| | | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 | Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 813118
11/7/2009 9:53 PM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
[ link to solarsystem.nasa.gov]
Please note also in this NASA website, that they mention the "occational passing star" disturbing the oort cloud and keiper belt. When do stars pass occationally? Why would they say that?
Concider their mention of the Occasional Passing Star. Lets see here, either they are lying, or they are practicing "psuedo-science" as it has been called on this thread. Because as far as i know, besides their nightly trek across the sky, most stars that are openly visable, stay where they are. I have never seen any kind of star close enough to be knocking oort cloud objects around.
I suspect that the whole notion of scale evades you.
The local galaxy is big. Very, very big. |
| Tantalus
User ID: 438726
11/8/2009 2:33 AM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
The comets supposedly from the Oort Cloud have periods of thousands, if not millions of years. So they could have been knocked out of the Oort Cloud long ago when no one would have noticed.
Nearby stars do move around the sky, albeit very slowly. Barnard's Star is at a distance of 6 light years, and moves about 10 arcseconds a year
[ link to en.wikipedia.org]
It is moving towards us and will be 3.8 light years away at closest approach. Probably not close enough to perturb the Oort Cloud, but it does provide proof of concept.
Gee, Wally, there sure are alot of comets tho.
As of May 2009 there are a reported 3,648 known comets of which about 1500 are Kreutz Sungrazers and about 400 are short-period. This number is steadily increasing. However, this represents only a tiny fraction of the total potential comet population.
Must be alot of stars out there with near misses to our solar system, getting close enough to distrub the oort cloud. Either that or, maybe a single repeat visitor. I mean if objects pass close enough to knock a couple of thousand large objects into elliptical orbits, you must also admit that at one point, one of these evidently frequent "passing stars" may have even passed close enough to become a permanent member to our solar system, like all of those comets from a simular speculated origin.
[link to en.wikipedia.org] |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 762134 (OP)
11/8/2009 4:31 AM | | Anonymous Coward
User ID: 813282
11/8/2009 4:49 AM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
So hows the new dog recipe book nancy is working on coming along??? |
| The Commentator
User ID: 587619
11/8/2009 4:52 AM
 | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
So hows the new dog recipe book nancy is working on coming along??? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 813282
Sadly it isn't going well, the dog ate their homework.
non sufficit Orbis |
| DrPostman  
Forum Moderator
User ID: 810765
11/8/2009 8:29 AM
 | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
When I said PX is near the Sun, it should have been obvious to you, it meant laterally....not distant. As far as PX hovering near the Sun, Nancy has a reason for this, and since you have been critical of her, without checking out her site, I feel there is no reason you would believe me, since you have your mind already made up. Why waste my time with trolls. Quoting: Volar 796327
No one is really wasting any time on you. We offer info that
exposes the nonsense you try to spew for those who you might
have confused with your silly claims. It is those readers
that I post for, and for my own edification because I learn
while researching answers.
"I've had two teenagers who were considering killing themselves, because they didn't want to
be around when the world ends. Two women in the last two weeks said they were contemplating
killing their children and themselves so they wouldn't have to suffer through the end of the world."
-- NASA Astrobiology Institute scientist David Morrison, on 2012 fears
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Battlefield Heroes is now in Open Beta
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Want to know if a site is down, or if the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
| Astronut
User ID: 715991
11/8/2009 11:12 AM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
You are asking me to believe NASA? Quoting: Volar 796327
You don't have to ask NASA, just ask any amateur astronomer, like me. I can vouch for just how much attention the constellation of Orion gets from anyone with a decent telescope and camera. |
| Astronut
User ID: 715991
11/8/2009 11:16 AM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
We were talking about seeing it with the "naked" eye. If you want to see it now, why don't you buy a nice telescope, with a good filter, and see for yourself, instead of looking at all the "videos", and "photos", of someone else's work. For this to happen you have to get out of your chair, and walk away from your computer. Quoting: Volar 796327
OMG, I have ALL of those things and I DO look for myself; there's NOTHING there! There is no "second sun;" if there were, I would be seeing it every time I do solar observing! |
| Astronut
User ID: 715991
11/8/2009 11:18 AM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
When I said PX is near the Sun, it should have been obvious to you, it meant laterally....not distant. Quoting: Volar 796327
If it was on any kind of eccentric trajectory that took it near the sun, it should very quickly be not near the sun any longer. So how many days until it emerges? It couldn't be more than a week.
