Users Online Now:
1,690
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
479,746
Pageviews Today:
787,086
Threads Today:
267
Posts Today:
5,020
09:30 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Virginia legislator is renewing his push to castrate sex offenders
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 1244074:MV8xMzM4OTAxXzIyMDE3NTg5XzkzODc5Nzc3] Physical castration would never be upheld by the Supreme Court. Chemical castration might, but I doubt it somewhat. Neither stops all sexual urges anyway, so it might well not help. There's also the fact that someone who has been forcably castrated may well be very angry with society in general and do something even more drastic than sex offences. [/quote]
Original Message
Sounds fair and balanced to me. But some experts say it doesn't help so I think perhaps also cutting off a little finger would help.
Renewed push for castration in Va.
A Virginia legislator is renewing his push to allow castration of sex offenders as an alternative to the increasing costs of detaining and treating them after they've served their prison sentence.
Sen. Emmett Hanger's bill would require the state to study the use of physical castration as an alternative to costly civil commitment for those deemed sexually violent predators. The General Assembly approved similar legislation four years ago, but then-Gov. Timothy M. Kaine vetoed it.
While opponents call the procedure barbaric and the proposal heavy-handed, Hanger argues castration is cost-effective for the state and could provide a cure for some offenders.
"I don't think it's radical at all," said Hanger, R-Augusta. "It's just something that's not typically the thing you want to bring up in polite conversation, but again the whole subject area is not for polite conversation.
"We're talking about people who are so driven because of the tendencies from the chemicals and the hormones inside their body to perform heinous acts. In that context, I think it's very appropriate to talk about something that could, perhaps, be a partial cure for them."
[
link to voices.washingtonpost.com
]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>