Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,170 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,088,143
Pageviews Today: 1,816,460Threads Today: 737Posts Today: 13,098
05:50 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject There is no Biblical evidence that Christ is of the seed of King David. In fact, the Bible proves He is not.
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
THIS IS WEIRD , I WAS HAVING A CONVERSATION WITH MY SON ABOUT THIS YESTERDAY. I ALSO PROFFERED THE THOUGHT THAT, WOULDN'T HE HAVE HAD TO BE A CLONE OF MARY IF HE ONLY HAD HER D.N.A. I'M NOT COMPLETELY SURE ON THIS. SOMEONE MAY BE ABLE TO CORRECT ME.
 Quoting: Lotis Gum 854474

Off topic perhaps?

However, if a method were found to tease out a human egg to begin celluar divison with the very first step being the production of a second copy of that egg's 23 chromosomes producing 46 chromosomes and then the egg divides, we could continue on the cell division as normal and it is thought (once the state of the 'art' reaches that point) that it would then be possible to produce a living viable human clone simply from a single egg without ever fertilizing that egg.

If you took a woman's egg and did this to it and implanted that egg back into that woman's womb, if successfuly implanted a woman then could literally give birth to a clone of herself... give birth to her own 'identical' twin.

The state of the Science of Human Genetics and human genetics engineering has not yet (that we know of) reached that point. This is one of the reasons there are bans on the production of human clones, by the way.

However, that clone would still carry two X chromosomes, even though they would be identical, only a female child could be produced by this process.

In some animals this sort of thing occurs in nature and it is called monoparthenogenesis. It seems that (as far as I have had time to determin) only turkeys are capable of other sex monoparthenogenesis a female turkey producing a male offspring in such a fashion. As far as I have had time to discover from the publications of modern research in this area there are no known cases of mammalian 'other sex' monoparthenogenesis... the female mammal seems to produce female offspring in the rare cases that mammalian monoparthenogenesis takes place.

There have even been some claimed cases of human monoparthenogenesis but even then in such claimes the claimed offspring has been female... and these are extremely rare... and in general the claims not believed by 'science'.

The interesting thing about this has to do with the promise made in the Garden of Eden about the Promised Seed of the Woman... as the source of the Savior of mankind.

I would suggest that you do a google on Arthur Custance and his Doorway Papers as he offers up a theory about how this might have worked... called, "The Promised Seed of the Woman". His genetics are those of the mid to late 1950's.. and his theory needs an update in light of the understanding of the genetics of 2010.

Interestingly once you see where Custance is coming from on this you will begin to see why there is this incredible push to study the Human Geneome and to do human genetic engineering and especially the great push for the scifi of Human Cloning it becomes easy to see what the dark ones among them are attempting to do.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP