ALIEN MONOLITH FOUND ON SATURN'S IAPETUS

How is it a prediction? Clarke never said any of his work was meant to be prophetic (although he did sort of claim to have invented the concept of geosynchronous orbits).

One thing I did find odd about his work is the fact that the asteroid impact that starts off Project Spaceguard which finds the Alien craft in "Rendezvous with Rama" occurs on 9-11-2077.

[link to www.alienvideo.net]

Clarke's Alien Monolith Prediction

Author of the 1968 "2001: A Space Odyssey", Arthur C. Clarke, writes about Iapetus. In the final chapters of the book, astronaut Dave Bowman finds an enigmatic alien monolith waiting for him on the surface of Iapetus.

Did Arthur C. Clarke have access to secret knowledge? It is speculated that some of hollywood's best writers, including George Lucas and Steven Spielberg have been privy to accessing secretive occult knowledge. In other words: not all of their ideas are original. It is interesting that Arthur C. Clarke wrote about an alien monolith on Saturn's Moon Iapetus, at a time in the 1960's when NASA knew very little about this moon. Then, in 2004 it is discovered an incredible mountain ridge encompasses nearly the entire planet - in what is likely the most bizarre formation in the solar system. What is inside the equilateral ridge? Does an alien monolith await us?

Clarke DID invent the concept of geo-sync satellites, back in the 1940's.

[link to www.alienvideo.net]

Clarke's Alien Monolith Prediction

Author of the 1968 "2001: A Space Odyssey", Arthur C. Clarke, writes about Iapetus. In the final chapters of the book, astronaut Dave Bowman finds an enigmatic alien monolith waiting for him on the surface of Iapetus.

Did Arthur C. Clarke have access to secret knowledge? It is speculated that some of hollywood's best writers, including George Lucas and Steven Spielberg have been privy to accessing secretive occult knowledge. In other words: not all of their ideas are original. It is interesting that Arthur C. Clarke wrote about an alien monolith on Saturn's Moon Iapetus, at a time in the 1960's when NASA knew very little about this moon. Then, in 2004 it is discovered an incredible mountain ridge encompasses nearly the entire planet - in what is likely the most bizarre formation in the solar system. What is inside the equilateral ridge? Does an alien monolith await us?


Special people do get special tours and access from the govt. However, this monolith thing is overblown. It's a natural formation that was discovered and sci-fi writers have been speculating about it ever since.

There must be something in this, if the Common-Hater raises so many BS flags!

There must be something in this, if the Common-Hater raises so many BS flags!





Well then why don't you just step up to the plate, kid, and prove there is indeed something to it?

Oh wait, you can't. So sorry to expose your woeful ignorance....

There must be something in this, if the Common-Hater raises so many BS flags!





Well then why don't you just step up to the plate, kid, and prove there is indeed something to it?

Oh wait, you can't. So sorry to expose your woeful ignorance....




[link to www.wunderkabinett.co.uk]

Looks like a triangular, smooth, tall monolith to me.

No doubt you'll call it lens flare, or some other debunker bullshit.

[link to www.youtube.com]

Subscribe
Unsubscribe adjuk
26 November 2008


A look at some of the anomalies on Iapetus. To me, the anomalies suggest that Iapetus is partly or wholly artificial in nature. What is interesting is that NASA largely ignore the anomalies and fo...
A look at some of the anomalies on Iapetus. To me, the anomalies suggest that Iapetus is partly or wholly artificial in nature.

What is interesting is that NASA largely ignore the anomalies and following the close flyby of Iapetus in 2007, the images released were less interesting than those captured from much further away in 2004.

The CGI of Cassini is lifted from NASA's "Ring World" video - which has a whole minute on the Iapetus images shown in this video...

[link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov]

After making this video, I discovered that there is a short NASA video "flyover" from 2007

[link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov]

or

[link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov]

It doesn't show much detail and makes no comments on the very unusual linear/bisecting nature of "The Wall"

Why does NASA ignore the most interesting data from its probes?


