A Federal NY Judge says Deutsche Bank and Capital One have to hand over Trump's financial records.

Deutsche Bank and Capital One Can Release Trump Records, Judge Rules
[link to www.nytimes.com (secure)]

trumps shitting himself right now! Him and Jr will face serious jail time for their laundering scheme.

This pertains to the entire Trump clan. Four sphincters just got tighter than Kellyanne's lips at a Congressional hearing.

Guess what? A federal judge needs PROBABLE CAUSE. They have none. Eat dirt you filthy degenerative liberal c$nts.

The days of political activist judges are coming to an end....118 federal judges replaced so far under Trump, another 94 to be replaced over the next 2 years, and then 320+ scheduled for replacement during his second term.

He might leave a dozen or so libtard judges in office for comic relief.

Yea finding more ammo for their wrap up smear isnt probable cause

Beating Hillary isnt probable cause

Fucking retards are really pushing their luck

Nope. Appeal to a higher court. Done.



Try harder.

For the second time this week, Donald Trump has had his ass handed to him in court in a lawsuit where the president is desperately seeking to keep companies he's done business with from turning over his financial records, pursuant to lawful subpoenas from the House of Representatives.

This comes after Trump got his ass handed to him on Monday on basically the same issue, in a different court case. Also, Wells Fargo and TD Bank have already been giving wee thousands of Trump financial documents to the House Financial Services Committee.

Oh yeah, and the New York state Assembly officially passed the bill previously passed by the state Senate to authorize New York to hand over Trump's state taxes (which probably have much as the same info as his federal taxes) to Congress.

You know, in case you were wondering why Trump blew up Infrastructure Week yesterday and threw a tantrum in the Rose Garden.

What will the basis of the appeals to these decisions be?

You can't just say "We didn't like that decision, so we're hoping to get a more favorable one here."

They'll have to say these rulings were wrongly decided, but there's really no precedents or arguments to support such claims.