Conspiracy Theory: GLOBAL WARMING

The man needs a straitjacket. :gore:

Last Edited by >Anastasia< on 12/17/2009 07:39 AM

I personally love the look on the faces of these criminals when they get interviewed about global warming, 911, etc. Any person who has pretty good iq can tell these people's manorisms and the way they come off they are def. lieing about everything they tell you.


Interviewer: Can HAARP cause any bad effects on the earth?
HAARP Director: Oh of course not, its impossible to do any damage with our machine!

Localized cooling has already been observed. In cities they call it urban heat island effect. There are many examples of human activities having local effects.

But where is the scientific proof that human activities have effects on global climate? That has not been proven.

As Professor Bob Carter puts it:

"Concerning the climate change that we observe around us today – which, importantly, is occurring at similar rates and magnitudes to that known to have occurred throughout the historical and geological past - the simplest (and therefore null) hypothesis, is that "the climate change observed today is natural unless and until evidence accrues otherwise".

In regard to which, first, no such evidence has emerged. And, second, like any null hypothesis, that about modern climate change is there to be tested, as it has been. There are literally tens of thousands of peer-reviewed papers in major scientific journals that contain observations, data, experiments and theoretical reasoning that are consistent with the null hypothesis, which has therefore yet to be falsified (but, of course, one day might be).

The onus is therefore on Penny Wong and her scientists to provide some “evidence otherwise”. To give a clue how hard that task is, note that since 1988 (when the IPCC was created) western nations have spent more than $100 billion, and employed thousands of scientists, in attempts to measure the human signal in the global temperature record. The search has failed. Though no scientist doubts that humans influence climate at local level - causing both warmings (urban heat island effect) and coolings (land-use changes) - no definitive evidence has yet been discovered that a human influence is measurable, let alone dangerous, at global level. Rather, the human signal is lost in the noise of natural climate variation.

[link to www.quadrant.org.au]

I would like to see a breakdown of subliminals in this show. Turner Broadcasting (Time Warner) owns the channel. Looks to me like Jesse just works for tptw and his job is to fill everyone in on what "they" are doing to us. I did notice in the first show that Jesse said several times a reference to the "right hand not knowing what the left hand is upto" or something to that effect, which seems to be subliminal to me. I'm sure there is more. I'm gonna slow it down and watch it on here.

I used to believe in Global warming but not anymore


The world is shady where ever people are, its sad.

First show was the bobber
911 was the hook
Now the TW CEOs needed to have a expanded audience base. (very resent editing)

Prince Charles, son of Prince Phillip and QEII... both avid closet NAZIs, The britis invented the NAZI movement almost single handily. The entire effort of Phillip's life is to produce the extermination of nearly all mankind. He has dedicated his life to this work and did so very long ago. His son, Charles walks in his footsteps and teachings.

Sure, lift the ionosphere up several miles and then drop it down.. no big deal... like dropping a big stone in a rather small pond.... resulting pressure waves alone do amazing things to weather. But taht is only a very small part of the HARRP patented effects and uses.

A quick look into the mind of a madman

A shift is necessary toward lifestyles less geared to environmental damaging consumption patterns.
Maurice Strong

After all, sustainability means running the global environment - Earth Inc. - like a corporation: with depreciation, amortization and maintenance accounts. In other words, keeping the asset whole, rather than undermining your natural capital.
Maurice Strong

Also, it is interesting that developing countries, with China and India perhaps in the lead, where the future of the global environment will be decided are now on board with the case for sustainable development.
Maurice Strong

Don't accept that you can't make a difference. Because if you can't make a difference, you won't make a difference, and if you put a multiplier on that we will continue on an unsustainable pathway.
Maurice Strong

I am convinced the prophets of doom have to be taken seriously.
Maurice Strong

I am on the board of corporations who contribute both to environmental problems and their solutions. And I am on the NGO side: the Earth Council and other organizations.
Maurice Strong

I am President of the UN created University for Peace, which has a strong commitment to the relationship between peace, security and the environment. I meet with young people around the world and I always come away enthused and encouraged.
Maurice Strong

I believe we are going to move into a situation where the more effective conferences will be smaller, more specialized, more focused, with occasional large gatherings to get the attention of the larger world.
Maurice Strong

I was with Ted Turner when he came to see Kofi Annan - the Secretary-General of the UN - to announce his decision to put $1 billion to the service of UN projects and programs.
Maurice Strong

I've developed a huge regard for Toyota for its environmental awareness, for its immense commitment to research and development in this field, and for its leadership in developing hybrids which others are now following.
Maurice Strong

If you want to maintain a sustainable supply of fish you have to farm the fish, rather than mine them. So putting your money into fishing fleets that are going to exacerbate the problem by over-fishing is not the way to preserve the underlying asset.
Maurice Strong

