Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking.

[link to www.youtube.com]


many people think that dimensions are achieved or spawned or realized through extension, or movement in a new direction
this is incorrect
dimensional phenomena is the result of relationships, and specifically feedbackloop relationships. or in other words, something in relation to itself
this is similar to math theory or philosophy wherein nothing, or the empty set, or zero, when considered, becomes something, altogether, in itself. Thus there is something, and it is nothing. Likewise, there is necessarily a set which could be said to contain the empty set, also known as zero. Thus the set of the empty set is actually the concept of the number 1. And 2 is merely the set of the set of the empty set known as one, and so forth goes all mathematical phenomena.
Applying this to dimensional theory we see that what is said to be the zero-th dimension is but a point
Another point, in whatever direction actually necessistates a dimension, and it is known as a line. Thus, it could be said, merely understanding a point's relationship to a point results in the concept of a line, which is the first dimension.
Likewise, a line's relationship to another line, even if parallel necessitates the second dimension which is known as a plane.
Contort the plane however you want in the third, and you will never necessitate the third dimension. Rather once you consider another plane, well then you have your third dimension. It is called a space.

And this is where the buck stops for most people before they begin to postulate what persists beyond this point. Three dimensions and no more, say some. Others come up with irrational or illogical shapes and call it a dimension. This is due to the fact that they think in terms of extension, which is working backwards, which you will see.

Space is everywhere, so one cannot extend in the traditional sense. So when you relate a space to another space, what you now have is a concept which can best be described by the following: a partition, a density, a shape, an amount, but the best way to describe this is an object. Seems simple right? So let's continue. Thus the fourth dimension is spacial density, or better known as an object.

When an object is related to another object we have a new concept known as something very much like time. If only one object exists in space, it cannot be said to be moving, nor can it be said to be anywhere at all. It is completely static. However, relate that object to another object, and a relative position can be drawn, and so can it be said that anything is "occurring" since a change in relationship is said to be a progression of time. Thus the fifth dimension is time, or better: a relationship between objects.

When a relationship between objects is related to a relationship between objects, what we now have is a complexity, or better known as a system. Just one more object, in fact, necesitates two different relationships between all parties. Our bodies are not merely objects, for instance, but systems. Indeed, our solar system, which is a relationship between all the local celestial bodies is exactly that: a system. Thus the sixth dimension is system.

When a system is related to another system, we have a grand system, or an organization, or in other words an abstract concept, or better known as a metaphysical entity. These are varied and are referred to daily in common tongue. A baseball game is a metaphysical entity because it requires the interworking of players which themselves are systems. In fact, elements of a grand system are not referred to as systems, but rather they are known as "subsystems" or "organs". Consciousness and the abstract concept of the self are described, not as objects which "exist" (so to speak) in the "real world", but are said to be abstract notions. Thus the seventh dimension is known as an organization or metaphysical or abstraction.

When a system is related to another system, we get relationships which consist of subsystems relating to their own systems, and grand systems relating to another grand system's subsystems, and so forth. This is known as attribution, category, subsystemization, property possession, employ, or patronage. This is not unknown or difficult to conceive. For instance, a baseball game is a system, but it is a relationship (known as a struggle) between two subsystems known as baseball teams which possess different properties. The baseball game is said to be won by whatever team wins, and thus there is a relationship between the subsystems and the system itself. But this can be extrapolated upon thusly: a player might be paid off to sabotage and throw the game for the other team. Thus that player is not actually a member of the team he is dressed for, but is actually a member of the other team by virtue of his relationship to the intended outcome of the game, or, in other words, his relationship to the grand system via possession of attributes possessed by the other team. Likewise, attributes are similarly described as relationships to grand systems. If I have the property of red hair, then I am a subsystem within the abstract concept of red hair. If I dye my hair I am a subsystem of the category of red haired people who dyed their hair, and on and on. A subsystem is essentially a property. An entire person can be a subsystem, and thus an entire person can be a property, like that of a property of a team of persons being a memeber of said team. In fact any random person, is actually a member of many different abstract concepts (or grand systems) since they contain many different properties. Indeed, the conept of identity is for any two things to be said to possess all the same properties. Thus it is said not to be two, but one. This relationships between properties and subsystems is best related to the concepts presented in polytheism. For instance, using red hair again, redheads born in ancient egypt were once burned alive because they were said to possess the attribute which was possessed by the Egyptian god of foreigners: Set. Thus the system of red hair is a patron of those subsystem who possess that property. Thus the eighth dimension is property or patronage.

