Users Online Now:
1,651
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
216,001
Pageviews Today:
567,287
Threads Today:
386
Posts Today:
7,317
01:27 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Drug company found guilty of negligence and malice. PROOF!! we all were right about drug companies!!
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Merck could lose billions 0:MV8xNDE3MDNfNkI3QUU0QUU=] The JUDGEMENT is descending on the fallen ones. Merck found liable in VIOXX Trial This is major news being announced from Texas this afternoon. The jury deliberated for 10 hours to reach the decision that Merck is liable for the death of the man who died as a result of taking VIOXX. They found Merck guilty of negligence and malice. It has been mentioned repeatedly that this case was weak and not the strongest of the VIOXX cases. Many are speculating that the information that was allowed by the Coroner is what helped the jury decide the case. Currently there are over four thousand cases awaiting trial against Merck in relation to VIOXX. In the coming days those case numbers could double! Legal analysts are predicting settlements from Merck on many of the pending cases. The huge jury award to a plaintiff in the nationīs first Vioxx case is likely to inspire thousands more suits on top of the 4,200 already filed against the drugīs marker Merck Co. and push liability estimates that reach $18 billion even higher, analysts said. Merck Co.īs stock sank $2.35, or 7.7 percent, to close at $28.06. The jury awarded $253.4 million in damages to a widow of a man who died in 2001 of heart arrhythmia, or irregular heart beat, after taking Vioxx for around eight months. The company plans to appeal. Merck yanked the popular pain reliever from the market last September after a study found it doubled patientsī risks of heart attacks and strokes after 18 months. [/quote]
Original Message
The JUDGEMENT is descending on the fallen ones.
Merck found liable in VIOXX Trial
This is major news being announced from Texas this afternoon. The jury deliberated for 10 hours to reach the decision that Merck is liable for the death of the man who died as a result of taking VIOXX. They found Merck guilty of negligence and malice. It has been mentioned repeatedly that this case was weak and not the strongest of the VIOXX cases. Many are speculating that the information that was allowed by the Coroner is what helped the jury decide the case.
Currently there are over four thousand cases awaiting trial against Merck in relation to VIOXX. In the coming days those case numbers could double! Legal analysts are predicting settlements from Merck on many of the pending cases.
The huge jury award to a plaintiff in the nationīs first Vioxx case is likely to inspire thousands more suits on top of the 4,200 already filed against the drugīs marker Merck Co. and push liability estimates that reach $18 billion even higher, analysts said.
Merck Co.īs stock sank $2.35, or 7.7 percent, to close at $28.06. The jury awarded $253.4 million in damages to a widow of a man who died in 2001 of heart arrhythmia, or irregular heart beat, after taking Vioxx for around eight months. The company plans to appeal.
Merck yanked the popular pain reliever from the market last September after a study found it doubled patientsī risks of heart attacks and strokes after 18 months.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>