Godlike Productions Banner
11:42 AM
Join Now, Free! (& No Ads) | FAQ | Links | Link to Us
 New! GLP YOUTUBE CHANNEL | GLP Radio! | Contact
  Tuesday, October 14, 2008  
  Breaking News     Back
Cox, Comcast biggest BitTorrent blockers in the world

Ars Technica

2008-05-19

US ISPs are generally perceived by users here to offer unlimited and fairly neutral connections to the 'Net for a monthly fee. Or they were, anyway, until Comcast admitted that it was "delaying" P2P traffic at peak times. New research from Germany now demonstrates that it's not just Comcast; Cox is getting a piece of the P2P blocking action, too. What's more, neither company blocks only at peak usage times. Paging the FCC!

Researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Software Systems have just released results of their own tests into BitTorrent blocking from around the world, and the results are startling: almost no one does it. In fact, out of 1,224 measured ISPs, only 13 were found to block BitTorrent traffic out. And where are the blocks coming from? Predominantly from the USA, where nine of the 13 ISPs were located.

Singapore, Malaysia, Canada, and Ireland each had one ISP apiece that engaged in blocking, though only Singapore's StarCom did so with regularity (26 out of the 45 tests that used its network were blocked with TCP reset packets).

Of the nine ISPs in the US found to block BitTorrent, Comcast and Cox were far and away the most aggressive. Both blocked more than half of all attempted BitTorrent tests on their networks (82 of 151 tests on Cox were blocked, while 491 of 788 tests on Comcast met the same fate).

The tests were done using a piece of open source software called Glasnost that users around the world downloaded and installed on their machines. 8,000 users took part in the test, which used Glasnost to establish BitTorrent sessions with a set of test servers in Germany. Since the researchers can collect information about both sides of the connection, they can determine when a connection is artificially broken using TCP reset packets (Comcast's preferred method).

One limit of such testing is that it can't uncover throttling or shaping of any kind, so the Max Planck researchers are clear to note that their work represents a strongly conservative estimate of the number of ISPs who interfere with P2P traffic.

Only at peak hours?

The researchers also took a look at time of day to see if the blocks occurred only during times of peak usage (generally in the evenings). They did not. Blocks, in fact, were pretty consistent throughout the day, as the Comcast chart below shows.

Free Press, one of the groups pressuring the FCC to take action in the current proceeding involving Comcast, responded with even more than its usual outrage to the news.

Ben Scott, the group's policy director, said in a statement, "Consumers have no reason left to trust their cable company. These Internet experts have also unequivocally demonstrated that blocking is not limited to times of supposed congestion. Their sophisticated testing shows that Comcast and Cox block BitTorrent applications at all times of the day—not just at times of peak traffic. This research proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that consumers, Congress and the FCC must urgently pursue the complaints against network providers."
Methodology

Previous research into TCP reset packets by Vuze drew the wrath of AT&T, which said that it does not use reset packets as a network management tool and that simply seeing resets on its network meant nothing. Vuze admitted that its methodology generated inconclusive results, but the new research appears much more rigorous.

The Max Planck Institute has published its methodology for inspection. The Glasnost program establishes several TCP streams before and after the BitTorrent connection; if none of these experience reset packets or other network problems, but the BitTorrent stream does get blocked, the researchers conclude that it was BitTorrent specifically that triggered a reset from a machine in the middle. In addition, the researchers only counted a reset packet as a block if it was generated just after protocol-specific "bitfield" messages but before any actual data transfer.

Requests for comment to both Cox and Comcast were not returned by press time.
Update:

Comcast comments to Ars. Parse this as you will:

"Comcast does not, has not, and will not block any websites or online applications, including peer-to-peer services like BitTorrent. We have acknowledged that we manage peer-to-peer traffic in a limited manner to minimize network congestion. While we believe our current network management approach was a reasonable choice, we are now working with a variety of companies including BitTorrent and confirm our March announcement that we will move to a protocol-agnostic network management technique no later than December 31, 2008."

  Email Article

  Discuss in the Forum

Back

Vote for Us!
Vote For Godlike Productions!
Vote for Us!  Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional



Disclaimer:
This website exists for entertainment purposes only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually review each and every one of the more than 5000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis. The content of posts
on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of GodlikeProductions. This site may contain adult content and if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.

Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.

This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Godlikeproductions.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.

Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.

We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.

Mail Webmaster with questions or comments about this site.

Page generated in 0.027s (1 queries)