| | | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 | ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31
| Menow
User ID: 405501
10/31/2009 8:29 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
OK Menow, you got your question addressed because it was a quiet night. It was answered before, but you got it answered again. Quoting: Nancy Lieder
(snip)
No, it was not answered before. A DIFFERENT question was answered. If it reallY WAS answered, you would not be trying to answer it all over again. How stupid do you think people are? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 508118
10/31/2009 8:30 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Thanks Nancy & Zetas...... |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 807135
10/31/2009 8:31 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Ooh come on Mennow. You come here week after week after week.
It's because of your actions, your whining that your question isn't answered. And even if it was answered you would still go on and on and on about the answer.
As it will never satisfy you in my opinion
Well, Gerard, as my question outlines... If I ask a quesion and it is repeated back to me devoid of the real context, I call that a DODGE, not an answer! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 405501
Who cares? Deal with it. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 806179
10/31/2009 8:33 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Nancy-is there something to worry about your health issue.
Best wishes and Love sent to you. |
| Menow
User ID: 405501
10/31/2009 8:35 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
[ link to www.zetatalk.com]
"Where the repulsion force comes to equal the force of gravity by the time the objects in play would make contact, it builds at a rate that differs from gravity."
"The repulsion force is infinitesimally smaller than the force of gravity, but has a sharper curve so that it equals the force of gravity at the point of contact."
************************************************
Under those stated parameters, what caused PX to slow as it approached the Sun?
Well, her is the second attempt. let's see if it REALLY answers the question I asked...
SOZT
The hose of gravity particles emitted form the core of Planet X, encountering the hose of gravity particles emitted from the core of the Sun, when meeting each other head on, represented a force GREATER than the drawn of gravity particles drifting toward the Sun falling on the far side of Planet X. Quoting: Nancy Lieder
Huh? What does that even MEAN? And what is a "drawn"? Oh... It was supposed to be "DRAW", i guess? But that flies directly against the other Zetatalk I quoted. That was the whole POINT of my question, which you seem to have ignored.
In other words, as the article in the Science section of ZetaTalk states, the slow drift toward a gravity giant is COUNTERED by the explosion of gravity particles from that gravity center. When that occurs, the Repulsion Force has clicked in.
EOZT Quoting: Nancy Lieder
Again, you have ignored the quoted Zetatalk, which states the SPECIFIC STRENGHT PARAMATERS of the repulsion force. What you state, here, does NOT address the quoted Zetatalk, which contradicts what you have said here. |
| KeepingItReal
User ID: 553451
10/31/2009 8:36 PM
 | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
SOZT
This will only occur during the pole shift itself. Firestorms require that the atmosphere be ripped away, so these petrochemicals in the tail cross over volcanoes at close range. This situation does not develop until the hour of the pole shift.
EOZT
Atmosphere ripped away = no oxygen.
Yeah, great conditions for a firestorm. ROFLMAO.
Dear "KeepingItReal"
GET REAL dummy.
Not all the atmosphere is ripped away.
Blackcrow. Quoting: blackcrow
Oh really. Then why didn't Nancy say "sort of ripped away" or "partially ripped away" (it's not like it would make her statement any less ridiculous).
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. |
| Menow
User ID: 405501
10/31/2009 8:37 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Ooh come on Mennow. You come here week after week after week.
It's because of your actions, your whining that your question isn't answered. And even if it was answered you would still go on and on and on about the answer.
As it will never satisfy you in my opinion
Well, Gerard, as my question outlines... If I ask a quesion and it is repeated back to me devoid of the real context, I call that a DODGE, not an answer!
Who cares? Deal with it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 807135
I am "dealing" with it. I'm challenging the response. What do YOU do when you are bullshitted, walk away with your tail between your legs? |
| UnHinged Loon 
Danger, Will Robinson!
User ID: 768028
10/31/2009 8:39 PM
 | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Thanks Nancy and Zeta's! Good night  |
| blackcrow
User ID: 804159
10/31/2009 8:40 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
And how exactly would the titties power over men's collective mind be reduced?
(did I misunderstand the statement?)
Just by this response you wrote is evidence enough of what you fear.
Live from your heart, NOW, while you are incarnated here.
Do it NOW, don't concern yourself with your next incarnation.
Blackcrow. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 807461
Say what?
Last Edited by blackcrow on 10/31/2009 at 8:40 PM |
| Menow
User ID: 405501
10/31/2009 8:40 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
[ link to www.zetatalk.com]
"Where the repulsion force comes to equal the force of gravity by the time the objects in play would make contact, it builds at a rate that differs from gravity."
"The repulsion force is infinitesimally smaller than the force of gravity, but has a sharper curve so that it equals the force of gravity at the point of contact."
************************************************
Under those stated parameters, what caused PX to slow as it approached the Sun?
SOZT
The hose of gravity particles emitted form the core of Planet X, encountering the hose of gravity particles emitted from the core of the Sun, when meeting each other head on, represented a force GREATER than the drawn of gravity particles drifting toward the Sun falling on the far side of Planet X. In other words, as the article in the Science section of ZetaTalk states, the slow drift toward a gravity giant is COUNTERED by the explosion of gravity particles from that gravity center. When that occurs, the Repulsion Force has clicked in.
EOZT
We now can observe totally conflicting Zetatalk, side by side.
Today's: "The hose of gravity particles emitted form the core of Planet X, encountering the hose of gravity particles emitted from the core of the Sun, when meeting each other head on, represented a force GREATER than the drawn of gravity particles drifting toward the Sun falling on the far side of Planet X."
Previous: [link to www.zetatalk.com]
"Where the repulsion force comes to equal the force of gravity by the time the objects in play would make contact, it builds at a rate that differs from gravity."
"The repulsion force is infinitesimally smaller than the force of gravity, but has a sharper curve so that it equals the force of gravity at the point of contact."
What gives, Zetas? |
| Free Store
User ID: 146318
10/31/2009 8:41 PM
 | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Thanks Nancy and the Zetas
I am "dealing" with it. I'm challenging the response. What do YOU do when you are bullshitted, walk away with your tail between your legs? Quoting: Menow 405501
"do geese see god?"
"... lol, do your eyes need proof that they can see for to be able to see? "
gooderboy |
| Menow
User ID: 405501
10/31/2009 8:42 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Nancy.... you skipped over my quesion at the top of page 3. Why?
Told you so mennow.
Quoting: Gerard
Yes, but you didn't say why my question wouldn't be answered. Why don't you take a stab at WHY?
Nothing, Gerard? Why wouldn't my question be answered? What was wrong with it?
I think keep asking someone for his/her private affair is STS enough.
Private affair? Gerard came on talking about ME! How is that HIS "private affair"?
I was referring to the past, are you that forgetful? Quoting: The Devil in Angel Disguise 807501
I have no idea to what past "private affair" you are referring. |
| Menow
User ID: 405501
10/31/2009 8:46 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
And how exactly would the titties power over men's collective mind be reduced?
(did I misunderstand the statement?)
Just by this response you wrote is evidence enough of what you fear.
Live from your heart, NOW, while you are incarnated here.
Do it NOW, don't concern yourself with your next incarnation.
Blackcrow.
Say what? Quoting: blackcrow
So, Blackcrow, what percentage of the atmosphere do you think is ripped away? 10%? 20%? Do you know how it would affect the entire atmosphere if that happened? No? You don't check into things like that? You just believe whatever Nancy tells you? |
| Texas Uncensored
User ID: 807524
10/31/2009 8:49 PM
 | | Menow
User ID: 405501
10/31/2009 8:53 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
:voices:
Menow, short for minnow, which is fish bait, it's time for your meds.