In addition to this, they already have a fuel cell car on the road in Japan. It is subsidized from within the corporation because they are still at a high cost.
Maurice Strong

Inertia is a powerful force in human and political affairs.
Maurice Strong

Licences to have babies incidentally is something that I got in trouble for some years ago for suggesting even in Canada that this might be necessary at some point, at least some restriction on the right to have a child.
Maurice Strong

Nevertheless, the concept of sustainable development is now known - even amongst those who haven't accepted it - and it's recognized, debated and followed by an increasing number of businesses.
Maurice Strong

Not to say that corporations are perfect today, but even grand corporations like Dupont have made immense progress in translating some of their past environmentally damaging practices into new profit opportunities.
Maurice Strong

One of the things that I've always thought I would like to do is to develop an environmental index. Then people can measure their own environmental performance on an index as they do in other ways.
Maurice Strong

So, what we do as individuals matters. It adds up.
Maurice Strong

Ted Turner is still a leader. And he sets a great example. His ability financially has been reduced, but his influence and his example still is an important asset to the whole environmental movement.
Maurice Strong

The Prime Minister of India, at a meeting that I co-chaired a few months ago, stated that any development that is not sustainable is not development.
Maurice Strong

The tendency is to keep doing things the way you have done them.
Maurice Strong

Toyota was the first to put a commercial fuel cell powered car on the road, and I have no doubt that Toyota will continue to be in the front lines in the development of competitive fuel cell vehicles.
Maurice Strong

We in the industrialized world make a greater difference because our ecological footprint, our impact on the condition of the environment, is 40 to 50 times larger than that of people in the developing world.
Maurice Strong

We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrial civilization to collapse.
Maurice Strong

We must, from here on in, all go down the same path... There may not be another chance.
Maurice Strong

We need what I have often called an ecological approach to the management of these resources and we do not have that now. We have the inertia of past habits, unsustainable habits.
Maurice Strong

We owe at least this much to future generations, from whom we have borrowed a fragile planet called Earth.
Maurice Strong

We're either going to save Ihe world or no one will be saved.
Maurice Strong

Well they do have a use, but we should never believe that any international conference is going to suddenly solve problems like the condition of the global environment.
Maurice Strong

What pleases me most is that sustainable development is on almost everybody's agenda now.
Maurice Strong

Global warming is mostly due to our simply being in a more energetic part of the galaxy.

After 2012 when we reach the apex, it will start to cool again but very slowly as has been the warming.

We do need to stop all this nasty pollution though.

Thanks, watching now.

I don't think we should forget Al Gore I'm pretty sure he knew who was behind him and he knows exactly what he is doing. Al Gore is also responsible for spreading LIES & is making lot's of $$$ for it.

Many of you may not be aware that the DOD,USAF,Secret Gov have Space Laser Platforms (John Walston photographed these) operating above you this very minute.

[link to www.google.com]

These Lasers are capable not only of destroying missiles,space debris,and extra-terrestrial threats,but,are capable of cutting glaciers and icebergs and warming the world's oceans.In effect,the DOD,USAF,and Secret Gov's Space Platforms are Weather Weapons of Mass Destruction.



They already 'own' the weather.


USAF 2025 - Weather As
A Force Multiplier: Owning
The Weather
From Ross Dowe <[email protected]>
3-294


A Research Paper Presented To Air Force 2025

By

Col Tamzy J. House
Lt Col James B. Near, Jr.
LTC William B. Shields (USA)
Maj Ronald J. Celentano
Maj David M. Husband
Maj Ann E. Mercer
Maj James E. Pugh

August 1996



2025 is a study designed to comply with a directive from the chief of staff of the Air Force to examine the concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the future. Presented on 17 June 1996, this report was produced in the Department of Defense school environment of academic freedom and in the interest of advancing concepts related to national defense. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the United States government.

This report contains fictional representations of future situations/scenarios. Any similarities to real people or events, other than those specifically cited, are unintentional and are for purposes of illustration only.

This publication has been reviewed by security and policy review authorities, is unclassified, and is cleared for public release.

Contents

Chapter

Disclaimer

Illustrations

Tables

Acknowledgments

Executive Summary

1. Introduction2. 3. Required Capability4.
* Why Would We Want to Mess with the Weather?
* What Do We Mean by "Weather-modification"?5. System Description6.
* The Global Weather Network
* Applying Weather-modification to Military Operations7.Concept of Operations8.
* Precipitation
* Fog
* Storms
* Exploitation of "NearSpace" for Space Control

* Opportunities Afforded by Space Weather-modification

* Communications Dominance via Ionospheric Modification

* Artificial Weather

* Concept of Operations Summary9. Investigation Recommendations10.

