It's like the most important city on the planet. Other then that I have no idea. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation.
from spaceweather
This impressive sunspot, which rotated over the sun's western limb three days ago, does not add to the sunspot number because it is no longer visible from Earth. Astronomers only count spots that are on the Earth-facing side of the sun. That's how it's been done since Rudolph Wolf invented the sunspot number in 1848. In those days, only one side of the sun was visible from Earth, so the tradition was established.
Now, however, for the first time in the history of astronomy, NASA's twin STEREO spacecraft are seeing over the sun's horizon, tracking sunspots that officially "don't count."
The two spacecraft are moving toward opposite sides of the sun, and by February 2011 the entire sun will be under their watchful eyes. Perhaps it is time to start thinking about a "whole sun" sunspot number. As today's image shows, the sun is not always as blank as it appears to be.
Luminous ~Waiting~ User ID: 296954 11/3/2009 2:28 PM
"There are two kinds of light--the glow that illuminates, and the glare that obscures." ~ James Thurber
~
Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." ~ Winston Churchill
Anonymous Coward User ID: 533525 11/3/2009 2:29 PM
Perhaps it is time to start thinking about a "whole sun" sunspot number. As today's image shows, the sun is not always as blank as it appears to be.
Quoting: summergirl 192197
This is the most important part of that story from space weather , They are really nothing more than an arm of NASA , This is not the first time Spaceweather or NASA has come forth to suggest counting the Sunspots in an attempt to hide from the public that Sunspots despite a large area from time to time have pretty much vanished .And they lie about the total counting . There is more or less a record though it is not complete but dates back to the 1750's . It has always been counted and the deception of counting areas that can not be seen or are only around for a few hours needs to be stopped . At one time there were standards and these people whom are now keeping the records are on purpose skewing data
Perhaps it is time to start thinking about a "whole sun" sunspot number.
Quoting: spaceweather
Before Sunspot 1029 there was an area they counted as a sunspot because it looked almost as if October would be yet another month without a sunspot .Sunspot 1028 on October 20th was active less than 3 hours and it was gone. I'm old enough to remember back in the day that an area had to be no less than the size of the United States to count and if it did not last 24 hours it was not counted
Anonymous Coward User ID: 809420 11/3/2009 2:59 PM
So what could be causing this? Maybe a black hole is approaching and sucking up these particles?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 294757
No i think the problem lies whitin the sun itself i mean there is clearly something that started at the end of solar cycle 23 as the sun began to be very quietand solar cycle 24 isn't starting as it should be.
It's like inhaling to exhale that's how the sun works the problem now is that it is only inhaling without breating out!
Which means that the magnetic pressure is building withing the sun itself without being released.
This can't be a good thing can it?
And look at the size of the last spot it is clearly not logic to have a spot of this size in a blank sun???????????????????????????
Really the sun is doing very weird!
Anonymous Coward User ID: 294757 11/3/2009 3:02 PM
Perhaps it is time to start thinking about a "whole sun" sunspot number. As today's image shows, the sun is not always as blank as it appears to be.
This is the most important part of that story from space weather , They are really nothing more than an arm of NASA , This is not the first time Spaceweather or NASA has come forth to suggest counting the Sunspots in an attempt to hide from the public that Sunspots despite a large area from time to time have pretty much vanished .And they lie about the total counting . There is more or less a record though it is not complete but dates back to the 1750's . It has always been counted and the deception of counting areas that can not be seen or are only around for a few hours needs to be stopped . At one time there were standards and these people whom are now keeping the records are on purpose skewing data
Perhaps it is time to start thinking about a "whole sun" sunspot number.
Before Sunspot 1029 there was an area they counted as a sunspot because it looked almost as if October would be yet another month without a sunspot .Sunspot 1028 on October 20th was active less than 3 hours and it was gone. I'm old enough to remember back in the day that an area had to be no less than the size of the United States to count and if it did not last 24 hours it was not counted
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 809598
That's pretty much my thought either.
The sun is too quiet the solar wind is too weak or like today non existant plus i noticed there were some spikes now and extreme spikes recorded on the nict web page but not on spaceweater charts makes you wonder sometimes.....
Spaceweather doesn't tell the entire truth it is clearly censored on sensible information.
Disclaimer: This website exists for entertainment purposes only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality
or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every
effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually
review each and every one of the more than 10,000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis.
The content of post
on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in
no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of
the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or
administration of GodlikeProductions.
This site may contain adult content and if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.
Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.
This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Godlikeproductions.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.
We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!
Fair Use Notice: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information please visit: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.
Mail Webmaster with questions or comments about this site.
The rapture!!! 