:nursemeds: Quoting: Texas Uncensored
Personal attacks all you got? Yep. More ridiculous out-of-focus images of Venus to gush over? Yep. |
| Michael Mc Hed
User ID: 807487
10/31/2009 8:57 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Thank you Mrs. Lieder and good night.
“No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father” (Gospel acc. Mark 13:32) |
| The Lone Ranger
Debunking Zetatalk for the sake of the people
User ID: 805901
10/31/2009 8:59 PM
 | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Last Edited by The Lone Ranger on 10/31/2009 at 9:00 PM
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
"ZetaTalk is all crap. Nancy has spent over ten years writing and compiling a huge web site full of total bullshit. It's a work of true insanity, but useful for nothing other than students of manic disorders." Anonymous Coward. User ID: 597174. 7/11/2009 8:22 PM
--------------------------------
I concede that Nancy and ZetaTalk are not the most "trustworthy" of "sources" because her reputation, credentials and track record leave a LOT to be desired. Melfy 9/21/09 |
| Michael Mc Hed
User ID: 807487
10/31/2009 9:02 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Thanks Nancy and the Zetas
I am "dealing" with it. I'm challenging the response. What do YOU do when you are bullshitted, walk away with your tail between your legs?
FREE STORE :))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
“No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father” (Gospel acc. Mark 13:32) |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 731
11/1/2009 2:06 AM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Related articles on Disclosure:
Official Disclosure of Extraterrestrial Life is Imminent
October 21, 2009
[ link to www.examiner.com]
The impending disclosure announcement follows upon the secret implementation of a year long openness policy on UFOs and extraterrestrial life. Over the period February 12-14, 2008, the United Nations held closed doors discussions where approximately 30 nations secretly agreed on a new openness policy on UFOs and extraterrestrial life in 2009. The openness policy was implemented but never publicly announced due to threats against UN diplomats not to disclose details of the secret agreement. The timing would most likely coincide sometime soon after his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech on December 10, 2009 in Oslo, Norway. David Wilcock, a prominent researcher of emerging scientific paradigms claimed in a Coast to Coast AM radio interview that “a 2-hour international TV special has already been booked that will introduce an alien species, similar to humans, to the world.” NASA and space researcher, Richard Hoagland concluded, also on the popular late night Coast to Coast AM radio show, that “LCROSS is part of a carefully constructed campaign to prepare the populace for imminent disclosure. Which ever of the above scenarios is used for announcing the existence of extraterrestrial life or technology, President Obama will figure prominently.
French Expert Publicly Emerges to Confirm Secret United Nations Meeting on UFO's
February 14, 2008
[ link to exopolitics.org]
A French aviation expert has come forward to reveal his participation in a secret meeting held at the United Nations New York headquarters that discussed the UFO phenomenon from February 12-14. Lorant revealed that a series of UN meetings were held over a three day period. In the meetings there was discussion of a confidential report, prepared by the U.S. Air Force and a branch of the National Guard, concerning the societal impact of UFO sightings. The initial meeting was held on February 12 and, according to Lorant's report, led to a request by three U.S. Senators for further discussions. Additional meetings were held immediately after on February 13 and 14. The implication is that three U.S. Senators attended the secret UN meetings. The meetings were very concerned about social upheaval from continued UFO sightings and the testimonies of individuals claiming to have first hand knowledge about UFO's, extraterrestrial life, and future global events. It was reported that adverse public reactions to UFO sightings could have a dramatic economic impact that could lead to recessions in some countries. 2009 was raised as the year when an important change in official attitudes concerning the UFO phenomenon could be made. The meetings results suggest that an official change in government policy from 'debunking' to 'openness' concerning UFO's would lead to official approval to narrowly define study of the UFO phenomenon. However, those claiming to have first hand experience of extraterrestrial life would be targeted as charlatans.
Hi Nancy! Quite a goundbreaking quote from ZT!! Astounding, atually!! Here is a question I hope you can answer...whenever...
