more reposts, for the people trying to understand the tech:

>
> Could someone please explain the difference between how radionic
> machines work from how Rife machines work. I truly do not understand.
Thanks.
>

Radionics has been described as "instrument-assisted Radiesthesia".
A Radionics practitioner endeavors to detect and influence speculative
energy fields by means of the psychic faculty.

A Rife practitioner seeks to kill pathogens by "resonant shattering" them with
their "Mortal Oscillatory Rate" in the manner of an opera singer shattering a
glass.

Radionics 'rates' are numerical representations of significances, while
Rife uses actual frequencies.

For more on Radionics google the exact phrase "History of Radionics"

-----------------------

>
> Somehow the definition of radionics was altered in the jump from books
> to the web. If you search 'radionics' you get overwhelmed with info
> presenting it as almost witchcraft, but if you search "history of
> radionics" you get it's actual origins and no clue how it jumped from
> that to what it is now. This much we know:
>
> 1. Disease creates certain biological reflexes in the ill person.
> 2. A healthy test subject's body will produce the same reflexes if
> brought into contact with the ill person.
> 3. A healthy test subject's body will produce the same reflexes if
> brought into contact with just disease tissue from the ill person.
> 5. A healthy test subject's body will produce the same reflexes if
> brought into contact with even just a spot of blood from the ill
> person.
>
> From the above a new method of diagnosis is suggested, and this
> evolved into radionics.
>
> Detection of the reflex
>
> They originally checked for the specific biological reflex by
> 'percussing' the person's abdomen and listening for a characteristic
> note. After evaluating other methods for their potential to be taught
> to others they switched to stroking a glass rod across the abdomen of
> the person while feeling for a 'stick'. Eventually this was replaced
> by a 'stick plate' which was a metal plate with latex stretched over
> it, which the practitioner stroked with his fingertips. The idea was
> that this took the place of the test subject's abdomen, but that's not
> really true. If you really consider what part does what, the stick
> detector is in fact taking the place of the glass rod, it is the
> practitioner's fingertips replacing the test subject's abdomen. What
> we really have here is the practitioner doing the job of both the test
> subject and examiner, it is the biological reflex of the practitioner
> responding to the emmanations from the blood spot obtained from the
> ill person.
>
> Now here's where it get's fun. We're not limited to medical
> conditions, in fact they are more or less prohibited by law. But there
> are psychics that can touch an item belonging to a person and get
> psychic 'impressions' about that person, and that ability merges well
> with everything described so far. And it gets us beyond just a spot of
> blood for the energetic link, we can use a lock of hair, a photo, a
> sample of their handwriting, etc. In radionics these are called the
> 'Witness'.
>
> But not everyone is a psychic, or at least not anymore, or perhaps
> just not at first. But everyone right now is at least intuitive enough
> to feel basic agreement-with or protest-toward a thing they become
> aware of. You see a picture of a politician you don't like, you feel
> this primal protest-to or agreement-with the politician immediately
> upon becoming aware of them, and you feel it _before_ you remind
> yourself why you don't like them, you feel it _before_ you "think"
> about them, because the impulse isn't from your brain, it's from your
> body; it's "the mind of the flesh", the "Enteric Nervous System", the
> Solar Plexus, the Abdominal Brain, the 'gut' brain. It does not deal
> in opinions and evaluations, it is the domain of things that are
> already known. It is the source of the reflex used in radionic
> analysis. Information from this source is fundamentally different from
> the interplay of assorted drives and barriers that color everything
> that comes out of our brains, it is the reason people say things like
> "I did it even though I knew I shouldn't have" or "I tried but I knew
> it wouldn't work", it is HOW they KNEW. You see from their own words
> the reason competent people FAIL is because they do not incorporate
> data from this source into their decisions.
>
> Enter Dowsing
>
> When you dowse with a pendulum you are communicating with this non-
> verbal source of data that is for some reason occluded in modern man.
> You drill an association between the primal expressions of Protest and
> Agreement and the characteristic pendulum motions until 'yes' and 'no'
> responses to your thoughts flow freely from it. That is what you do to
> get good with a pendulum. You do not "bless" the pendulum, burn
> incense to it, or invoke the Archangel Bob to guide it, you just think
> about things and spot the reactions in the pendulum. Everyone alive
> has a pulse, and this pulse is converted by physics into a rotation of
> the pendulum. You adjust the length of the thread or whatever until
> you find the resonant point at which the pendulum 'comes alive'. The
> reactions you watch for turn the circular path into an ellipse.
>
> Your eventual goal is to become aware of the bodily reflexes that
> result in the 'yes' or 'no' reactions of the pendulum so that you
> perceive them DIRECTLY and no longer need the pendulum at all. This
> stage represents restored communication between your conscious mind
