|
| Page 1 Previous Page Next Page | Judge Carter is Granting us Expedited Discovery - Immediately !!!! OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE 
| The Regulator
User ID: 751569
 United States
9/10/2009 11:58 PM
Report Abusive Post | Judge Carter is Granting us Expedited Discovery - Immediately !!!! OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE
| Quote |
I'm still trying to verify this......God I hope it's true!!
BREAKING!!! Judge Carter is Granting us Expedited Discovery - Immediately !!!! OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE
Breaking at 3 PM Thurs, Sept. 10. Obama Forced by Court Action to Release Birth Certificate and School Records - immediately‏
From: Recipient Deleted
Sent: Fri 9/11/09 12:30 AM
To:
First report and update . . . see Breaking News Update below . . .
Federal judge allows Obama eligibility case to go forward
By Linda Bentley | September 9, 2009
SANTA ANA, Calif. – On Sept. 8, U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter ordered a scheduling conference for Oct. 5, 2009, allowing the Obama eligibility case filed by Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. on behalf Captain Pamela Barnett, Alan Keyes and others to proceed.
UPDATE . . . BREAKING NEWS . . . Today, September 10 at 15.05 hours (3:05 PM)
Reliable sources reported today, Thursday, September 10th at 3:00 PM, that Judge Carter has granted the plaintiffs, the Taitz legal team, “expedited discovery” in the Obama Eligibility Case.
What expedited discovery means:
Under the court ordered expedited discovery, the Taitz legal team will be allowed to force President Barrack Hussein Obama to make public his official birth certificate with the name of the hospital and other legal particulars as well as his school records including how or who paid for his education and other information that the American people have not been allowed to see up to this day.
Hear me out. Don't send me emails commenting or lamenting on the merits of the case. That is not material! Think strategically. This case and Judge Carter's order of expedited discovery will force Obama to tell the truth, period, end of story.
Please go to Orly Taitz' website and contribute to help pay for the legal costs.
[link to www.orlytaitzesq.com]
[link to theregulatorsvigilancecommittee.ning.com]
[link to theregulatorsvigilancecommittee.ning.com]
The Regulator
[link to theregulatorsvigilancecommittee.ning.com] |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 755140
United States
9/11/2009 12:14 AM
Report abusive post | | Re: Judge Carter is Granting us Expedited Discovery - Immediately !!!! OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE | Quote |
 |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 766947
United States
9/11/2009 12:22 AM
Report abusive post | | Re: Judge Carter is Granting us Expedited Discovery - Immediately !!!! OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE | Quote |
I found the original article, but I haven't seen an update yet.
[link to www.sonorannews.com] |
| Dallas In Sat
User ID: 769601
United States
9/12/2009 10:58 PM
Report abusive post | | Re: Judge Carter is Granting us Expedited Discovery - Immediately !!!! OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE | Quote |
From what I can ascertain per following link, [link to www.scribd.com] the CA Judge Carter has NOT granted expedited discovery. His order is to refer the matter of whether there should be immediate discovery to a magistrate judge Arthur Nakazato. From my understanding how the procedures are to work with this order, the magistrate judge will either say yes or no to expedited discovery some time before currently scheduled Oct 5 hearing in Judge Carter’s courtroom. If the Magistrate judge says no, it goes back to Judge Carter whether or not to order discovery on October 5
I received an email indicating that Orly had conversation directly with Judge Carter and that he was granting her motion for discovery immediately. I'm finding it very difficult to understand how a judge would tell a plaintiff attorney something different than the orders that were filed. So I'm not trusting the email or any other postings. I'm only trusting the orders from Judge Carter filed per [link to www.scribd.com]
I've been following this issue since July 2008. Oh, how I want to believe that motion for discovery has been immediately granted. But with all that has transpired with all the different lawsuits since July 2008 with absolutely nothing to show for the efforts, I only trust the legal filings from the courts I can see with my own eyes.
Dallas in SAT |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 768705
United States
9/13/2009 5:07 AM
Report abusive post | | Re: Judge Carter is Granting us Expedited Discovery - Immediately !!!! OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE | Quote |
My prediction:
---------------->THE DOG WILL WAG.
. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 769752
 United Kingdom
9/13/2009 5:27 AM
Report abusive post | | Re: Judge Carter is Granting us Expedited Discovery - Immediately !!!! OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE | Quote |
But why would Obama not want us to see his long form BC? - or his school and college applications and records? - what possible objection could he have - after all he is probably the most influential person in the world with his finger on the nucler buttons - shouldn't we be entitled to know everything about him? |
| The Regulator (OP)
User ID: 751569
United States
9/13/2009 6:20 PM
Report abusive post | | Re: Judge Carter is Granting us Expedited Discovery - Immediately !!!! OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE | Quote |
But why would Obama not want us to see his long form BC? - or his school and college applications and records? - what possible objection could he have - after all he is probably the most influential person in the world with his finger on the nucler buttons - shouldn't we be entitled to know everything about him? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 769752
More info:
Source: [link to theregulatorsvigilancecommittee.ning.com]
The Theory is Now a Conspiracy And Facts Don’t Lie
By JB Williams Thursday, September 10, 2009 COMPLICITIES - Obama - CRIME SCENE (The Mistake, The Evidence, Obama is NOT a constitutional president)
Though we live in an era when all undesirable facts are often blindly labeled “conspiracy theories” by political operatives with an agenda at risk, a very real conspiracy unfolds every now and then.
While it is indeed true that not all theories are actual conspiracies, like when Hillary Clinton developed an imaginary “right-wing conspiracy” out to get her husband, when in fact, the semen stained dress provided all the necessary (but unfriendly) facts and a perfectly logical explanation for all of those nasty rumors – it is also true that some conspiracies are much more than just crackpot theory.
To be a bonafide conspiracy, two or more individuals must knowingly conspire, plot or plan an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious act. In politics or law, an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act, is a “conspiracy.” Not in theory, but in reality.
Such is the case today!
A political national committee, the Chair of the Party convention, the Secretary of the Party, Party offices in each of fifty states, and maybe many – many more, have knowingly and wantonly defrauded the American election system and more than 300 million American citizens.
They plotted and planned an act of evil, unlawful, treacherous fraud in a blind quest for unbridled political power, and they hoped that you would never catch it. They almost got away with it too…
They snuck it past fifty state election commissions, congress, the US Supreme Court and Justice Department, the Federal Elections Commission and countless members of the Electoral College nationwide. Not a single member of the, as Limbaugh says, “drive-by media” caught it either, or if they did, they decided to become complicit for their own political reasons.
But as is always the case with liars, cheats and thieves, they slip up – make a silly mistake – overplay their hand – leave evidence lying around that they had forgotten about. And as with all chronic liars, they eventually get caught in their own web of lies.
Then, one day, someone stumbles into that evidence, and the house of cards comes crashing down around them. It’s almost poetic…
The Mistake
Aware of the fact that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II – Section I constitutional requirements for the office of President, what well-seasoned professional politician would be stupid enough to sign their name and stake their personal career upon certifying Obama as eligible?
Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates are nominated at their respective Party Conventions.
Believe it or not, each Party is assigned the duty of vetting and certifying the legal eligibility of their own candidates. I know, like asking the fox to guard the henhouse, right. But hey, we are talking about a country which still thinks there is a separation of powers between the High Court and the Executive branch, which seats that court by way of political appointment, confirmed by congress, which wants a piece of the judge and expects a few political favors too.
The Evidence
In this case, the Democrat Party was responsible for vetting and certifying Barack Hussein Obama as legally eligible to seek the Oval Office. The U.S. Constitution has only three very specific requirements for the job. The proper legal text used on the DNC Party “Official Certification of Nomination” document reads as follows, and I quote;
“THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”
Yes, I know…. there is a typo in there. Not my typo, it belongs to whoever prepared the official document at the DNC. Did you catch it?
The document is signed by Chair of the DNC Convention and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond and Colorado Notary of Public Shalifa A. Williamson. It is dated August 28, 2008.
However, this document was never delivered to a single state DNC Office for state certification, and it was therefore, never presented to any state Election Commission as certification of these candidates, although I do have a copy of this notarized document myself.
Instead, a very similar document was delivered to fifty state DNC offices, which those offices certified to each of fifty state Election Commissions, who then date-stamped the document and stuck it in a file cabinet, and proceeded to place these “certified” candidates on the ballot.
The “Official Certification of Nomination” that was presented by the DNC in all fifty states for the 2008 Presidential election, in which Barack Hussein Obama became the new President of the United States, was almost identical, and it too was signed by Chair of the DNC Convention and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond and Notary of Public Shalifa A. Williamson, dated August 28, 2008.
