Is our Solar System a Binary Star System?

Courtesy of SOHO, from 1/5/2010!!!

This is UNBELIEVABLE!

Check out the luminous body at the 4 o'clock position near the sun! What is it?

[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]

Who's to say that you can summarily rule OUT the influence of magentic forces regarding gravity, or say that there IS no link or effect on ellipses, or anything else for that matter? Perhaps that's the very reason WHY the "math" works out...

We, as humans are pretty good at "pattern recognition" and I submit that recognizing these "patterns" that one could form relationships between these forces and be able to express them mathematically without even realizing that there are other things at work (i.e. MAGNETISM)

However, lines of magnetic force DO exert influences against gravity "waves" as this is shown quite easily with the repelling of magnets from one an another, or TO one another..

Courtesy of SOHO, from 1/5/2010!!!

This is UNBELIEVABLE!

Check out the luminous body at the 4 o'clock position near the sun! What is it?

[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]

Courtesy of SOHO, from 1/5/2010!!!

This is UNBELIEVABLE!

Check out the luminous body at the 4 o'clock position near the sun! What is it?

[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]




Its venus, bro, might even be Mercury, depending where the camera is relative to earth.


This solar system map shows the current position of the planets, and it looks like Venus or Mercury could be just about where that "object" is.

Dig it:
[link to www.fourmilab.ch]

Courtesy of SOHO, from 1/5/2010!!!

This is UNBELIEVABLE!

Check out the luminous body at the 4 o'clock position near the sun! What is it?

[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]

Dream Killer;
I have noticed on other threads that alot of people are saying this is Venus. I don't know how to use any kind of internet tools to figure this out and confirm that fact, but I am curious to know what makes you think this is not Venus based on your binary star system theory.
It looks to me like something might be behind Venus.
Thread: BREAKING EARTH SHATTERING WORLD CHANGING NEWS_after comet imact_birthing of TWO SUNS IN VIEW
This is another thread that is discussing this area as well. Different theory though.

Courtesy of SOHO, from 1/5/2010!!!

This is UNBELIEVABLE!

Check out the luminous body at the 4 o'clock position near the sun! What is it?

[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]

Dream Killer;
I have noticed on other threads that alot of people are saying this is Venus. I don't know how to use any kind of internet tools to figure this out and confirm that fact, but I am curious to know what makes you think this is not Venus based on your binary star system theory.
It looks to me like something might be behind Venus.
Thread: BREAKING EARTH SHATTERING WORLD CHANGING NEWS_after comet imact_birthing of TWO SUNS IN VIEW
This is another thread that is discussing this area as well. Different theory though.


I found this image and had no clue what it was! I "guessed" it could have been a remnant of the comet that crashed into the Sun last Sunday, OR it could have been something else. I put it up in the hopes of SOMEONE out there having an idea, and it worked. Check out the link from Tantalus!

However, lines of magnetic force DO exert influences against gravity "waves" as this is shown quite easily with the repelling of magnets from one an another, or TO one another..



My FEET exert influence against gravity. I'm performing that trick right now (well, okay, another part of my anatomy is occupied with that chore at the moment, but anyhow!)

This doesn't mean feet have some magical property to make gravity more complicated.


And the direction you are arguing, you seem to be saying that I wouldn't fall down if I didn't have feet. I'm sorry, but gravity works quite fine without input from foot magic. The fact that I can chose to stand up on them does not constrain gravity to only work in their presence.

Courtesy of SOHO, from 1/5/2010!!!

This is UNBELIEVABLE!

Check out the luminous body at the 4 o'clock position near the sun! What is it?

[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]

Dream Killer;
I have noticed on other threads that alot of people are saying this is Venus. I don't know how to use any kind of internet tools to figure this out and confirm that fact, but I am curious to know what makes you think this is not Venus based on your binary star system theory.
It looks to me like something might be behind Venus.
Thread: BREAKING EARTH SHATTERING WORLD CHANGING NEWS_after comet imact_birthing of TWO SUNS IN VIEW
This is another thread that is discussing this area as well. Different theory though.


I found this image and had no clue what it was! I "guessed" it could have been a remnant of the comet that crashed into the Sun last Sunday, OR it could have been something else. I put it up in the hopes of SOMEONE out there having an idea, and it worked. Check out the link from Tantalus!

Will do. Thanks

Its venus, bro, might even be Mercury, depending where the camera is relative to earth.


This solar system map shows the current position of the planets, and it looks like Venus or Mercury could be just about where that "object" is.

Dig it:
[link to www.fourmilab.ch]

January 3, 2010

Russia Prepares For Asteroid Strike As New Comet Nears Sun

Russian scientists are reporting today that our Sun’s worst Deep Solar Minimum in 100-years has been broken by a newly discovered comet currently plunging towards its surface that has increased this past months Sunspot Number to 15.7, the highest it has been in Solar Cycle 24 since March, 2008, and has caused a massive eruption of C-Class flares for the past 16 days.

Solar physicist David Hathaway of the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center had previously declared in 2008 about Solar Cycle 24 that it was “the blankest year of the space age”, a declaration he revised in 2009 when he stated “This is the quietest sun we've seen in almost a century”.

So powerful has this Deep Solar Minimum been during this cycle that scientists have reported a 50-year low in solar wind pressure, a 55-year low in solar radio emissions, and, most importantly, a 12-year low in solar “irradiance”; the sun's brightness which has dropped by 0.02% at visible wavelengths and 6% at extreme UV wavelengths since the solar minimum of 1996.