* How Do We Get There From Here?

* Conclusions

Appendix

A Why Is the Ionosphere Important?

B Research to Better Understand and Predict Ionospheric Effects

C Acronyms and Definitions


Bibliography
Notes

Illustrations
Figure
3-1. Global Weather Network
3-2. The Military System for Weather-Modification Operations
4-1. Crossed-Beam Approach for Generating an Artificial Ionospheric Mirror
4-2. Artificial Ionospheric Mirrors Point-to-Point Communications
4-3. Artificial Ionospheric Mirror Over-the-Horizon Surveillance Concept
4-4. Scenarios for Telecommunications Degradation
5-1. A Core Competency Road Map to Weather Modification in 2025
5-2. A Systems Development Road Map to Weather Modification in 2025

Tables

Table 1 - Operational Capabilities Matrix

Acknowledgments

We express our appreciation to Mr Mike McKim of Air War College who provided a wealth of technical expertise and innovative ideas that significantly contributed to our paper. We are also especially grateful for the devoted support of our families during this research project. Their understanding and patience during the demanding research period were crucial to the project's success.

Executive Summary

In 2025, US aerospace forces can "own the weather" by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications. Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather-modification system to achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map.

A high-risk, high-reward endeavor, weather-modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom. While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather-modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. Some of the potential capabilities a weather-modification system could provide to a war-fighting commander in chief (CINC) are listed in table 1.

Technology advancements in five major areas are necessary for an integrated weather-modification capability: (1) advanced nonlinear modeling techniques, (2) computational capability, (3) information gathering and transmission, (4) a global sensor array, and (5) weather intervention techniques. Some intervention tools exist today and others may be developed and refined in the future.

Table 1 - Operational Capabilities Matrix

DEGRADE ENEMY FORCES ENHANCE FRIENDLY FORCES Precipitation EnhancementPrecipitation Avoidance - Flood Lines of Communication- Maintain/Improve LOC - Reduce PGM/Recce Effectiveness- Maintain Visibility - Decrease Comfort Level/Morale- Maintain Comfort Level/Morale Storm EnhancementStorm Modification - Deny Operations- Choose Battlespace Environment Precipitation DenialSpace Weather - Deny Fresh Water- Improve Communication Reliability -- Induce Drought- Intercept Enemy Transmissions Space Weather- Revitalize Space Assets - Disrupt Communications/RadarFog and Cloud Generation - Disable/Destroy Space Assets- Increase Concealment Fog and Cloud RemovalFog and Cloud Removal - Deny Concealment- Maintain Airfield Operations - Increase Vulnerability to PGM/Recce- Enhance PGM Effectiveness Detect Hostile Weather ActivitiesDefend against Enemy Capabilities

Current technologies that will mature over the next 30 years will offer anyone who has the necessary resources the ability to modify weather patterns and their corresponding effects, at least on the local scale. Current demographic, economic, and environmental trends will create global stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries or groups to turn this weather-modification ability into a capability.

In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels. These levels could include unilateral actions, participation in a security framework such as NATO, membership in an international organization such as the UN, or participation in a coalition. Assuming that in 2025 our national security strategy includes weather-modification, its use in our national military strategy will naturally follow. Besides the significant benefits an operational capability would provide, another motivation to pursue weather-modification is to deter and counter potential adversaries.

In this paper we show that appropriate application of weather-modification can provide battlespace dominance to a degree never before imagined. In the future, such operations will enhance air and space superiority and provide new options for battlespace shaping and battlespace awareness.<v3c15-7.htm#11 "The technology is there, waiting for us to pull it all together;"<v3c15-7.htm#22 in 2025 we can "Own the Weather."

Chapter 1 Introduction

Scenario: Imagine that in 2025 the US is fighting a rich, but now consolidated, politically powerful drug cartel in South America. The cartel has purchased hundreds of Russian-and Chinese-built fighters that have successfully thwarted our attempts to attack their production facilities. With their local numerical superiority and interior lines, the cartel is launching more than 10 aircraft for every one of ours. In addition, the cartel is using the French system probatoire d' observation de la terre (SPOT) positioning and tracking imagery systems, which in 2025 are capable of transmitting near-real-time, multispectral imagery with 1 meter resolution. The US wishes to engage the enemy on an uneven playing field in order to exploit the full potential of our aircraft and munitions.

Meteorological analysis reveals that equatorial South America typically has afternoon thunderstorms on a daily basis throughout the year. Our intelligence has confirmed that cartel pilots are reluctant to fly in or near thunderstorms. Therefore, our weather force support element (WFSE), which is a part of the commander in chief's (CINC) air operations center (AOC), is tasked to forecast storm paths and trigger or intensify thunderstorm cells over critical target areas that the enemy must defend with their aircraft. Since our aircraft in 2025 have all-weather capability, the thunderstorm threat is minimal to our forces, and we can effectively and decisively control the sky over the target.

