Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,452 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,047,310
Pageviews Today: 2,890,938Threads Today: 839Posts Today: 15,325
10:47 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 677020
United States
03/08/2012 10:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Here are photos of Nibiru moon swirls showing up near the sun, taken over the last couple of days.

[link to poleshift.ning.com]

So far, no response on these from debunkers except to try to get people not to look at them or to blame them on gravity (I can't remember if it was Opie or Pinhead that said that.)
AstromutModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
03/08/2012 12:36 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
...


No response? Typical.
 Quoting: Astromut


Lol, you're funny Astro....you know that's the point, TBar does know what he's doing.
 Quoting: Tuff~Kooky

If you're implying he or I are lying, it's up to you to prove it.
I just don't don't have 100% trust of just anyone remaking Harrington's analysis anyway.
 Quoting: kooky

Generating an orbital diagram using Harrington's own data isn't "remaking Harrington's analysis." You could do it yourself if you were even halfway competent on the subject.
Harrington probably had more details to that, but I'm sure that's all gone, if not locked up
in Iron Mountain somewhere or somewhere similar.
 Quoting: kooky

The details are all right there in the paper that TBar presented, discussed, and linked to.
And I'm not so sure either if Harrington's Planet X theory is not true either.
 Quoting: kooky

I am.
Thread: Robert Harrington's Planet X Does Not Exist
* Show me where I'm wrong.
Or is Planet X/Nibiru a Dwarf Star of some kind?
 Quoting: kooky

That would make it even more massive and even more wrong.
 Quoting: Astromut



* There is more than reasonable doubt in my mind, that the data you have to work with from Dr. Harrington
may not only be inaccurate, but also INCOMPLETE. herethere
 Quoting: Tuff~Kooky

Then it's up to you to prove it by providing a scan of the paper he published listed above showing that the actual journal article contains different and additional information from what is available online.
Quotes from source
 Quoting: kooky

Your source is a joke. Either provide a scan of the hardcopy of the journal showing it differs from the documents previously listed or you've got nothing at all.
....By analyzing time-lapse photographs using the "blink comparison" technique, originated by famed Pluto discoverer, Clyde Tombaugh, Dr. Harrington proved that Planet X was indeed inbound into our Solar System.
 Quoting: Kooky

LMFAO! First of all, prove it, second of all, Clyde Tombaugh used blink comparison but he did not invent the technique. Carl Pulfrich did so in 1900, and though his application was originally for microscopes, Max Wolf immediately adapted it for astronomy and astrophotography (he had been trying to develop it himself as early as 1892). Again, your source is a joke written by a nutjob who knows nothing about astronomy.

Last Edited by Dr. Astro on 03/08/2012 12:37 PM
astrobanner2
AstromutModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
03/08/2012 12:38 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Did anyone notice the moon tonight?

The "man in the moon" face is tilted backwards again, this time more towards 12 o'clock.
Last month the full moon "face" was tilted to about 1 o'clock, specifically the "eye" of the "face" - as before.blink

Looking like more evidence to me.

hmm
 Quoting: Tuff~Kooky


Evidence that you're clueless about things like field rotation? Sure.
astrobanner2
yourmamaknows

User ID: 11202689
United States
03/08/2012 01:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
I have been doing some Cayce sleep and trance techniques to try and understand this difficult subject.

Some impressions are starting to come through. They will be posted first on this topic line.

Before you laugh yourself silly and spit out your breakfast cereal. No I am not kidding.

I hope my endeavors provide some insight into this matter that is useful. Take care all.

afro
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3555102
United States
03/08/2012 01:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
I have been doing some Cayce sleep and trance techniques to try and understand this difficult subject.

Some impressions are starting to come through. They will be posted first on this topic line.

Before you laugh yourself silly and spit out your breakfast cereal. No I am not kidding.

I hope my endeavors provide some insight into this matter that is useful. Take care all.

afro
 Quoting: yourmamaknows


How about you use science instead? There is no need for superstition.
yourmamaknows

User ID: 11202689
United States
03/08/2012 01:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
I have been doing some Cayce sleep and trance techniques to try and understand this difficult subject.

