| Users Online Now: 1,370 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 326,880 | |
| Pageviews Today: 523,231 | Threads Today: 163 | Posts Today: 3,081 |
| 06:46 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,370 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 326,880 | |
| Pageviews Today: 523,231 | Threads Today: 163 | Posts Today: 3,081 |
| 06:46 AM | ||
If you think a plane crashed in Shanksville, LISTEN TO THIS! | |
| Flight 93 hoax User ID: 768905  United States09/12/2009 12:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 717934 United States09/12/2009 10:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 769567 United States09/12/2009 10:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 765463  Canada09/12/2009 10:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 769567 United States09/12/2009 10:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 766570 United States09/12/2009 10:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nope, I don't think a plane crashed in shanksville. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 717934No plane parts, no wreckage = NO PLANE There was wreckage reported by both the private land owners and federal investigators. Are you saying that they're all liars? [link to en.wikipedia.org] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 769567 United States09/12/2009 10:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here seems to be what the talk is about with the link at the bottom. Media not reporting when 'Flight 93 found buried' further proves it didn't Only ONE photo shows alleged Flight 93 debris being excavated . . . and Pat Curley is a moron Hoodwinked at Shanksville: The Boeing 757 Challenge [link to killtown.blogspot.com] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 758380 United States09/12/2009 10:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 769567 United States09/12/2009 10:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There was wreckage reported by both the private land owners and federal investigators. Are you saying that they're all liars? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 766570[link to en.wikipedia.org] That piece looks totally planted. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 769567 United States09/12/2009 10:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 769520 United States09/12/2009 10:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There was wreckage reported by both the private land owners and federal investigators. Are you saying that they're all liars? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 769567[link to en.wikipedia.org] That piece looks totally planted. Laughable. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 769567 United States09/12/2009 10:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There was wreckage reported by both the private land owners and federal investigators. Are you saying that they're all liars? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 769520[link to en.wikipedia.org] That piece looks totally planted. Laughable. I know. It's looks like someone went to a plane graveyard and grabbed a burned out piece of fuselage and dropped it in some patch of shrubs and photographed it. Just look, that piece of debris is burned, but the shrubs and ground around it is not burned at all! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 766570 United States09/12/2009 11:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There was wreckage reported by both the private land owners and federal investigators. Are you saying that they're all liars? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 769567[link to en.wikipedia.org] That piece looks totally planted. Gee, that's some expert analysis you did..."it looks totally planted". Debris was found, it was reported by private and federal investigators, and there was an obvious smoldering hole in the ground, soooo.... If it wasn't a plane, what was it? Please don't default to "missile" or "bomb", because that would show that you didn't read about the remains found at the crash site. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 759674  Australia09/12/2009 11:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 766570 United States09/12/2009 11:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There was wreckage reported by both the private land owners and federal investigators. Are you saying that they're all liars? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 769567[link to en.wikipedia.org] That piece looks totally planted. Laughable. I know. It's looks like someone went to a plane graveyard and grabbed a burned out piece of fuselage and dropped it in some patch of shrubs and photographed it. Just look, that piece of debris is burned, but the shrubs and ground around it is not burned at all! That's because the piece flew through the air and landed there... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 769567 United States09/12/2009 11:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Gee, that's some expert analysis you did..."it looks totally planted". Quoting: Anonymous Coward 766570Debris was found, it was reported by private and federal investigators, and there was an obvious smoldering hole in the ground, soooo.... If it wasn't a plane, what was it? Please don't default to "missile" or "bomb", because that would show that you didn't read about the remains found at the crash site. Listen to the interview at about the 50 minute mark. They talk about that piece I believe along with another piece that had the United colors and it and do a beautiful job explaining why it's obviously planted. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 769567 United States09/12/2009 11:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 769520 United States09/12/2009 11:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Gee, that's some expert analysis you did..."it looks totally planted". Quoting: Anonymous Coward 769567Debris was found, it was reported by private and federal investigators, and there was an obvious smoldering hole in the ground, soooo.... If it wasn't a plane, what was it? Please don't default to "missile" or "bomb", because that would show that you didn't read about the remains found at the crash site. Listen to the interview at about the 50 minute mark. They talk about that piece I believe along with another piece that had the United colors and it and do a beautiful job explaining why it's obviously planted. Yes. The debris does not look like any American Airlines 747 known to man. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 766570 United States09/12/2009 11:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Truthseekr  User ID: 757308 United States09/12/2009 11:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There was wreckage reported by both the private land owners and federal investigators. Are you saying that they're all liars? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 769567[link to en.wikipedia.org] That piece looks totally planted. hellyea looks like it was cut n put there lol... how stupid did they think the people were?... i guess they only needed the story to work long enough to bring in all this new bullshit... and patriot act.... we were too slow... time to prepare for there next move |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 769220 United States09/12/2009 11:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nope, I don't think a plane crashed in shanksville. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 766570No plane parts, no wreckage = NO PLANE There was wreckage reported by both the private land owners and federal investigators. Are you saying that they're all liars? [link to en.wikipedia.org] There were debris and bodies found as far away as 15 miles from the supposed crash site. The only way for that to happen is for the plane to have broken apart in the air. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 769553 United States09/12/2009 11:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 769553 United States09/12/2009 11:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 752212 United States09/12/2009 11:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 766570 United States09/12/2009 11:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nope, I don't think a plane crashed in shanksville. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 769220No plane parts, no wreckage = NO PLANE There was wreckage reported by both the private land owners and federal investigators. Are you saying that they're all liars? [link to en.wikipedia.org] There were debris and bodies found as far away as 15 miles from the supposed crash site. The only way for that to happen is for the plane to have broken apart in the air. Heavy articles, other than paper or very small shards, we only found up to about a mile and a half away. [link to www.popularmechanics.com] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 398839 United States09/12/2009 11:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Flight 93 hoax 768905 I'll be SO glad when you loons stop spouting this horseshit. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 769553 United States09/12/2009 11:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's because the piece flew through the air and landed there... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 766570What do you mean? A singed piece of metal from a crash can fly far from the impact site and land in an area that isn't burned... Most of the plane dug underground. How did that piece of fuselage not only escape following the rest of the plane underground, but get all stripped off of its interior insulation and get its painted burned off, but then land without being on fire or even smoking? The jury is in. That piece was planted. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 769553 United States09/12/2009 11:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 766570 United States09/12/2009 11:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Gee, that's some expert analysis you did..."it looks totally planted". Quoting: Anonymous Coward 769553Hey what's your expert analysis that it wasn't planted? Could you tell if something was planted? So you can't support your off-the-cuff remark and want to throw the burden of proof to me? I'm quoting the "experts" who did the investigations. I'm also quoting the private land owners who reported the debris on their property. The burden of proof is on the conspiracy theorists to show that they're lying. Simply saying so doesn't make it so. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 768164 United States09/12/2009 11:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nope, I don't think a plane crashed in shanksville. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 717934No plane parts, no wreckage = NO PLANE There was a lot of magic on that day. The plane that dissintegrated in Pa. the plane that magically squeezed into that little hole in the pentagon. You guys just don't believe in magic. Prolly don't believe in Santa Clause either. It's your loss. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 766570 United States09/12/2009 11:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's because the piece flew through the air and landed there... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 769553What do you mean? A singed piece of metal from a crash can fly far from the impact site and land in an area that isn't burned... Most of the plane dug underground. How did that piece of fuselage not only escape following the rest of the plane underground, but get all stripped off of its interior insulation and get its painted burned off, but then land without being on fire or even smoking? The jury is in. That piece was planted. A plane crash at high speeds is a pretty chaotic event. Stuff flies everywhere. Just look at car crashes. Because a piece of metal gets shorn off doesn't mean it will be "burning". |
