Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking.

To clarify, some 'magic' is performed at the point of extraction for the (mostly) limestone. Then it is poured like concrete at the point of construction.

Sound is used to liquefy the limestone and light is used for accuracy (similar to lasers).

Thanks.

Regarding emotions-as-infections, I just mean to illustrate that emotions attempt to colonize a person by using the host's resources to reproduce.

Emotions are not created from scratch. They also begin to integrate with the person as soon as the person becomes 'infected'.

By "infections" I do not mean a negative or detrimental process occurring in a person's mind or body. However, we have no clear understanding of emotions (or consciousness) in this world. This, of course, does not validate my claims that emotions are infections. But the fact that there is no clear understanding of what emotions are should at least open the door to the possibility that the process of biochemical processes interacting with environmental influences is the same with the body (as a virus, in getting sick) as with the mind (emotions).

Our world has discovered that there are also virii that promote health and physical well-being, not just disease. In this world, such parasites are ignored because they're of no harm.

To respond to your query about how it physically feels to change perspectives, I think most of you know this already.

e.g., how does it feel physically to fall asleep? Changing perspectives to your dream world is mostly a non-physical sensation of no particular significance. What I do is no different. There is really no physical feeling in that sense.

-PL (low possibility, neutral logic) would mean constant if that's how you define it.

Other than the few icons of the 66 icons that I have defined, no others have definitions until users in this world ascribed standard definitions to them. (thus the game/app, which see)

It is still very usable without the standard definitions (because you would give them your own personal definitions).

Personal definitions for the icon sets would be much more powerful than a standard set of definitions.

Hope this helps some.

Sounds like the next level of the Genius (i.e., the abstract representation).

Try it again and again with different things. You'll get better at it.

Hi.

It's difficult to answer your question, as it presupposes that the cycle exists.

Rather than a cycle in time, imagine that we observe a color spectrum and call each color a 'cycle' as opposed to a 'translation' of light into different things which appear as colors.

We look back in time (and forward) and there appears to be a cycle, but it is only because of our perspective. All 'cycles' are occurring at once, so it is more like a translation of one thing into many things.

That is to say, a 'cycle' is the illusion of something that does not fit neatly into the perspective of time. You cannot perceive the entirety of it, so it appears to be a cycle when it is, instead, just the depth of something being translated into something that can be easily understood.

(Can we perceive two cycles at once? Of course. Just look at some of all of your inter-personal relationships.)

There is nothing that "will happen" in future that is not happening right now. Same for past.

And it is everything that is happening, not really one event.

So, "this world merging with the dreamworld" is not really a single event that will happen. It is a representation of something that is happening now and "has happened" since the beginning of time.

You merge with the dream world every time you sleep, or breath, or think, etc. Those, too, are cycles and are no different or less important than the cycles of which you speak.

It will happen the same way it happens now. Without anyone really noticing or really caring about it that much.

Again, just a progression of perspective. Really, anything that we notice in our perspective is a part of this change. Any major change is reflected in our immediate experience.

A burst of gamma radiation could affect us less than, say, a burst of anger from a parent simply because one is more relative to our lives and experience than the other.

We are the energy that helps us to do such things.

The energy is there, but if we experience it it is because it is the thing that is most relative to our experience.

-
Yes. DNA does not stop changing. There is no such thing as static DNA.

The rate of change is proportional, so it is not changing any more rapidly than it is a few thousand years ago.

Hope this helps.

There's really no difference between what seems to be internal and what seems to be external.

It's more a matter of, "How relative is X to my experience?"

As a rule of thumb, the closer X is to your senses the more relative it is to your experience. However, something may be powerful yet 'distant' that affects you in profound ways because you are picking up the stimuli from multiple points.

The only limit to the Genius is your imagination. If you can imagine it, then you're halfway there.

However, using the Genius on yourself should be more effective than using it for something that is not as relevant to your immediate experience.

Hi. I will be around until the game/language app is released. Then everyone will say, "WTF is this?" then I will leave for a short time, then come back to finish up the Magic Mirror of Chaos, then everyone will say, "WTF!" then I will leave for a short time again, the come back and bake nice, warm chocolate-chip cookies.

All the while, your perspective is changing around you. Mostly starting in what you translate as '2011' (this year, of course)

Something actually happens before you perceive it to happen. (Just like you're sick a couple of days before you actually feel sick.)

For example, "September 11, 2001" actually 'started' to happen several weeks prior to the event. A few days before the event things began to happen. It's the same with anything else. It's just a matter of relative energies coming together. At some point it makes what you think of as the event or thing (such as a chair or a person) but really it 'existed' before that point was reached.

Think Star Trek's transporter for events and things.

So the 'important events' happen in 2013 but also before 2013, starting mostly at the beginning of the century but getting interesting from 2011, 2012.

Perhaps you see some of these 'dream events' happening around you? These represent a personal change and can be directly related to your experience even if physically or emotionally distant.

Hi.

Of course, I am not familiar with all representations.

However, some representations are not representations of a process but more like shells that are just words with no corresponding thing.

If I say "Ecsys" and attach meaning to it, it does not mean that it has any validity beyond itself (the word and whatever else I have illustrated).

It is up to each person to find out what a symbol or representation means to them, to see if there's any value in it.

If representation X is not meaningful to someone then they probably would not really be able to answer a specific question about X, like a term that is used in its illustration.

