Taxpayers pay $101,000 for Pelosi's in-flight 'food, booze'. Trips are more about partying than anything else. $1k weekly bar tab

While I in no way condone this waste of money, I do have a question.

Since you're so keen to key in on this figure, perhaps you could tell me how much others either are spending, of have spent in the past?

The cost means nothing to me if I don't have anything to compare it against.

While I in no way condone this waste of money, I do have a question.

Since you're so keen to key in on this figure, perhaps you could tell me how much others either are spending, of have spent in the past?

The cost means nothing to me if I don't have anything to compare it against.

Hey They are footing a hell of a lot more since PeeLOSer has a new 757 to fly back and forth every week to Calif. non stop now!!!

She's pretty functional for a raging alcoholic!

She's pretty functional for a raging alcoholic!

She's pretty functional for a raging alcoholic!

The alcohol isn't for her, it for everyone else...

It's the only way people can deal with her for an extended period of time...

Going on an overseas flight with Pelosi...

Oh God, I need a bottle or two.

If she didn't, she'd be traveling ALONE.

She's pretty functional for a raging alcoholic!

The alcohol isn't for her, it for everyone else...

It's the only way people can deal with her for an extended period of time...

Going on an overseas flight with Pelosi...

Oh God, I need a bottle or two.

If she didn't, she'd be traveling ALONE.

While I in no way condone this waste of money, I do have a question.

Since you're so keen to key in on this figure, perhaps you could tell me how much others either are spending, of have spent in the past?

The cost means nothing to me if I don't have anything to compare it against.



This is the basic liberal fall back argument when a liberal cant defend the actions of his leaders.

They go back as far as the crusades to find an example of someone who was worse and say that what their guy did is somehow canceled out because some conservative fucked a goat in 1787.

While I in no way condone this waste of money, I do have a question.

Since you're so keen to key in on this figure, perhaps you could tell me how much others either are spending, of have spent in the past?

The cost means nothing to me if I don't have anything to compare it against.



This is the basic liberal fall back argument when a liberal cant defend the actions of his leaders.

They go back as far as the crusades to find an example of someone who was worse and say that what their guy did is somehow canceled out because some conservative fucked a goat in 1787.

You'll notice not only did I not make a defense for this ridiculous spending, but I said that in my very first sentence,

This is what someone does when they either can't answer the question, or won't because the full facts won't support their argument.

It's called deflection. It doesn't answer the question, it just tries to more the debate away from an indefensible position.

Nice try, too bad it didn't work.

Wanna try again?

While I in no way condone this waste of money, I do have a question.

Since you're so keen to key in on this figure, perhaps you could tell me how much others either are spending, of have spent in the past?

The cost means nothing to me if I don't have anything to compare it against.



This is the basic liberal fall back argument when a liberal cant defend the actions of his leaders.

They go back as far as the crusades to find an example of someone who was worse and say that what their guy did is somehow canceled out because some conservative fucked a goat in 1787.

You'll notice not only did I not make a defense for this ridiculous spending, but I said that in my very first sentence,

This is what someone does when they either can't answer the question, or won't because the full facts won't support their argument.

It's called deflection. It doesn't answer the question, it just tries to more the debate away from an indefensible position.

Nice try, too bad it didn't work.

Wanna try again?


Another LIBERAL tactic! Blame your opponent of what you're are doing!

And this is what people do when they can't answer a simple question without losing the argument, they shift the argument again, from deflection to name calling, and reversal of blame.

What am I doing? I asked a question, which apparently nobody wants to answer, which makes me wonder why.

I'm not the one refusing to answer the question.

How can any corrupt much less the top 10 corrupt politician be good for the people? I can't support any politician that isn't good for the population.

I meant:
How can any corrupt, much less the top 10 corrupt, politicians be good for the people? I can't support any politician that isn't good for the population.

George W. Bush spent more tax dollars on overnight male hookers staining the furniture at the White House than Pelosi's weekly bar tab.

Why are we paying for congressmen to get drunk?! They Tax us for our vice we pay for theirs? Fuck that shit?! This needs to end like yesterday.

While I in no way condone this waste of money, I do have a question.

Since you're so keen to key in on this figure, perhaps you could tell me how much others either are spending, of have spent in the past?

The cost means nothing to me if I don't have anything to compare it against.

This is the basic liberal fall back argument when a liberal cant defend the actions of his leaders.

They go back as far as the crusades to find an example of someone who was worse and say that what their guy did is somehow canceled out because some conservative fucked a goat in 1787.

You'll notice not only did I not make a defense for this ridiculous spending, but I said that in my very first sentence,

This is what someone does when they either can't answer the question, or won't because the full facts won't support their argument.

It's called deflection. It doesn't answer the question, it just tries to more the debate away from an indefensible position.

Nice try, too bad it didn't work.

Wanna try again?

How's that trip to Haiti going?
Considering that you shit on everyone who didn't jump to give money or even questioned the need, you will be donating your services, right?

Cost money to run the pope's empire

How's that trip to Haiti going?
Considering that you shit on everyone who didn't jump to give money or even questioned the need, you will be donating your services, right?


The trip has been postponed until reliable power is up and running, and a suitable place is found for a new facility.

But, in answer to you question, yes, I will be donating my time, and picking up my own expenses; the same way I did when Katrina hit.