Thanks TX for posting. I tried reading through the first round but my head started spinning on page 1.

I guess I was expecting....(head in the clouds)....
I'm not sure what I was expecting but my gut wasn't reacting positively. It was too much legalese instead of clear cut and straight to the point language. Conyers was right. You need 2 lawyers to interpret the language and 2 more to decipher their interpretations. Lawyer liars are not to be trusted.

Is it safe to assume that this plan does NOT read anything like other universal plans around the world? I have been looking into the Swedish system [link to www.sweden.se] but I really want to see their actual plan to compare how it's organized and worded.

I don't get how this plan is supposed to positively benefit "We the People". I really don't.

Now, I am in the camp that the US should have had the best health care system in the world. However, as I began reading section I. I swear nothing I expected to see was in there.

Thanks again.