Users Online Now: 837 (Who's On?)		Visitors Today: 156,282
Pageviews Today: 376,768	Threads Today: 433	Posts Today: 6,927
07:02 PM

News

Back to Forum

Post New Thread

View Favorites

SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer, CONCEALS DATA SOURCE

RSS

Hide and Seek!
User ID: 792918
10/31/2009 9:27 AM
Report abusive post

SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer, CONCEALS DATA SOURCE

Quote

The “Statisticians: ‘Global Cooling’ a Myth” story

WILLIAM M. BRIGGS
"All manner of statistical analyses cheerfully undertaken"

Published by Briggs at 6:55 am under Bad Stats, Climatology
Oct 28 2009

“J’accuse! A statistician may prove anything with his nefarious methods. He may even say a negative number is positive! You cannot trust anything he says.”

Sigh. Unfortunately, this oft-hurled charge is all too true. I and my fellow statisticians must bear its sad burden, knowing it is caused by our more zealous brethren (and sisthren). But, you know, it really isn’t their fault, for they are victims of loving not wisely but too well their own creations.

First, a fact. It is true that, based on the observed satellite data, average global temperatures since about 1998 have not continued the rough year-by-year increase that had been noticed in the decade or so before that date.

The temperatures since about 1998 have increased in some years, but more often have they decreased. For example, last year was cooler than the year before last. These statements, barring unknown errors in the measurement of that data, are taken as true by everybody, even statisticians.

Th AP gave this data—concealing its source—to “several independent statisticians” who said they “found no true temperature declines over time”

[link to www.cbsnews.com]

How can this be? Why would a statistician say that the observed cooling is not “scientifically legitimate”; and why would another state that noticing the cooling “is a case of ‘people coming at the data with preconceived notions’”?

Are these statisticians, since they are concluding the opposite of what has been observed, insane? This is impossible: statisticians are highly lucid individuals, its male members exceedingly handsome and charming. Perhaps they are rabid environmentalists who care nothing for truth? No, because none of them knew the source of the data they were analyzing. What can account for this preposterous situation!

Love. The keen pleasures of their own handiwork. That is, the adoration of lovingly crafted models.

Let me teach you to be a classical statistician. Go to your favorite climate site and download a time series picture of the satellite-derived temperature (so that we have no complications from mixing of different data sources); any will do. Here’s one from our pal Anthony Watts.

[link to wattsupwiththat.com]

Now fetch a ruler—a straight edge—preferably one with which you have an emotional attachment. Perhaps the one your daughter used in kindergarten. The only proviso is that you must love the ruler.

Place the ruler on the temperature plot and orient it along the data so that it most pleases your eye. Grab a pencil and draw a line along its edge. Then, if you can, erase all the original temperature points so that all you are left with is the line you drew.

If a reporter calls and asks if the temperature was warmer or colder last year, do not use the original data, which of course you cannot since you erased it, but use instead your line. According to that very objective line the temperature has obviously increased. Insist on the scientificity of that line—say that according to its sophisticated inner-methodology, the pronouncement must be that the temperature has gone up! Even though, in fact, it has gone down.

Don’t laugh yet, dear ones. That analogy is too close to the truth. The only twist is that statisticians don’t use a ruler to draw their lines—some use a hockey stick. Just kidding! (Now you can laugh.) Instead, they use the mathematical equivalent of rulers and other flexible lines.

Your ruler is a model Statisticians are taught—their entire training stresses—that data isn’t data until it is modeled. Those temperatures don’t attain significance until a model can be laid over the top of them. Further, it is our credo to, in the end, ignore the data and talk solely of the model and its properties. We love models!

All this would be OK, except for one fact that is always forgotten. For any set of data, there are always an infinite number of possible models. Which is the correct one? Which indeed!

Many of these models will say the temperature has gone down, just as others will say that it has gone up. The AP statisticians used models most familiar to them; like “moving averages of about 10 years” (moving average is the most used method of replacing actual data with a model in time series); or “trend” models, which are distinct cousins to rulers.

Since we are free to choose from an infinite bag, all of our models are suspect and should not be trusted until they have proven their worth by skillfully predicting data that has not yet been seen. None of the models in the AP study have done so. Even stronger, since they said temperatures were higher when they were in fact lower, they must predict higher temperatures in the coming years, a forecast which few are making.

We are too comfortable with this old way of doing things. We really can prove anything we want with careful choice of models.

[link to wmbriggs.com]

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 792918 (OP)
10/31/2009 9:41 AM

Re: SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer, CONCEALS DATA SOURCE	Quote
RELATED: Dishonesty Regarding the Associated Press’ Seth Borenstein’s Global Warming Headline By Harrison, on October 28th, 2009 [link to harrisonprice.com]

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 807149
10/31/2009 9:47 AM

Re: SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer, CONCEALS DATA SOURCE	Quote
Global Warming Holocaust Denier!

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 792918 (OP)
10/31/2009 9:55 AM

Re: SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer, CONCEALS DATA SOURCE	Quote
Global Warming Holocaust Denier! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 807149 Yes, that's an intelligent response.

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 807149
10/31/2009 9:57 AM

Re: SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer, CONCEALS DATA SOURCE	Quote
Global Warming Holocaust Denier! Yes, that's an intelligent response. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 792918 Thanks. I thought so too.

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 792918 (OP)
10/31/2009 10:32 AM

Re: SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer, CONCEALS DATA SOURCE	Quote
Looks like the Global Warmers are getting desperate again. Must be that Copenhagen thing in December that's got them worried. Anything to prop up their planet in peril bs. Pathetic really.

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 807149
10/31/2009 10:34 AM

Re: SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer, CONCEALS DATA SOURCE	Quote
Heretic! Blasphemer!

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 792918 (OP)
10/31/2009 10:49 AM

Re: SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer, CONCEALS DATA SOURCE	Quote
HAS ANYONE READ THE COPENHAGEN AGREEMENT? [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 807149
10/31/2009 10:59 AM

Re: SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer, CONCEALS DATA SOURCE	Quote
HAS ANYONE READ THE COPENHAGEN AGREEMENT? [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 792918 They only know what they see on tv. Which is why they'll all be cheering when you get burned at the stake for witchcraft.

Back to Forum

Post New Thread

View Favorites

Disclaimer:
This website exists for entertainment purposes only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually review each and every one of the more than 10,000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis.

The content of post on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of GodlikeProductions. This site may contain adult content and if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.

Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.

This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Godlikeproductions.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.

Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.

We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.

This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.

Mail Webmaster with questions or comments about this site.

Privacy Policy - Terms Of Use

Copyright 1999-2009 © GodLikeProductions.com

Page generated in 0.005s (5 queries)