Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,890 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,261,067
Pageviews Today: 1,962,525Threads Today: 572Posts Today: 12,857
06:02 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Sarah's Nightmare
Poster Handle ShadowDancer
Post Content
[link to www.zonesecurity.ru]






no one has yet to smear the video legitimately-the movement looks pretty legitimate to me...

Not a video...not a game...horrific


bump

hiding



 Quoting: ShadowDancer


GRBs,CMEs,fireballs, sulfur,HEAT,DREADFUL HEAT, consumed by fire...something to think about in 2010 and 2011-especially near October...have preps-many will be without adequate measures...cities are highlighted for many who haven't a clue-if the infrastructure collapses under something like this-long time to recover-decades even...best be mentally prepared in all ways and discerning.



All this happens with massive slowness. "It takes about 40 years for the belt to complete one loop," says Hathaway. The speed varies "anywhere from a 50-year pace (slow) to a 30-year pace (fast)."

When the belt is turning "fast," it means that lots of magnetic fields are being swept up, and that a future sunspot cycle is going to be intense. This is a basis for forecasting: "The belt was turning fast in 1986-1996," says Hathaway. "Old magnetic fields swept up then should re-appear as big sunspots in 2010-2011."

Like most experts in the field, Hathaway has confidence in the conveyor belt model and agrees with Dikpati that the next solar maximum should be a doozy. But he disagrees with one point. Dikpati's forecast puts Solar Max at 2012. Hathaway believes it will arrive sooner, in 2010 or 2011.

"History shows that big sunspot cycles 'ramp up' faster than small ones," he says. "I expect to see the first sunspots of the next cycle appear in late 2006 or 2007—and Solar Max to be underway by 2010 or 2011." [link to science.nasa.gov]

Who's right? Time will tell. Either way, a storm is coming.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation: