Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,486 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 209,910
Pageviews Today: 344,403Threads Today: 131Posts Today: 2,300
03:37 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject The final verdict on NASA´s Apollo Missions: No. Here is why not and how they pulled it off
Poster Handle Skeptic the First
Post Content
Seems like you're the liar. Here's a NASA article from 2005:
[link to science.nasa.gov]

And oh look, here's an interview conducted with a NASA
scientist from 1998!
[link to www.pbs.org]
 Quoting: DrPostman

No, NASA is the liar. Both NASA itself, and its fanboys everywhere (especially in this forum!), specifically pointed to the lack of water in "moon rocks" as proof of their lunar origin.

[link to www.space.com (secure)]
---
"Compared with terrestrial samples, all lunar rocks are oddballs because they are so dry," Ryder said. "They contain no molecules of water, they're not oxidized and they contain no ferric iron. They're easy to distinguish from rocks on Earth."
---

[link to www.newser.com]
---
Water Found in Moon Rock
Discovery stuns lunar experts

(Newser Summary) – Water has been detected in moon rock brought to Earth by Apollo astronauts, reports Space.com. A team used a new super-sensitive technique to discover the water in volcanic glass beads in the rock. The stunning find, detailed in the journal Nature, is forcing scientists to rethink theories about the moon's origin 4.5 billion years ago.
---

When we first got these "moon rocks," they caused scientists to redo all their theories to fit them. So now the same scientists are going to redo all their theories again, based on the same "moon rocks"? Gosh, it's amazing how hard those little rocks work to keep NASA rolling in $billions, year after year and decade after decade.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP