PLANS FOR A WORLD WIDE ONE CHILD ONLY POLICY!!! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 773137 United States 12/11/2009 12:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | are you guys pro life or pro abortion? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 776591cause procreation should be a decision made by an individual and not something forced by the state ya dig? No one is saying you cant have ANY children, the idea is for people to "meet half way", meaning it would be best if you had no children, but if you must lets just limit it to one. I really dont see why this is so unreasonable. No one has to worry about anyone making laws such as these as the population of the world is going to be cut in half in the next few years by natural disasters. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 838618 United States 12/11/2009 12:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | cause procreation should be a decision made by an individual and not something forced by the state Quoting: Anonymous Coward 838516ya dig? You presuppose we choose for ourselves. That could be argued. why the hell are we spreading "freedom" for if it isn't for the right to make OUR OWN DECISIONS? so it was all a FARCE after all? it defeats the whole purpose of invading sovereign nations to spread "freedom" when you believe we should not be allowed to choose for ourselves? what are our young man and woman fighting for then? have they been lied to? it has all been in vain! |
re User ID: 838647 United Kingdom 12/11/2009 12:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
wizard User ID: 700544 United States 12/11/2009 12:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ZTE User ID: 779511 United States 12/11/2009 12:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | are you guys pro life or pro abortion? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 776591cause procreation should be a decision made by an individual and not something forced by the state ya dig? No one is saying you cant have ANY children, the idea is for people to "meet half way", meaning it would be best if you had no children, but if you must lets just limit it to one. I really dont see why this is so unreasonable. Because you are forcing your ideals on people. It is unreasonable for people to force me to purchase health insurance in a free country. It is unreasonable for people to force me to get a vaccine or a chip in my hand. What's "best" for the whole is the death of the individual. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 189801 United States 12/11/2009 12:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 668328 United States 12/11/2009 12:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 668328 United States 12/11/2009 12:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 838618 United States 12/11/2009 12:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 446571 United States 12/11/2009 12:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think one child per couple for now until we reach an environmentally stable and responsible population is a very noble and correct goal. Endless overpopulation will result in horrible death down the road. After an environmentally sustainable population is reached then two per couple. If someone were to give you the choice of having one child and everything would be great or having multiple children and all your grandchildren would die of starvation and pollution what would you choose? Unbelievably to myself and any sane person, some would choose the latter citing all sorts of excuses. Well, you've just been told. |
Rusty Shakleford User ID: 304 United States 12/11/2009 12:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But if at the Church they would give us some ale, And a pleasant fire our souls to regale, We'd sing and we'd pray all the live-long day, And never once wish from the Church to stray. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 764206 United States 12/11/2009 12:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 764206 United States 12/11/2009 12:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rusty Shakleford User ID: 304 United States 12/11/2009 12:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think one child per couple for now until we reach an environmentally stable and responsible population is a very noble and correct goal. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 446571Endless overpopulation will result in horrible death down the road. After an environmentally sustainable population is reached then two per couple. If someone were to give you the choice of having one child and everything would be great or having multiple children and all your grandchildren would die of starvation and pollution what would you choose? Unbelievably to myself and any sane person, some would choose the latter citing all sorts of excuses. Well, you've just been told. Sorry, last post was for you. Your a douche bag. Population is controlled by nature. In every species, it is controlled by nature. But if at the Church they would give us some ale, And a pleasant fire our souls to regale, We'd sing and we'd pray all the live-long day, And never once wish from the Church to stray. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 700544 United States 12/11/2009 12:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nomind User ID: 705130 Canada 12/11/2009 01:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We need something to slow down the population growth a lot. What we could do is give every adult a 1 child voucher.. so couples could have 2 (one per adult), and if you don't want kids, you could sell your voucher to another adult, or something, so you have no kid and some couple has 3. Of course humanity is too selfish and plain dumb to go for any such system. Just look at how many many of you idiots pop out kids while there are millions of homeless and parentless kids out there who need you. Last Edited by nomind on 12/11/2009 01:03 PM My Interesting Karma messages: - "You are an idiot. This post proves it." -"GLP MEMBERS BEWARE!!! THIS IS A GOVERNMENT SHILL." - Most moranic one given to me: When you type ".." you need to put three dots instead of two. Thread: Nibiru, or how to appear like you know what you are talking about |
wizard User ID: 700544 United States 12/11/2009 01:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 446571 United States 12/11/2009 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think one child per couple for now until we reach an environmentally stable and responsible population is a very noble and correct goal. Quoting: Rusty ShaklefordEndless overpopulation will result in horrible death down the road. After an environmentally sustainable population is reached then two per couple. If someone were to give you the choice of having one child and everything would be great or having multiple children and all your grandchildren would die of starvation and pollution what would you choose? Unbelievably to myself and any sane person, some would choose the latter citing all sorts of excuses. Well, you've just been told. Sorry, last post was for you. Your a douche bag. Population is controlled by nature. In every species, it is controlled by nature. OK so you're in favor of the latter. No need to be rude. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 838618 United States 12/11/2009 01:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i thought my parents fought a great war to stop the bullshit like this Quoting: wizard 700544it was all in vain! we were told we were fighting for freedom and spreading democracy and yet they don't want us to have the right to procreate? what have we been fighting for? isn't it our goal to spread freedom to other nations so they to can enjoy the FREEDOMS AND MAKING YOUR OWN DECISIONS? what's next WE CAN ONLY VOTE FOR THEIR ELECTED OFFICIAL? hahaha too late already happening |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 776591 United States 12/11/2009 02:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i thought my parents fought a great war to stop the bullshit like this Quoting: Anonymous Coward 838618it was all in vain! we were told we were fighting for freedom and spreading democracy and yet they don't want us to have the right to procreate? what have we been fighting for? isn't it our goal to spread freedom to other nations so they to can enjoy the FREEDOMS AND MAKING YOUR OWN DECISIONS? what's next WE CAN ONLY VOTE FOR THEIR ELECTED OFFICIAL? hahaha too late already happening Even if this policy were put into place you would still have the "right" to procreate. It would just be limited. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 760960 United States 12/11/2009 02:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think one child per couple for now until we reach an environmentally stable and responsible population is a very noble and correct goal. Quoting: Rusty ShaklefordEndless overpopulation will result in horrible death down the road. After an environmentally sustainable population is reached then two per couple. If someone were to give you the choice of having one child and everything would be great or having multiple children and all your grandchildren would die of starvation and pollution what would you choose? Unbelievably to myself and any sane person, some would choose the latter citing all sorts of excuses. Well, you've just been told. "Sorry, last post was for you. Your a douche bag. Population is controlled by nature. In every species, it is controlled by nature." Yes it is controlled by nature...so man should not interfere. There are thousands starving in Africa as we speak. And this is what happens when you outbreed the productive capacity of your land. That is indeed nature at work. And yet there are retards who would feed them so that in a few years there are still more of them starving. Soon you will all have "the chip". You will be sterilized after the birth of the first child. It will be recorded on your chip and be easily readable by TPTB agents. It is a sorry thing that government has to get involved, but people live in their own very small world and simply cannot see beyond it. They have no perception of what human population growth is actually doing to their Earth. There should be a time lapsed movie showing a panorama or human population growth and its effects on the Environment/Eco system. For those of us who have been on this Earth 60+ years we can personally tell you that the effects have been deleterious. By the very nature of life in a very populous area your Freedoms are necessarily restricted. You young ones have not idea of how good we had it growing up and living our youth. You could drive miles without seeing another car. No air pollution (except in big cities), water was clean; not polluted with prescription drugs. You could safely drink water in wilderness rivers. You could safely eat bottom feeding marine life. Some places you could hunt and fish without a license. There are places today where you cannot even sell rocks off your own land. So if you want a world with 40 billion people, be prepared to have lots of rules and regulations that restrict every aspect of your life. What you can eat and how much; Where you go; what time you can go; how many clothes you can have and when & how you must wash them. There are some areas today where you are not allowed to hang your laundry outside. YOu must use your electric or gas drier. So much for saving your carbon credits. You really need to give this some serious thought. Do you really think that women in CHina are being executed for having more than one child? That is really stupid propaganda. Do you think that the Chinese do not know how to do the simple Tubal Ligation known as "band aid surgery"? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 760960 United States 12/11/2009 03:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i thought my parents fought a great war to stop the bullshit like this Quoting: wizard 700544You are sadly delusional. You were lied to. No war was ever faught in the name of personal freedoms. None of us is the beneficiary of any of these wars. We are in fact the losers. We lost loved ones. Some of them that lived are/were terrible maimed. We have had progressivly fewer freedoms during and after these wars. During WWII food was rationed. I never understood why they did that. There was as much food being grown as ever. The men in the armed forces certainly did not eat any more than they ususally did. So why the rationing? Doea anyone know? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61722791 Canada 03/13/2015 12:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68508162 Spain 03/13/2015 12:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65776835 United States 03/13/2015 12:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40731538 Netherlands 03/13/2015 12:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68508162 Spain 03/13/2015 12:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The problem is a benefit culture and that of assistance, look at Africa you give them shit for free they breed like rats. same goes for the west too. Only smart people don't have kids If they cant afford to look after them properly,Morons have them because they cant be bothered to wear a condom. Go figure |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61722791 Canada 03/13/2015 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |