Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,432 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,604,232
Pageviews Today: 2,121,885Threads Today: 481Posts Today: 8,721
03:18 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

BIG BANG THEORY DEBUNKED!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 670648
Canada
01/25/2010 06:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
BIG BANG THEORY DEBUNKED!!!!!!!!!!!!
"The Universe Was Not Created By A Big Bang" -Say Several of the World's Leading Cosmologists

[link to www.dailygalaxy.com]

Several of the worlds leading astrophysicists believe there was no Big Bang that brought the universe and time into existence. Before the Big Bang, the standard theory assumes, there was no space, just nothing. Einstein merged the universe into a single entity: not space, not time, but space time.

Proponents of branes propose that we are trapped in a thin membrane of space-time embedded in a much larger cosmos from which neither light nor energy (except gravity) can escape or enter and that that "dark matter" is just the rest of the universe that we can't see because light can't escape from or enter into our membrane from the great bulk of the universe. And our membrane may be only one of many, all of which may warp, connect, and collide with one another in as many as 10 dimensions -a new frontier physicists call the "brane world." Stephen Hawking, among others, envisions brane worlds bubbling up out of the void, giving rise to whole new universes

One of the most important space probes of the century is the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) launched in 2001 to measure the temperature differences in the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiatiion -the 14-billion year old Big Bang's remnant radiant heat . The anisotropies then in turn are used to measure the universe's geometry, content, and evolution; and, perhaps most importantly, to test the Big Bang model, and the cosmic inflation theory. WMAP data seem to support a universe that is dominated by dark energy in the form of a cosmological constant.

Perhaps not surprisingly, there is no supportative data to date for Big Bang theory, although the results aren't sensitive enough to rule out the pervasive Big Bang/inflation model.

The influence of gravitaional waves on polarization is different from that of overall energy distribution, so it should be possible to tell from polarization in the WMAP scans whether the variation is coming from contrasting energy density (heat) or gravitational waves that a Big Bang should have produced.

The world's leading astrophysicists are confidemt that with a sensitive enough probe such as that by the new Planck telescope with its more detailed CMB plots, that they can reduce the level of uncertainty low enough so that they can say definitively whether the gravitational waves that should have been created by the Big Bang as present.

If this next generation Planck Telescope shows that there is no onvious distortions caused by gravity waves, it will rule out the Big Bang plus inflation theory -an add-on theory that explains the phenomenal sudden expansion of space from a tiny point. In it's place will be new models that support what many leading cosmologists see as our universe to be proved to be one of just many in an eternal cycle of birth and rebirth.

Models of the universe that involve a bouncing brane or a Big Crunch rather than a start from scratch Big Bang predict much smaller gravity waves being produced than would come from a Big Bang. If the universe actually went through cycles of expansion and contraction, it is possible that the uneven distributions in the early post-Big Bang universe that resulted in the formation of galaxies were leftovers from the universe before.

Only gravity can't exist soley in a specific brane, but wanders where it will, leaking off our brane into what physicists call "the bulk" -- the rest of space-time. Brane theory offer an fascinating and plausable explanation for why gravity is such a weakling: Maybe it's not any weaker than the other forces, nut just concentrated somewhere else in the bulk, or on another brane, providing the key to understanding the dark matter that makes up 90 % of our universe.

If our brane is but a small slice of a much larger cosmos, however, the "dark matter" might be nothing but ordinary matter trapped on another brane. Such a shadow world, Hawking speculated, might contain "shadow human beings wondering about the mass that seems to be missing from their world."

Are branes the key to understanding the origin of our universe? "Who knows?" says Sean Carroll. "they will have taught us a useful lesson that we should have known all along, which is that we don't have a clue to what's going on."

Alan Guth of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, creator of the currently accepted model of the Big Bang, said recently "he felt a little like Rip Van Winkle -- picking up his head from a long sleep only to notice that the landscape of physics he thought he knew had suddenly, drastically, changed."

Casey Kazan.

Source Credits:

[link to articles.latimes.com]

[link to www.newscientist.com]

Image Credit: [link to www.csudh.edu]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 762208
United States
01/25/2010 06:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BIG BANG THEORY DEBUNKED!!!!!!!!!!!!
Man, this kind of shit gives me a headache but I DO thank you Op!
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 670648
Canada
01/25/2010 07:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BIG BANG THEORY DEBUNKED!!!!!!!!!!!!
Titor right again ...
Funney

User ID: 78211
Czech Republic
01/25/2010 07:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BIG BANG THEORY DEBUNKED!!!!!!!!!!!!
..of course its a breathing organism!
Thundercheeks

User ID: 664542
Australia
01/25/2010 07:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BIG BANG THEORY DEBUNKED!!!!!!!!!!!!
We exist inside a brain cell.
Brakes is gone!! "Weeze fweewheelin!"