As far as PX hovering near the Sun, Nancy has a reason for this, and since you have been critical of her, without checking out her site, I feel there is no reason you would believe me, since you have your mind already made up. Why waste my time with trolls. Quoting: Volar
If you think her theory as to why it should violate all the laws of physics has merit, please explain it to us. Otherwise it tells me you're not at all confident in her theory either. |
| Tantalus
User ID: 438726
11/8/2009 2:46 PM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
When I said PX is near the Sun, it should have been obvious to you, it meant laterally....not distant. As far as PX hovering near the Sun, Nancy has a reason for this, and since you have been critical of her, without checking out her site, I feel there is no reason you would believe me, since you have your mind already made up. Why waste my time with trolls. Quoting: Volar 796327
Have you ever heard of something called the "Venus Transit"
It is essentially when venus passes between earth and the sun. Venus' path across the face of the sun is clearly visable. So what your saying is that we can see this small planet called Venus pass in front of the sun, but we cannot see a large planet like nibiru do essentially the same thing.
Here is a photo of a venus transit:
[link to www.lunarplanner.com]
Here is a website explaining the nature of Venus transits.
[link to www.lunarplanner.com]
So what you are saying is that something like the venus transit cycle can be observed in such detail, but we can miss observation of a large planet like nibiru hanging out near the sun.
Sure. |
| Tantalus
User ID: 438726
11/8/2009 2:48 PM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
sorry, here is the second link again, it seems i posted the same link 2x.
Corrected Link:
[link to www.lunarplanner.com] |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 762134 (OP)
11/8/2009 3:08 PM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
When can I have a star and a shield? |
| Tantalus
User ID: 438726
11/8/2009 3:32 PM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
I'm open....His arrogance got in the way of properly introducing himself. Quoting: Volar 796327
Oh, and FYI, I was the first Named, ( non AC ), replier on the first page of this thread. You must have a memory problem, even with the history at your fingertips. |
| Tantalus
User ID: 438726
11/8/2009 3:35 PM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
I'm open....His arrogance got in the way of properly introducing himself.
Oh, and FYI, I was the first Named, ( non AC ), replier on the first page of this thread. You must have a memory problem, even with the history at your fingertips. Quoting: Tantalus 438726
Sorry, that sounds kinda rude, not meant to be, but just try to have a better memory, where as weak memory can be a weakness in these types of subject matter. |
| Tantalus
User ID: 438726
11/8/2009 3:38 PM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
sorry, here is the second link again, it seems i posted the same link 2x.
Corrected Link:
[ link to www.lunarplanner.com]
When can I have a star and a shield?
What, like a Deputy Sheriff? Alright, Deputy OP. |
| Volar
User ID: 796327
11/9/2009 12:48 PM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
When I said PX is near the Sun, it should have been obvious to you, it meant laterally....not distant.
If it was on any kind of eccentric trajectory that took it near the sun, it should very quickly be not near the sun any longer. So how many days until it emerges? It couldn't be more than a week.
As far as PX hovering near the Sun, Nancy has a reason for this, and since you have been critical of her, without checking out her site, I feel there is no reason you would believe me, since you have your mind already made up. Why waste my time with trolls.
