Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,268 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 360,760
Pageviews Today: 527,322Threads Today: 141Posts Today: 2,943
06:02 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model – by David Horowitz

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 823266
United Kingdom
11/20/2009 03:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model – by David Horowitz
Since taking office Barack Obama, who promised during his campaign to create a moderate, inclusive administration, has engaged in actions that have created division and fear because they are meant to radically change America, not improve on what has always worked. As a result, David Horowitz writes in Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model, “Many Americans have gone from hopefulness, through unease, to a state of alarm as the President shows a radical side only party visible during his campaign.”

Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model provides an understanding of the roots of the current administration’s effort to subject America to a wholesale transformation by looking at the work of one of the President’s heroes—radical Chicago “community organizer” Saul Alinsky. The guru of Sixties radicals, Alinsky urged his followers to be flexible and opportunistic and say anything to get power, which they can then use to destroy the existing society and its economic system. Alinsky died in 1972, but left behind an organization in Chicago dedicated to his malicious ideas. This team hired Barack Obama in 1986 when he was 23 and taught him how to organize for radical transformation.

In this insightful new booklet, Horowitz discusses Alinsky’s work in the 60s—and his advice to radicals to seize any weapon to advance their cause. This became the philosophy of Alinskyite organizations such as ACORN and to Alinsky disciples Van Jones, a self described “communist” who served as President Obama’s “Green Czar” until he was forced to resign when his extremist ideas became public.

After his analysis of Saul Alinsky, Horowitz points out what the grandfather of “social organizing” created “is not salvation but chaos.” Then he asks the crucial question: “And presidential disciples of Alinsky, what will they create?”

Today we are publishing this new booklet by David Horowitz that analyzes the radical strategy of the Obama administration and reveals the Machiavellian thinking that guides it. Everyone concerned about the future of our country should read this booklet and share it with others.

Frontpage is making it available in a convenient pocket-size format. For a contribution of $25 plus shipping and handling readers will receive 25 copies. For a pdf version of Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution click here. To order printed copies, click here.

[link to frontpagemag.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 792302
United States
11/20/2009 03:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model – by David Horowitz
do you really DARE to spread a truth.

S H A M E... S H A M E

I tell you
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 656642
United States
11/20/2009 03:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model – by David Horowitz
bump


I will bump anything that helps to educate people on the warped psychology.



But, don't just limit this to Obama. Hillary Clinton was a protege of Alinsky as well.

This is NOT Obama's rule book it is the LIBERAL's rule book.




Also does not explain how the Cloward Piven Strategy was meshed with Alinsky's rules.



Nor does it explain how Bernays' techniques were used.




There are so many head games.



Learn the head games, learn how they are used against you so that you can tell when someone is manipulating you.
Bluebird

User ID: 730536
United States
11/20/2009 03:28 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model – by David Horowitz
Yes and turn them back on those using them on you.
One of the most important aspects of conspiracy theories is being able to discern when there isn't one.

Oh yeah, like you'd understand anyway.

Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?. . .J. Handy
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 656642
United States
11/20/2009 03:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model – by David Horowitz
[link to www.msnbc.msn.com]

The senior thesis of Hillary D. Rodham, Wellesley College class of 1969, has been speculated about, spun, analyzed, debated, criticized and defended. But rarely has it been read, because for the eight years of Bill Clinton’s presidency it was locked away.

As forbidden fruit, the writings of a 21-year-old college senior, examining the tactics of radical community organizer Saul D. Alinsky, have gained mythic status among her critics — a “Rosetta Stone,” in the words of one, that would allow readers to decode the thinking of the former first lady and 2008 presidential candidate.

Despite the fervent interest in the thesis, few realize that it is no longer kept under lock and key. As MSNBC.com found, it is available to anyone who visits the archive room of the prestigious women’s college outside Boston. With Clinton’s opponents in the 2008 presidential race looking for the next “Swift Boat” attack ad, and the senator herself trying to cast off her liberal image, Clinton's 92-page thesis is certain to be read and reread by opposition researchers and reporters visiting the campus.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 656642
United States
11/20/2009 03:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model – by David Horowitz
[link to www.robertphoenix.com]

What really sparked this exploration into the depths of creulty was diving into the world of Saul Alinsky in the last entry. Quite frankly, I was blown away by the thorough and rigorous strategem that he devised over the course of a lifetime and two, radical manifestos. Alinsky gives props to old Lou himself in the intro for Rules For Radicals;

“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history… the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”

Alinsky’s tactics and techniques are completely amoral and as a result, he’ll resort to anything in order to bring about “change.” In Alinsky’s world, the means justify the ends;

“The end is what you want, the means is how you get it. Whenever we think about social change, the question of means and ends arises. The man of action views the issue of means and ends in pragmatic and strategic terms. He has no other problem; he thinks only of his actual resources and the possibilities of various choices of action. He asks of ends only whether they are achievable and worth the cost; of means, only whether they will work. … The real arena is corrupt and bloody.”

This type of ruthless pragmatism, was learned at the elbow of one of Alinsky’s mentors, Al Capone, whom he spent considerable time with after he graduated with a degree in criminology, a fairly new field at the time, dedicated to understanding the morals and methodologies of the criminal mind. Like Nietzche and Marx before him, Alinsky is pure Luciferian when it comes to the application of energy and will and he sets it loose in the political arena, unconstrained in it’s applications.

Two of his greatest tactics are ridicule and taking advantage of man’s inability to live up to his own (read christian) moral doctrines.

Pithy enjoinders from the heart and mind of Saul Alinsky include such gems as, “Last guys finish nice.” and “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

Finally, lest we not forget this golden mean to an end, one of which GW Bush must have surely paid great attention to; “Yesterday’s immoral terrorist is today’s moral and dignified statesman of high standing — because he was successful. Yesterday’s moral statesman is sitting in front of a ‘war crimes tribunal’ today — because he lost.” Rules for Radicals whether it makes you vomit or break out your old Mao cap to wear to the office, must be recognized for it’s sheer audacity and penetrating look into how to disassemble modern man in all of his emotional and psychological contradictions and then re-organize him into units of action. It’s right up there with Machiavelli folks.

News