Gay marriage gives AIDS to children | |
Jeremy User ID: 717112 United States 12/07/2009 01:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Jeremy User ID: 717112 United States 12/07/2009 01:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 742606 Canada 12/07/2009 01:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Mr. Muggles User ID: 716247 United States 12/07/2009 02:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 833146 United States 12/07/2009 02:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Mr. Muggles User ID: 716247 United States 12/07/2009 02:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 819509 Canada 12/07/2009 02:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 822681 Australia 12/07/2009 02:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 592518 United States 12/07/2009 02:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There are many reported cases where gay civil unions have led to parents transmitting AIDS to their children through the practice of incest. It is very, very said that this is happening at this very moment. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 833724I wonder if Catholick priests fuck little boys, or little girls more. Oh well it doesn't matter - statistically, there are WAAY more hetersexual child predators than there are homosexual. It's just the priests that like to fuck little boys. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 833724 Canada 12/07/2009 11:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Babe in a Bunker User ID: 833991 United States 12/07/2009 11:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well it seems so real I can see it And it seems so real I can feel it And it seems so real I can taste it And it seems so real I can hear it So why can't I touch it? So why can't I touch it? Twatter: [link to twitter.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 835960 United States 12/07/2009 11:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There are many reported cases where gay civil unions have led to parents transmitting AIDS to their children through the practice of incest. It is very, very said that this is happening at this very moment. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 833724I think gay marriage is a farce at best, but if you really believe this inane BS, you need a labotomy. |
TunafishSammiches User ID: 516200 Canada 12/07/2009 11:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 750445 United States 12/08/2009 08:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seriously, you're an idiot. BY FAR the most cases of incest occur between a male adult and a female child. Quoting: Jeremy 717112i guess we'll see who the IDIOT is here .. this is exactly why gays should not be allowed to adopt. Gay man pleads guilty to sex with adopted son WRAL: White Rapists and Lombard Mike Adams Monday, December 07, 2009 Over the course of the last few weeks, I have received several requests for an update on the Frank Lombard case. Lombard is the (now former) Duke administrator who was accused last summer of attempting to allow, and even arrange for, strangers he met on the internet to rape his adopted child. A few days ago, WRAL, a Raleigh-based news station, released an update on the case. That update is worth re-printing here, along with my commentary, both for what the update says and what it does not say: “A former Duke University employee has agreed to plead guilty to a federal charge of sexual exploitation of a minor, authorities said Tuesday.” Here, the “sexual exploitation of a minor” is not described in any great detail. That is good because the sexual exploitation Lombard inflicted upon his own child is simply too graphic to reprint fully. I have read all of the documentation in this case. It contains descriptions of conduct, which can only be described as sub-human. “Frank M. Lombard, 42, of 24 Indigo Creek Trail in Durham, will enter the plea in federal court in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 17, authorities said. He likely will face 15 years in prison, authorities said.” It is interesting that the first demographic mentioned is age, as opposed to race or sexual orientation. As I proceed with my commentary it may be worthwhile to ask, once again, a question I will ask now: Is Frank Lombard’s age the most relevant demographic variable in relation to the charges to which he agreed to plead guilty? “Authorities on Tuesday filed a criminal information in the case, indicating that they were negotiating a plea and didn't want to pursue an indictment against Lombard. According to the filing, Lombard coerced a minor, identified only as ‘M.L.,’ into engaging in sexual conduct so that Lombard could transmit a live video of it over the Internet.” And now we have another mention of the “minor” followed by the assertion that the criminal information only identifies the minor as “M.L.” But WRAL knows precisely what the “L” in “M.L.” means. It means Lombard. It is his adopted black son. But to acknowledge that “M.L” is the son, not daughter, of Frank Lombard is to acknowledge that Lombard is gay. And the Gods of Diversity frown upon the notion that males can be victims of rape and that the perpetrators can be