When Will "Planet X" Cause A Pole Shift? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 92100 United States 01/08/2010 12:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That is like saying the Government has slowed down printing money. By the way, how do you know the number of earthquakes has decreased? Wait...let me guess....NASA told you. Quoting: Volar 796327Why would NASA tell us anything about earthquakes? They don't have anything to do with keeping track of statistical earthquake data. If you're claiming that earthquakes are increasing, how do you know that? Wait...let me guess...Nancy told you. Please do not challenge me Circuit Breaker....you do not have a clue. You live in your own little world. [link to scifiles.larc.nasa.gov] [link to nasadaacs.eos.nasa.gov] NASA does not correlate earthquake data...that is the job of the USGS, and other countried have their own counterpatrs...none of which show any increase in earthquakes. You really need to come out of the basement every once in a while. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 92100 United States 01/08/2010 12:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Volar User ID: 796327 United States 01/08/2010 12:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That is like saying the Government has slowed down printing money. By the way, how do you know the number of earthquakes has decreased? Wait...let me guess....NASA told you. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 92100Why would NASA tell us anything about earthquakes? They don't have anything to do with keeping track of statistical earthquake data. If you're claiming that earthquakes are increasing, how do you know that? Wait...let me guess...Nancy told you. Please do not challenge me Circuit Breaker....you do not have a clue. You live in your own little world. [link to scifiles.larc.nasa.gov] [link to nasadaacs.eos.nasa.gov] NASA does not correlate earthquake data...that is the job of the USGS, and other countried have their own counterpatrs...none of which show any increase in earthquakes. You really need to come out of the basement every once in a while. You got to be kidding....NASA, and the USGS are in bed together. You are not going to get true Earthquake data from USGS if it becomes sensitive information. Especially if it relates, in any way, to Planet X. [link to www.nasa.gov] [link to lidar.cr.usgs.gov] [link to pubs.usgs.gov] [link to lpdaac.usgs.gov (secure)] [link to www.usgs.gov] [link to pubs.usgs.gov] [link to pubs.usgs.gov] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 838091 Canada 01/08/2010 12:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Volar User ID: 796327 United States 01/08/2010 12:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let me ask you this, Volar, how long do you intend to keep up the whining about the imaginary planet x? When do you suppose it will be "undeniable"? What if it never is? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 92100What kind of question is that? This is like saying, "When are our "fearless leaders" going to come clean, and stop all this lying, to the American people. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 92100 United States 01/08/2010 01:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let me ask you this, Volar, how long do you intend to keep up the whining about the imaginary planet x? When do you suppose it will be "undeniable"? What if it never is? Quoting: Volar 796327What kind of question is that? This is like saying, "When are our "fearless leaders" going to come clean, and stop all this lying, to the American people. Your evasion is noted. |
Henry Fnord User ID: 548017 United States 01/08/2010 01:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let me ask you this, Volar, how long do you intend to keep up the whining about the imaginary planet x? When do you suppose it will be "undeniable"? What if it never is? Quoting: Volar 796327What kind of question is that? This is like saying, "When are our "fearless leaders" going to come clean, and stop all this lying, to the American people. That makes no sense to me at all. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 92100 United States 01/08/2010 01:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 859201 United States 01/08/2010 01:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let me ask you this, Volar, how long do you intend to keep up the whining about the imaginary planet x? When do you suppose it will be "undeniable"? What if it never is? Quoting: Henry FnordWhat kind of question is that? This is like saying, "When are our "fearless leaders" going to come clean, and stop all this lying, to the American people. That makes no sense to me at all. And neither does zetatalk/nancy. |
