BREAKING: NASA Images Earth Sized Spherical Objects Inside Corona of SUN (UPDATE: 5/4/2010)

i have done more pictures now with gimp imaging and this is what i came up with
original image with me pointing out objects
[link to i737.photobucket.com]

now i add sharpness and edge detection. objects get clearer

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

then the close ups starting from left to right .
[link to i737.photobucket.com]

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

awesome any more post more and ill see what i can find

Answer me this...In the past month...not one...but two comets have crashed into the sun...why no images of this occuring on STEREO images?


Moving the goalposts. Classic kookery.

Kook on Penny. Kook on.

i have done more pictures now with gimp imaging and this is what i came up with
original image with me pointing out objects
[link to i737.photobucket.com]

now i add sharpness and edge detection. objects get clearer

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

then the close ups starting from left to right .
[link to i737.photobucket.com]

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

awesome any more post more and ill see what i can find

OK lady's and gentlemen look at the image and then the video, we have a match!

[link to 2.bp.blogspot.com]

i have done more pictures now with gimp imaging and this is what i came up with
original image with me pointing out objects
[link to i737.photobucket.com]

now i add sharpness and edge detection. objects get clearer

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

then the close ups starting from left to right .
[link to i737.photobucket.com]

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

awesome any more post more and ill see what i can find



Great close ups. Some look like frogs:)

Yes, if they didn't conveniently "lose" them in the "download glitch."


Yes, not everyone and everything is a perfect as Sandi_T.

You seem to be a genius researcher. Can you tell me why you "sleuths" aren't finding any "anomalies" in images earlier than, say, Jan 16?

Can you interpret the image code and maybe explain why it might be?

Can you pull up the Science images and not the Beacon images for me?

Didn't think so. Genius.

**********************************************

Can you tell us why they didn't
Can you tell us why they're not

Can you pull up past images that

Of course I can't tell you why they weren't there before the 16th

It should be simple for NASA to drop some previous incidences

Why aren't they doing so?
Why aren't they posting all these "common" anomalies?
Why DON'T any exist before this month?

Are they stupid? Incompetent? They don't back up their photos?

So why aren't they showing us all these other anomalous photo backups?

Thanks for your snide little useless commentary,

i have done more pictures now with gimp imaging and this is what i came up with
original image with me pointing out objects
[link to i737.photobucket.com]

now i add sharpness and edge detection. objects get clearer

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

then the close ups starting from left to right .
[link to i737.photobucket.com]

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

awesome any more post more and ill see what i can find



thanks manny

awesome work

i have done more pictures now with gimp imaging and this is what i came up with
original image with me pointing out objects
[link to i737.photobucket.com]

now i add sharpness and edge detection. objects get clearer

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

then the close ups starting from left to right .
[link to i737.photobucket.com]

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

[link to i737.photobucket.com]

awesome any more post more and ill see what i can find



thanks manny

awesome work

OK lady's and gentlemen look at the image and then the video, we have a match!

[link to 2.bp.blogspot.com]




Guy's I'm shafted, I have been busy with this since Friday, my wife is angry, even the dog is ignoring me!

Please watch the video above and look at the image, my gut tells me it is important.

If you want anything sending to the Newspaper guy, post it here or e-mail me at gazbom56@gmail.com

Thank you all

Yes, if they didn't conveniently "lose" them in the "download glitch."


Yes, not everyone and everything is a perfect as Sandi_T.

You seem to be a genius researcher. Can you tell me why you "sleuths" aren't finding any "anomalies" in images earlier than, say, Jan 16?

Can you interpret the image code and maybe explain why it might be?

Can you pull up the Science images and not the Beacon images for me?

Didn't think so. Genius.

**********************************************

Can you tell us why they didn't
Can you tell us why they're not

Can you pull up past images that

Of course I can't tell you why they weren't there before the 16th

It should be simple for NASA to drop some previous incidences

Why aren't they doing so?
Why aren't they posting all these "common" anomalies?
Why DON'T any exist before this month?

Are they stupid? Incompetent? They don't back up their photos?

So why aren't they showing us all these other anomalous photo backups?

Thanks for your snide little useless commentary,


I notice the genius didn't answer my questions, just foamed at the mouth and ranted. Good show. Very enjoyable.

NASA isn't in the habit of posting explanations for every kook idea that gets posted on the web. They don't have a Dept. of Kookery.

[link to stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov]
You'll note this quote:
"The STEREO space weather beacon telemetry mode is a very low rate, highly compressed data stream broadcast by the spacecraft 24 hours per day. These data are used for space weather forecasting. Because of the large compression factors used, these beacon images are of much lower quality than the actual science data."

Perhaps they think they're dealing with people who can actually read. I see they were wrong.

As to why they aren't doing all the things you ask, they are a science organization and are not required to guess and respond to every kook idea that comes down the pike.

Kook on.