Some impressions are starting to come through. They will be posted first on this topic line.

Before you laugh yourself silly and spit out your breakfast cereal. No I am not kidding.

I hope my endeavors provide some insight into this matter that is useful. Take care all.

afro
 Quoting: yourmamaknows


How about you use science instead? There is no need for superstition.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102



Well................... That would be a long story, by way of explanation. LUCUS has done stunning research and Astromut relies on science.

I can only offer what I have to offer.

hf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12184733
Germany
03/08/2012 01:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Did anyone notice the moon tonight?

The "man in the moon" face is tilted backwards again, this time more towards 12 o'clock.
Last month the full moon "face" was tilted to about 1 o'clock, specifically the "eye" of the "face" - as before.blink

Looking like more evidence to me.

hmm
 Quoting: Tuff~Kooky


Yep. Noticed for the last few month... But austronut will surely 'debunk' it... He'll call it 'Wet moon' or some shit like that
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 677020
United States
03/08/2012 01:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Here are photos of Nibiru moon swirls showing up near the sun, taken over the last couple of days.

[link to poleshift.ning.com]

So far, no response on these from debunkers except to try to get people not to look at them or to blame them on gravity (I can't remember if it was Opie or Pinhead that said that.)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


Still waiting, debunkers ... How do you explain these photos (other than to change the subject or claim they are Photoshopped)?
TBar1984

User ID: 5852796
United States
03/08/2012 01:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Look at all the Nibirus I found the other day!





Oh, you won't find Manny's Red Star videos anymore. It was an object next to where he was shooting reflecting into the camera. I told him to change locations, block the Sun from the camera, and look for his Red Star... It was Gone, as are his videos about it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3555102
United States
03/08/2012 01:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Here are photos of Nibiru moon swirls showing up near the sun, taken over the last couple of days.

[link to poleshift.ning.com]

So far, no response on these from debunkers except to try to get people not to look at them or to blame them on gravity (I can't remember if it was Opie or Pinhead that said that.)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


Still waiting, debunkers ... How do you explain these photos (other than to change the subject or claim they are Photoshopped)?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


I already debunked these. You have yet to respond.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 677020
United States
03/08/2012 02:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Here are photos of Nibiru moon swirls showing up near the sun, taken over the last couple of days.

[link to poleshift.ning.com]

So far, no response on these from debunkers except to try to get people not to look at them or to blame them on gravity (I can't remember if it was Opie or Pinhead that said that.)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


Still waiting, debunkers ... How do you explain these photos (other than to change the subject or claim they are Photoshopped)?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


I already debunked these. You have yet to respond.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


People, look at these for yourselves. Notice that he says he debunked them but won't quote himself. That's because all he did was change the subject and refuse to address the photos themselves. That's because these images can't be debunked. Wake up, all -- it's here!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3555102
United States
03/08/2012 02:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Here are photos of Nibiru moon swirls showing up near the sun, taken over the last couple of days.

[link to poleshift.ning.com]

So far, no response on these from debunkers except to try to get people not to look at them or to blame them on gravity (I can't remember if it was Opie or Pinhead that said that.)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


Still waiting, debunkers ... How do you explain these photos (other than to change the subject or claim they are Photoshopped)?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


I already debunked these. You have yet to respond.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


People, look at these for yourselves. Notice that he says he debunked them but won't quote himself. That's because all he did was change the subject and refuse to address the photos themselves. That's because these images can't be debunked. Wake up, all -- it's here!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


Ill do it again, ready?

Gravity. Those pictures have just been debunked.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 677020
United States
03/08/2012 02:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
...


Still waiting, debunkers ... How do you explain these photos (other than to change the subject or claim they are Photoshopped)?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


I already debunked these. You have yet to respond.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


People, look at these for yourselves. Notice that he says he debunked them but won't quote himself. That's because all he did was change the subject and refuse to address the photos themselves. That's because these images can't be debunked. Wake up, all -- it's here!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


Ill do it again, ready?

Gravity. Those pictures have just been debunked.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Oh, Clem, right. It was you that said "gravity". What a fucking moron. You're saying that gravity caused several of Nibiru's moons to appear in a photo of the Sun. LOL!!!! Were you born with a negative IQ or is it something you had to work at?

cruise
TBar1984

User ID: 5852796
United States
03/08/2012 03:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
...


