|
REPLY TO THREAD
|
|
Subject
|
Did A Missile Hit The World Trade Center on 9/11?
|
|
User Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Font color:
Font:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original Message
|
1) A cruise missile (JASSM AGM-158) has the same silhouette and cruise speed as a Boeing 767, which would deceive many of the witnesses into believing that they had seen a plane.
2) A cruise missile (JASSM AGM-158) is highly reliable, accurate, and precise. It is a far less "risky" option than a remote-controlled Boeing 767, a Boeing 767 piloted by manchurian candidates, or a Boeing 767 piloted by dupe hijackers.
3) While other aircraft (such as a real Boeing airliner) would hit the building and explode outside, a cruise missile is designed to penetrate the building and then explode, creating a fiery, pyrotechnic spectacle. This would create a "credible" cause for the building demolitions, which were undeniably the primary focus of the perpetrators.
4) A cruise missile impacts, penetrates, and then explodes only after it has entered the building. This exactly what many photographs/videos show. The "plane" (a CGI graphic insert) enters the building like a ghost going through a wall and then explodes. This would be bizarre, were it an airplane. The airplane's fuel would erupt as soon as it impacted the building. It wouldn't wait until it made it inside. A missile, however, is designed to do just that.
6) Research by Simon Shack, BSRegistration, Killtown, Joe Craine, OzzyBanOswald, and others has proved indisputably that the "airplane" images in the second-hit videos are CGI graphic inserts, not real airplanes. Missiles are, of course, very different from commercial airliners in their appearance. On film, if a missile was seen it would reveal the entire operation. The use of missiles would explain the reason why the perpetrators inserted CGI airplanes into the videos.
7) Research by Simon Shack has proved indisputably that the media washed out the backgrounds of the 9/11 news footage and replaced it with chromakey fake "backgrounds". Missiles leave a distinct trail in the air. Airplanes do not leave such a trail. If a trail like this was seen in the air on the news footage, the operation would have been revealed. Thus, the use of missiles would explain the reason why the perpetrators inserted a fake skyline into the news broadcasts.
8) A pre-archive NBC shot shows no airplane, but only a faint "trail". This is consistent with a missile, but not with an airplane. The shot was later edited and a black "ball" was inserted where the "missile" trail was.
9) Ginny Carr was recording a meeting in a nearby building and caught the sound of the second attack on tape. Shortly prior to the "impact" blast, we hear a faint whistle that is consistent with a missile approach.
10) A number of people on the ground thought they saw or heard a missile hit the World Trade Center.
11) Vince Cellini was speaking to Winston Mitchell (his on-phone witness) and asked him if he was at the WTC "when the mi-the plane made contact". He distinctly first says "The mi.." -- freudian slip?
|
|
Pictures (click to insert)
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | | Next Page >> |
|