Even if they are distorted due to compression...there is still an object that it's picking up to distort...make sense?

Guy's I'm shafted, I have been busy with this since Friday, my wife is angry, even the dog is ignoring me!

Please watch the video above and look at the image, my gut tells me it is important.

If you want anything sending to the Newspaper guy, post it here or e-mail me at gazbom56@gmail.com

Thank you all

its a shmae that you cant do anything with it, something i have noticed though is these hot pixels seem to exhibit the ability to reflect light in a way that is relative to their distance and position from the sun.

The objects are that are closer within the corona seem to be very bright possibly because being enveloped within the corona there is a lot of light available and it reflects of almost all of the surface.
The objects on the edge of the corona and only have one face exposed to the sun tend to only reflect light on that side and the distance they are from the sun is proportional to the amount of light they are reflecting.

Bloody amazing that these artifacts do not behave like artifacts ie their being a dull spot within the corona or a particularly bright spot outside the corona its odd that the artifacts behave in a way an object would dependant on its position and distance from the sun.

Yes, if they didn't conveniently "lose" them in the "download glitch."

Yes, not everyone and everything is a perfect as Sandi_T.

You seem to be a genius researcher. Can you tell me why you "sleuths" aren't finding any "anomalies" in images earlier than, say, Jan 16?

Can you interpret the image code and maybe explain why it might be?

Can you pull up the Science images and not the Beacon images for me?

Didn't think so. Genius.

*****************************************

I'm no sleuth, and I'm certainly not an expert, but the fact that nothing similar to these anomalies appeared prior to Jan 16 (I thought it was the 18th, but I digress) would seem to make them more suspicious, not less. Did NASA change something about the way their data is received, transmitted, or displayed since Jan 16? If so, I'd say this has been debunked, but I haven't heard anything like that mentioned in 78 pages.


I think it's the 17th but I'm too lazy to look it up.

Read Dr. Gurman's response a page or two back.
They didn't receive the proper full res Science image download due to a software glitch. The onboard computer started sending them images from the 10th(?) I think he said. They reset and are now behind time-wise on getting the 2048x2048 images processed and up. (that's if they didn't lose them)
The 512x512 beacon images are relatively continuously transmitted on the lo-bandwidth telemetry so that is what you people are looking at, not the full res images.
Normally they post the beacon images almost in real time as .jpg (more compression artifacts) and a few days later replace them with .jpgs made from the full res images.
Due to the software glitch, it didn't happen that way this time, but if they didn't lose the 2048 images, they will be processed and posted in replacement to the ones the "sleuths" are looking at now. It may be today, it may be a week from now.
That is why I warned the "sleuths" that their pixel-picking will soon end except for the most current day.
That is why you don't find the "anomalies" on earlier images. Those images have had the beacon lo-res images replaced by much better full-res .jpgs.

More.

[link to stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov]

PG aka Anon 812425

This was it found it

"Hello ICE, A little more info came my way from my astrophysics friend in Europe, I hope you remember lol, anyway I posted some pics of these "objects" to her and she said that she knew they were coming based on her math, I again tried to pry some more info out of her and she brought up the facts that after the 26 of Jan 2010 things will really start to get strange in the sense of whale beachings, aircraft navigation problems and health concerns of people as we move along the timeline of the pole shift. I also picked up a story on Nasa about this cloud we are going through and she said its all connected that their is some type of disturbance that is now befalling the planet and that all of this is connected, I asked about the earthquakes lately and she said it is due to the magnetic effects of what is coming from space at us now, and we continue to talk, I promised I would get back to you and there it is." Paul.

OK lady's and gentlemen look at the image and then the video, we have a match!

[link to 2.bp.blogspot.com]




Guy's I'm shafted, I have been busy with this since Friday, my wife is angry, even the dog is ignoring me!

Please watch the video above and look at the image, my gut tells me it is important.

If you want anything sending to the Newspaper guy, post it here or e-mail me at gazbom56@gmail.com

Thank you all


Gazbom you should check out Manny's pics that have been filtered, it has some great images of these "artifacts" in question, im sure it will help these news reporters and give them a chill like i had when i seen them

edit: i just noticed you have seen them

More.

[link to stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov]


It moved.

[link to stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov]

Answer me this...In the past month...not one...but two comets have crashed into the sun...why no images of this occuring on STEREO images?

******************************************

Moving the goalposts. Classic kookery.

Kook on Penny. Kook on.

******************************************

Answer please...

so your parents had a sighting in the 50's. yet you always debunk ufo's as nothing?

i know if your words are TRUE, you have found the evidence you need. so why keep dismissing everything as nothing?

Go take the wife out to dinner and the dog for a walk. We'll still be here later:)

Even if they are distorted due to compression...there is still an object that it's picking up to distort...make sense?

That's your assumption. If it were a transient hot pixel due to local radiation being compressed into a funny shape... how would you be able to tell the difference?