Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking.

Unit3, that is an extraordinary building. When I went to the site, I got a very strong feeling akin to deja-vu (although not anything like deja-vu)...it feels like having the answer to a nagging question on the tip of the tongue but not being able to spit it out.

This is somehow related to my Genius Map???....although I'm not in architecture or construction.

Interesting. Thanks.

!!

Chaol

The trick is to see the next step when it is cast before you.

How do you see the next step without making inferences on what your subconscious is trying to send your way. What is the trick to see that next step?

I would start with Chaol's website:
[link to ecsys.org]
It has all the necessary information to get you started.

And I don't agree that time is short. We have all the time in the world to learn this stuff. So what's the hurry? Enjoy the ride

My question exactly.

To me Chaol is look like a version of Darryl Anka as Bashar, if you listen Bashar teaching/channeling it sound like him such reasoning and logic. Please listen to his introduction as Fundamentals.


[link to bashar.org]

Listen to these at 4:00 mins on the video [link to www.youtube.com]

Listen to these at 4:00 mins on the video [link to www.youtube.com]

Hi,

I'm one of the newer people here but I'll tell you what I did. I read the first posts in all his threads. There are 5 of them, btw, so +200 pages is just the start.

I also studied his website (I noticed someone gave you a link)for a while. Then, I came to the back of the threads and followed the conversation for a while.

I finally started posting.

Time is short because Chaol is leaving in a few days and will be gone for several months. I also feel it's short because there are nexus points that allow us to accomplish our goals. Chaol says when the current nexus point closes, it will be 15-20 years before the next one.

Yes, it is extraordinary. Aren't you in mechanical engineering or something like that?

Yes...processes and mechanical. I feel that what you posted is related to my Genius Map (maybe it has to do with water technologies??), but I can't intuit the relation. Like the question Dodec posted, inferring the relations and progressions from one [Genius perspective] to the next is difficult.

Yes the image has to do with water technologies. Isn't your Genius for a new job?

I'm no expert but in a recent discussion with Chaol, we talked about what to do when you start noticing your Genius desire in your perspective. My understanding is that you can adjust your Genius at that time to help bring the desire on in. Or, interact with your Genius more.

Is this what you're talking about?

Last Edited by ERE3 on 01/14/2013 11:39 PM

Chaol....where are you?

Chaol is here offering us a bridge. It is an opportunity. He says that the bridge will not always be there and that once it is gone, there is no more opportunity for the next 15 - 20 years.

Go to the thread for meeting in the dream reality to find out more about the bridge.

Chaol, thank you for your answers. I want to further explore the use of the Genius keeping the above in mind. Right now I've got 2 incomplete Genius models that I'd like your input on before I fully implement them, if you'd be so kind :)

#1
Desired Experience: Undecided (Interim: My New Car)
Symbol: Organic piece of paper crumpled up and placed "inside" of a folded up note card. Melted candle wax (from a birthday candle) was dripped all over it. The un melted portion of the candle was also placed inside the note card, and everything was secured with 2 zip ties.
Possibility: Table in the garage (Shared space with 2 other tenants)
Interaction: My current car, other tenants, their cars, tools, bikes and other storage items, etc
Logic: Undecided

- For the Desired Experience, Would it be better to say <My New Car> because it is the least specific thing I can think of, or would something along the lines of <Pulling my new car into my garage> tie up all of the elements together better? Or does it matter?

- At the time I was constructing this symbol, I had an idea that I could create an other symbol for the same experience, and place it somewhere (Possibility) where the car might first manifest, such as a car dealership. My thought was that maybe one symbol would tie in with the other and things might move quicker.

I was visiting 2 hours away from home and learned that a dealership nearby did have a car like the one I was interested in for this exercise. I threw a symbol together MacGyver style the night before with the intent to visit and leave it at the dealership the next day. Funny, that symbol was disassembled my someone else before I had a chance to do anything with it. Because of that, I ended up creating a new symbol with the base being a birthday candle that I swear wasn't there the night before ;) If it was I probably would have gone for it first.

#2
Desired Experience Again, <My New Car> or <Driving my New Car off the lot>?
Symbol: Birthday Candle, set inside of a pencil grip, secured with a twisty tie
Possibility: Sitting on top of a Plymouth Prowler (not the car I had in mind), which is on display inside of the dealership.
Interaction: Dealership, salesmen, porters, customers, potential buyers, other cars etc.
Logic: Undecided

- You say only one model per desired perspective. Would my second model be considered a sequential model? Or will it not work that way since my initial thought was to have 2 models represent the same thing, just at different locations.

- If I have the first one being <Pulling my new car into my garage> and the 2nd <Driving my new car off the lot>, instead of having both represent <my new car>, could it be said they are 2 different models for 2 different experiences?

I hope this reaches you before you go. Your answers are all ways appreciated!

We're saying the same thing. I didn't use the word bridge. I used the word nexus because it takes the nexus point to cross the bridge.

Hi,

Yes, you've left bashar's links in Chaol's threads before. Here's a quote of his that sounds like Chaol,

"Everything already always exists. The change you experience is simply an illusion of continuity. You do not change one earth into another. You shift your consciousness focus from one earth to another that already exists... you only shift to a parallel reality where that reality already represents the shift in your own vibration. Nothing changes in that context. The change happens within your consciousness."

I'd say the only difference is that Chaol doesn't speak of vibration. It's not a matter of raising our vibrations, it's a matter of changing our perception. I would think this is a big difference in their approach.


Also, Chaol personally helps us and I have found him impeccable.

Last Edited by ERE3 on 01/15/2013 11:51 AM

I'm not sure what you're saying here, Chaol.

Does it mean part of my perspective comes and goes? So my perspective actually includes the drama of something "might" happen rather than it happening?

In regards to the value of sickness, there is the drama factor plus rewards in healing them.

Last Edited by ERE3 on 01/15/2013 08:24 AM

Nope.

Feel free to enlighten me then.

I have not left yet :) still here, observing. I will try to respond to as many posts as I can before I leave.

You and all is very welcome :)

The November 17th date was last year.

There are so many this year I don't mention them anymore.

We will see.

Unfortunately, Metis is not available at this time.

You could say that.

But some things are more gradual than others.

I live a double life lo

The automated messages would probably get lost. It would be like trying to throw a ball in a swerving truck. (As well, because of the nature of the current time, a proxy could be unpredictable. I have no idea what it would say or do.)

When you're wearing pigtails then I visit :)

Are you intending, by being "very expressive", to fool your subconscious into having those needs satisfied in a way that your waking mind would prefer?

What if we are not uncomfortable with the idea?
What does it mean if I perceive the nothing-in-particular as my interior self?

How could you not be uncomfortable with it?

By "you" I mean the core of you, not the you that formulated the question with words.

You cannot perceive nothing-in-particular. That's the idea.

Sure, why not! =D