The WFSE has the necessary sensor and communication capabilities to observe, detect, and act on weather-modification requirements to support US military objectives. These capabilities are part of an advanced battle area system that supports the war-fighting CINC. In our scenario, the CINC tasks the WFSE to conduct storm intensification and concealment operations. The WFSE models the atmospheric conditions to forecast, with 90 percent confidence, the likelihood of successful modification using airborne cloud generation and seeding.

In 2025, uninhabited aerospace vehicles (UAV) are routinely used for weather-modification operations. By cross-referencing desired attack times with wind and thunderstorm forecasts and the SPOT satellite's projected orbit, the WFSE generates mission profiles for each UAV. The WFSE guides each UAV using near-real-time information from a networked sensor array.

Prior to the attack, which is coordinated with forecasted weather conditions, the UAVs begin cloud generation and seeding operations. UAVs disperse a cirrus shield to deny enemy visual and infrared (IR) surveillance. Simultaneously, microwave heaters create localized scintillation to disrupt active sensing via synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems such as the commercially available Canadian search and rescue satellite-aided tracking (SARSAT) that will be widely available in 2025. Other cloud seeding operations cause a developing thunderstorm to intensify over the target, severely limiting the enemy's capability to defend. The WFSE monitors the entire operation in real-time and notes the successful completion of another very important but routine weather-modification mission.

This scenario may seem far-fetched, but by 2025 it is within the realm of possibility. The next chapter explores the reasons for weather-modification, defines the scope, and examines trends that will make it possible in the next 30 years.

Contact: [link to www.au.af.mil]
Last updated: 11 December 1996



[link to www.rense.com]

lol imagine that, it's really COLD in copenhagen right now

HAARP helps create the "global warming".

This snip from Space Jockey's post makes one's blood run cold.Hurricane Katrina comes to mind.

>
In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels.

yes the earth is alive and its climate changes....not a damn thing you or anyone else can do about it

you all know its a scam as everything else ! thers a reason why the elite are meeting more and more often now ....even the rich , famous are getting ready.

they are just gonna blame all that is gonna happen on the climate changes lol :)

something else is incoming !

fuck it !

Last Edited by antwan on 12/17/2009 11:34 AM

Going happen in the next 5/10 years we have passed the point of no return it is all down hill from now on no matter what they agree,we are starting to cool then we will start cooling fsster and faster big changes world wide starting right now then iceage we are fucked and your goverments know it.

You do not hear any mention of real causes of pollution- the real trappers of CO2- Methane (huge animal farms) and Coal! Oh that's right because it's big Corporate business as usual. Let's subsidize them instead.

The link you posted contradicts that - the 'enemies' DID know about the project; their spies just didn't manage to penetrate it. However, the Soviets did and sent information back to Russia that helped speed up their own program.

The Governments have been made up all over the world by the elitist for decades and there plan is working.


..

The point i was making is that there are plenty of reasons to want to stop pollution, lung problems, cancer etc however that doesn't matter to these jerks.

There are good reasons to want to stop pollution, but that is not the reason it's being worked on, you know it, i know it.

Global warming is real, however like most here, i believe it is not manmade,or at the very least not from what they say.

Thread: Monckton Vs Pauchauri

Yeah the rest of the solar system is heating up too, I suppose that is our fault as well?

What a load of crap.

Thats like saying "Well I'm dieing but at least its by gun shot rather than stabbing."

*face palm*

I remember the news footage during Hurricane Katrina and how all these scientists were blaming global warming. They kept repeating that Hurricanes would only get worse. That this was a new generation of super Hurricanes. Doesn't seem to be the case in the last couple of years. Weather modification has been going on for years. Since at least the 1940s. If you think about it like that they've had decades to perfect and weaponize their technology.

Also we have to remember Whitley Strieber and Art Bells, The Coming Global Superstorm. I totally bought onto that and now I'm wondering who Strieber and Bell were really working for.

So because most ppl believe that global warming is real makes it a fact? Didn't most ppl believe in burning witches at the stake at one point, didn't most humans believe that earth was the center of the universe? You get the point. Ideas evolve over time.

What troubles me is that we've studied the human body for hundreds of years and yet we are still learning new things about it. But we've only studied "climate change" for the last few decades and people are completely willing to pass legislation in regards to it. Legislation that severely restricts human beings and that causes our cost of living to increase tremendously.

does anyone know what the ratings for this episode and for that matter last weeks episode are? I assume the show is doing well?