Ancient Anunnaki Spaceport found & confirmed

I love all these armchair "I know how to move these massive slabs"

Ya, You have it all figured out don't you?

Give me a break

Actually, it has already been figured out. As mentioned before, you can build your own stonehenge in your backyard if you wish.

Simple physics.


Stonehenge In Your Backyard!

[link to www.youtube.com]

does that slab weigh 120,000 to 200,000 Tons?

I think not. Apples and oranges really

you morons will believe anything!!

There is no way those slabs were moved for a mile and a half then put into perfect place with wooden levers and whatnot regardless of how many people you have.

Come on now

There is no way those slabs were moved for a mile and a half then put into perfect place with wooden levers and whatnot regardless of how many people you have.

Come on now


Because believing that aliens did it is more plausible.

And again, Todays best tech (Cranes) can't lift these and your telling me a bunch a people with some rope and wooden planks did?

And again, Todays best tech (Cranes) can't lift these and your telling me a bunch a people with some rope and wooden planks did?


I tend to think that it could be likely humans have lived on another planet before, but attributing such simple things as rock moving to aliens just distracts the issue.

Did you even watch the video some of us posted? This same principle can be used on stones of any size. And we are talking about using a fulcrums, not levers and pulleys.

how did a video of some ruins get turned in to "ancient anunnaki spaceport found & confirmed"?

i fail to see the space port and the evidence there has even been one

idiots

Because the discriptions & locations of these spaceports are recorded by the Sumarians? In great detail?

BTW, I'm not saying slabs of that size cannot be lifted to that height... it is actually quite easy using a very simple fulcrum. Modern machinery is not needed, gravity will do all the work. Physically speaking one single person could lift those slabs to that height completely by himself, it would just take alot of walking and some effort. And it would only take a couple months to achieve the feat. The ancients were masters of moving heavy objects using just some very simple principles.

D.

And again, Todays best tech (Cranes) can't lift these and your telling me a bunch a people with some rope and wooden planks did?


I tend to think that it could be likely humans have lived on another planet before, but attributing such simple things as rock moving to aliens just distracts the issue.

Did you even watch the video some of us posted? This same principle can be used on stones of any size. And we are talking about using a fulcrums, not levers and pulleys.

They can't be used with any size slab, it's just physics, At a certain point the amount of people needed grows beyond the possible and the force needed to move the lever grows as well.

I am attributing it to the Anunnaki because Sitchin recorded what our own ancestors wrote and recorded reagding the Anunnaki and it was written of there space ports and it just so happens that exactlty where they said they were these ruins hust happened to be?

That is a stretch, Have you read Sitchins work?

who ever said we are talking about Stonehenge?

Regardless, those video's don't even show a slab as big as Stonehenge in my opinion.

And they are nowhere close to the size of these slabs of stone.

A single person with a couple buckets of water can raise those concrete slabs by walking from end to end when the slabs are balanced on two fulcrums. A single person can do this, but a few people would definitely speed the task along. You do need to build up supports on either side as it is lifted into the air, but wooden structures and other concrete blocks are capable of this, and can be moved as smaller pieces.

If the slabs were in fact moved a great distance, this is also achievable by balancing the slabs on a one or two rocks and rotating the slab to move it forward.

The video we posted clearly shows both of these principles at play, but i regress, the anunnaki certainly could have been responsible, I just think the human scenario is more likely.

A single person with a couple buckets of water can raise those concrete slabs by walking from end to end when the slabs are balanced on two fulcrums. A single person can do this, but a few people would definitely speed the task along. You do need to build up supports on either side as it is lifted into the air, but wooden structures and other concrete blocks are capable of this, and can be moved as smaller pieces.

If the slabs were in fact moved a great distance, this is also achievable by balancing the slabs on a one or two rocks and rotating the slab to move it forward.

The video we posted clearly shows both of these principles at play, but i regress, the anunnaki certainly could have been responsible, I just think the human scenario is more likely.


It is clearly possible to slowly, but deliberately move a single stone block at a time like this. Slowly. Very slowly.

Riddle us this, then...

How long would it take to construct one pyramid this way? We're not talking years or even decades any longer. We're talking centuries! We're not talking about stomping crop circles in the middle of the night, now. We're talking about moving 20-80 tonne blocks over several miles and up several hundred feet and laying them so precisely that they have an impossibly lower margin of error than any of today's architectural or construction feats (buildings, machinery, even telescopes).

Ho do buckets of water explain this away, if you may, please?

The aliens managed to travel thousands of light years yet when the got to earth it was necessary for them to build launch pads out of massive slabs of stone? I'm finding it difficult to buy into that theory.

You think aliens would have something better to do other than building space ports out of stone?

You think aliens would have something better to do other than building space ports out of stone?


I did not state that aliens built the pyramids, if that was directed at me. I was just casting extreme doubt over the "man + buckets of water" theory proposed earlier as the likely method behind any of these constructions.

A lifting hand is worth ten wagging tongues. Be a man of fortitude and courage. Prepare to fight, for Earth gives man but two choices: to struggle or perish. There is work to be done in the Garden of God, therefore cease useless performances and word-wasting discussions, go, pick up the hoe and tackle the task to hand. - fragment from an Egyptian scroll.

this is all entirely bullshit, you all know that, right? the stones, over time, have blended together, many smaller stones caked in a mudlike covering to make ONE stone.

A lifting hand is worth ten wagging tongues. Be a man of fortitude and courage. Prepare to fight, for Earth gives man but two choices: to struggle or perish. There is work to be done in the Garden of God, therefore cease useless performances and word-wasting discussions, go, pick up the hoe and tackle the task to hand. - fragment from an Egyptian scroll.


Pretty much why I, myself, am seen less around here lately too. I agree with the philosophy. However, it does not explain how even tens or hundreds of thousands of people, armed with your earlier proposed water-bucket theory, constructed all of these mega projects in so little a time in history. Something we could not repeat today with all of the current modern technology at our disposal. Not only in the physical might sense, but also in the accuracy and precision sense. We simply could not do it. So much for evolution then, if we were to go along with that water-bucket theory, even for argument's sake.

A lifting hand is worth ten wagging tongues. Be a man of fortitude and courage. Prepare to fight, for Earth gives man but two choices: to struggle or perish. There is work to be done in the Garden of God, therefore cease useless performances and word-wasting discussions, go, pick up the hoe and tackle the task to hand. - fragment from an Egyptian scroll.


Pretty much why I, myself, am seen less around here lately too. I agree with the philosophy. However, it does explain how even tens or hundreds of thousands of people, armed with your earlier proposed water-bucket theory, constructed all of these mega projects in so little a time in history. Something we could not repeat today with all of the current modern technology at our disposal. Not only in the physical might sense, but also in the accuracy and precision sense. We simply could not do it. So much for evolution then, if we were to go along with that water-bucket theory, even for argument's sake.

The ancient civilizations were alot more advanced than we give them credit for, sure they didn't have some of the modern technology but they understood the basic sciences and astronomy better than we do today.. The supposedly most most advance scientists of today are spending billions looking for a subatomic "gravity" particle that doesn't exist. Even the basic model is wrong, there are no such things as electons.

DC