Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,266 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 370,172
Pageviews Today: 515,615Threads Today: 116Posts Today: 2,451
05:19 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT From Boeing 767 GREAT PIX

 
Jon Carlson
04/04/2005 08:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT From Boeing 767 GREAT PIX
WTC Jet Engine Confirmed
NOT From Boeing 767
By Jon Carlson
carlson.jon@att.net
4-4-5


Popular Mechanics, while mentioning that an engine from the South Tower airliner landed in the street, neglected to show an engine photo, engine street location, and engine positive identification. Just by identifying undamaged parts from the damaged engine positive identification of the engine was made in the article: However, the engine identified, a CFM56, is the primary engine of the Boeing 737 not the Boeing 767 alleged to have struck the South Tower.

Shortly after the article was posted, a Boeing 767 airliner mechanic emailed that he concurred with the engine identification and that it was not from a Boeing 767.

Excerpts from his email:

I am an A&P mechanic for a major airline. I overhaul 767´s. The engines are NOT from a 767. No 767 in existence uses CFM56´s. Not enough power to lift a ´67.

THOSE ENGINES ON THE STREET IN NEW YORK DID NOT COME OFF A 767.

Engine location. Church & Murray Street.





In the hardest hitting investigative journalism since 911, The Power Hour Radio in their completely revamped video, 911 in Plane Site, the Director´s Cut (Order) reported that the FBI roped off the area and photographed the street engine. Has anyone seen the FBI report on identification of that engine? Or their street engine photos?








Since the engine landed 3 blocks away from Ground Zero the FBI can´t say the engine was vaporized. Where is it today? Ditto for the Pentagon JT8D engine that was identified that was NOT from Flight 77.






Full story at [link to www.rense.com]


KARL SCHWARZ has the big Pentagon picture in hard-hitting analysis

l Note the html ending. Visit www.karlschwarz.com for the big 9/11 picture and more.

In the hardest hitting journalism since 9/11, THE POWER HOUR RADIO SHOW has totally revamped and added new analysis to an earlier video. 911 IN PLANE SITE, The Director´s Cut. Visit www.policestate21.com to order. A quote from their South Tower airliner video analysis: "...there was some sort of incendiary or explosive that would serve as a match to ignite the enormous amount of fuel (when the plane hit the ST.)" [link to www.rense.com] has the full story.

Craig Hill also has revamped his dynamite video, Treason, Inc.
[link to hillsenatenow.org]

DON´T MISS:
Second 911 Remote Control Antenna Verified
[link to www.rense.com]

Avionics Expert-A 911 Remote Control Lesson for PM
[link to www.rense.com]

WTC Cutter Charges Clearly Visible
[link to www.rense.com]

Real 911 Science For PM - The ST Airliner Photo
[link to www.rense.com]

PM Claims Landing Gear Made Pentagon 12 Foot Hole
[link to www.rense.com]

PM Missed NASA 911-type Airliner Crash 20 Years Ago
[link to www.rense.com]

Is Popular Mechanics Hiding 911 NYC Engine In Street Photo?
[link to www.rense.com]

Missing Pentagon Jet Engine Identified?
[link to www.rense.com]

Missing Pentagon Unobstructed Citgo Videos
[link to www.rense.com]




MainPage
[link to www.rense.com]

News