But this version of the document was missing the following text, and I quote;
“- and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”
The legal certification text on the DNC certified nomination document used for the DNC ticket was limited to, and I quote;
“THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:
Oops, another typo? The reference to Obama’s constitutional eligibility was missing… An accidental omission?
The text certifying that Barack Hussein Obama was “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution” had been removed from the document sent to the states. And yes, I have a copy of this version of the DNC Official Certification of Nomination letter too!
In fact, this version is in Election Commission files of all fifty state Election Commission offices, state DNC headquarters, complete with date stamps, matching signatures, even the same Notary of Public authentication, and absent the constitutional text.
Just in case you are wondering, the answer is yes. This version also includes the same typo present in the version not submitted by the DNC, but including the constitutional text, which means both documents have the same place of origin.
The individual at DNC headquarters who prepared this very important document was not only a poor typist… they were sloppy enough to leave both versions of the signed documents lying around.
Now this is the stuff real conspiracies are made of!
The Implications
Please, allow me to connect the dots here…
The DNC drafted, signed and notarized TWO slightly different versions of their Official Certification of Nomination documents, not one.
One of those documents had complete legal language, and one of them was missing the text concerning the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama.
The version which is absent any certification of constitutional standing for the office of President is the version that was filed with every state in the country, and the one used by the DNC to elect Barack Obama President.
Oh, there is one more important document in this story.
The RNC “Official Certification of Nomination” for John McCain and Sarah Palin reads, and I quote:
“We do hereby certify that a national convention of Delegates representing the Republican Party of the United States, duly held and convened in the city of Saint Paul, State of Minnesota, on September 4, 2008, the following person, meeting the constitutional requirements for the Office of President of the United States, and the following person, meeting the constitutional requirements for the Office of Vice President of the Unites States, were nominated for such offices to be filled at the ensuing general election, November 4, 2008, viz;”
The certification of constitutional eligibility is there in the RNC Certification of Nomination presented to the state Election Commissions. It’s there in the document which the DNC had prepared, signed and notarized, but did NOT deliver to the states.
But it is NOT there in the DNC Certification of Nomination that the DNC used to certify and elect Barack Hussein Obama President and Joseph Biden Vice President of the United States of America.
Last, the fact that TWO DNC Certifications exist, both signed, dated and notarized by the same individuals on the same day, means that a very real conspiracy to commit election fraud was underway, and since it took until six months after the election to uncover it, the conspiracy was indeed successful.
Are you still wondering why Barack Obama has spent nearly $1.5 million in taxpayer’s funds to race Department of Justice lawyers around the country to stop all cases questioning Obama’s eligibility before discovery can force Obama to open up his top secret life?
Now I realize that leftists, I mean liberals, no “progressives” – don’t like getting all bogged down in minutia and nit-picky details like the Constitution, but this is actually very serious business here. We are talking about the top-down leadership of the ruling political Party knowingly and wantonly defrauding voters by way of playing monkey business with fraudulent election documents.
As Al Gore once said, the debate is OVER!
There is no honest debate on the matter anymore. Obama is NOT a constitutional president, which is to say, we do NOT have a constitutional federal administration at present and every anti-American policy of the last six months is also, BINGO! – Unconstitutional!
What is still in question however – does any court in America have the backbone to do what must be done? – And what do the American people do, if not one court in the nation has that kind of constitutional backbone today?
Obama’s DOJ has thus far been successful in blocking the people’s access to the courts by claiming that no American citizen, including another presidential candidate, has “proper standing” to demand proof of Obama’s constitutional eligibility for the office he fraudulently holds.
To be very clear, the RNC nomination form filed with the states certifies that John McCain met all constitutional requirements for the Office of President. But the DNC nomination form filed with the states is absent any such language.
I know what I conclude from these facts, but what do you conclude from these facts?
More importantly, what will a court of law conclude? Will they ever even agree to hear the evidence?
[link to canadafreepress.com]
JB Williams Most recent columns
JB Williams is a business man, a husband, a father, and a writer. A no nonsense commentator on American politics, American history, and American philosophy. He is published nationwide and in many countries around the world. JB Williams’ website is jb-williams.com/
JB Williams can be reached at: letters@canadafreepress.com
The Regulator
[link to theregulatorsvigilancecommittee.ning.com] |
| dfssdf
User ID: 771836
United States
9/15/2009 2:57 PM
Report abusive post | | Re: Judge Carter is Granting us Expedited Discovery - Immediately !!!! OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE | Quote |
huge |
| Page 1 Previous Page Next Page | |
|
