Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,373 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 56,460
Pageviews Today: 78,770Threads Today: 17Posts Today: 431
12:33 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1571037
United States
02/29/2012 09:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
We can now add February Tornado Outbreak to the evergrowing already long list.

EFFECTS BEING WITNESSED IN RECORD NUMBERS

Bird Deaths – Fish Deaths – Bees Dying – Volcanoes Awakening Everywhere – Earthquakes – Tsunamis – Broken Weather Records – Magnetic Field Fluctuation – Lost Whales – Strange Tides – Bright Sun – Bright Moon – Ears Ringing – Strange Sounds – Asteroid Impacts – Huge Fireballs – Sinkholes – Floods – Fires – Droughts – Record Snows – Record Heat – Cosmic Rays Rising – Chandler Wobble Stopping – Axis Shifting – Snow in the Sahara – Sun Rising Early – Planets Heating Up – Reporters Talking Gibberish – Nuclear Power Plant Problems – Gulf Stream Slowing – Ice Melting – Land Sinking – Unknown Force Ripples Through the Atmosphere – Giant Whirlpool Forms Near S. Africa – Venus Rotation Slowing Down – February Tornado Outbreak


THE PLANNING & COVER-UP

$$$2.3 Trillion Missing – Underground Bunkers – Global Warming Hoax – Police State – Bringing the Military Home – FEMA Camps – Chemtrails – HAARP – GMO Foods – Doomsday Seed Vault – Denver “New World” Airport – Georgia Guidestones – Archaeology Cover Up – Norway Spiral – Ancient Petroglyphs – Mayan Calendar –Elites Moving to High Grounds – China Building Ghost Cities in High Ground – New World Order – Tyrannical Laws Being Passed – TSA Transportation Takeover –Economy Crashing – Half a Million Plastic Coffins – MRE Stockpiling
 Quoting: LUCUS


that is the best sum up that I have ever read. You cannot deny what this person just wrote.iamwith
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4313926
United States
02/29/2012 09:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
There seems to be some earthquake swarms around Japan recently.

This could be a dangerous situation,especially with all those reactors. If there is a problem around March 22nd Japan could be hit again.

I think the 188 day cycle will hold up. Nibiru is kinda like a murderer on a celestial scale.


hf
 Quoting: yourmamaknows


Earthquakes have no relation to a brown dwarf, especially if it is as far out as the "sources" lucus posted are even remotely true.

Regardless, there isn't a brown dwarf. We would see it by now and it would be one of the brightest objects in the sky.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Bull...

Dark objects do not shine and it would not be bright in fact the darker the object the more light it would absorb.

That's why it's called the BLACK SUN or DARK STAR.
 Quoting: LUCUS


That is simply untrue, a brown dwarf does not magically absorb light.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


No... all black or dark objects do. You just don't seem to understand how light works do you?

The reason why an object is white is because it reflects almost all the light.

The reason why an object is black is because it absorbs almost all the light.

Learn something about light, then come back with a tangible argument.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4313926
United States
02/29/2012 09:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
When you see black objects like say the plastic case of your computer monitor you are not seeing a "color" black you are seeing the absence of light reflected to your eye.

It is not "true" black anyway. The only way you can see true black is by locking yourself in a closed container where no light can enter.

When you see an orange it is ONLY because you are seeing the red and yellow color bands being reflected back... the rest of the light is being absorbed into the orange.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3555102
United States
02/29/2012 09:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
...


Earthquakes have no relation to a brown dwarf, especially if it is as far out as the "sources" lucus posted are even remotely true.

Regardless, there isn't a brown dwarf. We would see it by now and it would be one of the brightest objects in the sky.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Bull...

Dark objects do not shine and it would not be bright in fact the darker the object the more light it would absorb.

That's why it's called the BLACK SUN or DARK STAR.
 Quoting: LUCUS


That is simply untrue, a brown dwarf does not magically absorb light.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


No... all black or dark objects do. You just don't seem to understand how light works do you?

The reason why an object is white is because it reflects almost all the light.

