When Will "Planet X" Cause A Pole Shift?

Yes she has. Her credibility has been skewed by the likes of Dr. Postman, Circuit Breaker, Menow, Astronut, and others, that find delight in antagonizing, and belittling.

[link to revver.com]


LMAO!

The very first "prediction" she offers as proof of her accuracy in that video starts off:

"The earth's magnetic North Pole points consistently in one direction" and "does not change, ever."

You stand by that?


How many directions do YOU think Earth's magnetic North Pole should point?


Well, since the magnetic North Pole ISN'T the same as the pole at the end of the axis on which the Earth turns, it rotates with the Earth and "points" in a number of different directions throughout a 24 hour period and not "consistently in one direction as though focused on a distant point in the Universe" as claimed by Nancy.

And that's not taking into account that the magnetic North Pole has been gradually moving ever since it was located.

[link to www.zetatalk.com]

Additionally, what Nancy is claiming here is that there are never any reversals of the magnetic poles.

Regardless of whether it is Magnetic, or Crustal movement, there has to be a reason for the abrupt changes taking place on our Planet. Twenty years ago, this subject would have never been this controversial, let along all the other abnormalities we are also experiencing. This is one of the basic reasons I feel we may be in serious trouble. How can one NOT suspect a Planet X....unless of course age prevents a judgmental comparison of the past.

Regardless of whether it is Magnetic, or Crustal movement, there has to be a reason for the abrupt changes taking place on our Planet. Twenty years ago, this subject would have never been this controversial, let along all the other abnormalities we are also experiencing. This is one of the basic reasons I feel we may be in serious trouble. How can one NOT suspect a Planet X....unless of course age prevents a judgmental comparison of the past.

Yes, I know what she meant, although it is very easy to twist things around to mean entirely something else....I learned that, from talking with you guys.

Oh no, you've proven very consistent at twisting peoples words, it's not like this is the first time you've done it.

Her reasoning is the magnetic pole is stationary, and only the crust moves. If I am not mistaken, I do believe she also said the Zetas periodically do correction, so as to stabilize the seasons.

If the crust is moving but the magnetic field isn't, then polaris should still be moving as seen by anyone standing on the crust. She said the Zetas were tilting the earth back and forth to simulate the seasons, but if that were the case the stars would all be out of place as sidereal time would still equal 24 hours exactly (instead of the 23hrs 56minutes 4.1seconds it's supposed to be) and the constellations would cease to change with the seasons. Polaris would also appear to tilt out of place, as would the moon, but none of that has happened. Polaris and the moon are right where they're supposed to be Volar, she was wrong.

So a "correction" in the tilt would lead one to believe it was Magnetic, instead of a Crustal movement? Do you realize that even if the poles are moving 40 miles a year, it would only take a decade to move 400 miles? That is only if the movement does not speed up. With Planet X, you can just about guarantee it will.

Let me ask you this, Volar, how long do you intend to keep up the whining about the imaginary planet x? When do you suppose it will be "undeniable"? What if it never is?


What kind of question is that? This is like saying, "When are our "fearless leaders" going to come clean, and stop all this lying, to the American people.


Your evasion is noted.


What I am trying to say is it no longer is up to me. Nancy is the one calling the shots. I am just a believer.

So a "correction" in the tilt would lead one to believe it was Magnetic, instead of a Crustal movement? Do you realize that even if the poles are moving 40 miles a year, it would only take a decade to move 400 miles? That is only if the movement does not speed up. With Planet X, you can just about guarantee it will.



If you're talking about the "correction" the alleged Zetas are supposedly making to maintain the seasons, what Nancy is claiming is a physical tilting of the Earth. A magnetic change would have no effect on that.

It seems to me you are still confused on the distinction between the magnetic poles and physical poles. This is no doubt in large part due to you believing Nancy is an authority on the subject when she obviously does not know what she is talking about.

So a "correction" in the tilt would lead one to believe it was Magnetic, instead of a Crustal movement?

Do you realize that even if the poles are moving 40 miles a year, it would only take a decade to move 400 miles?

That is not what I said. Try reading it slower, and more carefully this time. Then you will see I am in complete agreement with Nancy.

Holy crap... I see "Volar" is back and trolling with a vengeance!

Holy crap... I see "Volar" is back and trolling with a vengeance!

The trolling is left to you Menow.. but I am finding Volar to be insightful and patient with all this debunking crap.

Volar.. You are doing and amazing job at showing that the debunkers lack any qualification for judging Nancy or Zetatalk. Thank you for your efforts.

I liked Volar better when he was Zetamax.

Holy crap... I see "Volar" is back and trolling with a vengeance!

The trolling is left to you Menow.. but I am finding Volar to be insightful and patient with all this debunking crap.

Volar.. You are doing and amazing job at showing that the debunkers lack any qualification for judging Nancy or Zetatalk. Thank you for your efforts.