Had the moron president GW Bush requested that the zetas not disclose his intetions- (ala Obama)- would they ha  ve agreed? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 731
11/1/2009 2:13 AM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Corrections: Moran- not moron, (as in the glp vernacular)
And how many life bearing plsces are there  in the universe?! |
| blackcrow
User ID: 804159
11/1/2009 3:28 AM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Oh really. Then why didn't Nancy say "sort of ripped away" or "partially ripped away" (it's not like it would make her statement any less ridiculous). Quoting: KeepingIt_UN_Real
Because, Oh ignorant one, if you had read the zetatalk website you would know that the Zeta's have said many times that PX would "rip away" a portion of the atmosphere. This is Zetatalk-101.
You are a knit-picking idiot.
Blackcrow.
Last Edited by blackcrow on 11/1/2009 at 3:35 AM |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 807732
11/1/2009 3:43 AM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
What I find that's funny is that YOU idiots still give her an audience. How many more times is she going to predict the passing of this invisible planet? How many dogs have you had euthanized? How in the hell would anyone let this continue?
I have a doomer friend who hangs on her every word, had me almost talked into believing all this bullshit (and other doomeer theories too) but I ain't biting anymore. He HOPES the end will come so that he can be right....Though I don't know why, he is fully dependent on the American taxpayers, so he will starve in the event of any disaster.
It's never bad to be prepared for a disaster, but to LIVE YOUR LIFE under a rock or believing the rantings of a lunatic is beyond me. Honestly, if a group of aliens that have "our best interests" at heart would certainly pick someone more credible to speak through....wait...if they are out there and really wanna help, why dont they show up and say, "The shit is going to hit the fan, be ready" or better yet, take care of the threat this mythical planet for us? Gimme a break!  |
| KeepingItReal
User ID: 553451
11/1/2009 3:49 AM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Oh really. Then why didn't Nancy say "sort of ripped away" or "partially ripped away" (it's not like it would make her statement any less ridiculous).
Because, Oh ignorant one, if you had read the zetatalk website you would know that the Zeta's have said many times that PX would "rip away" a portion of the atmosphere. This is Zetatalk-101.
You are a knit-picking idiot.
Blackcrow. Quoting: blackcrow
The one that is nit picking (not knit picking) and flip flopping is you, o wise and special one. This is science 101, stuff you should have learned in grade school.
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. |
| Nancy Lieder 
Forum Moderator
User ID: 807491
11/1/2009 6:51 AM
 | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Related articles on Disclosure:
Official Disclosure of Extraterrestrial Life is Imminent
October 21, 2009
[ link to www.examiner.com]
The impending disclosure announcement follows upon the secret implementation of a year long openness policy on UFOs and extraterrestrial life. Over the period February 12-14, 2008, the United Nations held closed doors discussions where approximately 30 nations secretly agreed on a new openness policy on UFOs and extraterrestrial life in 2009. The openness policy was implemented but never publicly announced due to threats against UN diplomats not to disclose details of the secret agreement. The timing would most likely coincide sometime soon after his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech on December 10, 2009 in Oslo, Norway. David Wilcock, a prominent researcher of emerging scientific paradigms claimed in a Coast to Coast AM radio interview that “a 2-hour international TV special has already been booked that will introduce an alien species, similar to humans, to the world.” NASA and space researcher, Richard Hoagland concluded, also on the popular late night Coast to Coast AM radio show, that “LCROSS is part of a carefully constructed campaign to prepare the populace for imminent disclosure. Which ever of the above scenarios is used for announcing the existence of extraterrestrial life or technology, President Obama will figure prominently.
