THE RETURN OF THE DESTROYER, NIBIRU, PLANET X, DRAGON, DARK STAR, BROWN DWARF, ECT...

If you're implying he or I are lying, it's up to you to prove it.

Generating an orbital diagram using Harrington's own data isn't "remaking Harrington's analysis." You could do it yourself if you were even halfway competent on the subject.

The details are all right there in the paper that TBar presented, discussed, and linked to.

I am.
Thread: Robert Harrington's Planet X Does Not Exist
Show me where I'm wrong.

That would make it even more massive and even more wrong.

In other words, the important thing (from your point of view) is to make sure no one looks at the photos. Or if they do, that they come to the conclusion that they mean nothing. Nice try, fuckwit.

P.S. That's these photos right here that the debunkers don't want you to see...

[link to poleshift.ning.com]

too fishy to be true

go outside and make the photo, see if there is something on it

I don't think so

What? No...not at all. The important thing is that people do REAL research and REAL science. Not half-assed "oh a photo must be reality". It is clear the scientific method is still over your head after your reply.

Hilarious! That's the same tactic Nancy has been using for some 15 years- pretending that debunkers are afraid of her "evidence". Why don't you just post that pic right here for everyone to see? I certainly don't care.

I would try to re-explain your (and your loser friends') complete misunderstanding of the scientific method, but it would only cause you to embarrass yourselves further. So, best to leave you mumbling nervously amongst yourselves while those of us with a life will continue to enjoy that life and to only post to threads whose subjects interest us (and not those we only visit in order to make asses of ourselves).

Science definitely has it's place, but it's way too controlled to be 100% infallible 100% of the time,
not to mention that it often unnecessarily complicates simple facts. People need to trust what their intuition tells them as well.







Last Edited by Tuff~Kooky on 03/07/2012 04:16 PM

Yet another silly misrepresentation of the debunker postition that "science is 100% infallible 100% of the time".

I notice that a lot of peoples "intuition" is telling them some really absurd things about how the sky, and objects in it should work/move while they completely ignore dozens of sources which would explain it to them.

I have zero misunderstanding of it. Please do point out where I do. Not that 'having a life' is relevant whatsoever but I can assure I have a great life and a great career.

Too controlled? Science has to be controlled or it isn't science. Because you are claiming that science has to be "100% infallible 100% of the time" directly shows your misunderstanding of what science is and how it works.

How does it over-complicate simple facts? It doesn't do that whatsoever....it actually specifically defines the simple facts. Almost everything you use on a daily basis is the result of science, your car, your lights, your computer, your toothpaste, your running water...everything.

So, just to summarize folks:

(1) Here are the photos in question, taken over the last couple of days.

(2) The debunkers don't want you to look at the photos or think about them, so they're going on and on endlessly babbling about the scientific method, which they have only the most tenuous grasp of.

(3) They do this because even they admit that they can't explain these photos and have made no attempt to do so. The best they can come up with is that "photos can be faked."

(4) So, if you believe the photos are fakes, then by all means, ignore them.

Oh, yes, the photos:

[link to poleshift.ning.com]

Unverifiable photos are not evidence of anything. You post photos and ask us to debunk them? Before that you have to prove that they are indeed photos of what you claim otherwise you are just playing god of the gaps. Basically you are saying that these photos are your only form of "evidence".

Again, please point out where I am misunderstanding the scientific method because so far you have seemed to ignore following it at all.

Oh and I can debunk those photos with one word.

Gravity.


Learn how it works and what would happen if there was a second sun or dwarf planet that close to us.

Somebody doesn't want you to look at these photos. Wonder why?

You are hopeless, or a troll...or both.

I looked at them and gave you how they aren't what you claim they are.

Gravity.

Learn how it works and understand what would happen if there was a second sun or planet that close to our solar system.

* There is more than reasonable doubt in my mind, that the data you have to work with from Dr. Harrington
may not only be inaccurate, but also INCOMPLETE.

Quotes from source> [link to yowusa.com]

------------

>> " Planet X and the Mysterious Death of Dr. Robert Harrington " <<

by John DiNardo and
Janice Manning

...." Dr. Robert S. Harrington, the chief astronomer of the U.S. Naval Observatory, died before he could publicize the fact that Planet X is approaching our Solar System.....

.....In 1991, Dr. Robert S. Harrington, the chief astronomer of the U.S. Naval Observatory, took a puny 8-inch telescope to Black Birch, New Zealand, one of the few viewing points on Earth optimal for sighting Planet X, which he definitively calculated to be approaching from below the ecliptic at an angle of 40 degrees.

However, the source below quotes Dr. Harrington as predicting 30 degrees, not 40.....

______

.....The Independent, September 18, 1990
Lexical priming and the properties of text, quotation of British newspaper,

Dr Harrington says the most remarkable feature predicted for Planet X is that its orbit is tilted 30 degrees away from the ecliptic, the main plane of the solar system, where all previous searches have concentrated. His models also predict a greater distance from the Sun, about 10 billion miles, or between two or three times as distant as Pluto.

______

Back to >> " Planet X and the Mysterious Death of Dr. Robert Harrington " <<

by John DiNardo and
Janice Manning

....By analyzing time-lapse photographs using the "blink comparison" technique, originated by famed Pluto discoverer, Clyde Tombaugh, Dr. Harrington proved that Planet X was indeed inbound into our Solar System. Harrington sent back reports of this ominous discovery, but died of what was reported to be esophageal cancer before he could pack up his telescope and come home to hold what would have been a highly publicized press conference......

(more here:)

[link to yowusa.com]

---------



Last Edited by Tuff~Kooky on 03/07/2012 06:19 PM

Okay, Opie, anything you say. Meanwhile, thanks for bumping the thread so that everyone has a chance to see the photos that somebody doesn't want them to look at.

Yep, you still go around my point. Typical of someone who doesn't understand the matter at hand.

Actually, I said that they should be posted right here. How is that not wanting people to look at them?

Thoughts on this?????

[link to allnibiru247.net]

If they are ignored, it's proof they are valid. If they are debunked it's proof they are valid right? I think you are the troll who produced them and are just trying to yank people's chains with them. If there are large objects near the sun ANYONE could take pics of them any day of the week and see them naked-eye. What a joke.

Gawd! Objects like that hanging in the sky in Antarctica and no one else in the southern hemisphere noticed them? Gullible much?

Oh, it's the god-awful fake again with Saturn's moon Dione.
[link to www.daviddarling.info]
It's really a shit job too, they just panned around a still image composite. You guys are really gullible.

This is Return of the Great Dragon

[link to www.youtube.com]

Did anyone notice the moon tonight?

The "man in the moon" face is tilted backwards again, this time more towards 12 o'clock.
Last month the full moon "face" was tilted to about 1 o'clock, specifically the "eye" of the "face" - as before.

Looking like more evidence to me.

Here are photos of Nibiru moon swirls showing up near the sun, taken over the last couple of days.

[link to poleshift.ning.com]

So far, no response on these from debunkers except to try to get people not to look at them or to blame them on gravity (I can't remember if it was Opie or Pinhead that said that.)