When people talk about ascension and such, I don't really know what they're talking about because it doesn't relate to my experience that much. People are talking about such things for thousands of years in your world but there doesn't seem to be anything there.

Finding out about something that isn't really in my perspective would be quite difficult.

However, my guess is that 'ascension' and 'awakening' is more of a day-to-day hope that something more than ourselves exists, rather than something that may happen to them.

I would not want to really claim that we are 'always awake' and 'always ascended' which, though more accurate, would destroy the hope that moves some of us forward.

Hi. Thanks for the ThohT. However, I prefer to keep myself out of the equation as much as possible.

Although this way may make it less likely that Ecsys would spread far and wide (because people usually to think about other people) I think it will spread deeply to those people who think about ideas more than people.

Few and far between, indeed, but deep as the planets in the galaxy.

Aha! I had a hunch all the superpowers and psychic abilities we all think we have are once again, perceptions. Vedy interesante'!

Takes the steam out of all the folks with a messiah complex, Nobody wannabe's, etc: around here, heh!

I was just wondering about psychic abilities from an Ec perspective today. Makes me think anyone could develop that skill. But most won't bother because it seems too far fetched, weird or scary.

Also, I really have to think about the whole "emotions are infections" thing. Can't quite get my head around that. Not sure I want to be without my emotions. But I don't want to be ruled by them either.

Hi.

Travel betwixt worlds is mostly a relative thing. It takes fossil fuel for your ships to go to another world because that is the most relative way to get there, all things considered.

If I want to go somewhere I basically have two choices:

1) Know exactly where I am going: the 'method' that would probably take the least amount of energy is what you would refer to as just appearing there.
2) Not know exactly where I am going: the 'method' that would probably take the least amount of energy would be driving or walking, for example.

I make the 'destination' relative to my current perspective. That is to say, I find the 'destination' in my perspective and bring it more into focus, making it even more relative.

When you drive a car it may seem like you're moving through space but you're actually just experiencing what is most relative from 'point' A to point B. If you drive a car, it needs a certain type of fuel and has limitations (beyond which more energy would be required, which would be inefficient and thus highly unlikely to be experienced).

Drive something different to get a new set of limitations and remove the old ones.

Regarding bananas, there are about 7 billion men in my world, but more than half are gay or bi-sexual. (You have homosexuals fighting for rights here. We have asexuals doing the same.) So many of these bananas are green with envy. You're probably looking for ripe yellow bananas but we don't really export to this world, unfortunately. Perhaps a nice orange?

this thread was started over four years ago, nothing has changed at all.

Maybe you don't have eyes to see changes, yet.

that is rather sarcastic to say the least. i do have eyes very clear eyes. i see the issues in the world very clearly. what i don't see, is all the wilful doom that's spouted out all the time which i see as complete and utter dog food. there are too many dreamers here and sounds like you are one of them. take the plank of wood out of your own eyes before suggesting to others how to remove the spec out of theirs.

I wasn't suggesting you need to remove a spec from your eyes. I am suggesting that you may learn how to expand your perspective so you see "changes."

i do understand what you mean, i think changes that are happening are not moving quick enough, hence the need for doom, perhaps inner conflicts need arising and clearing in order to see perspectives more clearly

Is it possible that since you are the observer, what you observe might be up to you?

i agree totally, nothing more to add.

In a way.

Except that the presentation layer, as you call it, would be the same as any other layer. The same, but different. (Two perspectives of the same thing, in a way.)

"Swapping it out for some other presentation layer" is just a new perspective. You're doing this constantly, without realizing it.

Changing perspective = finding the most efficient experience.

My absence is a type of trial, to see how well people fare with the material on their own accord.

To me, it is interesting that the material seems so dependent on me in this forum (as if they were both one and the same).

Of course, ideas are independent of their 'creators'. I did not create Ecsys. You did.

Ecsys was before me and will be after me. It is powerful by itself, if you use it as instructed.

Hi.

I've spoken a few times before about the need to separate the message from the messenger.

However, I wouldn't say "all". More likely to those who think the two are the same.

It's nearly intentional.

Above, I mean that my visible absence is a trial to see how the vocal people fare in this forum during it.



There is but one perspective. You could say that this one perspective is composed of an endless variety of relationships.

Some of these relationships seem to be people, or memories, or objects, concepts, etc.


What is "they"?



I simply focus more on your world's representation in my world.

My partner does not exist in my world because it's a different world filled with different relationships (to simplify)

I could probably find someone that looks exactly like here, but it would not be the same.

Hi.

The main pyramid at Gizeh serves different purposes over time.

It is mostly built as a machine. Again, for different purposes over time.

Computers are pretty large 40 years ago and even larger thousands of years ago :)

But this particular pyramid was more about what would be called an electrical switch box. A computer still, but not the way we currently think of computing devices.

Also, it must be realized that the Earth is not in the same position then as it is today, nor does the sky look the same or objects glow the same.

Stonehenge is less about the stars and more about being able to harness and distribute energies, similar to a router. That it has some correlation with the stars is the same as putting your computer near an outlet (intentional and it helps the process).

We happen to see large objects made of stone and get an incomplete picture. But we miss all of the non-stone objects that would paint a more complete picture.

We are not much different then as we are now. Things look newer, cleaner, fresher now but mirror functions that we've had for a very long time.

Hey, U3. I noticed there was some discussion about a user creating an Ec app. Did that ever happen?