homosexual men. And to acknowledge the race of the victim is to suggest that homosexuals might be capable of committing hate crimes, even if they do not play Lacrosse. Hate crimes legislation is supposed to protect, not prosecute, gay men. And, finally, there should be no mention (yet) that his son was adopted. The public, when confronted with such information, might use it to form dangerous opinions – such as the opinion that gay men should not be adopting little boys. According to the news media, the general public is not capable of processing all of this information. People in the news media are the only ones who can be trusted with all of the benefits (and responsibilities) that attach to the full disclosure of information. “Lombard was arrested in June after authorities said Washington police caught him in a sting operation soliciting an adult to have sex with his adopted 5-year-old child.” This is certainly odd. WRAL finally mentions that Frank Lombard’s child was adopted. But they fail to mention his sex or his race. In fact, the way this paragraph is worded, it is not entirely clear that the incident leading to his arrest is the incident leading to the information – or that it led to any formal criminal charges. So let me clarify this very sloppy portion of the WRAL release. The child coerced into engaging in sexual conduct on a webcam was Frank Lombard’s adopted black son. Lombard performed oral sex on every portion of the little boy’s body that was capable of expelling human waste. I hope this clarifies any ambiguity. I will withhold further details. “Duke fired Lombard in July from his position as associate director of the university's Center for Health Policy.” I think we can now see why WRAL has withheld certain relevant information. Lombard was a high-level administrator in the area of health policy. To reveal his sexual orientation would raise certain questions, which might violate someone’s right to feel comfortable at all times. For example, “Are certain sexual practices both detrimental to individual health and prevalent in the gay community?” And, “Could such practices, if widely adopted (no pun intended), be detrimental to the public health?” Finally, “Is a homosexual man the best candidate available to help run a Center for Public Health and teach a course about AIDS at Duke University?” According to the people at WRAL, and many at Duke University, Frank Lombard is no ordinary white racist. Nor is he an ordinary white rapist. He is gay and entitled to special treatment in the court of public opinion. To refuse to treat him differently would promote hatred and discrimination. And that would send a dangerous message to small children. Above all else, we must protect small children from danger. Copyright © 2009 Salem Web Network. All Rights Reserved. [link to townhall.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 765179 United States 12/08/2009 06:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There are many reported cases where gay civil unions have led to parents transmitting AIDS to their children through the practice of incest. It is very, very said that this is happening at this very moment. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 833724Are you f***ing kidding me. Do some research whoever you are. Grow up. |
rachel User ID: 620806 United States 12/08/2009 06:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 836395 United Kingdom 12/08/2009 06:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seriously, you're an idiot. BY FAR the most cases of incest occur between a male adult and a female child. Quoting: DrPostmani guess we'll see who the IDIOT is here .. this is exactly why gays should not be allowed to adopt. All that proves is that you found one rare exception. I bet I can find a dozen straight examples of the same thing. Hell, I even know of a straight guy locally who pimped his own biological daughter on the net! All you prove here is that you are desperate to rationalize your hatred. OK. How about, single men, or male "couples" should NEVER, under ANY circumstances, be allowed to adopt children. Does that cover all the bases, for you? |
Lil Miss Trouble User ID: 601435 United States 12/08/2009 06:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | +1 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 834857 United States 12/08/2009 06:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 836548 United States 12/08/2009 06:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Nikki_LaVey User ID: 830508 United States 12/08/2009 06:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seriously, you're an idiot. BY FAR the most cases of incest occur between a male adult and a female child. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 750445i guess we'll see who the IDIOT is here .. this is exactly why gays should not be allowed to adopt. Gay man pleads guilty to sex with adopted son WRAL: White Rapists and Lombard Mike Adams Monday, December 07, 2009 Over the course of the last few weeks, I have received several requests for an update on the Frank Lombard case. Lombard is the (now former) Duke administrator who was accused last summer of attempting to allow, and even arrange for, strangers he met on the internet to rape his adopted child. A few days ago, WRAL, a Raleigh-based news station, released an update on the case. That update is worth re-printing here, along with my commentary, both for what the update says and what it does not say: “A former Duke University employee has agreed to plead guilty to a federal charge of sexual exploitation of a minor, authorities said Tuesday.” Here, the “sexual exploitation of a minor” is not described in any great detail. That is good because the sexual exploitation Lombard inflicted upon his own child is simply too graphic to reprint fully. I have read all of the documentation in this case. It contains descriptions of conduct, which can only be described as sub-human. “Frank M. Lombard, 42, of 24 Indigo Creek Trail in Durham, will enter the plea in federal court in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 17, authorities said. He likely will face 15 years in prison, authorities said.” It is interesting that the first demographic mentioned is age, as opposed to race or sexual orientation. As I proceed with my commentary it may be worthwhile to ask, once again, a question I will ask now: Is Frank Lombard’s age the most relevant demographic variable in relation to the charges to which he agreed to plead guilty? “Authorities on Tuesday filed a criminal information in the case, indicating that they were negotiating a plea and didn't want to pursue an indictment against Lombard. According to the filing, Lombard coerced a minor, identified only as ‘M.L.,’ into engaging in sexual conduct so that Lombard could transmit a live video of it over the Internet.” And now we have another mention of the “minor” followed by the assertion that the criminal information only identifies the minor as “M.L.” But WRAL knows precisely what the “L” in “M.L.” means. It means Lombard. It is his adopted black son. But to acknowledge that “M.L” is the son, not daughter, of Frank Lombard is to acknowledge that Lombard is gay. And the Gods of Diversity frown upon the notion that males can be victims of rape and that the perpetrators can be homosexual men. And to acknowledge the race of the victim is to suggest that homosexuals might be capable of committing hate crimes, even if they do not play Lacrosse. Hate crimes legislation is supposed to protect, not prosecute, gay men. And, finally, there should be no mention (yet) that his son was adopted. The public, when confronted with such information, might use it to form dangerous opinions – such as the opinion that gay men should not be adopting little boys. According to the news media, the general public is not capable of processing all of this information. People in the news media are the only ones who can be trusted with all of the benefits (and responsibilities) that attach to the full disclosure of information. “Lombard was arrested in June after authorities said Washington police caught him in a sting operation soliciting an adult to have sex with his adopted 5-year-old child.” This is certainly odd. WRAL finally mentions that Frank Lombard’s child was adopted. But they fail to mention his sex or his race. In fact, the way this paragraph is worded, it is not entirely clear that the incident leading to his arrest is the incident leading to the information – or that it led to any formal criminal charges. So let me clarify this very sloppy portion of the WRAL release. The child coerced into engaging in sexual conduct on a webcam was Frank Lombard’s adopted black son. Lombard performed oral sex on every portion of the little boy’s body that was capable of expelling human waste. I hope this clarifies any ambiguity. I will withhold further details. “Duke fired Lombard in July from his position as associate director of the university's Center for Health Policy.” I think we can now see why WRAL has withheld certain relevant information. Lombard was a high-level administrator in the area of health policy. To reveal his sexual orientation would raise certain questions, which might violate someone’s right to feel comfortable at all times. For example, “Are certain sexual practices both detrimental to individual health and prevalent in the gay community?” And, “Could such practices, if widely adopted (no pun intended), be detrimental to the public health?” Finally, “Is a homosexual man the best candidate available to help run a Center for Public Health and teach a course about AIDS at Duke University?” According to the people at WRAL, and many at Duke University, Frank Lombard is no ordinary white racist. Nor is he an ordinary white rapist. He is gay and entitled to special treatment in the court of public opinion. To refuse to treat him differently would promote hatred and discrimination. And that would send a dangerous message to small children. Above all else, we must protect small children from danger. Copyright © 2009 Salem Web Network. All Rights Reserved. [link to townhall.com] And how many straight men have you heard of molesting children .... Sorry the stats are against you on this one ... I'm a LGBT Parent Last Edited by Nikki_LaVey on 12/08/2009 06:43 PM How Can You Be Two Places At Once When You're Not Anywhere at all |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 822681 Australia 12/08/2009 07:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seriously, you're an idiot. BY FAR the most cases of incest occur between a male adult and a female child. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 750445i guess we'll see who the IDIOT is here .. this is exactly why gays should not be allowed to adopt. Gay man pleads guilty to sex with adopted son WRAL: White Rapists and Lombard Mike Adams Monday, December 07, 2009 Over the course of the last few weeks, I have received several requests for an update on the Frank Lombard case. Lombard is the (now former) Duke administrator who was accused last summer of attempting to allow, and even arrange for, strangers he met on the internet to rape his adopted child. A few days ago, WRAL, a Raleigh-based news station, released an update on the case. That update is worth re-printing here, along with my commentary, both for what the update says and what it does not say: “A former Duke University employee has agreed to plead guilty to a federal charge of sexual exploitation of a minor, authorities said Tuesday.” Here, the “sexual exploitation of a minor” is not described in any great detail. That is good because the sexual exploitation Lombard inflicted upon his own child is simply too graphic to reprint fully. I have read all of the documentation in this case. It contains descriptions of conduct, which can only be described as sub-human. “Frank M. Lombard, 42, of 24 Indigo Creek Trail in Durham, will enter the plea in federal court in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 17, authorities said. He likely will face 15 years in prison, authorities said.” It is interesting that the first demographic mentioned is age, as opposed to race or sexual orientation. As I proceed with my commentary it may be worthwhile to ask, once again, a question I will ask now: Is Frank Lombard’s age the most relevant demographic variable in relation to the charges to which he agreed to plead guilty? “Authorities on Tuesday filed a criminal information in the case, indicating that they were negotiating a plea and didn't want to pursue an indictment against Lombard. According to the filing, Lombard coerced a minor, identified only as ‘M.L.,’ into engaging in sexual conduct so that Lombard could transmit a live video of it over the Internet.” And now we have another mention of the “minor” followed by the assertion that the criminal information only identifies the minor as “M.L.” But WRAL knows precisely what the “L” in “M.L.” means. It means Lombard. It is his adopted black son. But to acknowledge that “M.L” is the son, not daughter, of Frank Lombard is to acknowledge that Lombard is gay. And the Gods of Diversity frown upon the notion that males can be victims of rape and that the perpetrators can be homosexual men. And to acknowledge the race of the victim is to suggest that homosexuals might be capable of committing hate crimes, even if they do not play Lacrosse. Hate crimes legislation is supposed to protect, not prosecute, gay men. And, finally, there should be no mention (yet) that his son was adopted. The public, when confronted with such information, might use it to form dangerous opinions – such as the opinion that gay men should not be adopting little boys. According to the news media, the general public is not capable of processing all of this information. People in the news media are the only ones who can be trusted with all of the benefits (and responsibilities) that attach to the full disclosure of information. “Lombard was arrested in June after authorities said Washington police caught him in a sting operation soliciting an adult to have sex with his adopted 5-year-old child.” This is certainly odd. WRAL finally mentions that Frank Lombard’s child was adopted. But they fail to mention his sex or his race. In fact, the way this paragraph is worded, it is not entirely clear that the incident leading to his arrest is the incident leading to the information – or that it led to any formal criminal charges. So let me clarify this very sloppy portion of the WRAL release. The child coerced into engaging in sexual conduct on a webcam was Frank Lombard’s adopted black son. Lombard performed oral sex on every portion of the little boy’s body that was capable of expelling human waste. I hope this clarifies any ambiguity. I will withhold further details. “Duke fired Lombard in July from his position as associate director of the university's Center for Health Policy.” I think we can now see why WRAL has withheld certain relevant information. Lombard was a high-level administrator in the area of health policy. To reveal his sexual orientation would raise certain questions, which might violate someone’s right to feel comfortable at all times. For example, “Are certain sexual practices both detrimental to individual health and prevalent in the gay community?” And, “Could such practices, if widely adopted (no pun intended), be detrimental to the public health?” Finally, “Is a homosexual man the best candidate available to help run a Center for Public Health and teach a course about AIDS at Duke University?” According to the people at WRAL, and many at Duke University, Frank Lombard is no ordinary white racist. Nor is he an ordinary white rapist. He is gay and entitled to special treatment in the court of public opinion. To refuse to treat him differently would promote hatred and discrimination. And that would send a dangerous message to small children. Above all else, we must protect small children from danger. Copyright © 2009 Salem Web Network. All Rights Reserved. [link to townhall.com] have they tested this child to see what diseases his gay dad gave him? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 751773 United States 12/08/2009 08:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Nikki_LaVey User ID: 830508 United States 12/08/2009 11:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I want statistics proving all of the accusations above, specifically those targeted at white men, Christians, and heterosexuals - let fly. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 751773Are homosexual adults in general sexually attracted to children and are preadolescent children at greater risk of molestation from homosexual adults than from heterosexual adults? There is no reason to believe so. The research to date all points to there being no significant relationship between a homosexual lifestyle and child molestation. There appears to be practically no reportage of sexual molestation of girls by lesbian adults, and the adult male who sexually molests young boys is not likely to be homosexual (Groth & Gary, 1982, p. 147). [link to psychology.ucdavis.edu] How Can You Be Two Places At Once When You're Not Anywhere at all |
Jeremy User ID: 717112 United States 12/08/2009 11:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There are many reported cases where gay civil unions have led to parents transmitting AIDS to their children through the practice of incest. It is very, very said that this is happening at this very moment. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 592518I wonder if Catholick priests fuck little boys, or little girls more. Oh well it doesn't matter - statistically, there are WAAY more hetersexual child predators than there are homosexual. It's just the priests that like to fuck little boys. Statistically speaking are priests more likely to be child molesters? I don't think so. And I guarantee you many of them were false accusations. The reason there are so many accusations against the Catholic Church is because they have more money than the tent revivalist pedophiles do. I have a tendency not to trust people who try to profit from their so called "abuse". |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 762594 United Kingdom 12/09/2009 05:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I want statistics proving all of the accusations above, specifically those targeted at white men, Christians, and heterosexuals - let fly. Quoting: Nikki_LaVeyAre homosexual adults in general sexually attracted to children and are preadolescent children at greater risk of molestation from homosexual adults than from heterosexual adults? There is no reason to believe so. The research to date all points to there being no significant relationship between a homosexual lifestyle and child molestation. There appears to be practically no reportage of sexual molestation of girls by lesbian adults, and the adult male who sexually molests young boys is not likely to be homosexual (Groth & Gary, 1982, p. 147). [link to psychology.ucdavis.edu] Good one. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 762594 United Kingdom 12/09/2009 05:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 573835 Canada 12/09/2009 05:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP gets his Insanity from this Christian site -------------------------------------------------------------- [link to www.truechristian.com] "What's worse than a Fag? Two Fags! How could anyone anyone be so ignorant? You fools! We aren't to allow these pedophiles to wed, we are to KILL THEM ALL!! Listen to the words of Love by Jesus Himself! Leviticus 20 13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them." ---------------------------------------------------------- People who believe in this bible crap are dangerous |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 766567 Belgium 12/09/2009 05:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Nikki_LaVey User ID: 830508 United States 12/09/2009 11:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I want statistics proving all of the accusations above, specifically those targeted at white men, Christians, and heterosexuals - let fly. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 762594Are homosexual adults in general sexually attracted to children and are preadolescent children at greater risk of molestation from homosexual adults than from heterosexual adults? There is no reason to believe so. The research to date all points to there being no significant relationship between a homosexual lifestyle and child molestation. There appears to be practically no reportage of sexual molestation of girls by lesbian adults, and the adult male who sexually molests young boys is not likely to be homosexual (Groth & Gary, 1982, p. 147). [link to psychology.ucdavis.edu] Good one. He asked for proof ... he got it How Can You Be Two Places At Once When You're Not Anywhere at all |