The reason why an object is black is because it absorbs almost all the light.

Learn something about light, then come back with a tangible argument.
 Quoting: LUCUS

A reason an object is black is because of what the color of materials it is made from are not because it absorbs light.

There is no tangible evidence that black dwarfs exist as they are just hypothetical because the universe is not old enough for them to exist. You are all over the place with your claims, first its a brown dwarf but now its a black dwarf? You are grasping at straws to find whatever conveniently fits your scenario.
Ratboy

User ID: 1527938
United Kingdom
02/29/2012 09:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
There seems to be some earthquake swarms around Japan recently.

This could be a dangerous situation,especially with all those reactors. If there is a problem around March 22nd Japan could be hit again.

I think the 188 day cycle will hold up. Nibiru is kinda like a murderer on a celestial scale.


hf
 Quoting: yourmamaknows


Earthquakes have no relation to a brown dwarf, especially if it is as far out as the "sources" lucus posted are even remotely true.

Regardless, there isn't a brown dwarf. We would see it by now and it would be one of the brightest objects in the sky.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Bull...

Dark objects do not shine and it would not be bright in fact the darker the object the more light it would absorb.

That's why it's called the BLACK SUN or DARK STAR.
 Quoting: LUCUS


That is simply untrue, a brown dwarf does not magically absorb light.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


If they are so blatant then surely they would have been officially discovered long before 1988??? If they are only really visible in the infra-red spectrum we would not see it unless we all had the means to do so.

And apparent fact it is coming from the south of the planet no one really has much hope of catching it coming.
Ratboy

User ID: 1527938
United Kingdom
02/29/2012 10:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
That came out a bit wrong, that was in response to "That is simply untrue, a brown dwarf does not magically absorb light."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3555102
United States
02/29/2012 10:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
...


Earthquakes have no relation to a brown dwarf, especially if it is as far out as the "sources" lucus posted are even remotely true.

Regardless, there isn't a brown dwarf. We would see it by now and it would be one of the brightest objects in the sky.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Bull...

Dark objects do not shine and it would not be bright in fact the darker the object the more light it would absorb.

That's why it's called the BLACK SUN or DARK STAR.
 Quoting: LUCUS


That is simply untrue, a brown dwarf does not magically absorb light.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


If they are so blatant then surely they would have been officially discovered long before 1988??? If they are only really visible in the infra-red spectrum we would not see it unless we all had the means to do so.

And apparent fact it is coming from the south of the planet no one really has much hope of catching it coming.
 Quoting: Ratboy


They are not blatant at all...but you have to understand why they aren't and why it took so long for us to find them.

1. Telescope and detection technology was not advanced enough to detect them.

2. The brown dwarfs we have found are hard to see because of how far away they are. If there was one anywhere near our solar system it would be one of the brightest objects on the sky.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4313926
United States
02/29/2012 10:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
A reason an object is black is because of what the color of materials it is made from are not because it absorbs light.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Bullshit... what are you 12?

Idiot... You have no freaking idea what you are talking about. Seriously, anybody that knows anything about color and light knows this. Now you are just sounding stupid.


Black is the color of objects that do not emit or reflect light in any part of the visible spectrum; they absorb all such frequencies of light. Although black is sometimes described as an "achromatic", or hueless, color, in practice it can be considered a color, as in expressions like "black cat" or "black paint".
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3555102
United States
02/29/2012 10:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
A reason an object is black is because of what the color of materials it is made from are not because it absorbs light.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Bullshit... what are you 12?

Idiot... You have no freaking idea what you are talking about. Seriously, anybody that knows anything about color and light knows this. Now you are just sounding stupid.


Black is the color of objects that do not emit or reflect light in any part of the visible spectrum; they absorb all such frequencies of light. Although black is sometimes described as an "achromatic", or hueless, color, in practice it can be considered a color, as in expressions like "black cat" or "black paint".
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
 Quoting: LUCUS


Exactly, but there is no "true black". Black doesn't make something invisible...especially when referring to a high mass body in space.

Regardless of the color, even if there was a "black dwarf" then it would still be altering the orbits of the planets by this point.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4313926
United States
02/29/2012 10:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Try learning about light and colors before you taste anymore of your foot.

How Do We See Colors?
[link to www.hhmi.org]

Color Think Tank - How Do We See Color.
[link to www.pantone.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3555102
United States
02/29/2012 10:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Try learning about light and colors before you taste anymore of your foot.

How Do We See Colors?
[link to www.hhmi.org]

Color Think Tank - How Do We See Color.
[link to www.pantone.com]
 Quoting: LUCUS


Zzzz,

Regardless of the color, even if there was a "black dwarf" then it would still be altering the orbits of the planets by this point.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4313926
United States
02/29/2012 10:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
A reason an object is black is because of what the color of materials it is made from are not because it absorbs light.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Bullshit... what are you 12?

Idiot... You have no freaking idea what you are talking about. Seriously, anybody that knows anything about color and light knows this. Now you are just sounding stupid.


Black is the color of objects that do not emit or reflect light in any part of the visible spectrum; they absorb all such frequencies of light. Although black is sometimes described as an "achromatic", or hueless, color, in practice it can be considered a color, as in expressions like "black cat" or "black paint".
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
 Quoting: LUCUS


Exactly, but there is no "true black". Black doesn't make something invisible...especially when referring to a high mass body in space.

Regardless of the color, even if there was a "black dwarf" then it would still be altering the orbits of the planets by this point.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


OK so now proven wrong you instantly change topics. You don't even know the basics of color and light and you think anybody should listen to your other bright ideas?

:popup:
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4313926
United States
02/29/2012 10:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
TRY AGAIN...

The presence of such a massive object in the solar system's far-flung Oort Cloud could explain a barrage of comets from an unexpected direction, according to a December article at Space.com.

[link to news.blogs.cnn.com]

And if you want to go down that road here is a HUGE list of news stories talking about the outer planet's orbits being disturbed.

The Victoria Advocate - Jun 13, 1968

[link to news.google.com]

The Nevada Daily Mail - Apr 26, 1972

[link to news.google.com]

Bangor Daily News - Apr 28, 1972

[link to news.google.com]

Beaver County Times - Apr 28, 1972

[link to news.google.com]

The Phoenix - Apr 28, 1972

[link to news.google.com]

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette - Apr 29, 1972

[link to news.google.com]

Sunday Times-Sentinel - Apr 30, 1972

[link to news.google.com]

The Sydney Morning Herald - May 2, 1972

[link to news.google.com]

The Montreal Gazette - May 6, 1972

[link to news.google.com]

Sarasota Herald-Tribune - Jul 16, 1972

[link to news.google.com]

Tri City Herald - Nov 2, 1972

[link to news.google.com]

The Rochester Sentinel - Feb 2, 1973

[link to news.google.com]

The Times-News - Feb 19, 1980

[link to news.google.com]

Anchorage Daily News - Mar 1, 1980

[link to news.google.com]

Lakeland Ledger - Mar 9, 1980

[link to news.google.com]

Ocala Star-Banner - Apr 9, 1980

[link to news.google.com]

The Miami News - Oct 6, 1980

[link to news.google.com]

The Times-News - Feb 19, 1980

[link to news.google.com]

Anchorage Daily News - Mar 1, 1980

[link to news.google.com]

Lakeland Ledger - Mar 9, 1980

[link to news.google.com]

Ocala Star-Banner - Apr 9, 1980

[link to news.google.com]

Anchorage Daily News - Feb 6, 1983

[link to news.google.com]

Time Magazine Monday, Feb. 14, 1983

[link to www.time.com]

Daily Leader - Mar 10, 1983

[link to news.google.com]

Nature 31 March 1983

[link to www.nature.com]

Anchorage Daily News - Apr 26, 1983

[link to news.google.com]

NY Times May 1, 1983

[link to www.nytimes.com]

The Nevada Daily Mail - May 26, 1983

[link to news.google.com]

Eugene Register-Guard - May 29, 1983

[link to news.google.com]