Watch the video, or visit the links below and make your own mind up.

[link to www.checktheevidence.co.uk]

[link to www.enterprisemission.com]
Category: Science & Technology

[link to www.youtube.com]

Subscribe
Unsubscribe adjuk
26 November 2008


A look at some of the anomalies on Iapetus. To me, the anomalies suggest that Iapetus is partly or wholly artificial in nature. What is interesting is that NASA largely ignore the anomalies and fo...
A look at some of the anomalies on Iapetus. To me, the anomalies suggest that Iapetus is partly or wholly artificial in nature.

What is interesting is that NASA largely ignore the anomalies and following the close flyby of Iapetus in 2007, the images released were less interesting than those captured from much further away in 2004.

The CGI of Cassini is lifted from NASA's "Ring World" video - which has a whole minute on the Iapetus images shown in this video...

[link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov]

After making this video, I discovered that there is a short NASA video "flyover" from 2007

[link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov]

or

[link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov]

It doesn't show much detail and makes no comments on the very unusual linear/bisecting nature of "The Wall"

Why does NASA ignore the most interesting data from its probes?


Watch the video, or visit the links below and make your own mind up.

[link to www.checktheevidence.co.uk]

[link to www.enterprisemission.com]
Category: Science & Technology



So watching a youtube vid and listening to conmen is a substitute for elementary science and rational thought?

Is that what you are saying, bunky?

There must be something in this, if the Common-Hater raises so many BS flags!





Well then why don't you just step up to the plate, kid, and prove there is indeed something to it?

Oh wait, you can't. So sorry to expose your woeful ignorance....




[link to www.wunderkabinett.co.uk]

Looks like a triangular, smooth, tall monolith to me.

No doubt you'll call it lens flare, or some other debunker bullshit.


Care to give us a cogent, well reasoned argument why this can't be something mundane, like a ROCK?

Didn't think so.

Comic books and playing games in your parent's basement is no substitute for real argument and rational discourse, kid. Better luck when you manage to graduate from third grade.

Like being a spreader of bunk? Apparently you do.

Andrew Johnson isnt a con man...he's one of the most respected researchers on the planet as you can see by his website [link to www.checktheevidence.com]



[link to www.youtube.com]

Subscribe
Unsubscribe adjuk
26 November 2008


A look at some of the anomalies on Iapetus. To me, the anomalies suggest that Iapetus is partly or wholly artificial in nature. What is interesting is that NASA largely ignore the anomalies and fo...
A look at some of the anomalies on Iapetus. To me, the anomalies suggest that Iapetus is partly or wholly artificial in nature.

What is interesting is that NASA largely ignore the anomalies and following the close flyby of Iapetus in 2007, the images released were less interesting than those captured from much further away in 2004.

The CGI of Cassini is lifted from NASA's "Ring World" video - which has a whole minute on the Iapetus images shown in this video...

[link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov]

After making this video, I discovered that there is a short NASA video "flyover" from 2007

[link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov]

or

[link to saturn.jpl.nasa.gov]

It doesn't show much detail and makes no comments on the very unusual linear/bisecting nature of "The Wall"

Why does NASA ignore the most interesting data from its probes?


Watch the video, or visit the links below and make your own mind up.

[link to www.checktheevidence.co.uk]

[link to www.enterprisemission.com]
Category: Science & Technology



So watching a youtube vid and listening to conmen is a substitute for elementary science and rational thought?

Is that what you are saying, bunky?

There must be something in this, if the Common-Hater raises so many BS flags!





Well then why don't you just step up to the plate, kid, and prove there is indeed something to it?

Oh wait, you can't. So sorry to expose your woeful ignorance....




[link to www.wunderkabinett.co.uk]

Looks like a triangular, smooth, tall monolith to me.

No doubt you'll call it lens flare, or some other debunker bullshit.


