Users Online Now:
2,615
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,948,581
Pageviews Today:
2,701,378
Threads Today:
659
Posts Today:
12,666
08:38 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Why have most of the extra-solar planets so far discovered been super massive "hot Jupiters"?
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 0:MV8xMTk2MjBfMjk3NTY3M19DNUNFMDE4Qw==] energy from ether or dark matter is continually pouring through into light matter. an increase in solar output coupled with a capacitor like effect of transitional elements around the core of the planet would I hypothesise create enough of a bottle neck in the discharge process at some point to fire up the core. a capaciitor works by magnifying charge across a non conductor - if the sun flares up enough, I theorise that the charge could build up more than it tends to discharge creating an energy bottleneck that could fire the core [/quote]
Original Message
Why have most of the extra-solar planets so far discovered been super massive "hot Jupiters"? I personally believe that there is something wrong with the detection method. Could such planets exist for very long without evaporating? How could they hold a significant atmosphere if their orbital periods are on the order of something like 2 days for many of them?
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>