The critical danger to our Earth with the dropping of our Sun’s brightness lies in its “irradiance” levels being long associated with periods of Global cooling, including the catastrophic period between the 16th and 19th centuries named the Little Ice Age, a fact which American scientists have been accused of hiding from the public so as to further advance their now discredited theories of Planetary warming.

But to the greatest danger facing our World it is not from the horrific effects a massive Global Cooling event would have upon us, warn Russian scientists, but rather it is from the rising potential of our Earth being struck by, or “electrically interacting” with, a comet emanating from the currently destabilizing Oort Cloud from which these ‘space missiles’ are being increasingly hurled into our Solar System.

One such “electrical interaction” between these Oort Cloud “space missiles” plunging into our inner Solar System towards the Sun is occurring now, and offering further evidence supporting these Russian scientists claims after its discovery this week by Australian amateur astronomer Alan Watson who found this ‘new comet’ while inspecting images obtained by NASA’s STEREO-A's Hemispheric Imager. [Photo top left]

Important to note at this point are that Russian scientists stand adamantly opposed to their American counterparts over what constitutes a comet and defines their interactions in space. Where the American scientists state in their theories that comets are ‘dirty snowballs’ whose tails are formed by the ejection of an icy mass, Russian scientists ascribe to the theory of their being made of iron, and other such metals, and whose tails are formed by the electromagnetic interaction between them and the Sun. This is known as the Electric Comet Theory.

The comet currently plunging into the Sun whose arrival was ‘announced’ over a fortnight ago with the breaking of the Deep Solar Minimum and the mass ejection of solar flares supports the Russian scientist’s theories beyond all doubt, a fact, however, which the Americans will not acknowledge as their theories have never been designed for truth, but rather for the social engineering of their public to keep them as unaware as possible to what the future holds for our Earth.

Do you understand the difference between a body massing around that of Mercury at 60 AU, and a body several times the mass of Jupiter that comes within 30 AU?

are you saying that the star system is a computer.

are you saying that the star system is a computer.


Hmmm... No, but many of the theories man has come to understand, come directly from observations made of the universe. (read: star system)

These observations have led us to OTHER discoveries that has allowed our understanding to grow to the point where technologies can be developed surrounding these theories.

CAVEAT: Remember, ONE BASIC RULE OF PHYSICS: Theories are PROVEN by their EXCEPTIONS!

Courtesy of SOHO, from 1/5/2010!!!

This is UNBELIEVABLE!

Check out the luminous body at the 4 o'clock position near the sun! What is it?

[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]

Dream Killer;
I have noticed on other threads that alot of people are saying this is Venus. I don't know how to use any kind of internet tools to figure this out and confirm that fact, but I am curious to know what makes you think this is not Venus based on your binary star system theory.
It looks to me like something might be behind Venus.
Thread: BREAKING EARTH SHATTERING WORLD CHANGING NEWS_after comet imact_birthing of TWO SUNS IN VIEW
This is another thread that is discussing this area as well. Different theory though.


I found this image and had no clue what it was! I "guessed" it could have been a remnant of the comet that crashed into the Sun last Sunday, OR it could have been something else. I put it up in the hopes of SOMEONE out there having an idea, and it worked. Check out the link from Tantalus!

Will do. Thanks



Here's the link from Tantalus once again, in case you missed it...


Its venus, bro, might even be Mercury, depending where the camera is relative to earth.


This solar system map shows the current position of the planets, and it looks like Venus or Mercury could be just about where that "object" is.

Dig it:
[link to www.fourmilab.ch]

are you saying that the star system is a computer.


Hmmm... No, but many of the theories man has come to understand, come directly from observations made of the universe. (read: star system)

These observations have led us to OTHER discoveries that has allowed our understanding to grow to the point where technologies can be developed surrounding these theories.

CAVEAT: Remember, ONE BASIC RULE OF PHYSICS: Theories are PROVEN by their EXCEPTIONS!



Sorry, don't like to seem like I keep hammering on you, but that's a misquote.

It more-or-less happens over the different meanings in English of the word "prove"; the statement works better in German, where it is rendered "probe" (which better approximates the second meaning.)

A theory is not made strong by discovering an exception. A theory is made strong when you encounter an apparent exception.

One of two things happens; either the exception is true and you've managed to falsify the theory. It is now time to look for a better one. Or, the exception turns out to be properly covered by the theory anyhow, (or it is possible -- as it is, say, with relativistic effects and newtonian mechanics -- to use the exception to limit the domain.)

The exception, then, tests the theory. It proofs it the way a proving ground does; the exception is, in fact, a test to destruction of the theory. If it survives the exception, it will be stronger.

are you saying that the star system is a computer.


Hmmm... No, but many of the theories man has come to understand, come directly from observations made of the universe. (read: star system)

These observations have led us to OTHER discoveries that has allowed our understanding to grow to the point where technologies can be developed surrounding these theories.

CAVEAT: Remember, ONE BASIC RULE OF PHYSICS: Theories are PROVEN by their EXCEPTIONS!

Binary Star System



[link to www.youtube.com]

Brown dwarfs never ignited so they don't give off light. They range is size from 2 times the size of Jupiter, to almost the size of our Sun. They only way scientists/astronomers/NASA now see them is because of the infrared light they give off. Infrared is a light spectrum the human eye can NOT see.

If they're outside our solar system, it's not likely that you could see them with the naked eye looking up at night to the sky. Any amateur astronomers with an average telescope also would NOT see them as they do not emit normal light for the eye to see. Stars/lights you do see in the night sky are real stars.