Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,101 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,847,828
Pageviews Today: 2,730,841Threads Today: 740Posts Today: 15,533
10:20 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Atheists demand their constitutional right not to have to lick Mother Teresa's backside

 
Free Store
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 146804
Canada
01/30/2010 08:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Atheists demand their constitutional right not to have to lick Mother Teresa's backside
Atheist Group Blasts Postal Service for Mother Teresa Stamp
[link to www.foxnews.com]
An atheist organization is blasting the U.S. Postal Service for its plan to honor Mother Teresa with a commemorative stamp, saying it violates postal regulations against honoring "individuals whose principal achievements are associated with religious undertakings."

The Freedom from Religion Foundation is urging its supporters to boycott the stamp — and also to engage in a letter-writing campaign to spread the word about what it calls the "darker side" of Mother Teresa.

The stamp — set to be released on Aug. 26, which would have been Mother Teresa's 100th birthday — will recognize the 1979 Nobel Peace Prize winner for her humanitarian work, the Postal Service announced last month.

"Noted for her compassion toward the poor and suffering, Mother Teresa, a diminutive Roman Catholic nun and honorary U.S. citizen, served the sick and destitute of India and the world for nearly 50 years," the Postal Service said in a press release. "Her humility and compassion, as well as her respect for the innate worth and dignity of humankind, inspired people of all ages and backgrounds to work on behalf of the world’s poorest populations."

But Freedom from Religion Foundation spokeswoman Annie Laurie Gaylor says issuing the stamp runs against Postal Service regulations.

"Mother Teresa is principally known as a religious figure who ran a religious institution. You can't really separate her being a nun and being a Roman Catholic from everything she did," Gaylor told FoxNews.com.

Postal Service spokesman Roy Betts expressed surprise at the protest, given the long list of previous honorees with strong religious backgrounds, including Malcolm X, the former chief spokesman for the Nation of Islam, and the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., a Baptist minister and co-founder of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.

"In fact we honored Father Flanagan in 1986 for his humanitarian work. This has nothing to do with religion or faith," Betts told FoxNews.com.

Click here to see other controversial U.S. stamps.

Gaylor said the atheist group opposed Father Flanagan's stamp but not those for King and Malcolm X, because she said they were known for their civil rights activities, not for their religion.

Martin Luther King "just happened to be a minister," and "Malcolm X was not principally known for being a religious figure," she said.

"And he's not called Father Malcolm X like Mother Teresa. I mean, even her name is a Roman Catholic honorific."

Gaylor said Mother Teresa infused Catholicism into her secular honors — including an "anti-abortion rant" during her Nobel Prize acceptance speech — and that even her humanitarian work was controversial.

"There was criticism by the end of her life that she turned what was a tiny charity into an extremely wealthy charity that had the means to provide better care than it did," Gaylor said. "...There's this knee jerk response that everything she did was humanitarian, and I think many people would differ that what she was doing was to promote religion, and what she wanted to do was baptize people before they die, and that doesn't have a secular purpose for a stamp."

But the Postal Service said the commemorative stamp has nothing to do with Mother Teresa's religion.

"Mother Teresa is not being honored because of her religion, she's being honored for her work with the poor and her acts of humanitarian relief," Betts told FoxNews.com.

"Her contribution to the world as a humanitarian speaks for itself and is unprecedented," he added.

Some atheists, too, spoke out against the group's objections, including Bruce Sheiman, author of "An Atheist Defends Religion." He said the Freedom from Religion Foundation is being "hypocritical" and really "stepping over the line."

"Clearly there are a number of things that you can point to and say it's religious and a number of things you can point to and say that it's areligious," Sheiman told FoxNews.com. "So it really doesn't make sense to protest it."

He said the Foundation's campaign stems from concern that the abundance of humanitarian work done by believers will overshadow that done by atheists.

"Like billboards and bus ads, this is just part of the whole campaign that they're doing to make non-belief more visible," he said.

