Users Online Now:
2,151
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,621,229
Pageviews Today:
2,367,451
Threads Today:
647
Posts Today:
13,367
07:18 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Pentagon Employee Says No Plane Used - 9/11 Inside Job" video"
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 1470679:MV8xNTY3OTM2XzI1OTE1Mzc4X0Q1MjM3Mjgz] [quote: ] [color=blue]"New Pearl Harbor"[/color] Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "[b][color=red]Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor[/color][/b]" [/quote] This document was printed in Sept. 2000, exactly 1 year before the 9/11 "attacks". [quote: ] [color=blue]Though not arguing that Bush administration PNAC members were complicit in those attacks[/color], other social critics such as commentator Manuel Valenzuela and journalist Mark Danner,[39][40][41] investigative journalist John Pilger, in New Statesman,[42] and former editor of The San Francisco Chronicle Bernard Weiner, in CounterPunch,[43] all argue that PNAC members used the events of 9/11 as the "Pearl Harbor" that they needed––that is, as an "opportunity" to "capitalize on" (in Pilger's words), in order to enact long-desired plans. http://www.webcitation.org/5e3est5lT http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century [/quote] Notice how in this ither somewhat related story, they mention and then completely skip over the fact the Bush Administration was complicit. Yet....at least they admit at the very least that they allowed it to happen for agenda purposes. O.K., so where are the indictments? Why no outrage? [/quote]
Original Message
[liveleak] [
link to www.liveleak.com
] [/liveleak]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>