Earths polar motion unchanged since September 19, 2009. Is this the cause of all the large earthquakes?

Hey Dickhead! Read the fucking link I posted that states what Chandlers Wobble is!

Hey Stupid! The report on the Earth Orientation Center. MORAN!

The only thing coming out of my ass is your brains!
Shit for Brains Mother Fucker!

Interesting indeed!
I wonder what is causing that?
It's too early for the shift.
The magnetic field hasn't even flipped yet.

Yes it can if some other large object's magnetic field is putting pressure on the Earth (and other planets in the solar system).

Dude - why are you so touchy about what may or may not happen???

These are some of the "signs" that most people blow off and ignore (till it is too late).

Matter cannot be created nor destroyed. Even us humans are made from the elements of the earth. Now what if humans act as counter weights? Depending on where we go, it may affect the balance of the weight distribution

The data is clearly visible for the 7 days prior to or preceeding each earthquake. I did not say the data was for the date of the earthquakes. There is a big difference.

[link to 74.125.153.132]

There is a diagram on this page about2/3 of the way down that shows that the tilt of the earth's axis remains constant (points in the same direction) from season to season.

If anything, the Sun is involved, as always.
The Sun is not static, many,(idiots), seem to think it is.
As the Earth revolves around the Sun, and if there is a little warp to the orbital symmetry, perhaps then, the polar motion seems unchanged.(?)
(or, earthquakes are possibly caused. still, who knows, exactly? (perhaps, someone does know, hmmm.))

ok i give up im a fag. ok?

im sorry for being a bitch all this time. its only because i have some complexes about myself.
i will to the best of my ability stop being a bittch fakk

Can someone explain how the polar motion has come to a standstill amongst all these quakes?

I recall the 2004 9.0 Sumatra had altered the Earths rotation because the Eath was 'ringing like a bell'.

You are correct but the poles are always in a state of movement. According to this data the Earth has held itself in the same position pole wise since for the past 12 days.

[link to www.theaustralian.news.com.au]

BURIED in the squiggles on seismographs may be tiny pointers that will help scientists predict when and where a lethal earthquake will strike.

Experts admit both goals lie beyond the horizon, although some see progress towards the "where" part of the dream.

"In terms of quake prediction, I don't think we'll ever be able to say things like, 'next Thursday, at two o'clock'," said Sandy Steacy, a professor of environmental sciences at Northern Ireland's University of Ulster. But, in some respects, "we are closer" to figuring out where, she said.

Experts are aided especially by the big quakes of the past. The greatest help has come from the 9.1-magnitude tremor that struck west of the Indonesian island of Sumatra on December 26, 2004, unleashing a tsunami that claimed 250,000 lives.

The catastrophe provided geologists with the best chance in decades to unlock knowledge about a quake's knock-on effects.

The biggest quake in 40 years made the planet ring like a bell for weeks. Global positioning system stations set up to monitor land movements found Earth's crust had shifted by between 5mm and 10mm at sites up to 3000km from the epicentre.

In the weeks that followed, Professor Steacy's colleague, John McCloskey, worked the calculations. In March 2005, he declared another quake, on a possible scale of 8.4, could soon erupt on the same fault just south of the 9.1 event. Using language that, for a seismologist, was exceptionally blunt, he said: "We are not trying to cry wolf ... When it comes to earthquakes, lightning does strike twice."

His warning was based on knowledge of other areas where quakes have cascaded down a fault, ripping open one section after another. The analogy is that of a shirt being ripped open. When one button is torn off, stress passes on to the next button until it eventually pops, and so on.

Within two weeks, Mr McCloskey was proved chillingly right. An 8.7 quake occurred smack where he had predicted it.

But sustaining such success was elusive. A further prediction that the next southbound section of fault, near Padang, would fail turned out to be wrong. The next earthquake "jumped", occurring further south near Bengkulu, in September 2007, with a magnitude 8.5 shake.

Padang, meanwhile, has had its big quake. The 7.6 event on Wednesday may have killed thousands, Indonesian officials fear.

But how it happened was unexpected. The quake did not derive from a build-up of domino-like stress, said French expert Robin Lacassin, of the Institute of the Physics of the Globe in Paris.

It occurred at greater depth, apparently where a mighty piece of Earth's crust, the Australia plate, contorts as it slides beneath the Sunda plate to the east.

"It happened at some depth, around 80km. It appears to have occurred in the subducted plate, beneath the face where the two plates meet," Professor Lacassin said.

Lessons about domino-style faults could be a lifesaver in northwestern Turkey, where the 1999 Izmit earthquake boosted stress on the North Anatolian fault, Professor Steacy said.

