Users Online Now:
2,205
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,509,482
Pageviews Today:
2,509,478
Threads Today:
1,003
Posts Today:
17,889
11:24 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Dr Dan Burisch Information
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 12559:MV8xNTcwMTJfMjAxNTUxOV9EREI0QjU2Qg==] Hi Publius, thanks for posting that info.... I did attend a Stanton Friedman lecture about 10 years ago where he gave a fairly convincing argument for Roswell. This was even before the AA film came out. I tend to look at Roswell in light of the mindset that existed in 1947...things were much simpler then, even in the realm of military disinfo...was it a cunningly concieved plan to decieve the enemy, or a clumsy coverup where they filled the blanks in later? There´s also a lot of aspects which I don´t think Redfern addresses, like the disappearence of a whole month´s worth of archived ´Roswell Daily´s" from the Library of Congress. Even if Roswell does turn out to be a hoax, I don´t think it can be used as a lynchpin for the wholesale disbelief in ET´s. This ignores the whole gamut of ET & UFO evidence throughout history, even though much of it stems from ´non-official sources. I´m tending more and more to believe all the ´average Joe´ reports & anecdotes rather than any ´official´ or military data regarding this phenomena. Look to where there´s no possible agenda from the person involved and it will be more likely to be true. I´ve got a lot more thoughts regarding the AA & Vallee stuff, too e.g. do Progeria sufferers have no genitals and totally unrecognisable internal organs? For me there´s a lot of holes in Redfern´s data...and issues just not addressed at all. Anyway, more later... Cheers I´ve [/quote]
Original Message
Hello readers.
This is a link to just a small part of the material relating to the ongoing research and investigation into Dr Dan Burisch.
[
link to www.tonicvision.tv
]
Anyone can read there, assess for themselves. I´m not here to twist arms. Neither will I get involved in pointless argument (anymore). I do however retain my SOH.
Assess the material, if anyone has a question, they can post here and I will point them in the right direction wherever possible.
Most of the questions will have simple answers, many others are complex.
I will be updating this initial page post if there is sufficient interest and the questions are sincere. No spam please. If the responses are poor, I will abandon this thread.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Updates Sept 23rd
All 6 Volumes of Eagles Unchained. A must read
[
link to danburischinfo.95mb.com.
]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The 18 page Document, transcribed and with Glossary.
[
link to danburischinfo.95mb.com.
]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It´s upto you guys.
What do you want?
As a starter, someone at the SG site has been knocking together a preliminary profile for Dan Burisch. Once this has been vetted, it will be made available.
Heres the ´QDP´...that´s the Quick Dan Profile, early days yet but some interesting reading just the same.
[
link to danburischinfo.95mb.com.
]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>