Gaylor said the foundation's only concern is the "other things that deserve to be commemorated but are not because the people behind it didn't have the power of the Catholic church."

"It's enormously difficult to get them," she said, referring to commemorative stamps, "and people have huge campaigns, and to me this speaks of the power of the Roman Catholic Church in hierarchy.

"They want to make her a saint and this is part of the PR machine."

The Foundation is encouraging its supporters to purchase the new stamp honoring the late actress Katharine Hepburn, who was an atheist, instead — or any of the other 2010 stamps, which include cartoonist Bill Mauldin, singer Kate Smith, filmmaker Oscar Micheaux, painter Winslow Homer and poet Julia de Burgos.

Betts said that despite the Foundation's accusations and letter-writing campaign, "The response to Mother Teresa has been overwhelmingly in favor of this stamp."

He said the Mother Teresa stamp, like other stamp subjects, will "stand the test of time, reflect the cultural diversity of our nation and have broad national appeal."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 831180
United Kingdom
01/30/2010 08:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Atheists demand their constitutional right not to have to lick Mother Teresa's backside
atheists are still up their own back side i see
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 877317
Canada
01/30/2010 08:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Atheists demand their constitutional right not to have to lick Mother Teresa's backside
Atheists are just afraid of Mother Theresa because they hate all that is holy and all that is good. They are more afraid of her than Martin Luther King or Father Flanagan because she is more credible to the unbelieving world than they are.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 739044
United States
01/30/2010 02:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Atheists demand their constitutional right not to have to lick Mother Teresa's backside
She probably did the most work of anyone in this century to help the poor, regardless of her religion. So what is the problem?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 825669
United States
01/30/2010 02:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Atheists demand their constitutional right not to have to lick Mother Teresa's backside
She sent a large part of the donations she received to the Vatican rather than using it to help the poor, is one thing I've heard.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 526155
Canada
01/31/2010 12:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Atheists demand their constitutional right not to have to lick Mother Teresa's backside
She was a corrupt EVIL MONSTER. But of course you self righteous Xtians are too stupid to do your research on the bitch:
[link to www.population-security.org]

Exposing Mother Teresa
Hitchens’ Book A Devastating Insight



By JOHN M. SWOMLEY

ONE OF THE interesting books published in 1995 debunks the myth of Mother Teresa, who has been unjustly built into a near-saint by the media. She has been virtually untouchable as an almost sacred figure. and anyone who dares to criticize her is promptly rebuked.

The book is The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa In Theory And Practice, by Christopher Hitchens (Verso, London and New York, 1995) $12.95. Hitchens aired a documentary on her in England and has investigated her activities.

He questions her Nobel Peace Prize in 1979 because she never did anything for peace. In fact, in her acceptance speech she said, “Abortion is the worst evil, and the greatest enemy of peace... Because if a mother can kill her own child, what will prevent us from killing ourselves or one another? Nothing.”

Wherever she goes this is her constant message. In 1992 at an open air mass in Knock, Ireland, she said, “Let us promise our Lady who loves Ireland so much, that we will never allow this country a single abortion. And no contraceptives.” She obviously sees no connection between poverty and too many children.

In one interview cited in the book, she was asked, “So you wouldn’t agree with people who say there are too many children in India?” She said, “I do not agree, because God always provides. He provides for the flowers and the birds, for everything in the world He has created. And those little children are his life. There can never be enough.”

One of Mother Teresa’s volunteers in Calcutta described her “Home for the Dying” as resembling photos of concentration camps such as Belsen. No chairs, just stretcher beds. Virtually no medical care or painkillers beyond aspirin, and a refusal to take a 15-year-old boy to a hospital. Hitchens adds, “Bear in mind that Mother Teresa’s global income is more than enough to outfit several first class clinics in Bengal. The decision not to do so... is a deliberate one. The point is not the honest relief of suffering, but the promulgation of a cult based on death and suffering and subjection.”