Beaver County Times - Jun 12, 1983

[link to news.google.com]

Observer-Reporter - Dec 17, 1984

[link to news.google.com]

NY Times December 18, 1984

[link to www.nytimes.com]

The Age - Dec 19, 1984

[link to news.google.com]

Record-Journal - Dec 20, 1984

[link to news.google.com]

Ocala Star-Banner - Dec 30, 1984

[link to news.google.com]

The Deseret News - Jan 13, 1985

[link to news.google.com]

Lakeland Ledger - Jan 13, 1985

[link to news.google.com]

Times Daily - Jan 13, 1985

[link to news.google.com]

Daily Union - Jan 15, 1985

[link to news.google.com]

The Leader-Post - Jan 16, 1985

[link to news.google.com]

The Free Lance-Star - Jan 25, 1985

[link to news.google.com]

NY Times July 1, 1987

[link to www.nytimes.com]

Schenectady Gazette - Jul 3, 1987

[link to news.google.com]

Gainesville Sun - Jul 8, 1987

[link to news.google.com]

The Telegraph - Oct 4, 1987

[link to news.google.com]

Spokane Chronicle - Oct 5, 1987

[link to news.google.com]

The Hour - Oct 29, 1987

[link to news.google.com]

Bangor Daily News - Jun 14, 1988

[link to news.google.com]

The Pittsburgh Press - Jun 14, 1988

[link to news.google.com]

Reading Eagle - Jun 14, 1988

[link to news.google.com]

The Hour - Jun 15, 1988

[link to news.google.com]

Gadsden Times - Aug 12, 1988

[link to news.google.com]

The Modesto Bee - Sep 15, 1988

[link to news.google.com]

Schenectady Gazette - Sep 15, 1988

[link to news.google.com]

Gadsden Times - Jan 11, 1990

[link to news.google.com]

New Straits Times - Jan 12, 1990

[link to news.google.com]

Lawrence Journal-World - Apr 22, 1990

[link to news.google.com]

The Free Lance-Star - Apr 26, 1990

[link to news.google.com]

Record-Journal - May 1, 1990

[link to news.google.com]

Kentucky New Era - Dec 10, 1990

[link to news.google.com]

Toledo Blade - Dec 23, 1990

[link to news.google.com]

Bangor Daily News - Jan 4, 1991

[link to news.google.com]

New Scientist, 07 September 1991

[link to www.newscientist.com]

New Scientist, 30 November 1991

[link to www.newscientist.com]

DER SPIEGEL, 30.12.1991

[link to www.spiegel.de]

Bangor Daily News - Jan 1, 1992

[link to news.google.com]

NY Times, September 20, 1992

[link to www.nytimes.com]

NY Times, January 27, 1993

[link to www.nytimes.com]

New Scientist, 30 January 1993

[link to www.newscientist.com]

NY Times, June 01, 1993

[link to www.nytimes.com]

Lakeland Ledger - Jun 6, 1993

[link to news.google.com]

The Times-News - Jun 27, 1993

[link to news.google.com]

DTE - Aug 31, 1993

[link to www.downtoearth.org.in]

Discover - September 1, 1993

[link to discovermagazine.com]

Independent - Tuesday, 24 October 1995

[link to www.independent.co.uk]

Time Magazine - Feb. 05, 1996

[link to www.time.com]

The Economist - May 15th 1997

[link to www.economist.com]

The Madison Courier - Jul 12, 1997

[link to news.google.com]

New Scientist, 18 October 1997

[link to www.newscientist.com]

The Atlantic - Feb 1998

[link to www.theatlantic.com]

MSNBC - Oct. 7, 1999

[link to www.msnbc.msn.com]

The Economist - Oct 14th 1999

[link to www.economist.com]

Science - 15 October 1999

[link to www.sciencemag.org]

Space Daily - Dec. 4, 2000

[link to www.spacedaily.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1639930
Germany
02/29/2012 10:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Big fan of your work lucus. I have a I'm a little confused though about your explanation as to what the Norway spiral was. If it truly. was the destroyer star and it was close enough to see, how come nothing happened?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1639930
Germany
02/29/2012 10:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Big fan of your work lucus. I have a I'm a little confused though about your explanation as to what the Norway spiral was. If it truly. was the destroyer star and it was close enough to see, how come nothing happened?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3555102
United States
02/29/2012 10:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
A reason an object is black is because of what the color of materials it is made from are not because it absorbs light.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Bullshit... what are you 12?