Just say "NO!" to Luciferian Insectazoids.

"I am not here"...what is here?..Isn't here just there without a T...?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 839198
Australia
01/25/2010 07:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BIG BANG THEORY DEBUNKED!!!!!!!!!!!!
bsflag
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 687593
Sweden
01/25/2010 07:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BIG BANG THEORY DEBUNKED!!!!!!!!!!!!
Either if:
It was God who created the Universe, or
It was created by itself out of nothing,
we humans can never understand the physics involved, it will always remain religion, not science.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 869273
Hungary
01/25/2010 07:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BIG BANG THEORY DEBUNKED!!!!!!!!!!!!
Of course this doesn't prove the "God" theory.
Neesie

User ID: 873611
United States
01/25/2010 07:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BIG BANG THEORY DEBUNKED!!!!!!!!!!!!
We exist inside a brain cell.
 Quoting: Thundercheeks


Brane is short for membrane. scientists think there may be parallel universes and they are right next to each other closer than the clothes against your skin. they are seperated by some kind of membrane,
.A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell.

C. S. Lewis
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 829503
Canada
01/25/2010 07:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BIG BANG THEORY DEBUNKED!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's crazy how scientists even conceive of this stuff at all, never mind actually believing it. Multi dimensional-ism and "proving" the existence of it, starting with "flat landers" and 2d examples, is just retarded in my opinion. Only in a humans head can such things be conceived and believed.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 291297
United States
04/08/2011 11:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BIG BANG THEORY DEBUNKED!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Universe is not expanding. Itís dissipating in a similar way that a water droplet evaporates. This explains why celestial bodies move faster and faster away, the closer it gets to the universeís exterior.

So the end of this Universe is a dissipation of itís body, likewise to be percipitated elsewhere with other new universive components in a new way.

My theory also dismisses the Big Bang theory of how the Universe began. I theorize that this Universe is a one one-of-a-kind unique universe of many other one-of-a-kind unique universes which began not with a bang, but a sort of celestial condensate.

However, I caution that more study will be required to determine if the modelís behavior is consistent with other observations.

Perhaps dark matter is nothing more than a mere higher area of viscocity within the fluid volume of space within the exterior surface tension of our universe?

Imaginge the phenomena that would occur if, two or more universes came in contact with each other to merge into one giant mixture.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1146148
United States
04/08/2011 11:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BIG BANG THEORY DEBUNKED!!!!!!!!!!!!
does the big bang theory need to be debunked?
j0310s

User ID: 291297
United States
04/08/2011 11:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BIG BANG THEORY DEBUNKED!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Universe is not expanding. Itís dissipating in a similar way that a water droplet evaporates. This explains why celestial bodies move faster and faster away, the closer it gets to the universeís exterior.

So the end of this Universe is a dissipation of itís body, likewise to be percipitated elsewhere with other new universive components in a new way.

My theory also dismisses the Big Bang theory of how the Universe began. I theorize that this Universe is a one one-of-a-kind unique universe of many other one-of-a-kind unique universes which began not with a bang, but a sort of celestial condensate.

However, I caution that more study will be required to determine if the modelís behavior is consistent with other observations.

Perhaps dark matter is nothing more than a mere higher area of viscocity within the fluid volume of space within the exterior surface tension of our universe?

Imaginge the phenomena that would occur if, two or more universes came in contact with each other to merge into one giant mixture.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 291297


/\ This is me /\
(just registered)
see my original posts at [link to bigthink.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 301517
United States
04/08/2011 11:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BIG BANG THEORY DEBUNKED!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anon
User ID: 10458015
United States
09/03/2012 08:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BIG BANG THEORY DEBUNKED!!!!!!!!!!!!
The only reason they came up with dark matter is because matter should be equally distributed if the big bang happened, and because normal gravity does not have the reach that our galactic cores have apparently.

People simply don't realize that plasma has a massive electro-magnetic field that is much stronger than gravity. the space between our planets is massive, even with the sun being 3 million X the size of earth, it is hard to imagine that it would have the gravitational tug on objects like Pluto and further out.

The Sun is plasma, and Plasma is very powerful, I do agree with the statement that we don't really know whats going on, but I think we can safely confirm that the big bang is a big dud that is simply an apologist ideology to support cosmic evolutionism, like chemical evolution.

matter is not equally distributed, giant explosions do not create dimensions and physics, and certainly not atomic structures. they are not something that simply pops out of nothingness, they come from something as all things do.

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!