The ninth dimension is relationships between all properties and all patrons. It is, essentially, a relationship between everything scaled up and down in scope. This results in the ultimate system. This results something similar to conceptions of perfection, necessity, and existence. The ninth dimension is known as the funciton of everything.

The tenth relationship is a relationship between everything and not everything. It is known as something similar to morality, or behavior, or virtue, or wisdom.

TPTB=Where I hide that I cling to physicality

[link to www.wnd.com]

Again, I didn't install on a MacBook right now. But my advice would be to stay with the 32 bit versions, especially if you have older hardware. Good luck!

Is this what you were referring to, Ambra?

I find this exercise very inspiring, still. Although I did some work on it, I don't fully understand it. Anyone fancy trying it again? Chaol makes it sound so promising!

Interesting eh?

To add!

It would be quite difficult to maintain the same frame of mind as one had in much younger years.

If you could open your mind instead of closing it as you get older, make stress irrelevant, and minimize the stress of your cells, ageing would not be much of an issue.

Observe youth (or children) and try to figure out how they see the world. Becoming older we make continuous conscious decisions to abandon our youth and make "getting older" more relative to us. What things do we adopt into our lives that represent ageing? Where did our child-like wonder and imagination go? Knowing becomes more important than not-knowing. We often exercise to resist the ageing process, which actually makes us age faster. Ultimately we, not nature, end up ageing ourselves.

Some questions to ask yourself:

How are you interacting or associating with the ageing process? How do you see yourself?

How are you representing being older? (Sending signals of maturity to your peers, covering up your grey hair, exercising often, etc)

What rules on ageing have you adopted? (Thinking about retirement, what you're not supposed to do after a certain age, etc)

Again, we often create the very things we resist.

Thanks.

The End Of The World started December 21, 2012 - The End Of The World will Be August 2013.
The End Of The Kuiper Belt

The electromagnetic particles that will be flowing & interchanging between the planets during the 12.21.12 alignment will be highly magnified and highly supercharged when they reach Earth. They will penetrate the crust, through the Earth and down into its core. At the actual moment of alignment it will cause the Earth to pause, for only a moment, and this process will completely transform the core of our planet to a completely new kind of energy form & source. This new energy form, in the language spoken on the Andromeda Council biospheres, the language of the Mirach star system in the Andromeda constellation, by the Andromeda Council scientists, is called: "sar".

This will be the first time cosmic transformational event of this type ever... for a planet. Time will begin to go away throughout all of 2013. And Earth will continue her evolution & transformation process into becoming a higher dimensional world in January 2014.

Thanks Jesse. I enjoyed your comments.

I didn't see this council saying the old systems won't come down but rather, they will try to help, so it's not so hard on us.

I didn't care for their handling of the "controllers" since that's something I can change in my perspective on my own.

But, they are also a part of my perspective!

I agree with trying to include everyone, they have August as a nexus and they say we will have a blue hue, so there is a lot of similarities.

Chaol has told us to examine our culture of endless profits. Neo shared with us some ways to change our perspective by re-defining labels. But, what else are we doing to change our perspective to another culture?

The Code of Ecsys says to make our thoughts and desires physical in a small way every day. I did a bunch of meme's and now I'm looking for additional ways to cultivate a new culture

And to be truthful, I'm not too excited about Chaol's world. Obviously, he isn't either! And, when he was asked why he doesn't go to a more enlightened place, he said it's too hard to understand them. So, I am trying to create the perspective that suits me.

One way is, I'll do a meme for this theme of someone to save us that I find throughout my perspective but I'd love to hear what others are doing if anyone wants to share. A day makes a huge difference with the tools Chaol has taught us!

I'm sure my new perspective includes classes and training since so much of my dreamtime is exactly that.

Jesse, I always enjoy your feedback and perspective... keep it coming.

As Jesse pointed out, there is no one that can save you but yourself.

While Chaol has left me with only that: I cannot really know anything truly and truthfully, and thus can really never be sure of anything.

Though I feel this, and thus only half believe what follows, I feel the following points have some thing to them.



1. I think there is something to be said about faith and value, that one should value something. A feeling, ideal, or concept and live life as if trying their best to actualize that ideal. Maybe that ideal is freedom, peace, love, passion, joy? Find whatever it is that you most think you are the matching frequency of (you/ who you feel you are or most wish to be) and then have faith that the universe is that thing, or will shift to match that. But having faith of something beyond your thoughts and what they can conceptualize.

in my opinion, since the universe is either negative, neutral, or positive. Since I view neutrality..../equality/unconditional compassion, love, etc. as "positive" that the universe is inherently slightly falling towards positive.

2. You get what you focus on, this seems pretty clear, and extra impactfull depending on how much one believes the environment is in direct relationships with one's very own choices. Since all you can know is your own perspective and that your perspective seems to change all the time and especially when you actively focus on specific things. Almost as if anything one brings attention to gets mirrored back even more relative.

It seems to me, that we should try to positivize all of our personal relationships with all symbols in order to better influence the overall scale of our perspectives towards positivety.

Which is why 4. I think there is something to the "New Age" saying of "raising frequency". it better puts it that it is not towards one pole or another but going up. Not focusing on the illusory relationships between good and bad.

5. I think not thinking or "thinking with the heart and feelings with the mind" is a way of raising that "frequency." start focusing the mind on things like how it feels breathing fresh air, or the smell of the coffee in the morning. Start focusing on these senses by not skipping the following video. ;)

6. legit probably just some computer simulation game of love vs. fear.



Maybe Jesus was a carpenter because we are all going to be building bridges forever. ;)

If Love is the Answer Your Home

I know little of the "Andromeda Council" and I suppose I may be speaking out of ignorance. It seems to me, though, that they're a social parasite playing on the Messianic programing our cultures have installed.

No one can help you, but you. If it's all you, then pointing fingers at something and saying it's bad, etc.. Cannot change it, and will only incorporate more of that into your perspectivet want to. The idea of Jesus, an alien Co-operative or anything else coming to save us, is useless. It implies that we "need" saving (imo, we do not).

[link to www.youtube.com]

Jesse, I always enjoy your feedback and perspective... keep it coming.

As Jesse pointed out, there is no one that can save you but yourself.

While Chaol has left me with only that: I cannot really know anything truly and truthfully, and thus can really never be sure of anything.

Though I feel this, and thus only half believe what follows, I feel the following points have some thing to them.



1. I think there is something to be said about faith and value, that one should value something. A feeling, ideal, or concept and live life as if trying their best to actualize that ideal. Maybe that ideal is freedom, peace, love, passion, joy? Find whatever it is that you most think you are the matching frequency of (you/ who you feel you are or most wish to be) and then have faith that the universe is that thing, or will shift to match that. But having faith of something beyond your thoughts and what they can conceptualize.

in my opinion, since the universe is either negative, neutral, or positive. Since I view neutrality..../equality/unconditional compassion, love, etc. as "positive" that the universe is inherently slightly falling towards positive.

2. You get what you focus on, this seems pretty clear, and extra impactfull depending on how much one believes the environment is in direct relationships with one's very own choices. Since all you can know is your own perspective and that your perspective seems to change all the time and especially when you actively focus on specific things. Almost as if anything one brings attention to gets mirrored back even more relative.

It seems to me, that we should try to positivize all of our personal relationships with all symbols in order to better influence the overall scale of our perspectives towards positivety.

Which is why 4. I think there is something to the "New Age" saying of "raising frequency". it better puts it that it is not towards one pole or another but going up. Not focusing on the illusory relationships between good and bad.

5. I think not thinking or "thinking with the heart and feelings with the mind" is a way of raising that "frequency." start focusing the mind on things like how it feels breathing fresh air, or the smell of the coffee in the morning. Start focusing on these senses by not skipping the following video. ;)

6. legit probably just some computer simulation game of love vs. fear.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Maybe Jesus was a carpenter because we are all going to be building bridges forever. ;)

If Love is the Answer Your Home

I'm not sure how you could perceive something that had absolutely no value, but yes.