Idiot... You have no freaking idea what you are talking about. Seriously, anybody that knows anything about color and light knows this. Now you are just sounding stupid.


Black is the color of objects that do not emit or reflect light in any part of the visible spectrum; they absorb all such frequencies of light. Although black is sometimes described as an "achromatic", or hueless, color, in practice it can be considered a color, as in expressions like "black cat" or "black paint".
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
 Quoting: LUCUS


Exactly, but there is no "true black". Black doesn't make something invisible...especially when referring to a high mass body in space.

Regardless of the color, even if there was a "black dwarf" then it would still be altering the orbits of the planets by this point.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


OK so now proven wrong you instantly change topics. You don't even know the basics of color and light and you think anybody should listen to your other bright ideas?

:popup:
 Quoting: LUCUS


But it is actually you that is changing topics. First its a brown dwarf, then its a black dwarf which is only a hypothetical object and not invisible nor undetectable (assuming it even existed). Then you disregard the fact that gravity has a role in this and can't understand that if there was a high mass body near our solar system then the planets orbits would be perturbed (which they are not). None of this is off-topic technically, it is all related to your claim of a brown/black/bullshit dwarf coming our way.

Let me guess what's next, a cloaked dwarf? an inter-dimensional dwarf? Grasp at those straws Lucus, you are pretty good at using the god of the gaps arguments.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4313926
United States
02/29/2012 10:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Big fan of your work lucus. I have a I'm a little confused though about your explanation as to what the Norway spiral was. If it truly. was the destroyer star and it was close enough to see, how come nothing happened?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1639930


I don't know what that spiral was. I do know that the ancients were very clear about the spiral though.

All those petroglyphs associating the spiral with floods and dead birds and fish is pretty amazing.

The spirals could be some electrical interaction but I can't even begin to imagine what it really is.

With all this holographics technology these days it could have been some sort of display.

Remember all the world leaders were there so maybe they were being shown what to look for when it happens.

Who knows.
John Everytard

User ID: 5027429
United States
02/29/2012 10:23 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
...


Bullshit... what are you 12?

Idiot... You have no freaking idea what you are talking about. Seriously, anybody that knows anything about color and light knows this. Now you are just sounding stupid.


Black is the color of objects that do not emit or reflect light in any part of the visible spectrum; they absorb all such frequencies of light. Although black is sometimes described as an "achromatic", or hueless, color, in practice it can be considered a color, as in expressions like "black cat" or "black paint".
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
 Quoting: LUCUS


Exactly, but there is no "true black". Black doesn't make something invisible...especially when referring to a high mass body in space.

Regardless of the color, even if there was a "black dwarf" then it would still be altering the orbits of the planets by this point.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


OK so now proven wrong you instantly change topics. You don't even know the basics of color and light and you think anybody should listen to your other bright ideas?

popup
 Quoting: LUCUS


But it is actually you that is changing topics. First its a brown dwarf, then its a black dwarf which is only a hypothetical object and not invisible nor undetectable (assuming it even existed). Then you disregard the fact that gravity has a role in this and can't understand that if there was a high mass body near our solar system then the planets orbits would be perturbed (which they are not). None of this is off-topic technically, it is all related to your claim of a brown/black/bullshit dwarf coming our way.

Let me guess what's next, a cloaked dwarf? an inter-dimensional dwarf? Grasp at those straws Lucus, you are pretty good at using the god of the gaps arguments.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


I guess you missed the dozens of links for the 50+ past years from articles that discuss the outer planets orbits being perturbed.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4313926
United States
02/29/2012 10:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Quakes are picking up again near Japan

5.7 2012/02/29 14:32:46 35.218 141.006 9.8 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN

4.8 2012/02/29 11:31:37 39.642 143.324 31.4 OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN

5.2 2012/02/29 09:00:05 37.309 141.632 35.0 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3555102
United States
02/29/2012 10:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
...


Exactly, but there is no "true black". Black doesn't make something invisible...especially when referring to a high mass body in space.

Regardless of the color, even if there was a "black dwarf" then it would still be altering the orbits of the planets by this point.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


OK so now proven wrong you instantly change topics. You don't even know the basics of color and light and you think anybody should listen to your other bright ideas?

:popup:
 Quoting: LUCUS


But it is actually you that is changing topics. First its a brown dwarf, then its a black dwarf which is only a hypothetical object and not invisible nor undetectable (assuming it even existed). Then you disregard the fact that gravity has a role in this and can't understand that if there was a high mass body near our solar system then the planets orbits would be perturbed (which they are not). None of this is off-topic technically, it is all related to your claim of a brown/black/bullshit dwarf coming our way.

Let me guess what's next, a cloaked dwarf? an inter-dimensional dwarf? Grasp at those straws Lucus, you are pretty good at using the god of the gaps arguments.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


I guess you missed the dozens of links for the 50+ past years from articles that discuss the outer planets orbits being perturbed.
 Quoting: John Everytard


Except they they aren't.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4313926
United States
02/29/2012 10:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Except they they aren't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


:geniuses:
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3555102
United States
02/29/2012 10:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Except they they aren't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


:geniuses:
 Quoting: LUCUS


zzzz, typical
AstromutModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
02/29/2012 10:41 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
...


Exactly, but there is no "true black". Black doesn't make something invisible...especially when referring to a high mass body in space.

Regardless of the color, even if there was a "black dwarf" then it would still be altering the orbits of the planets by this point.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


OK so now proven wrong you instantly change topics. You don't even know the basics of color and light and you think anybody should listen to your other bright ideas?

popup
 Quoting: LUCUS


But it is actually you that is changing topics. First its a brown dwarf, then its a black dwarf which is only a hypothetical object and not invisible nor undetectable (assuming it even existed). Then you disregard the fact that gravity has a role in this and can't understand that if there was a high mass body near our solar system then the planets orbits would be perturbed (which they are not). None of this is off-topic technically, it is all related to your claim of a brown/black/bullshit dwarf coming our way.

Let me guess what's next, a cloaked dwarf? an inter-dimensional dwarf? Grasp at those straws Lucus, you are pretty good at using the god of the gaps arguments.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


I guess you missed the dozens of links for the 50+ past years from articles that discuss the outer planets orbits being perturbed.
 Quoting: John Everytard


Thread: Robert Harrington's Planet X Does Not Exist
astrobanner2
Dutchguy

User ID: 1259147
Netherlands
02/29/2012 10:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Big fan of your work lucus. I have a I'm a little confused though about your explanation as to what the Norway spiral was. If it truly. was the destroyer star and it was close enough to see, how come nothing happened?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1639930


Actually,,,, something did happen, The Norway Spiral!?



But to add, i've got a little confusion myself about this subject.
If it really was a low mass object or a dark star that had created the Norway Spiral, why haven't we seen any more things like it. Do you expect their will be more spirals like the Norway spiral to be seen this year??

I stil find it hard to believe there is a massive object lurking around our solar system wich we don't know of (at least not known mainstream). If it would be true, and also the myths are true, than it has to travel at an enormous speed if it has to pass our planet this year. I'm talking almost speed of light, speed, if it stil is not seen in our skies as a distant star or anything!! What is your view on this?

I know there is a large portion of Orions constellation blacked out on google sky, but if it has to come from that direction, we on earth would already have seen a new dot/star in or around the Orion constellation, maybe not visseble with the naked eye, but surely it would have been visseble for quite some time now with telescopes around the world (and in orbit around our planet).

