Godlike Productions Banner
02:34 AM
Join Now, Free! (& No Ads) | FAQ | Links | Link to Us | Contact | User Map
User Photo Album | Dooms Day Calendar | Radio! | GLP Store | Proxy Toolbar
  Wednesday, May 14, 2008  
  Breaking News     Back
Clashes in Bolivia on Vote Over More Autonomy

The New York Times

2008-05-05

SANTA CRUZ, Bolivia — Street clashes broke out here and in small towns in the surrounding countryside on Sunday as Santa Cruz, Bolivia’s largest province and a bastion of separatist groups, held a referendum on measures that would give it greater autonomy from the government of President Evo Morales.

Still, voting unfolded without hindrance at most polling places even as Mr. Morales denounced the vote as illegal and some of his supporters laid siege to voting stations in isolated attacks. Dozens of people were injured in the scattered clashes, according to radio reports, including one demonstrator hit by a dynamite blast in the town of Montero.

At least one death was reported, an elderly man affected by tear gas that was fired at protesters in Plan Tres Mil, a sprawling slum here in the provincial capital. As polling stations closed, hundreds of pro- and anti-autonomy youths wielding sticks ran through the slum as the riot police, ordered to refrain from battling the protesters, stood idle.

Even before official results were announced, provincial officials declared victory to thousands of supporters here on Sunday night.

The vote deepens the rift between Mr. Morales’s vision for Bolivia, in which the country’s wealth in natural resources would be used to improve the lives of its impoverished Indians, and that of Santa Cruz, a prosperous, ethnically diverse province where many of those resources are found.

“We do not want the creation of another republic,” said Carlos Pablo Klinsky, a provincial lawmaker who helped draft the statute. “But we do want control over our own destiny and our own resources.”

The referendum’s opponents, many of whom were indigenous migrants from the highlands, denounced it as an unconstitutional ploy by the province’s light-skinned political elite.

“This statute is grossly illegitimate,” said René Hilari, 28, a lawyer who lives in Plan Tres Mil, as stone-throwing protesters gathered nearby amid the stench of burning trash and open sewage. “The elite of Santa Cruz want to push this autonomy down the throat of the nation and we do not want it.”

Although the statute was expected to be approved, efforts by Mr. Morales’s supporters in Santa Cruz to encourage people to weaken its legitimacy by not voting also appeared to have succeeded. Preliminary analysis by electoral officials showed that almost 40 percent of eligible voters did not vote.

The statute would give Santa Cruz the ability to elect its own legislature, create its own police force and raise new taxes for public works. It is expected to allow the province to negotiate its own royalty agreements with energy companies.

And it would also effectively halt Mr. Morales’s efforts to break up large rural estates in the province and redistribute the land among impoverished indigenous migrants.

But it remains unclear which of these measures, if any, will be implemented.

They face strong resistance from the central government. In a stern warning to the province on Saturday night, Gen. Luis Trigo, the head of Bolivia’s armed forces, called the referendum a threat to national security.

Questions also remain over its legality and, especially regarding the royalty agreements, how realistic it may be.

Although Santa Cruz and other lowland provinces produce the bulk of the country’s natural gas, the largest gas customers, Argentina and Brazil, have given no indication of being ready to cut deals with Santa Cruz.

“As long as Brazil and Argentina believe the central government is still in control, and as long as they sympathize ideologically with Evo, they won’t recognize the validity of the referendum,” said Miguel Centellas, a political scientist at Mount St. Mary’s University in Emmitsburg, Md., who is from Santa Cruz.

Still, the vote is a defining moment in efforts to dismantle one of Latin America’s most centralized political systems, and was closely watched in three other provinces that are considering their own autonomy proposals, as well as other Latin American countries that face similar regional power struggles.

Still, few countries in the region contain Bolivia’s contrasts, with presidents ruling from the sleepy capital, La Paz, on the impoverished, windswept high plains, while the country’s economy revolves around Santa Cruz, a boomtown in the fertile lowlands. There avenues of glistening office buildings house some of Bolivia’s largest private companies and the headquarters of most foreign corporations operating in the country.

Besides finance and resource extraction, Santa Cruz is also home to agribusiness concerns that produce much of the nation’s food. The city has grown to 1.5 million residents from about 50,000 just a few decades ago.

In this battle’s most recent round, Mr. Morales announced the nationalization last week of four energy companies and Entel, the country’s largest telecommunications company, a move that was seen here as a direct challenge to the region’s economic might.

The election in 2005 of Mr. Morales, an Aymara Indian, as Bolivia’s first indigenous president was heralded as a democratic triumph, but the strong centralization and structures of previous authoritarian governments still permeate the country’s politics.

For instance, routine matters like the formation of a new union or professional association must be carried out in La Paz, something that the referendum would change in this province of 2.6 million. Three other eastern provinces are awaiting the outcome of the vote here before proceeding with votes on their own statutes in the coming months.

Supporters of Mr. Morales point out that the statute was drafted behind closed doors by an assembly handpicked by members of the province’s political elite. They say it also reveals racial tensions in Santa Cruz.

The statute, for example, recognizes the rights of lowland indigenous groups like the Chiquitanos and Guarayos, but does not do the same for Aymaras and Quechuas, Bolivia’s two largest ethnic groups, despite the migration of hundreds of thousands of Aymaras and Quechuas from the highlands to Santa Cruz in recent decades.

Silvestre Saisari, a Quechua Indian and a prominent land-rights advocate here, warned that the autonomy statute could set in motion events unforeseen by the politicians of Santa Cruz, like the declaration of autonomy by indigenous groups in the province.

“The white elite want Balkanization on their own terms, but they should be careful what they wish for,” Mr. Saisari said in an interview. “I might die fighting against their views, but not before taking some of them with me.”

  Email Article

  Discuss in the Forum

Back

Vote for Us!
Vote For Godlike Productions!

Vote for Us!  Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional



Disclaimer:
This website exists for entertainment purposes only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually review each and every one of the more than 5000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis. The content of posts
on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of GodlikeProductions. This site may contain adult content and if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.

Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.

This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Godlikeproductions.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.

Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.

We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.

Mail Webmaster with questions or comments about this site.

Page generated in 0.039s (1 queries)