> and the abdominal brain, and on your way to reaching it you will
> experience the various types of 'psychic' phenomena reported in this
> list by users of Astral Interface. Whether it represents a lost
> faculty being reclaimed or a connection that hasn't evolved yet, it is
> a fundamental part of the path to becoming the new kind of psychic
> that I predicted would come out of the Astral Interface project, and
> we've proven it. A simple 'yes' or 'no' poll in this list currently
> shows 77.78% of respondents have experienced increased psychical
> awareness after at least a few weeks of use, and it's not a rigged
> poll, for example I didn't vote in it myself, and one of AI's own
> distributors has answered 'no'(they have elsewhere answered 'yes' to
> successfully manifesting intentions). This is up from a much older
> poll that showed around 37%, so duration of use is a factor.
>
> I'm taking a break now, later I'll re-read your questions and work my
> way up to them, but you wanted it from the beginning :)
>
> - Magnus
>
> If this kind of thing is of use I could include it in the next
> distro.
>
> Note to lamers, I retain ownership of the above, don't pepper it with
> made up words and pretend it's your own data.
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "Scott Hendrickson"
> <mindfu@y...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From the help file:
> > "Astral Interface is more than just a visual representation of a
> > radionics device, it actually has symbolic 'virtual circuitry'
> > embedded beneath the surface. This principle has been used elsewhere
> > to embed subliminal sigils into web pages to draw off energy from
> the
> > visitors that view it, but here it is used to channel the psionic
> > energy of the operator to perform consciously directed radionics
> > work."
> >
> > Could you elaborate on this idea a bit and possibly point me to a
> > webpage that uses this technique?
>
> Okay, without spelling out any secrets, you've heard of 'pavlita
> generators' that start to spin just by staring at them, you've heard
> of the 'visual beam'. A neurologist will point out that the nerves of
> the eye only recieve, they don't beam anything. But picture a pipe
> carrying water from one pumping station to another. Each station has a
> valve and pressure meter on the pipe. The water only goes one way. Now
> suppose you wanted to communicate to the pumping station downstream
> from you. You could turn the water on and off and send morse code to
> the station downstream. But how do you send information upstream from
> the other one when the water only goes one way? Well, if you open and
> close the valve on your end, the pressure going up and down will
> register on the meter of the pumphouse upstream. So even though the
> flow is FROM him TO you, you can still communicate upstream by
> controlling your own resistance to the flow. That's how I took out
> four of the people doing the psychic attacks last year by the way, if
> you were around then.
>
>
>
> Well, it's hard to believe Astral Interface is a year old this month.
> I recently had a look at the first release and could not believe
> something with such a primitive appearance could have caused all the
> commotion that it did. We didn't even have PSI Field in those days,
> just the idea that an experienced practitioner's ability could be
> encoded in a form that could be recreated by an end user's computer. I
> remember being startled by the first testimonies that were posted. I
> wasn't 100% sure AI would work for anyone besides me, but suddenly
> users of software that had been around for years jumped ship, admitted
> they were unsatisfied with what they had, and hopped on board AI.
> Hardline occultists that made their living wasting people's time and
> money with "training" were furious that nobody needed them anymore, as
> if anyone ever did. I remember how newbies posted shocking testimonies
> about changing the weather or some other dramatic act on their first
> try with AI, and the experts still tried to tell them software
> wouldn't work *after the fact*. Naturally in no time flat every player
> in the yahoo radionics scene appointed themselves AI's opposition, but
> it didn't do them any good. The truth was out, the "experts" didn't
> know anything about radionics after all, they were just making up new
> words and sticking them on old occult practices. We've always heard
> them assert that radionics was "all in the mind" and that "the mind
> did all the work", but they never seemed to know what exact mechanism
> of the mind was at work, or how exactly it was pressed into service on
> demand. Instead they taught of spells and blithered about conjuring
> entities and other gutter ambitions and told us that was radionics.
> Abrahms, Heironymus, De LeWarr, you won't find this occult blithering
> in any of their writings. Unfortunately it's the occultists that
> reached the web first, and have subverted the practice of radionics
> for everyone. At least until now. Now we have a whole year of
> experience with AI. We know now that it's true that Man has paranormal
> abilities of his own, apart from any boobytrapped 'gifts' he could get
> from occult entities. We know now that a new type of psychic can
> indeed be created by technology like MindWave, whether by uncovering
> dormant abilities or by stimulating the development of totally new
> ones. Radionics is *not* dependent on occult training because it is
> *not* magick, not any more than hypnosis or biofeedback or cybernetics
> are magick, and we've proven it."
>