If you think her theory as to why it should violate all the laws of physics has merit, please explain it to us. Otherwise it tells me you're not at all confident in her theory either. Quoting: Astronut
OK, I'll bite. Her explanation was described in 2005 entitled "ZETATALK: Where is Planet X?" Acknowledge the link below:
[link to www.zetatalk.com] |
| Astronut
User ID: 634208
11/9/2009 2:10 PM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
OK, I'll bite. Her explanation was described in 2005 entitled "ZETATALK: Where is Planet X?" Acknowledge the link below:
[ link to www.zetatalk.com]
Ok, first of all, her talk about earth stopping in its orbit is complete bullshit; if it had done that, my telescope would stop working altogether. Everything would be off.
"Currently, Planet X is not quite at the mid-point between the Earth and the Sun, very close to the Ecliptic or the Sun’s middle, and consequently you cannot see it because it’s like a dull fuzz ball in front of the Sun and reflects back the light that hits the dust cloud so intensely that it’s a terrific glare. If you were on the Sun’s side, looking at it, you’d be blinded, but if you’re on the Earth side, looking at it, it looks like a gray fuzz ball."
Again I ask, WHY DOESN'T ANYONE SEE THIS WHEN DOING SOLAR ASTRONOMY? Why don't I see a gray fuzz ball in front of the sun when I look at it with my telescope? I captured this image of Venus passing in front of the sun 5 years ago:
[link to farm1.static.flickr.com]
Where's planet X if it's sitting in front of the sun? This doesn't page answer my question Volar, it just emphasizes it.
"And who’s to say, among human cultures, how fast a large planet, 23 times the mass of Earth, a big magnet who roars into the Sun and comes to a screeching halt as it skids around the Sun because of the Repulsion Force"
What a bunch of pseudo-scientific garbage, how can anyone fall for this cult's BS? That aside, my main point is the above; there's nothing in front of the sun, I can provide live video to prove it. The earth hasn't stopped in its orbit, my telescope still works and depends on the earth moving through its orbit exactly as it should without a "planet X" stopping or messing with it.
"and the Book of Enoch states, ‘the constellations will not be right for the seasons’"
The constellations are exactly where they should be for the season. Every time I operate my telescope it's dependent on the constellations being where they should be.
Alright, I did my part, I checked out her site. It's completely counter to, and disproven by, my constant experience operating my telescope. I can provide live video showing planet X is not where she says it is. I can provide live video showing the stars and galaxies appear where they should be. I'd happily be the first to provide the live telescopic images of planet X if I were wrong and I'd eat my hat, but I know for a fact I'm not wrong.
Last Edited by Astronut on 11/9/2009 at 2:16 PM |
| KeepingItReal
User ID: 553451
11/9/2009 2:33 PM
 | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
OK, I'll bite. Her explanation was described in 2005 entitled "ZETATALK: Where is Planet X?" Acknowledge the link below:
[ link to www.zetatalk.com]
Ok, first of all, her talk about earth stopping in its orbit is complete bullshit; if it had done that, my telescope would stop working altogether. Everything would be off.
"Currently, Planet X is not quite at the mid-point between the Earth and the Sun, very close to the Ecliptic or the Sun’s middle, and consequently you cannot see it because it’s like a dull fuzz ball in front of the Sun and reflects back the light that hits the dust cloud so intensely that it’s a terrific glare. If you were on the Sun’s side, looking at it, you’d be blinded, but if you’re on the Earth side, looking at it, it looks like a gray fuzz ball."
Again I ask, WHY DOESN'T ANYONE SEE THIS WHEN DOING SOLAR ASTRONOMY? Why don't I see a gray fuzz ball in front of the sun when I look at it with my telescope? I captured this image of Venus passing in front of the sun 5 years ago:
[ link to farm1.static.flickr.com]
Where's planet X if it's sitting in front of the sun? This doesn't page answer my question Volar, it just emphasizes it.
"And who’s to say, among human cultures, how fast a large planet, 23 times the mass of Earth, a big magnet who roars into the Sun and comes to a screeching halt as it skids around the Sun because of the Repulsion Force"
What a bunch of pseudo-scientific garbage, how can anyone fall for this cult's BS? That aside, my main point is the above; there's nothing in front of the sun, I can provide live video to prove it. The earth hasn't stopped in its orbit, my telescope still works and depends on the earth moving through its orbit exactly as it should without a "planet X" stopping or messing with it.