French Expert Publicly Emerges to Confirm Secret United Nations Meeting on UFO's
February 14, 2008
[ link to exopolitics.org]
A French aviation expert has come forward to reveal his participation in a secret meeting held at the United Nations New York headquarters that discussed the UFO phenomenon from February 12-14. Lorant revealed that a series of UN meetings were held over a three day period. In the meetings there was discussion of a confidential report, prepared by the U.S. Air Force and a branch of the National Guard, concerning the societal impact of UFO sightings. The initial meeting was held on February 12 and, according to Lorant's report, led to a request by three U.S. Senators for further discussions. Additional meetings were held immediately after on February 13 and 14. The implication is that three U.S. Senators attended the secret UN meetings. The meetings were very concerned about social upheaval from continued UFO sightings and the testimonies of individuals claiming to have first hand knowledge about UFO's, extraterrestrial life, and future global events. It was reported that adverse public reactions to UFO sightings could have a dramatic economic impact that could lead to recessions in some countries. 2009 was raised as the year when an important change in official attitudes concerning the UFO phenomenon could be made. The meetings results suggest that an official change in government policy from 'debunking' to 'openness' concerning UFO's would lead to official approval to narrowly define study of the UFO phenomenon. However, those claiming to have first hand experience of extraterrestrial life would be targeted as charlatans.
Hi Nancy! Quite a goundbreaking quote from ZT!! Astounding, atually!! Here is a question I hope you can answer...whenever...
Had the moron president GW Bush requested that the zetas not disclose his intetions- (ala Obama)- would they ha ve agreed?
No, and the reason is the nature of the Call that Bush and Obama give. Obama is STO, Service-to-Other, the good guys, and thus those aliens like the STO Zetas I'm involved with respond to his Call. Bush on the other hand was STS, so any Call he gave was answered by STS aliens, who are NOT running this chat!
First they ignore you,
then they ridicule you,
then they fight you,
then you win. -Mahatma Gandhi. |
| Nancy Lieder
Forum Moderator
User ID: 807491
11/1/2009 6:58 AM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Nancy.... you skipped over my quesion at the top of page 3. Why?
Told you so mennow.
Quoting: Gerard
Yes, but you didn't say why my question wouldn't be answered. Why don't you take a stab at WHY?
Nothing, Gerard? Why wouldn't my question be answered? What was wrong with it?
So easy. Because of your whining, being obnoxious and stubborness. Or should i rather say that the Zetas don't bother to ask your question because it is only important for you.
You mean the "Zetas" play favorites? If they(or you)don't like someone, they won't answer a legitimate question?
Seems to me that everyone asks a question which is important to THEM, don't they? How is mine different? Quoting: Menow 405501
Menow gets ignored a lot because he (deliberately) asks questions which have been addressed before, like on a weekly basis. This is an attempt to disrupt. For weeks on end he/they were asking where the Dark Twin was. Same question, same answer, like they were hoping that this question would somehow convince readers that ZetaTalk was averse science. ZT in fact trumps human science, purporting facts LONG before human science becomes aware of them, like this recent ZT accuracy.
[link to www.zetatalk.com]
The debunkers are warned at the start of the chat that this behavior will be ignored, by this notice:
Chat Ground Rules!
This Live ZetaTalk chat is to give the public the opportunity to ask legitimate and pertinent questions. It is NOT so that
1. debunking campaigns can hold sway,
2. or to throw out insults,
3. or to insist endlessly that the world is normal,
4. or to attempt distraction from business at hand.
This is not about censorship but about allowing those who want to participate in the conversation to do so for the designated time, without being harassed and without constant distractions.
If a question has been asked and answered in previous threads or existing ZetaTalk, I will say so and attempt to point to the location of the answers. REPEATEDLY asking the question will be considered trolling.
First they ignore you,
then they ridicule you,
then they fight you,
then you win. -Mahatma Gandhi. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 806131
11/1/2009 10:11 AM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Oh really. Then why didn't Nancy say "sort of ripped away" or "partially ripped away" (it's not like it would make her statement any less ridiculous).
Because, Oh ignorant one, if you had read the zetatalk website you would know that the Zeta's have said many times that PX would "rip away" a portion of the atmosphere. This is Zetatalk-101.
You are a knit-picking idiot.
