Schumer calls Brown a Teabagger

Is teabagger as bad as calling him a honkey or negro?

Isn't this the same charmer that called the Flight attendant a BITCH recently?

Wow, left wingers get a little power and they really show their asses don't they?

Bill Clinton, in an effort to help Coakley today, also denigrated the Tea Partiers (regular Americans included, not just Brown).

These Dems just don't know when to stop with the hate and insults towards Americans.

I will be, forever more..an EX-Dem.

Hope the Party implodes. Looks like it just might.

That is a lot nicer than what I would call Schumer.

The intellectual elite are too ignorant to realize that calling someone a Teabagger is likely to get them elected. I have never heard Schumer speak without it boiling me just a little.

The more they say and the more insults they hurl, the more Independents they turn over to Brown. I say send Nancy up there to speak and then Brown will have a lock on it.

Ironic.

Scott Brown, even if supported by the Tea Party, is so unlike Tea Partiers. He's an actual conservative.

Share this article with whoever can recognize true conservatives from the ones who have ruined the Republican Party.

SCOTT BROWN IS WORTH A LOOK, IS WORTH VOTING FOR

[link to www.frumforum.com]

Quote:

"Byron York is reporting that the bottom is dropping out of Martha Coakley’s support in the Mass Senate race. It’s not just the Democratic scare of a lifetime: Scott Brown might actually win.

If so, this is an earthquake in American politics: Massachusetts returning a Republican senator for the first time since 1972, sending to Washington the 41st vote on health care.

A Brown victory will rejoice Republicans nationwide. We will revel in it, triumph in it, deploy it, argue from it. Question: will we learn from it?

The Scott Brown who may rescue the country from Obamacare is not a talk radio conservative.

Strong on defense and school choice, opposed to the Obama administration’s signature initiatives, Brown voted in favor of Mitt Romney’s health plan in Massachusetts. He describes himself as pro-choice (subject to reasonable limitations), accepts gay marriage in Massachusetts as a settled fact, and told the Boston Herald editorial board he would have voted to confirm Sonia Sotomayor. He calls himself “fiscally conservative and socially conscious.” He’s got an environmental record too: In the state senate he voted in favor of a regional initiative to curb greenhouse gas initiatives.

Most important: Unlike his arrogant, brittle opponent, Brown has shown himself an open and accessible candidate, optimistic and without rancor. In short – he’s running exactly the kind of campaign that we alleged RINOs have been urging on the GOP for months now.

It would be a travesty if Brown’s victory is seized upon as a victory for anger, paranoia, and ideological extremism.

Some will try – but with a third New England Republican in the Senate, the time for a pushback may have come.

First step is to ignore, then the second step is to ridicule. What will be fun is if he wins and reid tries to push it thru with only 51 votes.

There's a guy who runs a survivalist blog that always refers to WTSHTF as "when the Schumer hits the fan". Being a New Yorker, I always use this term.