When 2 things exist then they both has a presumed value (whatever value you the other ascribes to it, formed from the relationship of it to the other thing).

Even saying or imagining that you are in a 'black void' has something like 2 values ("black" and "void"). So it could be said that "non-existence" exists, as do "black voids", "vacuums", and anything else you can think of. (Existing in the way that it has value, not that it is real.)

The cheapest for the universe to "create", energy-wise, is "nothing". But then there would be no universe. (And even the absence of something is something that has a value.)

It needs to break itself down into seemingly separate parts in order to pretend to exist.

Physicality need not actually exist. The illusion is 'good enough' and uses up the least amount of energy. But in the illusion itself energy is used. So our bodies seem physical only because that's how we think of it, and we think it's real. (If you were a thought you would probably also see yourself as "most real".)

In the whole, there is no physicality, no illusion, no energy, etc. But further explanation is where the use of the English language escapes us and why I presented Ec.

(These are all terms used for lack of better terms.)

Is a protector an off-shoot of savior?

Thread: Notes from an "alternate universe": Meeting in the new Dream reality (Page 37)

"The fire of the dream world, "Sekhmet", has a twin. It is symbolized as the protector of the physical world. You will know it as the Great Sphinx."

Chaol calls this, "secrets of the waking world."

Very cool! And I've got some work to do!!!!!

Thank you very much, Chaol and XWon!

Is a protector an off-shoot of savior?

Thread: Notes from an "alternate universe": Meeting in the new Dream reality (Page 37)

"The fire of the dream world, "Sekhmet", has a twin. It is symbolized as the protector of the physical world. You will know it as the Great Sphinx."

Chaol calls this, "secrets of the waking world."

I should also add, what you disbelieve you also interact with.

(There is no disbelief. Only belief or irrelevance.)

What I am saying is the savior is in my perspective. I'm interested in re-defining it.

How is it that you plan on doing that? If that's hard to answer, you may consider the following question:
"Why is the concept of a savior so relative to you?"

"Redefining" (as Chaol puts it) is not necessarily assigning a new definition (as it would be if taken literally in the traditional sense) as much as it's changing the logic that the representation uses to interact with your perspective (or the logic you use to interact with it).

I have no idea if this will be useful to you but.. When I am "redefining"(reassigning relationships to) a symbol I find it useful to imagine the symbol represented as a point with lines of light coming from it going out in all directions each line representing something it interacts with. Thicker lines of light imply high relevance and thinner lines less relevance. I like to imagine (pretend/play) that this is a mental map for the way things relate. If you have the patience and desire to do so, you might also find it useful to imagine what other symbols (nodes) the lines connect to and consider what other aspects of your perspective may be altered if you alter the way the node you're desiring to change interacts within perspective.

Most of the time I find the existing structure is useful as is and it just needed a few lines to intersect with other representations that allowed it to function in a way more relative to my desired perspective.

There is a similar "library" method as well. If you're awesome at keeping out distractions, you can do this in a "daydream" and if not you may want to meditate for focus. Imagine yourself in a library, imagine the texture of the bound books, the smell of their ancient pages, the vivid colors and detail in their bindings. Each book represents a concept that holds meaning to you and within each book is all the information you are aware of that is relative to that concept. Each book is unfinished, there are several blank pages at the end of each book. Still, each book houses the entirety of your understanding on each concept. Pick up one of the books that you'd like to add to, flip to the blank pages and write in some new relevant information to the concept. It doesn't matter if the information you write in is contradictory, these books have a tendency of editing inconsistencies out in a way most relative.

Hope these are a benefit to you.

snip...
Mutant Messiah:
Most of the time I find the existing structure is useful as is and it just needed a few lines to intersect with other representations that allowed it to function in a way more relative to my desired perspective.
snip...
U3:
Snip...
So by "seeing" more lines intersecting with a symbol, it's changed your perspective? Could you give an example on the bold paragraph? Thanks!
Snip...

That's just brilliant, MM.

I blogged it! TY.

I wonder, have you done anything with this advice from Chaol?
(No link, sorry. I wrote it down to contemplate it.)

"So in order to expand your perspective through thinking, get rid of your thoughts, rely on them less, and make them interact with what no longer matters to you."