Blackcrow. Quoting: blackcrow
You didn't answer Menow's question. What percentage of the Earth's atmosphere is ripped away? |
| Menow
User ID: 405501
11/1/2009 10:20 AM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Nancy.... you skipped over my quesion at the top of page 3. Why?
Told you so mennow.
Quoting: Gerard
Yes, but you didn't say why my question wouldn't be answered. Why don't you take a stab at WHY?
Nothing, Gerard? Why wouldn't my question be answered? What was wrong with it?
So easy. Because of your whining, being obnoxious and stubborness. Or should i rather say that the Zetas don't bother to ask your question because it is only important for you.
You mean the "Zetas" play favorites? If they(or you)don't like someone, they won't answer a legitimate question?
Seems to me that everyone asks a question which is important to THEM, don't they? How is mine different?
Menow gets ignored a lot because he (deliberately) asks questions which have been addressed before, like on a weekly basis. Quoting: Nancy Lieder
No Nancy. You are not speaking the truth. I ask follow-up questions when you don't REALLY answer the first time, or the answer is pure bullshit or makes no sense. That is exactly what happened with the Dark Twin. Your answers were totally contradictory and you NEVER answered as to WHERE IT IS IN THE SKY. You show images allegedly of the Dark Twin, but then claim it can't be seen. You claim that it can't be seen at an angle to the Sun when all other objects CAN be seen under such circumstances. You claim that Sunlight only reflects back toward the source when we know otherwise. In other words, you spewed some utter bullshit and expect people to eat it up. HEH!
A perfect example again with my repulsion force question. Your "Zetas" took my question, removed the context, rephrased it to take out the very point of the question and then "answered" something I didn't ask at all. I referred to previous Zetatalk and said "UNDER THOSE STATED PARAMETERS" but that context and emphasis was IGNORED in a transparant attempt to avoid addressing the clear contradiction within the repulsion force claims.
This is an attempt to disrupt. For weeks on end he/they were asking where the Dark Twin was. Quoting: Nancy Lieder
And you NEVER said WHERE IT IS. Why not, Nancy?
Same question, same answer, Quoting: Nancy Lieder
You mean, same question, because you NEVER ANSWERED IT. Where, in the sky, is the Dark Twin, Nancy?
like they were hoping that this question would somehow convince readers that ZetaTalk was averse science. Quoting: Nancy Lieder
No, the question was to show that your Dark Twin doesn't exist. If it did, we could see it. You won't say where it is, because it DOESN'T EXIST. And you KNOW it.
ZT in fact trumps human science, purporting facts LONG before human science becomes aware of them, like this recent ZT accuracy.
[ link to www.zetatalk.com]
The debunkers are warned at the start of the chat that this behavior will be ignored, by this notice:
Chat Ground Rules!
This Live ZetaTalk chat is to give the public the opportunity to ask legitimate and pertinent questions. It is NOT so that
1. debunking campaigns can hold sway,
2. or to throw out insults,
3. or to insist endlessly that the world is normal,
4. or to attempt distraction from business at hand.
This is not about censorship but about allowing those who want to participate in the conversation to do so for the designated time, without being harassed and without constant distractions.
If a question has been asked and answered in previous threads or existing ZetaTalk, I will say so and attempt to point to the location of the answers. REPEATEDLY asking the question will be considered trolling.
Where, in Zetatalk, have these questions been answered?:
1)Where, in the sky, is the Dark Twin?
2) Under the stated strength paramaters quoted in this Zetatalk: [link to www.zetatalk.com] What caused PX to slow as it approached the Sun?
Those questions have NEVER been answered, Nancy. Just because you type something in response doesn't mean the questions have been ANSWERED.
The REAL answer to #1 is: NOWHERE. It doesn't exist.
The REAL answer to #2 is: NOTHING would cause it to slow. "Zetas" story about the alleged repulsion force is FAULTY and self CONTRADICTORY. |
| Menow
User ID: 405501
11/1/2009 10:24 AM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Oh really. Then why didn't Nancy say "sort of ripped away" or "partially ripped away" (it's not like it would make her statement any less ridiculous).