Volar User ID: 796327 United States 01/08/2010 02:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let me ask you this, Volar, how long do you intend to keep up the whining about the imaginary planet x? When do you suppose it will be "undeniable"? What if it never is? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 92100What kind of question is that? This is like saying, "When are our "fearless leaders" going to come clean, and stop all this lying, to the American people. Your evasion is noted. What I am trying to say is it no longer is up to me. Nancy is the one calling the shots. I am just a believer. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 92100 United States 01/08/2010 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let me ask you this, Volar, how long do you intend to keep up the whining about the imaginary planet x? When do you suppose it will be "undeniable"? What if it never is? Quoting: Volar 796327What kind of question is that? This is like saying, "When are our "fearless leaders" going to come clean, and stop all this lying, to the American people. Your evasion is noted. What I am trying to say is it no longer is up to me. Nancy is the one calling the shots. I am just a believer. The question is WHY are you a "believer". What exactly is it about her lies that are so compelling to you? Can you provide even one single instance of an astronomical prediction or claim she's EVER made that has actually come true? |
Volar User ID: 796327 United States 01/08/2010 02:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let me ask you this, Volar, how long do you intend to keep up the whining about the imaginary planet x? When do you suppose it will be "undeniable"? What if it never is? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 92100What kind of question is that? This is like saying, "When are our "fearless leaders" going to come clean, and stop all this lying, to the American people. Your evasion is noted. What I am trying to say is it no longer is up to me. Nancy is the one calling the shots. I am just a believer. The question is WHY are you a "believer". What exactly is it about her lies that are so compelling to you? Can you provide even one single instance of an astronomical prediction or claim she's EVER made that has actually come true? Yes she has. Her credibility has been skewed by the likes of Dr. Postman, Circuit Breaker, Menow, Astronut, and others, that find delight in antagonizing, and belittling. [link to revver.com] [link to revver.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 795135 United States 01/08/2010 03:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let me ask you this, Volar, how long do you intend to keep up the whining about the imaginary planet x? When do you suppose it will be "undeniable"? What if it never is? Quoting: Volar 796327What kind of question is that? This is like saying, "When are our "fearless leaders" going to come clean, and stop all this lying, to the American people. Your evasion is noted. What I am trying to say is it no longer is up to me. Nancy is the one calling the shots. I am just a believer. The question is WHY are you a "believer". What exactly is it about her lies that are so compelling to you? Can you provide even one single instance of an astronomical prediction or claim she's EVER made that has actually come true? Yes she has. Her credibility has been skewed by the likes of Dr. Postman, Circuit Breaker, Menow, Astronut, and others, that find delight in antagonizing, and belittling. [link to revver.com] [link to revver.com] Wrong. Nancy has indeed NEVER gotten even one single astronomical prediction or claim right. Having her tell you she has is completely laughable. Try again. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 795135 United States 01/08/2010 03:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let me ask you this, Volar, how long do you intend to keep up the whining about the imaginary planet x? When do you suppose it will be "undeniable"? What if it never is? Quoting: Volar 796327What kind of question is that? This is like saying, "When are our "fearless leaders" going to come clean, and stop all this lying, to the American people. Your evasion is noted. What I am trying to say is it no longer is up to me. Nancy is the one calling the shots. I am just a believer. Wow! Just wow! Finally, a bunker admits that he has no mind of his own and is just tagging onto Nancy's skirt. |
Volar User ID: 796327 United States 01/08/2010 04:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What I am trying to say is it no longer is up to me. Nancy is the one calling the shots. I am just a believer. Quoting: DrPostmanWow, what a hell of an admission. This is why I love GLP. The idea of someone totally suspending their own credulity so that someone else can tell them how to think is simply amazing. Like I said, Dr. Postman, I do not take credit for someone else's show. This is Nancy, and the Zeta's grand stand. I am only an observer, and a believer of what she relates, in terms of Planet X. Anyone can hide behind a Computer, and spout any kind of remark they desire. My respect for Nancy is the way she handles all the hostility, and name calling, coming from people who are unable to face the reality of a rogue Planet entering into our Solar System, causing destruction. |
Henry Fnord User ID: 548017 United States 01/08/2010 04:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes she has. Her credibility has been skewed by the likes of Dr. Postman, Circuit Breaker, Menow, Astronut, and others, that find delight in antagonizing, and belittling. Quoting: Volar 796327[link to revver.com] LMAO! The very first "prediction" she offers as proof of her accuracy in that video starts off: "The earth's magnetic North Pole points consistently in one direction" and "does not change, ever." You stand by that? |
Anonymous 843492 User ID: 843492 United Kingdom 01/08/2010 04:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Henry Fnord User ID: 548017 United States 01/08/2010 04:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My respect for Nancy is the way she handles all the hostility, and name calling, Quoting: Volar 796327I find her at least as rude as her critics and if you go back over the internet exchanges of the last ten years or more, she started most of it. In fact, she is dependent on generating hostility and name calling. She actually revels in it. It is essential that there is a continuing debate and ridicule in order to validate ZetaTalk. Some of her followers admit as much. Without posting these outlandish claims in an open forum where rational people are sure to respond, there would be very, very little to no attention paid to Nancy. |
Volar User ID: 796327 United States 01/08/2010 04:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes she has. Her credibility has been skewed by the likes of Dr. Postman, Circuit Breaker, Menow, Astronut, and others, that find delight in antagonizing, and belittling. Quoting: Henry Fnord[link to revver.com] LMAO! The very first "prediction" she offers as proof of her accuracy in that video starts off: "The earth's magnetic North Pole points consistently in one direction" and "does not change, ever." You stand by that? How many directions do YOU think Earth's magnetic North Pole should point? |
Astronut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 634208 United States 01/08/2010 04:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Like I said, Dr. Postman, I do not take credit for someone else's show. This is Nancy, and the Zeta's grand stand. I am only an observer, and a believer of what she relates, in terms of Planet X. Anyone can hide behind a Computer, and spout any kind of remark they desire. My respect for Nancy is the way she handles all the hostility, and name calling, coming from people who are unable to face the reality of a rogue Planet entering into our Solar System, causing destruction. Quoting: Volar 796327Hap stepped up to the plate and offered Nancy the use of his personal telescope; I'd say that's far more than "hiding behind a computer." In fact I'd say your sweeping generalization is an insult to what Nancy's been offered. Nancy "handled it" by pretty much ignoring it, as she does with anything that disproves her. Like others, I did more than just sit behind a computer, I put her claim to the test. The result? Her claim was wrong Volar, the moon and polaris are right where they should be. There's no "rogue planet causing destruction" at all, it's fiction, not reality. |
Circuit Breaker (OP) User ID: 766491 United States 01/08/2010 04:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes she has. Her credibility has been skewed by the likes of Dr. Postman, Circuit Breaker, Menow, Astronut, and others, that find delight in antagonizing, and belittling. Quoting: Volar 796327No, Nancy's credibility was destroyed by her own failed predictions such as "Planet X" causing a "pole shift" on May 15, 2003...then May 27, 2003...then definitely by June 1, 2003...then within "weeks not months." And so on. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Astronut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 634208 United States 01/08/2010 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes she has. Her credibility has been skewed by the likes of Dr. Postman, Circuit Breaker, Menow, Astronut, and others, that find delight in antagonizing, and belittling. Quoting: Volar 796327[link to revver.com] LMAO! The very first "prediction" she offers as proof of her accuracy in that video starts off: "The earth's magnetic North Pole points consistently in one direction" and "does not change, ever." You stand by that? How many directions do YOU think Earth's magnetic North Pole should point? LOL, that's not what she said, she said it points in one direction consistently without ever changing. It changes, and is anything but consistent. Last Edited by Astromut on 01/08/2010 04:59 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 795135 United States 01/08/2010 05:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My respect for Nancy is the way she handles all the hostility, and name calling, coming from people who are unable to face the reality of a rogue Planet entering into our Solar System, causing destruction. Quoting: Volar 796327Never mind that she has a 100% failure record in the subject at the heart of her cult, astronomy. You think she's "nice" so you believe her. Can it possibly GET any funnier! |
