Users Online Now:
2,343
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,223,599
Pageviews Today:
2,040,621
Threads Today:
806
Posts Today:
14,036
08:22 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
IS NASA LIEING ABOUT COMET ELENIN?
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Astronut:MV8xMzg2Mzg5XzIyODY0NDU1Xzk0NjY0MDM4] [quote:Argana] [quote:Astronut] [quote:Anonymous Coward 643083] yeah right, nonsense- no sense! Are you listening to yourself? Where are your eyes? Look around you. [/quote] What you really mean by that is where is my confirmation bias. Nibiru is nonsense, plain and simple. A large planet or brown dwarf would be plainly visible by now, even if it were as black as fresh asphalt. Oh, and don't speak for 1290320, he can speak for himself. His anger is self-evident. [/quote] From what I am reading, A brown dwarf star would not be detectable with a standard telescope. I found several articles on the subject. Here is one: http://rabbithole2.com/news/top_news/the_destroyer_our_binary_partner_and_why_you_will_not_see_it.php :hiding: [/quote] You should be reading up on actual astronomy, rather than articles from Nibiru believers like Lucus. Here's the lone brown dwarf 2MASS J16452211-1319516 in infrared light using the same Palomar survey telescope normally used for visible light observations. It's the star near the center of the image: http://archive.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/dss_search?v=poss2ukstu_ir&r=16h+45m+22.11s&d=-13d+19%27+51.6%22&e=J2000&h=5.0&w=5.0&f=gif&c=none&fov=NONE&v3= And here's the same brown dwarf in visible red light: http://archive.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/dss_search?v=poss2ukstu_red&r=16h+45m+22.11s&d=-13d+19%27+51.6%22&e=J2000&h=5.0&w=5.0&f=gif&c=none&fov=NONE&v3= It's much dimmer relative to the other stars in visible light, but it's still detectable, and that's from 39 light years away using just a regular red sensitive film plate! The thing is, it doesn't even matter how much or how little infrared or red light the brown dwarf would be emitting, it would still reflect the sun's light and that alone would make it detectable regardless of emitted light. A brown dwarf at the distance from the earth that Elenin is currently at would not only be naked eye magnitude, but it would be one of the brightest objects in the sky. Brown dwarf stars tend to be not much larger than Jupiter in surface area, though they have many times Jupiter's mass. That's still a lot of surface area though, so even if it were as black as asphalt it would still be about magnitude -1.49 at 2.541 AU distance just based on reflected sunlight light alone (and that's an extremely conservative estimate because I factored in a sun distance of about 5 AU instead of the true 3.418 AU, so it would actually be even brighter than that). [/quote]
Original Message
Nasa states that comet Elenin takes 10,000 years to complete one orbit. If comet Elenin is suppose to be Nibiru or planet X and it comes around every 3600 years the numbers don't add up. Either Nasa is lieing or Elinin is not Nibiru. Or Im sofaking confused after researching all this stuff. Can anyone clue me in better?
[
link to astrobiology.nasa.gov
]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>