Then Hitchens notes that Mother Teresa “has checked into some of the finest and costliest clinics and hospitals in the West during her bouts with heart trouble and old age.”


The author mentions her visit to Haiti and her endorsement of the Duvaliers, the source of much deprivation of the poor in Haiti. Also, her acceptance of stolen money from Charles Keating, “now serving a ten-year sentence for his part in the savings and loan scandal.” Keating, a “Catholic fundamentalist”, gave Mother Teresa one and a quarter million dollars and “the use of his private jet.” During the course of Keating’s trial, Mother Teresa wrote Judge Ito asking clemency and asked Ito “to do what Jesus would do.”

One of the prosecutors in the trial wrote her telling her “of 17,000 individuals from whom Mr. Keating stole $252,000,000.” He added, “You urge Judge Ito to look into his heart--as he sentences Charles Keating--and do what Jesus would do. I submit the same challenge to you. Ask yourself what Jesus would do if he were given the fruits of a crime; what Jesus would do if he were in possession of money that had been stolen; what Jesus would do if he were being exploited by a thief to ease his conscience.” The prosecutor asked her to return the money, and offered to put her “in direct contact with the rightful owners of the property now in your possession.” This supposed paragon of virtue never replied to his letter.

No one knows what happens to the millions of dollars Mother Teresa receives. There is no accounting and no evidence that she has built a hospital or orphanage that reflects modern health and sanitary conditions.


Hitchens details the reactionary political activities of Mother Teresa, from aiding the Spanish right wing against the anti-Franco forces who were seeking a secular society in post-Franco Spain, to her visits to Nicaragua and Guatemala to whitewash the atrocities of the Contras and death squads.

There is much more in this book, such as letters from former workers with Mother Teresa exposing her hypocrisy. Hitchens concludes his 98-page book with reference to her fund-raising for clerical nationalists in the Balkans, her endorsement by Ralph Reed of the Christian Coalition, and her “cover for all manner of cultists and shady businessmen.” His last sentence is, “It is past time that she was subjected to the rational critique that she has evaded so arrogantly for so long.”


pope pennywise koolaid

SHE MADES A MOCKERY OF YOU IDIOTS
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 878907
United States
01/31/2010 01:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Atheists demand their constitutional right not to have to lick Mother Teresa's backside
I chuckle when I read this. Just last Christmas the Postal Service issued a stamp with the Blessed Mary holding the Christ Jesus, and on the stamp was printed "CHRISTMAS".
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 877995
United Kingdom
01/31/2010 01:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Atheists demand their constitutional right not to have to lick Mother Teresa's backside
As an agnostic-Deist, I can safely say that "Mother Theresa" did a lot of good stuff, but was basically an asshole!

Like me and everyone else!

cruise
The Philosopher Stoned

User ID: 878867
United States
01/31/2010 01:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Atheists demand their constitutional right not to have to lick Mother Teresa's backside
I can't remember the last time I had to lick a stamp.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 526155
Canada
01/31/2010 01:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Atheists demand their constitutional right not to have to lick Mother Teresa's backside
This is what a Saint looks like in the NWO. afro
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 526155
Canada
01/31/2010 09:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Atheists demand their constitutional right not to have to lick Mother Teresa's backside
whatever
Jaclyn

User ID: 866978
United States
01/31/2010 09:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Atheists demand their constitutional right not to have to lick Mother Teresa's backside
Atheists are annoying.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 670530
United States
01/31/2010 09:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Atheists demand their constitutional right not to have to lick Mother Teresa's backside
Atheists should lick each others backsides so they don't reproduce. Haiti is corrupt! She probably couldn't track all of the money.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 867576
United States
01/31/2010 10:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Atheists demand their constitutional right not to have to lick Mother Teresa's backside
What a bunch of superstitious mumbo jumbo on the part of atheists. It is a stamp of many stamps. If they don't want the Mother Theresa stamps, there are over a hundred stamps to pick, lick, and stick instead.





GLP