Because, Oh ignorant one, if you had read the zetatalk website you would know that the Zeta's have said many times that PX would "rip away" a portion of the atmosphere. This is Zetatalk-101.
You are a knit-picking idiot.
Blackcrow.
You didn't answer Menow's question. What percentage of the Earth's atmosphere is ripped away? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 806131
And what would happen to the air-breathing inhabitants of this planet if, say, 20% of the atmosphere was removed? You haven't really thought about that, now have you? Well, Neither did Nancy before she made up that part of her silly story. |
| User # 78/68
User ID: 681262
11/1/2009 2:05 PM
 | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Last time, in response to my question, "Zetas" asked me this question and paraphrased what I had asked:
SOZT
What caused Planet X to slow as it approached the Sun?
(snip)
EOZT
I feel compelled to answer. No, that does NOT accurately paraphrase my question. My question began with: " Under those stated parameters..." , referring to the quoted Zetatalk. I'll repeat my question. Please answer, noting the STATED PARAMETERS referred to in my question.
On this page, the "Zetas" give specific parameters for the strength of the repulsion force.
*************************************************
[ link to www.zetatalk.com]
" Where the repulsion force comes to equal the force of gravity by the time the objects in play would make contact, it builds at a rate that differs from gravity."
" The repulsion force is infinitesimally smaller than the force of gravity, but has a sharper curve so that it equals the force of gravity at the point of contact."
************************************************
Under those stated parameters, what caused PX to slow as it approached the Sun?
MeNow, perhaps the most well known shill countering Nancy on GLP, cannot for the life of him understand the Zeta explanation of repulsion force vs. gravity. He keeps asking the same damn question, week after week, month after month, like a spoiled teenager not hearing the answer he would like. He has been warned this is outside of the rules in this Sat Chat, yet he continues to badger away.
How stupid is this guy?
And he wonders why he gets banned? Not the sharpest knife in the drawer! |
| Menow
User ID: 405501
11/1/2009 2:11 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat October 31 | Quote |
Last time, in response to my question, "Zetas" asked me this question and paraphrased what I had asked:
SOZT
What caused Planet X to slow as it approached the Sun?
(snip)
EOZT
I feel compelled to answer. No, that does NOT accurately paraphrase my question. My question began with: " Under those stated parameters..." , referring to the quoted Zetatalk. I'll repeat my question. Please answer, noting the STATED PARAMETERS referred to in my question.
On this page, the "Zetas" give specific parameters for the strength of the repulsion force.
*************************************************
[ link to www.zetatalk.com]
" Where the repulsion force comes to equal the force of gravity by the time the objects in play would make contact, it builds at a rate that differs from gravity."
" The repulsion force is infinitesimally smaller than the force of gravity, but has a sharper curve so that it equals the force of gravity at the point of contact."
************************************************
Under those stated parameters, what caused PX to slow as it approached the Sun?
MeNow, perhaps the most well known shill countering Nancy on GLP, cannot for the life of him understand the Zeta explanation of repulsion force vs. gravity. He keeps asking the same damn question, week after week, month after month, like a spoiled teenager not hearing the answer he would like. He has been warned this is outside of the rules in this Sat Chat, yet he continues to badger away.
How stupid is this guy?
And he wonders why he gets banned? Not the sharpest knife in the drawer!
I understand it perfectly well. It outlines that nothing would slow PX as it approached the Sun, or the Dark Twin as it approached Earth. It says that TWICE right here:
*************************************************
[link to www.zetatalk.com]
"Where the repulsion force comes to equal the force of gravity by the time the objects in play would make contact, it builds at a rate that differs from gravity."
"The repulsion force is infinitesimally smaller than the force of gravity, but has a sharper curve so that it equals the force of gravity at the point of contact."
************************************************
If you care to differ with my take on those passages, go right ahead. We all know you won't, as you are only here as an attack dog. |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 | |
|