I already debunked these. You have yet to respond.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


People, look at these for yourselves. Notice that he says he debunked them but won't quote himself. That's because all he did was change the subject and refuse to address the photos themselves. That's because these images can't be debunked. Wake up, all -- it's here!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


Ill do it again, ready?

Gravity. Those pictures have just been debunked.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Oh, Clem, right. It was you that said "gravity". What a fucking moron. You're saying that gravity caused several of Nibiru's moons to appear in a photo of the Sun. LOL!!!! Were you born with a negative IQ or is it something you had to work at?

cruise
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


You really have to question someone's sanity when they continue to pursue a theory that can be debunked by simply walking outside and looking up. It is truly amazing someone can be that thick.

Here, I debunked all those 2 Sun images with one simple video. I can produce all the Nibirus I desire just by adding another filter in front of the camera and can make them move around at will.

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3555102
United States
03/08/2012 03:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
...


I already debunked these. You have yet to respond.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


People, look at these for yourselves. Notice that he says he debunked them but won't quote himself. That's because all he did was change the subject and refuse to address the photos themselves. That's because these images can't be debunked. Wake up, all -- it's here!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


Ill do it again, ready?

Gravity. Those pictures have just been debunked.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Oh, Clem, right. It was you that said "gravity". What a fucking moron. You're saying that gravity caused several of Nibiru's moons to appear in a photo of the Sun. LOL!!!! Were you born with a negative IQ or is it something you had to work at?

cruise
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


Ha! That is how I figured you respond.

If you understood gravity at all you would understand that it would be impossible for nibiru to be there or that close to us.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 677020
United States
03/08/2012 03:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
...


People, look at these for yourselves. Notice that he says he debunked them but won't quote himself. That's because all he did was change the subject and refuse to address the photos themselves. That's because these images can't be debunked. Wake up, all -- it's here!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


Ill do it again, ready?

Gravity. Those pictures have just been debunked.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Oh, Clem, right. It was you that said "gravity". What a fucking moron. You're saying that gravity caused several of Nibiru's moons to appear in a photo of the Sun. LOL!!!! Were you born with a negative IQ or is it something you had to work at?

cruise
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


You really have to question someone's sanity when they continue to pursue a theory that can be debunked by simply walking outside and looking up. It is truly amazing someone can be that thick.

Here, I debunked all those 2 Sun images with one simple video. I can produce all the Nibirus I desire just by adding another filter in front of the camera and can make them move around at will.


 Quoting: TBar1984


Wow, you really are as dumb as a bag of assholes. You really think that avoiding the subject at hand is going to fool anyone. Here are the photos: [link to poleshift.ning.com]

Debunk that, num-nuts. Or is the Photoshop-theory really the best you can do? Or (more likely) go off on another unrelated subject.

skull_fing
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3555102
United States
03/08/2012 03:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
...


Ill do it again, ready?

Gravity. Those pictures have just been debunked.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Oh, Clem, right. It was you that said "gravity". What a fucking moron. You're saying that gravity caused several of Nibiru's moons to appear in a photo of the Sun. LOL!!!! Were you born with a negative IQ or is it something you had to work at?

cruise
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


You really have to question someone's sanity when they continue to pursue a theory that can be debunked by simply walking outside and looking up. It is truly amazing someone can be that thick.

Here, I debunked all those 2 Sun images with one simple video. I can produce all the Nibirus I desire just by adding another filter in front of the camera and can make them move around at will.


 Quoting: TBar1984


Wow, you really are as dumb as a bag of assholes. You really think that avoiding the subject at hand is going to fool anyone. Here are the photos: [link to poleshift.ning.com]

Debunk that, num-nuts. Or is the Photoshop-theory really the best you can do? Or (more likely) go off on another unrelated subject.

skull_fing
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


...


Ill do it again, ready?