I've been busy with this subject for a couple of years now and most of the prophecies that were done in line with these predictions have not come true as of yet. (Like the one where people predicted "planet-X" to be seen from the northern hemisphere about 2 years ago (when i started touching this subject)), only thing i could notice so far was that Jupiter was super bright in the skies the last couple of years. JUPITER,,, not Planet-X like what most youtubers believe..

So if it still has to come our way, in what kind of a time span should i think, like astronomical terms (somewhere between now and the next million years), or in some real time span like this year/next year maybe within a decade??

Can i maybe get a link to the info you have stated in your vids. I would like to read up on all the magnificent info you have gathered.. Would greatly appreciate it :P
"If History is thought with oppression, war and genocide, then how else would the future be?"

"How can one learn positive if one only gets preached negative!."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4313926
United States
02/29/2012 10:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Except they they aren't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


:geniuses:
 Quoting: LUCUS


zzzz, typical
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Are you living in some sort of group home type of arrangement?

You're not taking up computer time from the other patients are you?

Share with your housemates.
AstromutModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
02/29/2012 10:44 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Earthquakes have no relation to a brown dwarf, especially if it is as far out as the "sources" lucus posted are even remotely true.

Regardless, there isn't a brown dwarf. We would see it by now and it would be one of the brightest objects in the sky.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Bull...

Dark objects do not shine and it would not be bright in fact the darker the object the more light it would absorb.

That's why it's called the BLACK SUN or DARK STAR.
 Quoting: LUCUS


Yawn.
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8389252
Germany
02/29/2012 10:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Big fan of your work lucus. I have a I'm a little confused though about your explanation as to what the Norway spiral was. If it truly. was the destroyer star and it was close enough to see, how come nothing happened?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1639930


I don't know what that spiral was. I do know that the ancients were very clear about the spiral though.

All those petroglyphs associating the spiral with floods and dead birds and fish is pretty amazing.

The spirals could be some electrical interaction but I can't even begin to imagine what it really is.

With all this holographics technology these days it could have been some sort of display.

Remember all the world leaders were there so maybe they were being shown what to look for when it happens.

Who knows.
 Quoting: LUCUS


Yeah, all of them there says it all. One thing is for sure, it wasn't a failed Russian rocket.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3555102
United States
02/29/2012 10:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Earthquakes have no relation to a brown dwarf, especially if it is as far out as the "sources" lucus posted are even remotely true.

Regardless, there isn't a brown dwarf. We would see it by now and it would be one of the brightest objects in the sky.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Bull...

Dark objects do not shine and it would not be bright in fact the darker the object the more light it would absorb.

That's why it's called the BLACK SUN or DARK STAR.
 Quoting: LUCUS


Yawn.
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
 Quoting: Astromut


I love how, in that thread, Lucus somehow manages to link giant whirlpools and earthquakes with a high mass body.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2313576
United States
02/29/2012 11:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Earthquakes have no relation to a brown dwarf, especially if it is as far out as the "sources" lucus posted are even remotely true.

Regardless, there isn't a brown dwarf. We would see it by now and it would be one of the brightest objects in the sky.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Bull...

Dark objects do not shine and it would not be bright in fact the darker the object the more light it would absorb.

That's why it's called the BLACK SUN or DARK STAR.
 Quoting: LUCUS


Yawn.
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
 Quoting: Astromut


Have you seen the interview with Harrington stating that "we have found it"...not hypothetical. I believe he was on the way to review the final data to confirm.
AstromutModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
02/29/2012 11:01 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Earthquakes have no relation to a brown dwarf, especially if it is as far out as the "sources" lucus posted are even remotely true.

Regardless, there isn't a brown dwarf. We would see it by now and it would be one of the brightest objects in the sky.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Bull...

Dark objects do not shine and it would not be bright in fact the darker the object the more light it would absorb.

That's why it's called the BLACK SUN or DARK STAR.
 Quoting: LUCUS


Yawn.
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
 Quoting: Astromut


I love how, in that thread, Lucus somehow manages to link giant whirlpools and earthquakes with a high mass body.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Yup, it somehow shakes the planets, even slows down their rotations, but it doesn't move the planets...
astrobanner2

News