"and the Book of Enoch states, ‘the constellations will not be right for the seasons’"
The constellations are exactly where they should be for the season. Every time I operate my telescope it's dependent on the constellations being where they should be.
Exactly. The earth is obviously not stalled in orbit. All you have to do is notice the change in seasons, occurring when and as they should. Nights are getting longer in the northern hemisphere. Snow is falling. Winter is coming. Six months ago the opposite was true. You don't even need to be an astronomer to see for yourself that the earth is not stopped in orbit. If the earth was stalled in orbit, NOBODY COULD DENY IT. It would be obvious to even the most uneducated on earth. They would be talking about it on the news.
So in order to explain why the seasons continue to occur as they always have, Nancy claims that the almighty Zetas move the earth to simulate the seasons. Why would they do this, and how could they possibly move the earth to allow us to see what is on the other side of the sun without messing up the relative positions if fixed stars. Why do occultations still happen exactly as predicted decades ago?
According to Nancy, the Zetas come to warn us that planet x is looming close by, the pole shift is imminent. The proof is that the earth is stalled in orbit since 2003, but the Zetas are covering up the proof of what they say to prevent us from freaking out. So why bother telling us in the first place? Nancy also says that the Zetas are not allowed to intervene, yet they move our planet around and hide the very thing that they have come to warn us of. Sounds like hard core intervention to me. Like all of the mountains of senseless and stupid drivel on the ZetaTalk website, none of it makes any sense if you learned anything in elementary school science class, and if you use a minimum of critical thinking skills.
News flash for everyone. Nancy has NEVER gotten one single astronomical prediction right. Not one! If you can provide an example of where she has, I would be very interested to see what you have. She said that Hale Bopp wasn't a comet, she said that the 2004 Venus transit would not happen. She claimed that Planet X would arrive in 2003 and all would see it. She claimed that planet X was imaged at specific coordinates by her imaging team, yet just last year, she finally admitted that she didn't understand how to read and interpret coordinates. She finally admitted that all this time (since 1995) she thought that RA and Dec were the same things as Alt and Azimuth. And the Zetas never corrected her mistake? People have pointed this out to her in the past, that she obviously didn't know how to read coordinates (she still insists that RA means Right Angle)and instead of accepting her error, she pig headedly called those people paid shills and banned them for daring to point out the obvious, that she didn't know how to read coordinates. One half of her imaging team, J. W. Dell has since admitted that nothing but hot pixels was imaged. If you don't believe me, check out this thread, where JWD has posted his version of what happened. It's a long thread, but you can search out his posts.
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
The linked thread was started because people with common sense and an interest in the truth got tired of being censored and banned by Nancy for posting evidence to counter her on her weekly "chat". There is a lot of good evidence there to challenge Nancy's claims.