Gravity. Those pictures have just been debunked.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Oh, Clem, right. It was you that said "gravity". What a fucking moron. You're saying that gravity caused several of Nibiru's moons to appear in a photo of the Sun. LOL!!!! Were you born with a negative IQ or is it something you had to work at?

cruise
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


You really have to question someone's sanity when they continue to pursue a theory that can be debunked by simply walking outside and looking up. It is truly amazing someone can be that thick.

Here, I debunked all those 2 Sun images with one simple video. I can produce all the Nibirus I desire just by adding another filter in front of the camera and can make them move around at will.


 Quoting: TBar1984


Wow, you really are as dumb as a bag of assholes. You really think that avoiding the subject at hand is going to fool anyone. Here are the photos: [link to poleshift.ning.com]

Debunk that, num-nuts. Or is the Photoshop-theory really the best you can do? Or (more likely) go off on another unrelated subject.

skull_fing
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


You are either a really bad troll or deluded.

If you understood gravity at all you would understand that it would be impossible for nibiru to be there or that close to us.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1020743
United States
03/08/2012 03:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
The Vasillas will not be happy about this, erase the photos so we can have lotus flowers in the spring! hf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8640456
United States
03/08/2012 03:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
the images he showed don't look like many of those taken from around the world with and without filters. Not at all.
AstromutModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
03/08/2012 03:31 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
...


(A) What's your point?

(B) Nancy didn't take those pics, some Italian guy did?

(C) Clever way to change the subject and avoid addressing the evidence.

(D) Not really that clever, just typical (yawn).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


What part of banned do you not understand? I was banned from the ning without even posting a single word. Nancy can go fuck herself for all I care.
 Quoting: Astromut


(A) What part of "I don't give a shit about what you think of Nancy" do you not understand?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020

Good for you, also irrelevant. What part of banned do you not understand?
(B) Clever way to continue avoiding the evidence of photos NOT taken by Nancy (what part of that statement do you not understand?)
 Quoting: AC

WHAT PART OF BANNED DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND? I HAVEN'T EVEN SEEN THE PHOTOS! POST THEM HERE OR I WON'T BE COMMENTING ON THEM!
 Quoting: Astromut

I wonder why it is the AC is too much of a coward to post the photos somewhere where I could actually see them.
astrobanner2
TBar1984

User ID: 5852796
United States
03/08/2012 03:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
...


Ill do it again, ready?

Gravity. Those pictures have just been debunked.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Oh, Clem, right. It was you that said "gravity". What a fucking moron. You're saying that gravity caused several of Nibiru's moons to appear in a photo of the Sun. LOL!!!! Were you born with a negative IQ or is it something you had to work at?

cruise
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


You really have to question someone's sanity when they continue to pursue a theory that can be debunked by simply walking outside and looking up. It is truly amazing someone can be that thick.

Here, I debunked all those 2 Sun images with one simple video. I can produce all the Nibirus I desire just by adding another filter in front of the camera and can make them move around at will.


 Quoting: TBar1984


Wow, you really are as dumb as a bag of assholes. You really think that avoiding the subject at hand is going to fool anyone. Here are the photos: [link to poleshift.ning.com]

Debunk that, num-nuts. Or is the Photoshop-theory really the best you can do? Or (more likely) go off on another unrelated subject.

skull_fing
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020

I have recreated those images myself simply by using filters just like the filters in the images you keep linking to. Again, at time 17:46 is an image similar to the ones you keep linking. I have others that are not in the video that look almost EXACTLY like yours, created by simply adding filters in front of the camera. PHOTOSHOP IS NOT INVOLVED you moron, look at time 2:35 in the first video where I SHOW YOU the filters I'm using.



Are you really that dense?
HI.Lander

User ID: 9519654
United States
03/08/2012 03:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
...


Ill do it again, ready?

Gravity. Those pictures have just been debunked.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3555102


Oh, Clem, right. It was you that said "gravity". What a fucking moron. You're saying that gravity caused several of Nibiru's moons to appear in a photo of the Sun. LOL!!!! Were you born with a negative IQ or is it something you had to work at?

cruise
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


You really have to question someone's sanity when they continue to pursue a theory that can be debunked by simply walking outside and looking up. It is truly amazing someone can be that thick.

Here, I debunked all those 2 Sun images with one simple video. I can produce all the Nibirus I desire just by adding another filter in front of the camera and can make them move around at will.


