Users Online Now:
2,247
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,032,765
Pageviews Today:
2,056,195
Threads Today:
874
Posts Today:
18,310
10:36 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:911thology 937737:MV8xMDI5OTE1XzE2MzQ4NTY3XzFGRUE3NEI2] [quote:Advocate 900491] Theory: As stated, the crush and pulverizing wave would not reach the top of the towers, which poses a bit of a problem for the demolition engineers. So did they do it in two stages, using somewhat similar devices and techniques? It was "reported" by firemen there was a secondary device "INSTALLED" at the top of the building. Was this a secondary upwardly vectored pulverizing device? Note how the top of the (second to fall) core section is blown off at the point where the top floors were initially destroyed from the BOTTOM UP from a point located near the upper limit of the subterranean crush wave. So did they first pulverize the top floors from the bottom up using a demolition device mounted in the vicinity of the 82nd floor, while the subterranean demolition waves propagated from the ground up of the bottom section of the tower to the vicinity of the 82nd floor, as Dimitri has suggested? This might explain the mystery of the "evaporating" top sections of the towers. [/quote] Would you mind, please, to be more attentive and to read carefully what I have posted in about the middle of the page 12 in regard to the very same question of yours? And I am waiting to your comments regarding that post of mine with impatience. [/quote]
Original Message
Part - 1:
Part - 2:
Part - 3:
Part - 4:
Part - 5:
Part - 6:
Part - 7:
Part - 8:
Part - 9:
Part - 10:
Part - 11:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5DeeHCCROg&feature=channel
Part - 12:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-TbpezpY0c&feature=channel
Part - 13:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhgS17l-PZo&feature=channel
Part - 14:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXk1-Ut7_ks&feature=channel
Part - 15:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMXdWK3KTGY&feature=channel
Part - 16:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYf5-iw6vok&feature=channel
Part - 17:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGHxFXB2Vew&feature=channel
Part - 18:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bto0KbFtqKs&feature=channel
Part - 19:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17H6sp-FyiA&feature=channel
Part - 20:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MW9CsWi2aDk&feature=channel
Part - 21:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TYP8JHGRsE&feature=channel
Part - 22:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x77s9lxt7t0&feature=channel
Part - 23:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgClEUxLXRk&feature=channel
Part - 24:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQDHAN3aQAg&feature=channel
Part - 25:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5q64FW0uiI&feature=channel
Part - 26:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0Wbh32W2uc&feature=channel
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>