Care to give us a cogent, well reasoned argument why this can't be something mundane, like a ROCK?

Didn't think so.

Comic books and playing games in your parent's basement is no substitute for real argument and rational discourse, kid. Better luck when you manage to graduate from third grade.

Like being a spreader of bunk? Apparently you do.





Sonny, you are one presumptuous POS twat, you know?

I'd like to meet you in person, and we can take it from there.

How is it a prediction? Clarke never said any of his work was meant to be prophetic (although he did sort of claim to have invented the concept of geosynchronous orbits).

One thing I did find odd about his work is the fact that the asteroid impact that starts off Project Spaceguard which finds the Alien craft in "Rendezvous with Rama" occurs on 9-11-2077.

There must be something in this, if the Common-Hater raises so many BS flags!





Well then why don't you just step up to the plate, kid, and prove there is indeed something to it?

Oh wait, you can't. So sorry to expose your woeful ignorance....




[link to www.wunderkabinett.co.uk]

Looks like a triangular, smooth, tall monolith to me.

No doubt you'll call it lens flare, or some other debunker bullshit.


Care to give us a cogent, well reasoned argument why this can't be something mundane, like a ROCK?

Didn't think so.

Comic books and playing games in your parent's basement is no substitute for real argument and rational discourse, kid. Better luck when you manage to graduate from third grade.

Like being a spreader of bunk? Apparently you do.





Sonny, you are one presumptuous POS twat, you know?

I'd like to meet you in person, and we can take it from there.



But you won't, because your Mother/keeper won't let you cross the street alone.

Oh yes, nice job defending your delusion, kid. Does that wound in your foot hurt much?

What about the one on Phobos?

The one referred to by the Buzzmeister?

It looks symmetrical, and smooth. Totally artificial.

There must be something in this, if the Common-Hater raises so many BS flags!





Well then why don't you just step up to the plate, kid, and prove there is indeed something to it?

Oh wait, you can't. So sorry to expose your woeful ignorance....




[link to www.wunderkabinett.co.uk]

Looks like a triangular, smooth, tall monolith to me.

No doubt you'll call it lens flare, or some other debunker bullshit.


Care to give us a cogent, well reasoned argument why this can't be something mundane, like a ROCK?

Didn't think so.

Comic books and playing games in your parent's basement is no substitute for real argument and rational discourse, kid. Better luck when you manage to graduate from third grade.

Like being a spreader of bunk? Apparently you do.





Sonny, you are one presumptuous POS twat, you know?

I'd like to meet you in person, and we can take it from there.



But you won't, because your Mother/keeper won't let you cross the street alone.

Oh yes, nice job defending your delusion, kid. Does that wound in your foot hurt much?


No, really. I'd like to do this.

How can we meet?

Note, to people checking out this thread.

The "Common-Hater" is a well-known shill, at GLP.

It never presents any arguments. Just look back on this thread, for proof.

It always attacks the messenger.

That should tell you all that you need to know.

There must be something in this, if the Common-Hater raises so many BS flags!





Well then why don't you just step up to the plate, kid, and prove there is indeed something to it?

Oh wait, you can't. So sorry to expose your woeful ignorance....




[link to www.wunderkabinett.co.uk]

Looks like a triangular, smooth, tall monolith to me.

No doubt you'll call it lens flare, or some other debunker bullshit.


Care to give us a cogent, well reasoned argument why this can't be something mundane, like a ROCK?

Didn't think so.

Comic books and playing games in your parent's basement is no substitute for real argument and rational discourse, kid. Better luck when you manage to graduate from third grade.

Like being a spreader of bunk? Apparently you do.





Sonny, you are one presumptuous POS twat, you know?

I'd like to meet you in person, and we can take it from there.



But you won't, because your Mother/keeper won't let you cross the street alone.

Oh yes, nice job defending your delusion, kid. Does that wound in your foot hurt much?


No, really. I'd like to do this.

How can we meet?


Come on, Common-Hater!

Let's meet!