 Quoting: TBar1984


Wow, you really are as dumb as a bag of assholes. You really think that avoiding the subject at hand is going to fool anyone. Here are the photos: [link to poleshift.ning.com]

Debunk that, num-nuts. Or is the Photoshop-theory really the best you can do? Or (more likely) go off on another unrelated subject.

skull_fing
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 677020


He didn't use Photoshop. Did you even watch the video?

edit: That was a clean and thorough debunking.

Last Edited by HI.Lander on 03/08/2012 03:45 PM
"Waste no more time arguing about what a good man should be. Be one." -- Marcus Aurelius

Today I broke my personal record for most consecutive days lived.
Tuff~Kooky

User ID: 10846356
United States
03/08/2012 04:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
...


Lol, you're funny Astro....you know that's the point, TBar does know what he's doing.
 Quoting: Tuff~Kooky

If you're implying he or I are lying, it's up to you to prove it.
I just don't don't have 100% trust of just anyone remaking Harrington's analysis anyway.
 Quoting: kooky

Generating an orbital diagram using Harrington's own data isn't "remaking Harrington's analysis." You could do it yourself if you were even halfway competent on the subject.
Harrington probably had more details to that, but I'm sure that's all gone, if not locked up
in Iron Mountain somewhere or somewhere similar.
 Quoting: kooky

The details are all right there in the paper that TBar presented, discussed, and linked to.
And I'm not so sure either if Harrington's Planet X theory is not true either.
 Quoting: kooky

I am.
Thread: Robert Harrington's Planet X Does Not Exist
* Show me where I'm wrong.
Or is Planet X/Nibiru a Dwarf Star of some kind?
 Quoting: kooky

That would make it even more massive and even more wrong.
 Quoting: Astromut



* There is more than reasonable doubt in my mind, that the data you have to work with from Dr. Harrington
may not only be inaccurate, but also INCOMPLETE. herethere
 Quoting: Tuff~Kooky

Then it's up to you to prove it by providing a scan of the paper he published listed above showing that the actual journal article contains different and additional information from what is available online.
Quotes from source
 Quoting: kooky

Your source is a joke. Either provide a scan of the hardcopy of the journal showing it differs from the documents previously listed or you've got nothing at all.
....By analyzing time-lapse photographs using the "blink comparison" technique, originated by famed Pluto discoverer, Clyde Tombaugh, Dr. Harrington proved that Planet X was indeed inbound into our Solar System.
 Quoting: Kooky

LMFAO! First of all, prove it, second of all, Clyde Tombaugh used blink comparison but he did not invent the technique. Carl Pulfrich did so in 1900, and though his application was originally for microscopes, Max Wolf immediately adapted it for astronomy and astrophotography (he had been trying to develop it himself as early as 1892). Again, your source is a joke written by a nutjob who knows nothing about astronomy.
 Quoting: Astromut


You are demanding for me to "Prove it"? chuckle Funny, we're not on trial here, but since you're doing the role-play I'll say this:

I don't have to prove anything to you. Right now I am playing the part of the jury - I am an observer - and you are not providing me a convincing enough case. I have my doubts. The evidence from the other side is much more convincing to me,
which involves much more than just in recent years and what's here on the internet.

And I find your sources not 100% credible being that they are heavily controlled Idol1

>>"…Publicity of Harrington's discovery would pose a great threat to the social, political,
and economic stability of the World
…"<<

---which means the above applies not only to Harrington's discovery but also to anyone else doing research whether Planet X/Nibiru be a planet, whichever-colored dwarf star, or whatever.

Hence the gigantic coverup! secrets

So, although I can understand your position from your standpoint,
I'm sure by now you can see that I'm not your regular dumbass black friday shopper LOL

zombies scream 1dpanic
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3555102
United States
03/08/2012 04:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
...

If you're implying he or I are lying, it's up to you to prove it.
...

Generating an orbital diagram using Harrington's own data isn't "remaking Harrington's analysis." You could do it yourself if you were even halfway competent on the subject.
...

The details are all right there in the paper that TBar presented, discussed, and linked to.
...