Alerted, the city of Istanbul was taking steps to mitigate damage and beef up earthquake training in expectation of a future shake, she said.

The GLP Report

For those that don't get it, google precession. It is why we are leaving the age of pisces and entering into the age of aquarius. The sphinx indicates the age of leo.

He probably dislikes people trying to spread bullshit and lies.

From the January 17, 2005 Scientific American interview with a JPL scientist here [link to www.scientificamerican.com]

SA: Did the tilt of the earth's axis change as well?

The earth wobbles as it rotates because its mass is not balanced about its rotation axis, just like a tire on a car will wobble as it rotates if the tire is not perfectly balanced. The size of the planet's wobble is usually about 33 feet. As the India plate subducted beneath the Burma plate, the mass of Earth was rearranged, not only causing the speed of rotation to change, which causes the length of the day to change, but also causing the wobbling motion of the planet to change by about an inch. The wobble is also affected by other influences, such as changes in atmospheric pressure.

Nibiru as just magnetical gripped Earth Core...

Ztas were Right, that all the time!!!!

The Earth is expanding; getting larger in circumfrance.
[link to www.expanding-earth.org]

THE EARTH IS GROWING AND EXPANDING RAPIDLY

by

EXTERNAL ACCRETION

(METEORITES, DUST AND SOLAR ENERGY)

and

INTERNAL CORE EXPANSION

(BY GRAVITATIONALLY INDUCED HEATING)

(The mechanisms and a new cosmology)

Lawrence S. Myers

(Revised 29 April 2005)



The map shown here is PROOF of Earth's growth and expansion in just the last ~200 million years--proving there were NO oceans (now covering over 70% of the planet) when it was 40% smaller than it is today.

The evidence is obvious, unmistakable and irrefutable!

OP is referring to the apparent "flat line" after 19 Sep 2009 in the graphs of "dX / UAI 2000" and "dY / UAI 2000" (bottom pair of graphs) in the page at:
[link to hpiers.obspm.fr]

This is what I suspect has happened:
These parameters are automatically calculated on a scheduled daily basis using data from the sensors, or whatever. The process is completely automated and there is probably little or no human input, and apparently not much monitoring.

The programs to do this are probably well designed so that if there is some problem with the source data, the program simply spits out the result of the last successful calculation.

I suspect that the last successful calculation was made for data on 18 or 19 Sep, and since then the same value has been plotted in the graph.

So these parameters have not actually stopped changing; the program that calculates them has had a problem and has spat out the same number since that time. That is my theory.

Has someone sent a e-mail to someone at the site to ask about it? There is an e-mail address on [link to hpiers.obspm.fr]

What happens to cause the reversals, well, the tilting is like what you refer to as…say

your ‘rocking chair’ it goes backward and forward, yes, well that’s it, your Earth going backward and forward as it seeks to get a balance on her ‘new poles’ (?) that have realigned with the spin of the Northern and Southern vortices. Once the tilting steadies, then the earth hangs in balance, to move to or fro is not going to allow for the ‘reverse spin’ so she stops after tilting and hangs in BALANCE. This will begin your time of Stasis.

Hanging in this balance without moving forward or backward will produce atmospheric and environmental responses. You will refer to them as disasters, but it is part of the re-righting of the Earth’s axis.



She stands in balance, steady and unmoving while that which is not in vibration with her ascending movement is released from her gravitational forces. The magnetics at the Earth’s core will release and trigger propulsion that forces the involution of space and time as you know it. With such an involution the vortices will ‘suck-in’ or pull to one another and combust at the Earth’s Centre.


[link to abundanthope.net]

So then you are agreeing that you are a MEAN, NASTY, OBSCENE, WASTE OF LIFE. Great glad we could clear that one up.

As far as being erroneous, nothing you post, state or imagine is provable, it is just your opinion. You can't say that other people agree with you, they have to say it themselves.

You have proven yourself to be a pathetic little man and nothing more.

I didn't ASK you what Chandler's Wobble was, now did I? NO, I didn't, dickwad. Now... WHAT did I ask you? Let's see it's quoted just above... let's just see if you can READ IT. In case you can't(that seems likely) I'll quote it for you. I asked you "What the heck is "Chandler's law"??"(I've bolded it for you as well). Why did I ASK that? I ASKED it because you said: (Here comes another direct quote.. ready?) "...thus eliminating Chandler's law."

Now... let's try again, shall we babycakes? Try to read this ONE WORD AT A TIME and see if you can answer the question I am ACTUALLY ASKING. Here it is... READY? OK, here we go...

What the heck is "Chandler's law"??

QUOTE the alleged "report", moran.

Really. Why don't you explain, point by point, exactly what you meant when you posted the bolded part above. You can't because you were simply blowing smoke out your ass.