BREAKING NEWS***OBAMA BORN IN INDONESIA honolulu advertiser ONLINE VERSION STATES

Nothing we can do about it now....



.

VATICAN TERRORIST

whoover@honoluluadvertiser.com

I don't know about the in's and outs of this particular story. You don't either, but that is a discussion for another time.

What I do know is this: I have been in the papers more than once. More often than that, I have been present while "Journalists" have been taking down facts for a story.

Now, I don't have a perfect memory, but I do recall, verbatim about 50% of what I hear and about 40% of what I read. (This is about four or five times better than most people, but not perfect.) So, I tend to notice things when the news gets them wrong and I was there for the story.

EVERY newspaper story and most television news stories have glaring errors in them. These are almost never retracted or dealt with by the news agency in question. When there is a retraction or an edit, it almost always is a very minor article or retraction at the end of the newscast.

What am I saying? Just because an old paper claims that Obama was born one place and not another, that doesn't make it true. It is possibly not even a conspiracy, just the news services failing us once again.

I don't know about the in's and outs of this particular story. You don't either, but that is a discussion for another time.

What I do know is this: I have been in the papers more than once. More often than that, I have been present while "Journalists" have been taking down facts for a story.

Now, I don't have a perfect memory, but I do recall, verbatim about 50% of what I hear and about 40% of what I read. (This is about four or five times better than most people, but not perfect.) So, I tend to notice things when the news gets them wrong and I was there for the story.

EVERY newspaper story and most television news stories have glaring errors in them. These are almost never retracted or dealt with by the news agency in question. When there is a retraction or an edit, it almost always is a very minor article or retraction at the end of the newscast.

What am I saying? Just because an old paper claims that Obama was born one place and not another, that doesn't make it true. It is possibly not even a conspiracy, just the news services failing us once again.

I don't know about the in's and outs of this particular story. You don't either, but that is a discussion for another time.

What I do know is this: I have been in the papers more than once. More often than that, I have been present while "Journalists" have been taking down facts for a story.

Now, I don't have a perfect memory, but I do recall, verbatim about 50% of what I hear and about 40% of what I read. (This is about four or five times better than most people, but not perfect.) So, I tend to notice things when the news gets them wrong and I was there for the story.

EVERY newspaper story and most television news stories have glaring errors in them. These are almost never retracted or dealt with by the news agency in question. When there is a retraction or an edit, it almost always is a very minor article or retraction at the end of the newscast.

What am I saying? Just because an old paper claims that Obama was born one place and not another, that doesn't make it true. It is possibly not even a conspiracy, just the news services failing us once again.


I think I agree with you this time. And I usually don't agree with debunkers or shills. I don't know that you are one.

We pretty much figure the current illegally presiding president was born in Africa. So yeah, nothing wrong in them changing the locale. Yet, they have repeated their error in stating that he was born in Hawaii. Go figure. :)

I don't know about the in's and outs of this particular story. You don't either, but that is a discussion for another time.

What I do know is this: I have been in the papers more than once. More often than that, I have been present while "Journalists" have been taking down facts for a story.

Now, I don't have a perfect memory, but I do recall, verbatim about 50% of what I hear and about 40% of what I read. (This is about four or five times better than most people, but not perfect.) So, I tend to notice things when the news gets them wrong and I was there for the story.

EVERY newspaper story and most television news stories have glaring errors in them. These are almost never retracted or dealt with by the news agency in question. When there is a retraction or an edit, it almost always is a very minor article or retraction at the end of the newscast.

What am I saying? Just because an old paper claims that Obama was born one place and not another, that doesn't make it true. It is possibly not even a conspiracy, just the news services failing us once again.


I think I agree with you this time. And I usually don't agree with debunkers or shills. I don't know that you are one.

We pretty much figure the current illegally presiding president was born in Africa. So yeah, nothing wrong in them changing the locale. Yet, they have repeated their error in stating that he was born in Hawaii. Go figure. :)



Well lets just hope the republicans bring it to light this time instead of saying nothing about it like they did last time.

Also im sure some democrats that want to be president instead will bring it to light and then we will have our country back!

Barrack Hussein Mohamed Obama born on 23 August 1961 in Vancouver Canada.
[/quote


one interesting point of this is:

if he was born in the U.S....

why are there so many different conflicting accounts of where he WAS born?

YOU WANT PROOF YOU HAVE IT!

Barrack Hussein Mohamed Obama born on 23 August 1961 in Vancouver Canada.

Nothing we can do about it now....



.

YOU WANT PROOF YOU HAVE IT!



So an article, with no links to actual evidence, simply the opinion of the "ducky" person is all the PROOF we have?


Oooohkay.


Look, if he wasn't born in the U.S. then there has to be REAL evidence. A 10 year old chinese hacker can produce better evidence than this.

YOU WANT PROOF YOU HAVE IT!