Physicist Nassim Haramein has nasa video footage of a comet almost 2x the size of Jupiter that almost hit in 2003 His thoughts and ideas on this comet

You say he has proof and yet it's just his own thoughts and ideas.

This guy is so interesting to listen to. I have at least one of his vids favorited on my You Tube channel. Thanks for this one.

I think Nassim Haramein is very intresting , Real , legit or juust hypnotoad i dont know but i like it.i like physics

Physicist, huh?

You'd think he'd know the difference between 'twice the size of Jupiter' and 'twice the mass of Jupiter'. A comet can indeed be very large - sometimes having a coma larger even than the Sun, and a tail stretching for many millions of miles - but it consists almost entirely of a very diffuse cloud of gas, evaporating from the nucleus. It doesn't actually weigh anything significant, and can do no damage to anything in the solar system other than by direct impact.

You say he has proof and yet it's just his own thoughts and ideas.

yea sorry about that, i'll change it. Just thought the video was interesting and wanted to share it as fast as possible. Interesting how an obect that size didn't have any of the effects that we know of on the earth that it was suppose to have. By all means we should be fucking dead but were still here...Amazing, we must have been givin a second chance

[@ Rapheal .. End Commercial Break .. ]

Thanks Poet :)

Start of a New Year, I fell like covering some basics about a Plasma universe: (adapted loosely from Donald E. Scott's book, The Electric Sky)

"Because in the beginning was the Plasma" H.Alfven, 1970

Almost all of space is occupied by Plasma.

All the planets and all the moons carry an electric charge. This causes them to be surrounded by a sheath as they move through the Plasma that surrounds the Sun (solar plasma).

The Sun also carries an electric charge. The interplanetary plasma (the solar wind) makes up another much larger sheath that surrounds the Sun as it moves through the interstellar plasma of the Milky Way.

Each planet is an "intruder" in the solar plasma, and as such is surrounded by its own cell of plasma, called its plasmasphere. A double layer (DL) separates the plasmasphere from the solar plasma. The plasmasphere is not linked with the magnetosphere in the sense that you do not need a strong magnetosphere to have a massive plasmasphere. Example: VENUS, it has little if any magnetic field, yet it's plasmasphere stretches almost as far as Earth's orbit.

The planetary plasma sheaths are usually teardrop or windsock shape. Our moon has no such sheath, indicating it has reached voltage equilibrium with the solar plasma in its vicinity.

It's like a bubble within a bubble, within a bubble. Our planetary plasma is separated from the Solar Plasma by this double layer which acts like a cell membrane. The Solar Plasma is again separated from the Interstellar plasma by a double layer. This DL is called the Sun's Heliopause.

PLASMA Modes of Operation

There are three distinctly different steady state modes in which a plasma can operate:

1. Dark Current Mode - The strength of the electrical current (flow of charged particles) within the plasma is very low. The plasma does not glow. It is essentially invisible. We would not know a plasma was there at all unless we measured its electrical activity with sensitive instruments. The present day magnetospheres of the planets are examples of plasmas operating in the dark current mode.

2. Normal Glow Mode - The strength of the electrical current (flow of charged particles) is significant. The entire plasma glows. The brightness of the glow depends on the intensity of the current in the plasma. Examples: Any neon sign. Emission nebulae. The Sun's corona.

3. Arc Mode - The strength of the electrical current in the plasma is very high. The plasma radiates brilliantly over a wide spectrum. Current tends to form twisting filaments. Examples of this mode of operation are: An electric arc welding machine. Lightning. The Sun's photosphere.

In all three modes of operation, plasmas emit measurable electromagnetic radiation (radio frequency noise). At any given time, the current density (Amps per square meter) existing in the plasma, determines which particular mode a plasma is operating in. The atomic structure of the gas that became ionized to form the plasma in the first place also is a factor in this.