I am.
Thread: Robert Harrington's Planet X Does Not Exist
* Show me where I'm wrong.
...

That would make it even more massive and even more wrong.
 Quoting: Astromut



* There is more than reasonable doubt in my mind, that the data you have to work with from Dr. Harrington
may not only be inaccurate, but also INCOMPLETE. herethere
 Quoting: Tuff~Kooky

Then it's up to you to prove it by providing a scan of the paper he published listed above showing that the actual journal article contains different and additional information from what is available online.
Quotes from source
 Quoting: kooky

Your source is a joke. Either provide a scan of the hardcopy of the journal showing it differs from the documents previously listed or you've got nothing at all.
....By analyzing time-lapse photographs using the "blink comparison" technique, originated by famed Pluto discoverer, Clyde Tombaugh, Dr. Harrington proved that Planet X was indeed inbound into our Solar System.
 Quoting: Kooky

LMFAO! First of all, prove it, second of all, Clyde Tombaugh used blink comparison but he did not invent the technique. Carl Pulfrich did so in 1900, and though his application was originally for microscopes, Max Wolf immediately adapted it for astronomy and astrophotography (he had been trying to develop it himself as early as 1892). Again, your source is a joke written by a nutjob who knows nothing about astronomy.
 Quoting: Astromut


You are demanding for me to "Prove it"? chuckle Funny, we're not on trial here, but since you're doing the role-play I'll say this:

I don't have to prove anything to you. Right now I am playing the part of the jury - I am an observer - and you are not providing me a convincing enough case. I have my doubts. The evidence from the other side is much more convincing to me,
which involves much more than just in recent years and what's here on the internet.

And I find your sources not 100% credible being that they are heavily controlled Idol1

>>"…Publicity of Harrington's discovery would pose a great threat to the social, political,
and economic stability of the World
…"<<

---which means the above applies not only to Harrington's discovery but also to anyone else doing research whether Planet X/Nibiru be a planet, whichever-colored dwarf star, or whatever.

Hence the gigantic coverup! secrets

So, although I can understand your position from your standpoint,
I'm sure by now you can see that I'm not your regular dumbass black friday shopper LOL

zombies scream 1dpanic
 Quoting: Tuff~Kooky


I hope you are never on a real jury in a significant case, or any case for that matter. If you really believe your "evidence" is true then that does make you a "dumbass black Friday shopper".
Tuff~Kooky

User ID: 10846356
United States
03/08/2012 04:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Did anyone notice the moon tonight?

The "man in the moon" face is tilted backwards again, this time more towards 12 o'clock.
Last month the full moon "face" was tilted to about 1 o'clock, specifically the "eye" of the "face" - as before.blink

Looking like more evidence to me.

hmm
 Quoting: Tuff~Kooky


Evidence that you're clueless about things like field rotation? Sure.
 Quoting: Astromut


Yeah right, the moon wobbles naturally now according to you and you call it a "rotation".

Move along, nothing to see here.....


putin


Fact: "Field Rotation" did not exist in the 1960's and 1970's at least.

...oh that's right, you wouldn't remember that. baby

tounge
AstromutModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
03/08/2012 04:52 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
...

If you're implying he or I are lying, it's up to you to prove it.
...

Generating an orbital diagram using Harrington's own data isn't "remaking Harrington's analysis." You could do it yourself if you were even halfway competent on the subject.
...

The details are all right there in the paper that TBar presented, discussed, and linked to.
...

I am.
Thread: Robert Harrington's Planet X Does Not Exist
* Show me where I'm wrong.
...

That would make it even more massive and even more wrong.
 Quoting: Astromut



* There is more than reasonable doubt in my mind, that the data you have to work with from Dr. Harrington
may not only be inaccurate, but also INCOMPLETE. herethere
 Quoting: Tuff~Kooky

Then it's up to you to prove it by providing a scan of the paper he published listed above showing that the actual journal article contains different and additional information from what is available online.
Quotes from source
 Quoting: kooky

Your source is a joke. Either provide a scan of the hardcopy of the journal showing it differs from the documents previously listed or you've got nothing at all.
....By analyzing time-lapse photographs using the "blink comparison" technique, originated by famed Pluto discoverer, Clyde Tombaugh, Dr. Harrington proved that Planet X was indeed inbound into our Solar System.
 Quoting: Kooky

