James Cameron is on our side..that's why he gets dissed by media | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 772466 India 12/17/2009 12:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Titanic didn't touch the true motives of the other super wealthy families who wanted the other super wealthy families dead. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 843117So? What kind of logic is this? Titanic was a love story based on a doomed ship. It wasn't a movie about super-wealthy families wanting other super-wealthy families dead. That's why he isn't on our side, the movie should had focused on the real plot which was the assassination of all the rivaling wealthy families at that time that were on that boat? Guess who prosper from their demise? So how is Cameron on our side if he doesn't even mention the real events which contributed to the sinking of the Titanic. He's not on our side. I know many authors and writers who know a lot more than they write about. Do you think John Pilger, Joseph Splitz and others like them are unaware about the deeper conspiracies? They don't write about illuminati, because writing about such stuff would immediately disqualify them from being considered as serious journalists and writers. But despite their reluctance to reveal the complete truth, they are waking millions of people all over the world who would dismiss them as conspiracy kooks if they were to start writing about everything they know. Do you reveal the truth you know to every person you meet or to only a few friends who are open-minded enough to understand it? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 840765 United States 12/17/2009 12:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Your distaste of environmental propaganda shouldn't blind you to the reality of corporate looting of earth's natural resources in third world countries and the rape and plunder of poor countries of Asia and Africa by mining companies. |