Volar User ID: 796327 United States 01/08/2010 05:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes she has. Her credibility has been skewed by the likes of Dr. Postman, Circuit Breaker, Menow, Astronut, and others, that find delight in antagonizing, and belittling. Quoting: Astronut[link to revver.com] LMAO! The very first "prediction" she offers as proof of her accuracy in that video starts off: "The earth's magnetic North Pole points consistently in one direction" and "does not change, ever." You stand by that? How many directions do YOU think Earth's magnetic North Pole should point? LOL, that's not what she said, she said it points in one direction consistently without ever changing. It changes, and is anything but consistent. Yes, I know what she meant, although it is very easy to twist things around to mean entirely something else....I learned that, from talking with you guys. Her reasoning is the magnetic pole is stationary, and only the crust moves. If I am not mistaken, I do believe she also said the Zetas periodically do correction, so as to stabilize the seasons. Of course, I would have to double check these exact words, to make sure. I will get back with you. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 795135 United States 01/08/2010 05:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astronut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 634208 United States 01/08/2010 06:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, I know what she meant, although it is very easy to twist things around to mean entirely something else....I learned that, from talking with you guys. Quoting: Volar 796327Oh no, you've proven very consistent at twisting peoples words, it's not like this is the first time you've done it. Her reasoning is the magnetic pole is stationary, and only the crust moves. If I am not mistaken, I do believe she also said the Zetas periodically do correction, so as to stabilize the seasons. Quoting: VolarIf the crust is moving but the magnetic field isn't, then polaris should still be moving as seen by anyone standing on the crust. She said the Zetas were tilting the earth back and forth to simulate the seasons, but if that were the case the stars would all be out of place as sidereal time would still equal 24 hours exactly (instead of the 23hrs 56minutes 4.1seconds it's supposed to be) and the constellations would cease to change with the seasons. Polaris would also appear to tilt out of place, as would the moon, but none of that has happened. Polaris and the moon are right where they're supposed to be Volar, she was wrong. |
Volar User ID: 796327 United States 01/08/2010 06:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You'll fall for almost anything, won't you? Just how do these imaginary "zetas" perform "corrections"? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 795135I will try, and find out. Why don't you lend a hand, and help me find some answers. If not, why should I waste my time, and energy, if no one cares, or would believe, anyway. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 795135 United States 01/08/2010 07:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You'll fall for almost anything, won't you? Just how do these imaginary "zetas" perform "corrections"? Quoting: Volar 796327I will try, and find out. Why don't you lend a hand, and help me find some answers. If not, why should I waste my time, and energy, if no one cares, or would believe, anyway. I already know the answers, and you would too if you bothered to learn anything about real astronomy and science. But you have refused and instead have admitted to simply believe any damn stupid thing she tells you. How sad is that? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 548017 United States 01/08/2010 08:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes she has. Her credibility has been skewed by the likes of Dr. Postman, Circuit Breaker, Menow, Astronut, and others, that find delight in antagonizing, and belittling. Quoting: Volar 796327[link to revver.com] LMAO! The very first "prediction" she offers as proof of her accuracy in that video starts off: "The earth's magnetic North Pole points consistently in one direction" and "does not change, ever." You stand by that? How many directions do YOU think Earth's magnetic North Pole should point? Well, since the magnetic North Pole ISN'T the same as the pole at the end of the axis on which the Earth turns, it rotates with the Earth and "points" in a number of different directions throughout a 24 hour period and not "consistently in one direction as though focused on a distant point in the Universe" as claimed by Nancy. And that's not taking into account that the magnetic North Pole has been gradually moving ever since it was located. [link to www.zetatalk.com] Additionally, what Nancy is claiming here is that there are never any reversals of the magnetic poles. |
Volar User ID: 796327 United States 01/08/2010 09:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You'll fall for almost anything, won't you? Just how do these imaginary "zetas" perform "corrections"? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 795135I will try, and find out. Why don't you lend a hand, and help me find some answers. If not, why should I waste my time, and energy, if no one cares, or would believe, anyway. I already know the answers, and you would too if you bothered to learn anything about real astronomy and science. But you have refused and instead have admitted to simply believe any damn stupid thing she tells you. How sad is that? Sounds like you want to "bait" me into saying something that would let you into the door to ridicule. If you hate Nancy that much, you are looking for a chance to relieve some of the negative adrenalin that has been building up. Why would I want to pamper your Psychopathic tendencies? |