LMFAO! First of all, prove it, second of all, Clyde Tombaugh used blink comparison but he did not invent the technique. Carl Pulfrich did so in 1900, and though his application was originally for microscopes, Max Wolf immediately adapted it for astronomy and astrophotography (he had been trying to develop it himself as early as 1892). Again, your source is a joke written by a nutjob who knows nothing about astronomy.
 Quoting: Astromut


You are demanding for me to "Prove it"? chuckle Funny, we're not on trial here, but since you're doing the role-play I'll say this:

I don't have to prove anything to you. Right now I am playing the part of the jury - I am an observer - and you are not providing me a convincing enough case.
 Quoting: Tuff~Kooky

You claimed Harrington proved that Planet X "was indeed inbound into our Solar System." You claimed he found Planet X when he was in NZ. Prove it. You claim the other side has convincing evidence, so you should be able to supply the convincing evidence that goes with this claim. Where is it?
astrobanner2
AstromutModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
03/08/2012 04:57 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Yeah right, the moon wobbles naturally now according to you and you call it a "rotation".

Move along, nothing to see here.....
 Quoting: Tuff~Kooky

Thanks for further proving you don't even know what field rotation is. The moon is not actually rotating, it's an apparent rotation.
Fact: "Field Rotation" did not exist in the 1960's and 1970's at least.
 Quoting: Kooky

108-KSC-71P-74:
[link to apollomissionphotos.com]
Picture from 1971. You're wrong, once again.

Field rotation discussed in reference to siderostat observations over a hundred years ago:
[link to adsabs.harvard.edu]
You're wrong, once again.
astrobanner2
yourmamaknows

User ID: 11202689
United States
03/08/2012 06:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
The Vasillas will not be happy about this, erase the photos so we can have lotus flowers in the spring! hf
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1020743


And maybe a Cherokee Rose or two.

afro
eyesneyes

User ID: 10799160
United States
03/08/2012 06:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Did anyone notice the moon tonight?

The "man in the moon" face is tilted backwards again, this time more towards 12 o'clock.
Last month the full moon "face" was tilted to about 1 o'clock, specifically the "eye" of the "face" - as before.blink

Looking like more evidence to me.

hmm
 Quoting: Tuff~Kooky

Indeed it is . From older 'real life' pics , I'd say it's off about 10 degrees . Also getting further and closer . One hell of a wake up call . This link will argue both sides of the debate that has formed herein . [link to arxiv.org]
... A potentially viable Newtonian candidate would be a trans-Plutonian massive object (Planet X/Nemesis/Tyche) since it, actually, would affect e with a non-vanishing long-term variation. On the other hand, the values for the physical and orbital parameters of such a hypothetical body required to obtain the right order of magnitude for de/dt are completely unrealistic. Moreover, they are in neat disagreement with both the most recent theoretical scenarios envisaging the existence of a distant, planetary-sized body and with the model-independent constraints on them dynamically inferred from planetary motions. Thus, the issue of finding a satisfactorily explanation for the anomalous behavior of the Moon's eccentricity remains open.
Bottom line; something is way out of whack and it's disturbing our entire solar system . The people we count on to figure this stuff out either don't know or can't say . Stay alert .
eyesneyes
AstromutModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
03/08/2012 07:00 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...
Did anyone notice the moon tonight?

The "man in the moon" face is tilted backwards again, this time more towards 12 o'clock.
Last month the full moon "face" was tilted to about 1 o'clock, specifically the "eye" of the "face" - as before.blink

Looking like more evidence to me.

hmm
 Quoting: Tuff~Kooky

Indeed it is . From older 'real life' pics , I'd say it's off about 10 degrees .
 Quoting: eyesneyes


The paper you just posted, which itself rules out a "planet X" type perturber as a cause, fundamentally disagrees with your claim that the moon's off by 10 degrees. The difference between predicted and measured location was a matter of centimeters. No, you can't see that by eye or even by telescope, it can only be detected by long term lunar laser ranging measurements.
astrobanner2