Double Layers
One of the most important properties of any electrical plasma is its ability to "self-organize" - that is, to electrically isolate one section of itself from another. The isolating wall is called a double layer (DL). When a plasma is studied in the lab, it is usually contained in a closed cylindrical glass tube. Electrodes are inserted into the ends of the tube - one electrode (called the anode) is maintained at a higher voltage than the electrode at the other end (the cathode). If such a voltage difference is applied, then ionization will be initiated and current will start to flow through the plasma. Positive ions (atoms with one or more electrons stripped off) will migrate away from the anode, and negative ions (atoms carrying one or more extra electrons) will move toward the anode. The mathematical sum of these two oppositely directed flows constitutes the total current in the plasma.

If the voltage difference from one electrode to the other becomes large enough, a DL will form in a narrow cross-section somewhere in the middle of the tube. Almost all the voltage drop that is applied across the electrodes will fall across this DL. The plasma on one side of the DL (the side toward the anode) will have approximately the same voltage as the anode. The plasma on the cathode side of the DL will have essentially the same voltage as the cathode. The two halves of the plasma are then electrically isolated from one another by the DL. No electrostatic force is felt by particles on one side of the DL due to charges on the other side of the DL. The total electric current, however, is the same throughout the plasma (on both sides of the DL). Plasmas are excellent conductors and, therefore, there will not be a significant voltage drop across them while they are carrying current - thus the need for the presence of the DL that 'takes' most of any externally applied voltage. In other words, the DL is where the strongest electric fields in the plasma will be found.

If a foreign object is inserted into a plasma, a DL will form around it, shielding it from the main plasma. This effect makes it difficult to insert voltage sensing probes into a plasma in order to measure the electric potential at a specific location. This is a well known property of plasmas. Various methods have been developed in the laboratory to overcome it.

In space, it is impossible to send a spacecraft to measure the voltage of the solar plasma at some point. Voltage is a relative measure (like velocity, for example); it must be measured with respect to some datum. A spacecraft will start out having the same voltage as the surface of Earth. As it penetrates the plasmasphere and enters the solar plasma it will slowly accumulate charge and thus alter its voltage. The strength of an electric field, however, can be measured in space.

The Z-Pinch
Electric current, passing through a plasma, will take on the corkscrew (spiral) shape discovered by Birkeland. These Birkeland currents most often occur in pairs. There is a tendency for these pairs to compress between them any material (ionized or not) in the plasma. This is called the "z-pinch" effect. The ability of Birkeland currents to accrete and compress even non-ionized material is called "Marklund convection".

Hannes Alfven and the 'Frozen-in Magnetic Fields'
For years it was assumed that plasmas were perfect conductors and, as such, a magnetic field in any plasma would have to be 'frozen' inside it.

The technical explanation is as follows: One of Maxwell's equations is that the curl of E is equal to -dB/dt. Consequently, if the electric field, E, in a region is everywhere zero valued, then any magnetic field in that region must be time invariant (have a constant value). So if all plasmas are ideal conductors (and so cannot have electric fields - that is to say, voltage differences - inside them), then any magnetic fields inside a plasma must be frozen - i.e., cannot move or change in any way.

Now we know that there can be slight voltage differences between different points in plasmas. Plasma engineer Hannes Alfvén pointed out this fact in his acceptance speech while receiving the Nobel Prize for physics in 1970. The electrical conductivity of any material, including plasma, is determined by two factors: the density of the population of available charge carriers (the ions) in the material, and the mobility of these carriers. In any plasma, the mobility of the ions is extremely high. Electrons and ions can move around very freely in space. But the concentration (number per unit volume) of ions available to carry charge may not be at all high if the plasma is a very low pressure (diffuse) one. So, although plasmas are excellent conductors, they are not perfect conductors. Weak electric fields can exist inside plasmas. Therefore, magnetic fields are not frozen inside them.

Currents in Cosmic Sized Plasmas
Because plasmas are good (but not perfect) conductors, they are equivalent to wires in their ability to carry electrical current. It is well known that if any conductor cuts through a magnetic field, a current will be caused to flow in that conductor. This is how electric generators and alternators work. Therefore, if there is any relative motion between a cosmic plasma, say in the arm of a galaxy, and a magnetic field in that same location, Birkeland currents will flow in the plasma. These currents will, in turn, produce their own magnetic fields.

Plasma phenomena are scalable. That is to say, their electrical and physical properties remain the same, independent of the size of the plasma. Of course dynamic phenomena take much less time to occur in a small laboratory plasma than they do in a plasma the size, say, of a galaxy. But the phenomena are identical in that they obey the same laws of physics. So we can make accurate models of cosmic sized plasmas in the lab - and generate effects exactly like those seen in space. In fact, electric currents, flowing in plasmas, have been shown to produce most of the observed astronomical phenomena that are inexplicable if we assume that the only forces at work in the cosmos are magnetism and gravity.

[link to www.electric-cosmos.org]

I think Nassim Haramein is very intresting , Real , legit or juust hypnotoad i dont know but i like it.i like physics

Pursuit of knowledge does not require a genius mind. It requires an open mind that's tuned to see the truth.

Thread: Petroglyphs, not just simple, crude drawings from ancient man. The truth is stranger then you could ever imagine.

If you like physics, then avoid Nassim - he is not physicist : he is a theologian masquerading as a physicist. (also do a google search [Elizabeth Rauscher mind control] Ms Rauscher could be considered Nassim's handler)

Any Astro-physicist who claims existence of Black Holes/Dark Matter/String theory/Multiverse are THEOLOGIANS not physicists.

The Bastardization of Modern Science is another way that TPTB wish to control you. By Abstracting and promoting the Deductive Method, modern science becomes about more about rote regurgitation than about true Empirical study of Objects. Rote regurgitation of what your "peers" all beLIEve. Peer-review is a joke on you. If you don't learn "their" language, then you will not advance through their halls of knowledge.

Fortunately, as with everything held sacred by "them", these walls of deception are crashing down.

Pursuit of knowledge does not require a genius mind. It requires an open mind that's tuned to see the truth.

Thread: Petroglyphs, not just simple, crude drawings from ancient man. The truth is stranger then you could ever imagine.

I think Nassim Haramein is very intresting , Real , legit or juust hypnotoad i dont know but i like it.i like physics


If you like physics, then avoid Nassim - he is not physicist : he is a theologian masquerading as a physicist. (also do a google search [Elizabeth Rauscher mind control] Ms Rauscher could be considered Nassim's handler)

Any Astro-physicist who claims existence of Black Holes/Dark Matter/String theory/Multiverse are THEOLOGIANS not physicists.

The Bastardization of Modern Science is another way that TPTB wish to control you. By Abstracting and promoting the Deductive Method, modern science becomes about more about rote regurgitation than about true Empirical study of Objects. Rote regurgitation of what your "peers" all beLIEve. Peer-review is a joke on you. If you don't learn "their" language, then you will not advance through their halls of knowledge.

Fortunately, as with everything held sacred by "them", these walls of deception are crashing down.

Pursuit of knowledge does not require a genius mind. It requires an open mind that's tuned to see the truth.

Thread: Petroglyphs, not just simple, crude drawings from ancient man. The truth is stranger then you could ever imagine.

valid point but I still found this interesting regardless

valid point but I still found this interesting regardless


Not saying that Nassim isn't interesting. It was here on GLP that I first discovered Nassim. I really thought he was the "shit" and had it all together. I downloaded just about every available Nassim video clip and even purchased the DVD series. If I had the funds, I probably would've made the trip to Hawaii for his "indoctrination" .. I mean emissary camp.

The 8hr Google vid, is very interesting, but just as interesting as Tinkerbell. But they're both works of fiction.

Kent Steadman had a lot to say about that comet (C/2002 V1 (NEAT)):

[link to www.siloam.net]

These kind of orbit is not Keplerian,
but is made when a "masive planet" orbit a "Binary Star System"...

Better use the 3 body system math...(give a Try)
and you will see that "it" will getting Back!!!(BTW you will debunk Nasa, and Kepler)
in Earth direction... (some years after the 1st swing 2003)
:11:

Incoming Geographical Poleshift!!!!

Kent Steadman had a lot to say about that comet (C/2002 V1 (NEAT)):

[link to www.siloam.net]

.
... he now knows what the rest of us are still wondering about ...
.

Kent Steadman had a lot to say about that comet (C/2002 V1 (NEAT)):

[link to www.siloam.net]

.
... he now knows what the rest of us are still wondering about ...
.

yep, now he knows all. every single bit of all.