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. |
| Astronut
User ID: 634208
11/9/2009 3:29 PM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
Exactly. The earth is obviously not stalled in orbit. All you have to do is notice the change in seasons, occurring when and as they should. Nights are getting longer in the northern hemisphere. Snow is falling. Winter is coming. Six months ago the opposite was true. You don't even need to be an astronomer to see for yourself that the earth is not stopped in orbit. If the earth was stalled in orbit, NOBODY COULD DENY IT. It would be obvious to even the most uneducated on earth. They would be talking about it on the news. Quoting: KeepingItReal
All very true. I am merely trying to show quantifiably that these claims are dead wrong. Of course any rational human would see that they're wrong just based on the day to day experiences you mention, but we seem to be past the point of rational debate here. Handwaving to "Zetas" moving the pole to simulate seasons may work to excuse the most superficial observations, but not hard quantitative observations made by showing where planet x is claimed to be. |
| Volar
User ID: 796327
11/9/2009 5:52 PM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
She claimed that Planet X would arrive in 2003 and all would see it. She claimed that planet X was imaged at specific coordinates by her imaging team, yet just last year, she finally admitted that she didn't understand how to read and interpret coordinates. She finally admitted that all this time (since 1995) she thought that RA and Dec were the same things as Alt and Azimuth. And the Zetas never corrected her mistake? People have pointed this out to her in the past, that she obviously didn't know how to read coordinates (she still insists that RA means Right Angle..... Quoting: KeepingItReal
Alright, it is obvious she has very little knowledge of “Astronomy”. However, if you have read everything she has written, it would be very difficult, for someone of her skill, and education, to constantly answer questions, concerning Planet X, and how everything else works in relation to it. The relentless dedication, and the many years she has spent, relating to this elusive Planet, is very extraordinary, indeed. So, how does she do it, or should I say where does she get her answers, if not tutored. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 814469
11/9/2009 5:56 PM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
You really have to eat a LOT of DOG to see PX.
Its true..
Nancy TOLD me... |
| KeepingItReal
User ID: 553451
11/9/2009 6:02 PM
| | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
She claimed that Planet X would arrive in 2003 and all would see it. She claimed that planet X was imaged at specific coordinates by her imaging team, yet just last year, she finally admitted that she didn't understand how to read and interpret coordinates. She finally admitted that all this time (since 1995) she thought that RA and Dec were the same things as Alt and Azimuth. And the Zetas never corrected her mistake? People have pointed this out to her in the past, that she obviously didn't know how to read coordinates (she still insists that RA means Right Angle.....
Alright, it is obvious she has very little knowledge of “Astronomy”. However, if you have read everything she has written, it would be very difficult, for someone of her skill, and education, to constantly answer questions, concerning Planet X, and how everything else works in relation to it. The relentless dedication, and the many years she has spent, relating to this elusive Planet, is very extraordinary, indeed. So, how does she do it, or should I say where does she get her answers, if not tutored. Quoting: Volar 796327
She answers questions, but the answers make no sense and can be proven false very easily. If her answers could withstand scrutiny I might agree, but they don't. Show me just one instance where her explanations regarding planet x can be verified. I bet you can't. Just because she has written mountains and mountains of this stuff, doesn't make it true. All it proves is that she is obsessed enough to write daily over the period of years. It doesn't make the content credible or true. As for the source of her answers, where does a writer of science fiction come up with ideas for a story? No aliens needed, just a little imagination.
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. |
| DrPostman
Forum Moderator
User ID: 810765
11/9/2009 6:49 PM
| | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
Alright, it is obvious she has very little knowledge of “Astronomy”. However, if you have read everything she has written, it would be very difficult, for someone of her skill, and education, to constantly answer questions, concerning Planet X, and how everything else works in relation to it. The relentless dedication, and the many years she has spent, relating to this elusive Planet, is very extraordinary, indeed. So, how does she do it, or should I say where does she get her answers, if not tutored. Quoting: Volar 796327
The whole premise of Zetatalk is BASED on astronomical claims!
She's had a 15 year obsession running with this claim and
dedicating 24/7 of her time since she started on this. Of
course she has a LOT of details. She's not stupid, just
messed up. I can cite lots of examples of people who can
come across as brilliant as Nancy who have just as complicated
mythologies that they are pushing. Ever read any of Sheldan
Nidle's stuff? When someone has an obsession they simply
don't walk away, unless they get mental health assistance.
I don't ever see her doing that.
Vonnegut said it best: "Nothing compares to the complicated
futility of ignorance.".
Are you aware that for most of the last 8 years she didn't have
a clue what RA and Dec meant? Yet she banged her drum loudly
as if she did. That's the kind of crap I'm talking about!
"I've had two teenagers who were considering killing themselves, because they didn't want to
be around when the world ends. Two women in the last two weeks said they were contemplating
killing their children and themselves so they wouldn't have to suffer through the end of the world."