Yes she has. Her credibility has been skewed by the likes of Dr. Postman, Circuit Breaker, Menow, Astronut, and others, that find delight in antagonizing, and belittling.

No, Nancy's credibility was destroyed by her own failed predictions such as "Planet X" causing a "pole shift" on May 15, 2003...then May 27, 2003...then definitely by June 1, 2003...then within "weeks not months." And so on.

Holy crap... I see "Volar" is back and trolling with a vengeance!

The trolling is left to you Menow.. but I am finding Volar to be insightful and patient with all this debunking crap.

Volar.. You are doing and amazing job at showing that the debunkers lack any qualification for judging Nancy or Zetatalk. Thank you for your efforts.


What a joke. Neither you nor "Volar" can demonstrate where ANY of Nancy's astronomical predictions or claims are true.

By the way... why does Nancy think "RA" means "right angle"?

Heh.

Holy crap... I see "Volar" is back and trolling with a vengeance!

The trolling is left to you Menow.. but I am finding Volar to be insightful and patient with all this debunking crap.

Volar.. You are doing and amazing job at showing that the debunkers lack any qualification for judging Nancy or Zetatalk. Thank you for your efforts.


What a joke. Neither you nor "Volar" can demonstrate where ANY of Nancy's astronomical predictions or claims are true.

By the way... why does Nancy think "RA" means "right angle"?

Heh.

And yet with all of your efforts you have achieved?????

I liked Volar better when he was Zetamax.

Yes she has. Her credibility has been skewed by the likes of Dr. Postman, Circuit Breaker, Menow, Astronut, and others, that find delight in antagonizing, and belittling.

No, Nancy's credibility was destroyed by her own failed predictions such as "Planet X" causing a "pole shift" on May 15, 2003...then May 27, 2003...then definitely by June 1, 2003...then within "weeks not months." And so on.

If her credibility was destroyed then why do you dedicate so much of your energy to it?

You have almost generated some creativity in this tread CB. With a little more effort you might be able to start training your colleges in the art of bullshit.

I liked Volar better when he was Zetamax.

I see the debunker boycott has FAILED - just as I predicted it would!!

I have demonstrated that the likes of you and "Volar" are nothing but lying hoaxters, and had a grand time doing so!

Noted, that you had no response to the points of fact I raised, but only resort to attacking me. Droll, that.

I have demonstrated that the likes of you and "Volar" are nothing but lying hoaxters, and had a grand time doing so!

Noted, that you had no response to the points of fact I raised, but only resort to attacking me. Droll, that.

We have been debating for years and yet the only facts you have used lack any integrity.

You have used nothing but the lies that have been shoved down our throats in one form or another.

When I have pointed out to you that even you do not believe the drivel you spew, you fain ignorance.

With this experience there is nothing left to do but to point out your flawed character and cowardices.

With ever post you have done nothing but prove you lack any qualification to speak in public let alone debate some thing serious.

You are a plague on humanity.

If you honestly thought that Nancy was a crazy old lady that heard voices in her head, and this is the tact you choose the remidy the situation, then you are again proving that you do not deserve to be heard.

I think that only peace and love will save the world from the coming catastrophe. I propose a world wide orgy, group sex on a massive scale that would exhaust all the negative energies from this world. I think I'm going to start early. Care to join me?

I have demonstrated that the likes of you and "Volar" are nothing but lying hoaxters, and had a grand time doing so!

Noted, that you had no response to the points of fact I raised, but only resort to attacking me. Droll, that.

We have been debating for years and yet the only facts you have used lack any integrity.


The fact that ALL of Nancy's astronomical claims are false shows *MY* lack of integrity?!? That's SOOOOME thinkin' you're doin' there, pally!


You have used nothing but the lies that have been shoved down our throats in one form or another.


Excuse me? Which "lie"? Please be specific. You mean the "lie" that RA actually means right Right Ascension? The "lie" that Earth is orbiting normally? The "lie" that the Sun/Moon are right where they belong in the sky? The "lie" that a large planet can't hover, unseen by astronomers, near the Sun for 7 years? To WHICH (alleged) "LIE" do you refer?


When I have pointed out to you that even you do not believe the drivel you spew, you fain ignorance.


Point out again, if you dare. No one knows what you are talking about, including me.


With this experience there is nothing left to do but to point out your flawed character and cowardices.


No, you could point out how you know that any astronomical claim made by Nancy is correct. What is so hard about that?


With ever post you have done nothing but prove you lack any qualification to speak in public let alone debate some thing serious.

You are a plague on humanity.

If you honestly thought that Nancy was a crazy old lady that heard voices in her head, and this is the tact you choose the remidy the situation, then you are again proving that you do not deserve to be heard.


I have never said that Nancy is nothing but a "crazy old lady that hears voices in her head". Never. Care to try again?