Is our Solar System a Binary Star System?

Read this Website. Lots of good information here.

[link to www.binaryresearchinstitute.org]

Wanna talk about Magnestars?

If our sun does have a companion star it has to be pretty far out there. First off a brown dwarf will be 10 to 75 times the mass of Jupiter. Jupiter is a very bright object. So for an object 10 to 75 times more massive not to be seen and not to have a obvious impact on the sun and planets gravitationally, it has to be atleast a lightyear or more away. Still it is plausible.


[link to news.discovery.com]

If our sun does have a companion star it has to be pretty far out there. First off a brown dwarf will be 10 to 75 times the mass of Jupiter. Jupiter is a very bright object. So for an object 10 to 75 times more massive not to be seen and not to have a obvious impact on the sun and planets gravitationally, it has to be atleast a lightyear or more away. Still it is plausible.


[link to news.discovery.com]



The companion in the binary system gets no closer than 30 AU from the Sun.

[link to www.google.com]

If our sun does have a companion star it has to be pretty far out there. First off a brown dwarf will be 10 to 75 times the mass of Jupiter. Jupiter is a very bright object. So for an object 10 to 75 times more massive not to be seen and not to have a obvious impact on the sun and planets gravitationally, it has to be atleast a lightyear or more away. Still it is plausible.


[link to news.discovery.com]



The companion in the binary system gets no closer than 30 AU from the Sun.

[link to www.google.com]


Assuming the tremendous body of detailed research on this blog is accurate, and there's no reason NOT to, your 30AU distance concept may be accurate when the companion body is not in it's perihelion maneuver. During this transition, there's nothing to prohibit the object from getting MUCH closer than that.

Also, the research here bears out that brown dwarf sub-stars may be as small as 3-7 Jupiter masses....

Our magnetosphere is being HIGHLY disrupted, and the rest of the planets in our system are heating up probably due to the approaching magnetic node rings surrounding the dwarf as it executes the perihelion maneuver...

If our sun does have a companion star it has to be pretty far out there. First off a brown dwarf will be 10 to 75 times the mass of Jupiter. Jupiter is a very bright object. So for an object 10 to 75 times more massive not to be seen and not to have a obvious impact on the sun and planets gravitationally, it has to be atleast a lightyear or more away. Still it is plausible.


[link to news.discovery.com]



The companion in the binary system gets no closer than 30 AU from the Sun.

[link to www.google.com]

Also consider this secondary reference... The magnetosphere of our planet IS DEFINITELY weakening and is being distrupted by SOMETHING....

The approach of a brown dwarf into our locality celestially would certainly explain this as the magnetic node rings of the object impact our planet as it draws nearer..

This is an object, BTW, that can NOT be seen by telescopes under many scenarios detailed earlier in this blog...

[link to www.brighthub.com]

If our sun does have a companion star it has to be pretty far out there. First off a brown dwarf will be 10 to 75 times the mass of Jupiter. Jupiter is a very bright object. So for an object 10 to 75 times more massive not to be seen and not to have a obvious impact on the sun and planets gravitationally, it has to be atleast a lightyear or more away. Still it is plausible.


[link to news.discovery.com]



The companion in the binary system gets no closer than 30 AU from the Sun.

[link to www.google.com]


Assuming the tremendous body of detailed research on this blog is accurate, and there's no reason NOT to, your 30AU distance concept may be accurate when the companion body is not in it's perihelion maneuver. During this transition, there's nothing to prohibit the object from getting MUCH closer than that.

Also, the research here bears out that brown dwarf sub-stars may be as small as 3-7 Jupiter masses....

Our magnetosphere is being HIGHLY disrupted, and the rest of the planets in our system are heating up probably due to the approaching magnetic node rings surrounding the dwarf as it executes the perihelion maneuver...

I'd like to open a venue for the placement of information regarding our solar system actually being a BINARY system, with a Brown Dwarf as the companion star...

I have a good amount of information and links I'll be posting to this thread, and am interested in hearing from anyone with information, opinion, or curiosity regarding this possibility.

YES, it IS a "shooting gallery" out there....

And we are in it!

ps. the reoccurring theme of this years crop circles was based on earths magnetisphere..

I'd like to open a venue for the placement of information regarding our solar system actually being a BINARY system, with a Brown Dwarf as the companion star...

I have a good amount of information and links I'll be posting to this thread, and am interested in hearing from anyone with information, opinion, or curiosity regarding this possibility.

YES, it IS a "shooting gallery" out there....

And we are in it!


Your links and proof are bullshit. Any two-bit math major can prove it.

Planets would experience a period of slow orbit while closest to the binary twin, they would all do this, and they would all do it in the same relative area of orbit.

None of them do.

Oh and BTW Anonymous Coward 564424....

The elliptical orbits of ALL the planets demonstrate by the very nature of BEING an ellipse that there are TWO foci in the dynamic...

Again, I'm waiting on the edge of my chair for your mathematical proof...

Assuming, of course, that you are BEYOND some "two-bit" math major...
(or at LEAST on the same "par" as one...)

Well?

Oh and BTW Anonymous Coward 564424....

The elliptical orbits of ALL the planets demonstrate by the very nature of BEING an ellipse that there are TWO foci in the dynamic...

Again, I'm waiting on the edge of my chair for your mathematical proof...

Assuming, of course, that you are BEYOND some "two-bit" math major...
(or at LEAST on the same "par" as one...)

Well?



What, you re-writing Newton and Kepler now?

No. You don't need two foci to make an elliptical orbit.



I'd be interested in these supposed unexplained peturbations of yours...yes, I know there are still some...but it was by examining those that we discovered Pluto...which is forty AU out, a fraction of the mass of the Moon, has an apparent magnitude of only 15 but was predicted and located in 1930!

Seems to me a body several times the mass of Jupiter, brilliant in infrared, getting to within 30 AU, and actively interfering with the solar magnetic field, would have been spotted well before Pluto was. It certainly wouldn't hide even from amateurs until 2010.

Oh and BTW Anonymous Coward 564424....

The elliptical orbits of ALL the planets demonstrate by the very nature of BEING an ellipse that there are TWO foci in the dynamic...

Again, I'm waiting on the edge of my chair for your mathematical proof...

Assuming, of course, that you are BEYOND some "two-bit" math major...
(or at LEAST on the same "par" as one...)

Well?



What, you re-writing Newton and Kepler now?

No. You don't need two foci to make an elliptical orbit.



I'd be interested in these supposed unexplained peturbations of yours...yes, I know there are still some...but it was by examining those that we discovered Pluto...which is forty AU out, a fraction of the mass of the Moon, has an apparent magnitude of only 15 but was predicted and located in 1930!

Seems to me a body several times the mass of Jupiter, brilliant in infrared, getting to within 30 AU, and actively interfering with the solar magnetic field, would have been spotted well before Pluto was. It certainly wouldn't hide even from amateurs until 2010.