-- NASA Astrobiology Institute scientist David Morrison, on 2012 fears
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Battlefield Heroes is now in Open Beta
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Want to know if a site is down, or if the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 811921
11/9/2009 6:59 PM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
You are asking me to believe NASA?
You don't have to ask NASA, just ask any amateur astronomer, like me. I can vouch for just how much attention the constellation of Orion gets from anyone with a decent telescope and camera. Quoting: Astronut
How about a decent infrared filter? Show me the "amateur" super cooled one could you? And your ability to photograph objects 9 AU away? How do amateurs systematically search for PX when they are told it doesn't exist? |
| Volar
User ID: 796327
11/9/2009 7:01 PM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
She claimed that Planet X would arrive in 2003 and all would see it. She claimed that planet X was imaged at specific coordinates by her imaging team, yet just last year, she finally admitted that she didn't understand how to read and interpret coordinates. She finally admitted that all this time (since 1995) she thought that RA and Dec were the same things as Alt and Azimuth. And the Zetas never corrected her mistake? People have pointed this out to her in the past, that she obviously didn't know how to read coordinates (she still insists that RA means Right Angle.....
Alright, it is obvious she has very little knowledge of “Astronomy”. However, if you have read everything she has written, it would be very difficult, for someone of her skill, and education, to constantly answer questions, concerning Planet X, and how everything else works in relation to it. The relentless dedication, and the many years she has spent, relating to this elusive Planet, is very extraordinary, indeed. So, how does she do it, or should I say where does she get her answers, if not tutored.
She answers questions, but the answers make no sense and can be proven false very easily. If her answers could withstand scrutiny I might agree, but they don't. Show me just one instance where her explanations regarding planet x can be verified. I bet you can't. Just because she has written mountains and mountains of this stuff, doesn't make it true. All it proves is that she is obsessed enough to write daily over the period of years. It doesn't make the content credible or true. As for the source of her answers, where does a writer of science fiction come up with ideas for a story? No aliens needed, just a little imagination. Quoting: KeepingItReal
Maybe so…..There are so many people attacking her, believing she is wrong. It is very refreshing, to discuss this topic, in a more logical, and rational way, believing the truth will eventually become apparent. |
| DrPostman
Forum Moderator
User ID: 810765
11/9/2009 7:02 PM
| | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
How about a decent infrared filter? Show me the "amateur" super cooled one could you? And your ability to photograph objects 9 AU away? How do amateurs systematically search for PX when they are told it doesn't exist? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 811921
How would you know decent from poor? You don't have the first
clue what amateur astronomers do and how they do it. That's
evident enough from your question on what and how they look
for things.
You sure do have some goalposts that are slippery as hell!
Last Edited by DrPostman on 11/9/2009 at 7:02 PM
"I've had two teenagers who were considering killing themselves, because they didn't want to
be around when the world ends. Two women in the last two weeks said they were contemplating
killing their children and themselves so they wouldn't have to suffer through the end of the world."
-- NASA Astrobiology Institute scientist David Morrison, on 2012 fears
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Battlefield Heroes is now in Open Beta
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Want to know if a site is down, or if the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 811921
11/9/2009 7:02 PM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
Zeta talk is a red herring. Drop the dog meat and keep your hands in plane sight. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 811921
11/9/2009 7:04 PM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
Just answer the question. Mr. Expert, why do you stop people from keeping a close eye out? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 811921
11/9/2009 7:11 PM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
To see an infrared object one needs a good infrared filter. Thats what IRAS was for. What amateur astronomy filter do you suggest compares to that Dr. P? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 811921
11/9/2009 7:14 PM | | Re: Nibiru planet X 2012 PROOF of Government conspiracy | Quote |
You got NOTHING but zeta spew Dr. P get the F out. 2013 comes along and no PX I'll apologize. Till then YOU gotta keep looking! |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 | |
|
