Page 218)

How is there perspective without consciousness?

Yes. And in late October of that year, SOPA was introduced.

This website was one of many on 'the list' to be taken offline.

Some changes have been made since then and now your internet is safe and sound.

Can you define consciousness?

In truth, Chaol sometimes contradicts himself :)

The nexus point is a value in my perspective ;)

His dates have been off before. He will be back soon now and answer these questions, heh!!!!

I don't think he's ever described himself as an alien lol!

What I meant was he says 'we are not human' then he says his girlfriend knows him to be human.
Confusing!

I thought I'd better start over reading Chaol's posts and look what I just found:

Thread: Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking.

Everything truly exists. Like I mention above, When something cannot be fully perceived, it appears infinite.

Our language also enables us to perceive these alternate realities, if we want. One alterate realm is this one.

You exist in multiple realms now, at every moment. You could traverse hundreds of thousands of different possibilities in one day without knowing it.

So most of those bold statements are my understanding (before I met Chaol) of myself as spirit.

Edit: Found a contradiction:

Thread: Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking. (Page 2)

"The answers" in the universe apply to everyone, not just an infinitesimally small percentage of the population.

We look to scientists for these answers because they're doing things that we don't understand. It is no different than how (in the past) we look to the religious elite for the answers.

But the answers are not found in science or religion or any one particular aspect of the schools and politics that we have created.

The answers are universal and have more to do with consciousness and perception.

I think Chaol believes in universal law.


And this poster asked Chaol how could there not be consciousness....Chaol asked him what consciousness is to him. Here are both their answers:

Thread: Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking. (Page 2)

Intentionally misleading.

As I mentioned, I will at times manipulate for my own purposes of bringing your world closer to my own.

An example of this would be if I told you that Auntie Sally was coming on June 3rd.

I know that Auntie Sally won't arrive until mid-September but you would not understand how the preparations you usually make for Auntie Sally are needed on June 3rd even if she is not coming.

If you knew that she was not coming then you would not prepare the biscuits.

If I told you who was coming instead of Auntie Sally you would ask questions well beyond June 3rd, and we'd never get anywhere.

It is not that I want to hide something but sometimes things are exceedingly difficult to make sense of.

So Auntie Sally is arriving June 3rd. Do you need help with the chaos biscuits?

The website is meant as an introduction to this particular forum.

The language I use is specific for the intent. For the website, it is to use language and terms that people are more likely to understand.

As we move along in our understanding I will change the language and terms so that new (or as I say, more accurate) understandings come into play.

From the website there is one law (although I would not really call it a law), Ecsys Prime.

If you read it is it being written?

Or are you just reading it.

[snips]

Do you feel Chaol has complete control of all of his perspectives?
[snips]